Focusing on positive listening experiences improves hearing aid outcomes in first-time hearing aid users: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether positive focus (PF), an intervention that asks hearing aid users to focus on positive listening experiences, improves hearing aid outcomes for first-time hearing aid users. DESIGN: The participants were randomised into a control or PF group. They were fitted with hearing aids and followed for six months after fitting. The PF group was asked to report positive listening experiences in their daily life via an app. Participants in both groups were periodically prompted by the app to answer questionnaires about hearing aid satisfaction and benefit. Two follow-up visits at approximately one and six months were performed. STUDY SAMPLE: 20 adult first-time hearing aid users in the control and 18 in the PF group. RESULTS: Hearing aid satisfaction and benefit scores were significantly better in the PF group, already at two weeks and throughout the six months. In the PF group, the hearing aid outcomes were positively correlated with the number of submitted positive reports. CONCLUSIONS: These results point to the importance of asking first-time hearing aid users to focus on positive listening experiences and to reflect upon them. This can lead to improved short- and long-term hearing aid outcomes.

Focusing on positive listening experiences improves hearing aid outcomes in experienced hearing aid users.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether focusing on positive listening experiences improves hearing aid outcomes in experienced hearing aid users. DESIGN: The participants were randomised into a control or positive focus (PF) group. At the first laboratory visit, the Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) questionnaire was administered followed by hearing aid fitting. The participants wore the hearing aids for three weeks. The PF group was asked to report their positive listening experiences via an app. During the third week, all the participants answered questionnaires related to hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. This was followed by the second laboratory visit where the COSI follow-up questionnaire was administered. STUDY SAMPLE: Ten participants were included in the control and eleven in the PF group. RESULTS: Hearing aid outcome ratings were significantly better in the PF group in comparison to the control group. Further, COSI degree of change and the number of positive reports were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: These results point to the importance of asking hearing aid users to focus on positive listening experiences and talk about them. The potential outcome is increased hearing aid benefit and satisfaction which could lead to more consistent use of the devices.

The Acoustics of Instant Ear Tips and Their Implications for Hearing-Aid Fitting.

OBJECTIVES: Today, approximately 70 to 80% of hearing aid fittings are made with silicone instant ear tips rather than custom earmolds. Nevertheless, little is known about the impact of instant ear tips on the acoustic coupling between the hearing aid receiver and the individual ear canal, even though it can have a major impact on the overall sound of the hearing aids. This study aimed to investigate the acoustic properties of different instant ear tip types and their across-subject variability, the within-subject reliability of those properties, and the influence of the users' level of experience with ear-tip insertion on the acoustics. Furthermore, subjective ratings of occlusion produced by the ear tips were considered. DESIGN: Five types of instant ear tips (Open, Tulip, Round [2-vent], Round [1-vent], Double Domes) provided by the hearing aid manufacturer Widex were considered in this study. Probe-microphone measurements were performed at the eardrums of 30 participants (60 ears). In the first experiment, the real ear occluded insertion gain and the vent effect (VE) were measured, and the listeners rated the subjective occlusion experienced with each ear tip. In the second experiment, the same measurements were repeated six times per participant. The within-subject variability of the acoustic ear tip properties was investigated as well as the impact of the degree of users' experience with ear tip insertion on the resulting real ear measurements. RESULTS: All tested ear tips were, on average, acoustically transparent up to 1 kHz except Double Domes, which were only transparent up to 600 Hz. Distinct VE profiles were found for each ear tip type, but a large across-subject variability was observed for both real ear occluded insertion gain and VE. However, the within-subject reliability was high. The measured VE was highly correlated with the perceived occlusion. Finally, no significant effect of the level of experience in ear tip insertion on the acoustic properties of the ear tips was found, but the within-subject variability was larger in the less experienced group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the acoustic properties of instant ear tips and their coupling to the individual ear canal impact the resulting hearing aid fitting and should be considered by the hearing care professionals and reflected in the fitting software. The high within-subject reliability indicates that the ear tip acoustics remain stable for the individual in daily use. Finally, real ear measurements should be considered an essential part of the hearing aid fitting process in clinical practice to ensure an optimal fit for the individual hearing aid user.

Critical hearing experiences manifest differently across individuals: insights from hearing aid data captured in real-life moments.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether contrasts between situations of good and difficult listening experiences could be identified in objective hearing aid (HA) data, with the aim to use these insights for personalisation of hearing care. DESIGN: The participants were asked to fill out an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) report every time they encountered a good or difficult listening experience for a period of two weeks. During EMA reporting, the participants described their listening environment and why it was difficult while objective HA data describing the sound environment, activated HA features and gain were logged. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen experienced HA users completed the study. RESULTS: The group level objective HA data indicated that participants experienced difficulties in typical speech in noise environments. Data from 14/16 participants showed individual contrasts that were not seen on the group level, indicating that hearing challenges do not manifest themselves the same across persons. CONCLUSIONS: The objective data from real-life experiences add to our understanding of the difficulty of the situation. The fact that data between individuals varied so much emphasises the importance of considering each person as an individual when treating their hearing loss.

The Effects of Filter's Class, Cutoff Frequencies, and Independent Component Analysis on the Amplitude of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Recorded from Healthy Volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different preprocessing parameters on the amplitude of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). METHODS: Different combinations of two classes of filters (Finite Impulse Response (FIR) and Infinite Impulse Response (IIR)), three cutoff frequency bands (0.5-1000 Hz, 3-1000 Hz, and 30-1000 Hz), and independent component analysis (ICA) were used to preprocess SEPs recorded from 17 healthy volunteers who participated in two sessions of 1000 stimulations of the right median nerve. N30 amplitude was calculated from frontally placed electrode (F3). RESULTS: The epochs classified as artifacts from SEPs filtered with FIR compared to those filtered with IIR were 1% more using automatic and 140% more using semi-automatic methods (both p < 0.001). There were no differences in N30 amplitudes between FIR and IIR filtered SEPs. The N30 amplitude was significantly lower for SEPs filtered with 30-1000 Hz compared to the bandpass frequencies 0.5-1000 Hz and 3-1000 Hz. The N30 amplitude was significantly reduced when SEPs were cleaned with ICA compared to the SEPs from which non-brain components were not removed using ICA. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the preprocessing of SEPs should be done carefully and the neuroscience community should come to a consensus regarding SEP preprocessing guidelines, as the preprocessing parameters can affect the outcomes that may influence the interpretations of results, replicability, and comparison of different studies.

Venlafaxine and oxycodone have different effects on spinal and supraspinal activity in man: a somatosensory evoked potential study.

AIMS: Opioids and antidepressants that inhibit serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake (SNRI) are recognized as analgesics to treat severe and moderate pain, but their mechanisms of action in humans remain unclear. The present study aimed to explore how oxycodone (an opioid) and venlafaxine (an SNRI) modulate spinal and supraspinal sensory processing. METHODS: Twenty volunteers were included in a randomized, double-blinded, three-way (placebo, oxycodone, venlafaxine), crossover study. Spinal and full scalp cortical evoked potentials (EPs) to median nerve stimulation were recorded before and after 5 days of treatment. Assessment of the central effects of the three treatments involved: (i) amplitudes and latencies of spinal EPs (spinal level); (ii) amplitudes and latencies of the P14 potential (subcortical level); (iii) amplitudes and latencies of early and late cortical EPs (cortical level); (iv) brain sources underlying early cortical Eps; and (v) brain networks underlying the late cortical EPs. RESULTS: In the venlafaxine arm, the spinal P11 and the late cortical N60-80 latencies were reduced by 1.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7%, 1.9%) and 5.7% (95% CI 5.3%, 6.1%), whereas the early cortical P25 amplitude was decreased by 7.1% (95%CI 6.1%, 8.7%). Oxycodone increased the subcortical P14 [+25% (95% CI 22.2%, 28.6%)], early cortical N30 [+12.9% (95% CI 12.5%, 13.2%)] amplitudes and the late cortical N60-80 latency [+2.9% (95% CI 1.9%, 4.0%)]. The brainstem and primary somatosensory cortex source strengths were increased by 66.7% (95% CI 62.5%, 75.0%) and 28.8% (95% CI 27.5%, 29.6%) in the oxycodone arm, whereas the primary somatosensory cortex strength was decreased in the venlafaxine arm by 18.3% (95% CI 12.0%, 28.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids and SNRI drugs exert different central effects. The present study contributed to the much-needed human models of the mechanisms of action of drugs with effects on the central nervous system.

Manipulation of Dysfunctional Spinal Joints Affects Sensorimotor Integration in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Brain Source Localization Study.

Objectives. Studies have shown decreases in N30 somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) peak amplitudes following spinal manipulation (SM) of dysfunctional segments in subclinical pain (SCP) populations. This study sought to verify these findings and to investigate underlying brain sources that may be responsible for such changes. Methods. Nineteen SCP volunteers attended two experimental sessions, SM and control in random order. SEPs from 62-channel EEG cap were recorded following median nerve stimulation (1000 stimuli at 2.3 Hz) before and after either intervention. Peak-to-peak amplitude and latency analysis was completed for different SEPs peak. Dipolar models of underlying brain sources were built by using the brain electrical source analysis. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assessed differences in N30 amplitudes, dipole locations, and dipole strengths. Results. SM decreased the N30 amplitude by 16.9 ± 31.3% (P = 0.02), while no differences were seen following the control intervention (P = 0.4). Brain source modeling revealed a 4-source model but only the prefrontal source showed reduced activity by 20.2 ± 12.2% (P = 0.03) following SM. Conclusion. A single session of spinal manipulation of dysfunctional segments in subclinical pain patients alters somatosensory processing at the cortical level, particularly within the prefrontal cortex.

Measuring hearing aid satisfaction in everyday listening situations: Retrospective and in-situ assessments complement each other.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we developed a hearing-related lifestyle questionnaire (HEARLI-Q) which asks respondents to rate their hearing aid (HA) satisfaction in 23 everyday listening situations. It is unknown how HA satisfaction on the retrospective HEARLI-Q scale compares to HA satisfaction measured on the same scale implemented in Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA). PURPOSE: To learn how retrospective (HEARLI-Q) and in-situ (EMA) assessments can complement each other. RESEARCH DESIGN: An observational study. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-one experienced HA users. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The participants first filled out the HEARLI-Q questionnaire, followed by a one-week EMA trial using their own hearing aids. HA satisfaction ratings were compared between the two questionnaires and the underlying drivers of discrepancies in HA satisfaction ratings were evaluated. RESULTS: HA satisfaction scores were significantly higher in EMA for speech communication with one or several people. Hearing difficulty in these situations was rated higher in HEARLI-Q than in EMA, but occurrence of those difficult listening situations was also rated to be lower. When comparing only the situations that occur on daily or weekly basis, the two questionnaires had similar HA satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Lower occurrence of difficult listening situations seems to be the key driver of discrepancies in HA satisfaction ratings between EMA and HEARLI-Q. The advantage of EMA is that it provides insight into an individual's day-to-day life and is not prone to memory bias. HEARLI-Q, on the other hand, can capture situations which occur infrequently or are inconvenient to report in the moment. Administering HEARLI-Q and EMA in combination could give a more holistic view of HA satisfaction.

Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users.

Negativity bias is a cognitive bias that results in negative events being perceptually more salient than positive ones. For hearing care, this means that hearing aid benefits can potentially be overshadowed by adverse experiences. Research has shown that sustaining focus on positive experiences has the potential to mitigate negativity bias. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a positive focus (PF) intervention can improve speech-in-noise abilities for experienced hearing aid users. Thirty participants were randomly allocated to a control or PF group (N = 2 × 15). Prior to hearing aid fitting, all participants filled out the short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) based on their own hearing aids. At the first visit, they were fitted with study hearing aids, and speech-in-noise testing was performed. Both groups then wore the study hearing aids for two weeks and sent daily text messages reporting hours of hearing aid use to an experimenter. In addition, the PF group was instructed to focus on positive listening experiences and to also report them in the daily text messages. After the 2-week trial, all participants filled out the SSQ12 questionnaire based on the study hearing aids and completed the speech-in-noise testing again. Speech-in-noise performance and SSQ12 Qualities score were improved for the PF group but not for the control group. This finding indicates that the PF intervention can improve subjective and objective hearing aid benefits.

Implementing Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiological Research: Opportunities and Challenges.

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a way to evaluate experiences in everyday life. It is a powerful research tool but can be complex and challenging for beginners. Application of EMA in audiological research brings with it opportunities and challenges that differ from other research disciplines. This tutorial discusses important considerations when conducting EMA studies in hearing care. While more research is needed to develop specific guidelines for the various potential applications of EMA in hearing research, we hope this article can alert hearing researchers new to EMA to pitfalls when using EMA and help strengthen their study design. The current article elaborates study design details, such as choice of participants, representativeness of the study period for participants' lives, and balancing participant burden with data requirements. Mobile devices and sensors to collect objective data on the acoustic situation are reviewed alongside different possibilities for EMA setups ranging from online questionnaires paired with a timer to proprietary apps that also have access to parameters of a hearing device. In addition to considerations for survey design, a list of questionnaire items from previous studies is provided. For each item, an example and a list of references are given. EMA typically provides data sets that are rich but also challenging in that they are noisy, and there is often unequal amount of data between participants. After recommendations on how to check the data for compliance, reactivity, and careless responses, methods for statistical analysis on the individual level and on the group level are discussed including special methods for direct comparison of hearing device programs.

Reasons for ceiling ratings in real-life evaluations of hearing aids: the relationship between SNR and hearing aid ratings.

Introduction: In past Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) studies, hearing aid outcome ratings have often been close to ceiling. Methods: To analyze the underlying reasons for the very positive ratings, we conducted a study with 17 experienced hearing aid wearers who were fitted with study hearing aids. The acceptable noise level and the noise level where participants were unable to follow speech were measured. The participants then rated hearing aid satisfaction, speech understanding and listening effort for pre-defined SNRs between -10 and +20 dB SPL in the laboratory. These ratings were compared to ratings of a two-week EMA trial. Additionally, estimates of SNRs were collected from hearing aids during the EMA trial and we assessed whether the participants experienced those SNRs rated poorly in the laboratory in real life. Results: The results showed that for hearing aid satisfaction and speech understanding, the full rating scale was used in the laboratory, while the ratings in real life were strongly skewed towards the positive end of the scale. In the laboratory, SNRs where participants indicated they could not follow the narrator ("unable to follow" noise level) were rated clearly better than the lowest possible ratings. This indicates that very negative ratings may not be applicable in real-life testing. The lower part of the distribution of real-life SNR estimates was related to participants' individual "unable to follow" noise levels and the SNRs which were rated poorly in the laboratory made up less than 10% of the speech situations experienced in real life. Discussion: This indicates that people do not seem to frequently experience listening situations at SNRs where they are dissatisfied with their hearing aids and this could be the reason for the overly positive hearing aid outcome ratings in EMA studies. It remains unclear to what extent the scarcity of such situations is due lack of encounters or intentional avoidance.

Brain source connectivity reveals the visceral pain network.

INTRODUCTION: Several brain structures have been consistently found to be involved in visceral pain processing. However, recent research questions the specificity of these regions and it has been suggested that it is not singular activations of brain areas, but their cross-communication that results in perception of pain. Moreover, frequency at which neurons are firing could be what separates pain from other sensory modalities which otherwise involve the same anatomical locations. In this test/retest study, we identified the network of sources and their frequencies following visceral pain. METHODS: 62-channel evoked potentials following electrical stimulation in oesophagus were recorded in twelve healthy volunteers on two separate days. Multichannel matching pursuit (MMP) and dipolar source localisation were used. Multiple sources responsible for one MMP component were considered to act synchronously as each MMP component is mono-frequency and has a single topography. We first identified components that were reproducible within subjects over recording sessions. These components were then analysed across subjects. RESULTS: MMP and source localisation showed three main brain networks; an early network at ~8.3 Hz and ~3.5 Hz involving brainstem, operculum, and pre-frontal cortex peaking at ~77 ms. This was followed by an operculum, amygdale, mid-cingulate, and anterior-cingulate network at ~4.5 Hz. Finally, there was an operculum and mid-cingulate network that persisted over the entire time interval, peaking at 245.5±51.4 ms at ~2.1 Hz. CONCLUSION: This study gives evidence of operculum's central integrative role for perception of pain and shows that MMP is a reliable method to study upstream brain activity.

Hearing aid delay in open-fit devices: Preferred sound quality in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

A key factor influencing sound quality in open-fit digital hearing aids is the processing delay. So far, the delay limit needed for ensuring optimal (rather than tolerable) sound quality has not been established. Using a realistic hearing aid simulator, the current study investigated the relationship between preferred sound quality and five processing delays ranging from 0.5 to 10 ms in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. The listeners with normal hearing showed a strong preference for the shortest delay. For the listeners with impaired hearing, participants with mild hearing losses below 2 kHz also preferred the shortest delay.

Assessment of Hearing-Related Lifestyle Based on the Common Sound Scenarios Framework.

PURPOSE: Auditory lifestyle can play a role in hearing care needs, and, as such, it needs to be considered when treating people with hearing loss. In this study, we propose a questionnaire consisting of 24 listening situations based on the Common Sound Scenarios (CoSS) framework. METHOD: Seventeen experienced hearing aid (HA) users filled out the Hearing-Related Lifestyle Questionnaire four times: Days 1, 2, 15, and 29. The questionnaire consisted of 24 listening situations that participants rated on frequency of occurrence, importance to hear well, difficulty to hear, and HA satisfaction. Four questionnaire outcomes were extracted from these ratings: richness of hearing-related lifestyle, hearing demand, hearing difficulty, and HA satisfaction. Additionally, the participants were asked whether any listening situations are not understandable or relatable, whether any situations are missing from the questionnaire, and whether the number of questions is acceptable. Test-retest reliability analyses were done to assess whether the questionnaire outcomes are reliable across the four reports. Correlation analyses were done to assess whether there is a relationship between the questionnaire outcomes. RESULTS: The questionnaire outcomes have excellent reliability. The listening situations in the questionnaire are generally complete and relatable, and the number of questions is acceptable. Correlation analyses revealed that the questionnaire outcomes are related to each other. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there are no other hearing-related lifestyle questionnaires that purely assess listening situations. The proposed questionnaire has the potential to add to our understanding of hearing-related lifestyle of people needing or undergoing hearing care. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21514044.

Opioid Specific Effects on Central Processing of Sensation and Pain: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Moderate to severe pain is often treated with opioids, but central mechanisms underlying opioid analgesia are poorly understood. Findings thus far have been contradictory and none could infer opioid specific effects. This placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-way cross-over, double-blinded study aimed to explore opioid specific effects on central processing of external stimuli. Twenty healthy male volunteers were included and 3 sets of assessments were done at each of the 2 visits: 1) baseline, 2) during continuous morphine or placebo intravenous infusion and 3) during simultaneous morphine + naloxone or placebo infusion. Opioid antagonist naloxone was introduced in order to investigate opioid specific effects by observing which morphine effects are reversed by this intervention. Quantitative sensory testing, spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflexes (NWR), spinal electroencephalography (EEG), cortical EEG responses to external stimuli and resting EEG were measured and analyzed. Longer lasting pain (cold-pressor test - hand in 2° water for 2 minutes, tetanic electrical), deeper structure pain (bone pressure) and strong nociceptive (NWR) stimulations were the most sensitive quantitative sensory testing measures of opioid analgesia. In line with this, the principal opioid specific central changes were seen in NWRs, EEG responses to NWRs and cold-pressor EEG. The magnitude of NWRs together with amplitudes and insular source strengths of the corresponding EEG responses were attenuated. The decreases in EEG activity were correlated to subjective unpleasantness scores. Brain activity underlying slow cold-pressor EEG (1-4Hz) was decreased, whereas the brain activity underlying faster EEG (8-12Hz) was increased. These changes were strongly correlated to subjective pain relief. This study points to evidence of opioid specific effects on perception of external stimuli and the underlying central responses. The analgesic response to opioids is likely a synergy of opioids acting at both spinal and supra-spinal levels of the central nervous system. Due to the strong correlations with pain relief, the changes in EEG signals during cold-pressor test have the potential to serve as biomarkers of opioid analgesia. PERSPECTIVE: This exploratory study presents evidence of opioid specific effects on the pain system at peripheral and central levels. The findings give insights into which measures are the most sensitive for assessing opioid-specific effects.

Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment Increases the Cortical Drive to the Lower Limb Muscle in Chronic Stroke Patients.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of a single session of chiropractic spinal adjustment on the cortical drive to the lower limb in chronic stroke patients. In a single-blinded, randomized controlled parallel design study, 29 individuals with chronic stroke and motor weakness in a lower limb were randomly divided to receive either chiropractic spinal adjustment or a passive movement control intervention. Before and immediately after the intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of the lower limb with the greatest degree of motor weakness. Differences in the averaged peak-peak MEP amplitude following interventions were calculated using a linear regression model. Chiropractic spinal adjustment elicited significantly larger MEP amplitude (pre = 0.24 ± 0.17 mV, post = 0.39 ± 0.23 mV, absolute difference = +0.15 mV, relative difference = +92%, p < 0.001) compared to the control intervention (pre = 0.15 ± 0.09 mV, post = 0.16 ± 0.09 mV). The results indicate that chiropractic spinal adjustment increases the corticomotor excitability of ankle dorsiflexor muscles in people with chronic stroke. Further research is required to investigate whether chiropractic spinal adjustment increases dorsiflexor muscle strength and walking function in people with stroke.

Pain-associated adaptive cortical reorganisation in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In various chronic pain conditions cortical reorganisation seems to play a role in the symptomatology. The aims of this study were to investigate cortical reorganisation in patients with pain caused by chronic pancreatitis (CP) and to correlate putative cortical reorganisation to clinical pain scores. METHODS: 24 patients suffering from CP and 14 healthy volunteers were included. Patients' daily experience of pain was recorded in a pain diary. The sigmoid was stimulated electrically with simultaneous recording of evoked brain potentials (EPs). The brain source localisations reflecting direct neuronal activity were fitted by a five-dipole model projected to magnetic resonance imaging of the individual brains. RESULTS: Patients showed prolonged latencies of the EPs confined to the frontal region of the brain (p < 0.01). The corresponding brain sources were located in the bilateral insula, cingulate gyrus and bilateral secondary somatosensory area. The insular dipoles were localised more posterior in the patients than in healthy subjects (p < 0.01). The shift in insular dipole localisation was negatively correlated with the patients' clinical pain scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that sustained pain in CP leads to functional reorganisation of the insular cortex. We suggest its physiological correlate to be an adaptive response to chronic pain. and IAP.

Investigating the Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation on EEG in Stroke Patients.

: Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of chiropractic spinal manipulation on the early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recorded from chronic stroke patients. Methods: Seventeen male patients (53 ± 12 years old) participated in this randomized cross-over study. The patients received chiropractic spinal manipulation and control intervention, in random order, separated by at least 24 hours. EEG was recorded before and after each intervention during rest and stimulation of the non-paretic median nerve. For resting-state EEG, the delta-alpha ratio, brain-symmetry index, and power-spectra were calculated. For SEPs, the amplitudes and latencies of N20 and N30 peaks were assessed. Source localization was performed on the power-spectra of resting-state EEG and the N30 SEP peak. Results: Following spinal manipulation, the N30 amplitude increased by 39%, which was a significant increase compared to the control intervention (p < 0.01). The latency and changes to the strength of the cortical sources underlying the N30 peak were not significant. The N20 peak, the resting-state power-spectra, delta-alpha ratio, brain-symmetry index, and resting-state source localization showed no significant changes after either intervention. Conclusion: A single session of chiropractic spinal manipulation increased the amplitude of the N30 SEP peak in a group of chronic stroke patients, which may reflect changes to early sensorimotor function. More research is required to investigate the long-term effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation, to better understand what impact it may have on the neurological function of stroke survivors.

An automated method for micro-state segmentation of evoked potentials.

We present a method for segmenting evoked potentials into functional micro-states. The method is based on measuring the similarity between all the topographic maps in the evoked potential and grouping them into functional micro-states based on minimizing an error function. The similarity is measured as the normalized cross-correlation coefficient. The method was validated on simulated data and tested on its ability to segment a visual evoked potential. On simulated data the method missed from 1% to 8.5% of the micro-state boundaries for evoked potentials with a signal-to-noise ratio of 20-1dB, respectively. The proposed segmentation method was compared with segmentation based on K-mean clustering. It was found that the proposed method was better at detecting the correct number of micro-states and was computationally more efficient. The automatic segmentation of the visual evoked potential was compared to the manual segmentation performed by eleven EEG specialists. No significant difference in the deviation of micro-state boundaries was observed between two random EEG specialists and between a random EEG specialist and the automatic method. Thus it was found that the method could reliably segment evoked potentials into their functional micro-states.

The effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation on central processing of tonic pain - a pilot study using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA).

The objectives of the study were to investigate changes in pain perception and neural activity during tonic pain due to altered sensory input from the spine following chiropractic spinal adjustments. Fifteen participants with subclinical pain (recurrent spinal dysfunction such as mild pain, ache or stiffness but with no pain on the day of the experiment) participated in this randomized cross-over study involving a chiropractic spinal adjustment and a sham session, separated by 4.0 ± 4.2 days. Before and after each intervention, 61-channel electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at rest and during 80 seconds of tonic pain evoked by the cold-pressor test (left hand immersed in 2 °C water). Participants rated the pain and unpleasantness to the cold-pressor test on two separate numerical rating scales. To study brain sources, sLORETA was performed on four EEG frequency bands: delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (12-32 Hz). The pain scores decreased by 9% after the sham intervention (p < 0.05), whereas the unpleasantness scores decreased by 7% after both interventions (p < 0.05). sLORETA showed decreased brain activity following tonic pain in all frequency bands after the sham intervention, whereas no change in activity was seen after the chiropractic spinal adjustment session. This study showed habituation to pain following the sham intervention, with no habituation occurring following the chiropractic intervention. This suggests that the chiropractic spinal adjustments may alter central processing of pain and unpleasantness.