Intra-operative electroencephalogram frontal alpha-band spectral analysis and postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) remains a frequent complication after cardiac surgery, with pre-operative cognitive status being one of the main predisposing factors. However, performing complete pre-operative neuropsychological testing is challenging. The magnitude of frontal electroencephalographic (EEG) α oscillations during general anaesthesia has been related to pre-operative cognition and could constitute a functional marker for brain vulnerability. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that features of intra-operative α-band activity could predict the occurrence of POD. DESIGN: Single-centre prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital, from 15 May 2019 to 15 December 2021. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre-operative cognitive status was assessed by neuropsychological tests and scored as a global z score. A 5-min EEG recording was obtained 30 min after induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Power and peak frequency in the α-band were extracted from the frequency spectra. POD was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit, the Confusion Assessment Method and a chart review. RESULTS: Sixty-five (29.5%) of 220 patients developed POD. Delirious patients were significantly older with median [IQR] ages of 74 [64 to 79] years vs. 67 [59 to 74] years; P  < 0.001) and had lower pre-operative cognitive z scores (-0.52 ±â€Š1.14 vs. 0.21 ±â€Š0.84; P  < 0.001). Mean α power (-14.03 ±â€Š4.61 dB vs. -11.59 ±â€Š3.37 dB; P  < 0.001) and maximum α power (-11.36 ±â€Š5.28 dB vs. -8.85 ±â€Š3.90 dB; P  < 0.001) were significantly lower in delirious patients. Intra-operative mean α power was significantly associated with the probability of developing POD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81 to 0.96; P  = 0.007), independently of age and only whenever cognitive status was not considered. CONCLUSION: A lower intra-operative frontal α-band power is associated with a higher incidence of POD after cardiac surgery. Intra-operative measures of α power could constitute a means of identifying patients at risk of this complication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03706989.

Deep continuous theta burst stimulation of the operculo-insular cortex selectively affects Aδ-fibre heat pain.

KEY POINTS: Deep continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) of the right operculo-insular cortex delivered with a double cone coil selectively impairs the ability to perceive thermonociceptive input conveyed by Aδ-fibre thermonociceptors without concomitantly affecting the ability to perceive innocuous warm, cold or vibrotactile sensations. Unlike deep cTBS, superficial cTBS of the right operculum delivered with a figure-of-eight coil does not affect the ability to perceive thermonociceptive input conveyed by Aδ-fibre thermonociceptors. The effect of deep operculo-insular cTBS on the perception of Aδ-fibre input was present at both the contralateral and the ipsilateral hand. The magnitude of the increase in Aδ-heat detection threshold induced by the deep cTBS was significantly correlated with the intensity of the cTBS pulses. Deep cTBS delivered over the operculo-insular cortex is associated with a risk of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced seizure. ABSTRACT: Previous studies have suggested a pivotal role of the insular cortex in nociception and pain perception. Using a double-cone coil designed for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation, our objective was to assess (1) whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) of the operculo-insular cortex affects differentially the perception of different types of thermal and mechanical somatosensory inputs, (2) whether the induced after-effects are lateralized relative to the stimulated hemisphere, and (3) whether the after-effects are due to neuromodulation of the insula or neuromodulation of the more superficial opercular cortex. Seventeen participants took part in two experiments. In Experiment 1, thresholds and perceived intensity of Aδ- and C-fibre heat pain elicited by laser stimulation, non-painful cool sensations elicited by contact cold stimulation and mechanical vibrotactile sensations were assessed at the left hand before, immediately after and 20 min after deep cTBS delivered over the right operculo-insular cortex. In Experiment 2, Aδ-fibre heat pain and vibrotactile sensations elicited by stimulating the contralateral and ipsilateral hands were evaluated before and after deep cTBS or superficial cTBS delivered using a flat figure-of-eight coil. Only the threshold to detect Aδ-fibre heat pain was significantly increased 20 min after deep cTBS. This effect was present at both hands. No effect was observed after superficial cTBS. Neuromodulation of the operculo-insular cortex using deep cTBS induces a bilateral reduction of the ability to perceive Aδ-fibre heat pain, without concomitantly affecting the ability to perceive innocuous warm, cold or vibrotactile sensations.

Quickly responding C-fibre nociceptors contribute to heat hypersensitivity in the area of secondary hyperalgesia.

KEY POINTS: A recent animal study showed that high frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of C-fibres induces a gliogenic heterosynaptic long-term potentiation at the spinal cord that is hypothesized to mediate secondary hyperalgesia in humans. Here this hypothesis was tested by predominantly activating C-fibre nociceptors in the area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia induced by HFS in humans. It is shown that heat perception elicited by stimuli predominantly activating C-fibre nociceptors is greater, as compared to the control site, after HFS in the area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. This is the first study that confirms in humans the involvement of C-fibre nociceptors in the changes in heat sensitivity in the area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia induced by HFS. ABSTRACT: It has recently been shown that high frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of C-fibres induces a gliogenic heterosynaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) at the spinal cord in animals, which has been hypothesized to be the underlying mechanism of secondary hyperalgesia in humans. Here we tested this hypothesis using a method to predominantly activate quickly responding C-fibre nociceptors in the area of secondary hyperalgesia induced by HFS in humans. HFS was delivered to one of the two volar forearms in 18 healthy volunteers. Before, 20 min and 45 min after HFS, short-lasting (10 ms) high-intensity CO2 laser heat stimuli delivered to a very small area of the skin (0.15 mm2 ) were applied to the area of increased mechanical pinprick sensitivity at the HFS-treated arm and the homologous area of the contralateral control arm. During heat stimulation the electroencephalogram, reaction times and intensity of perception (numerical rating scale 0-100) were measured. After HFS, we observed a greater heat sensitivity, an enhancement in the number of detected trials, faster reaction times and an enhancement of the N2 wave of C-fibre laser-evoked potentials at the HFS-treated arm compared to the control arm. This is the first study that confirms in humans the involvement of C-fibre nociceptors in enhanced heat sensitivity in the area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia induced by HFS.

Human primary somatosensory cortex is differentially involved in vibrotaction and nociception.

The role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established. In contrast, its involvement in nociception is still debated. Here we test whether S1 is similarly involved in the processing of nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory input in humans by comparing the aftereffects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of S1 on the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. Cathodal HD-tDCS significantly affected the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the contralateral hand: both early-latency ERPs from within S1 (N20 wave elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of median nerve) and late-latency ERPs elicited outside S1 (N120 wave elicited by short-lasting mechanical vibrations delivered to index fingertip, thought to originate from bilateral operculo-insular and cingulate cortices). These results support the notion that S1 constitutes an obligatory relay for the cortical processing of nonnociceptive tactile input originating from the contralateral hemibody. Contrasting with this asymmetric effect of HD-tDCS on the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory input, HD-tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex led to a bilateral and symmetric reduction of the magnitude of the N240 wave of nociceptive laser-evoked potentials elicited by stimulation of the hand dorsum. Taken together, our results demonstrate in humans a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Whereas the role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established, its involvement in nociception remains strongly debated. By assessing, in healthy volunteers, the effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over S1, we demonstrate a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.

Secondary hyperalgesia is mediated by heat-insensitive A-fibre nociceptors.

KEY POINTS: It is believed that secondary hyperalgesia (the increased sensitivity to mechanical nociceptive stimuli that develops after cutaneous tissue injury in the surrounding uninjured skin) is mediated by a subclass of nociceptors: the slowly adapting A-fibre mechano-heat nociceptors (AMH-type I). Here we tested this hypothesis. By using intense long-lasting heat stimuli, which are known to activate these slowly adapting AMH-type I nociceptors, we show that the perceived intensity elicited by these stimuli is not increased in the area of secondary hyperalgesia. Moreover, we show that during an A-fibre nerve conduction block the perception elicited by the long-lasting heat stimuli is significantly reduced in a time window that matches the response profile of the AMH-type I nociceptors. AMH-type I nociceptors contribute to the perception of sustained heat, but they do not mediate secondary hyperalgesia. Therefore, we propose that secondary hyperalgesia is mediated by high threshold mechanoreceptors. ABSTRACT: Secondary hyperalgesia refers to the increase in sensitivity to mechanical nociceptive stimuli delivered outside the area of tissue injury. Previous studies have suggested that secondary hyperalgesia is mediated by a specific class of myelinated nociceptors: slowly adapting A-fibre mechano- and heat-sensitive (AMH) type I nociceptors. Here, we tested this hypothesis by examining whether long-lasting heat stimuli, which are known to activate AMH-type I nociceptors, elicit enhanced responses when delivered to the area of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high frequency electrical stimulation of the skin (HFS). Before and 20 min after HFS, sustained 30 s radiant heat stimuli were delivered to the area of increased mechanical pinprick sensitivity while participants continuously rated intensity of perception using an online visual analog scale (0-100 mm). After HFS, no significant enhancement of heat perception was observed in the area of increased pinprick sensitivity. To establish that myelinated nociceptors actually contribute to the perception of sustained heat, we conducted a second experiment in which sustained heat stimuli were presented before and during an A-fibre nerve conduction block, achieved by applying a rubber band with weights which compresses the superficial radial nerve against the radius. During the block, heat perception was significantly reduced 17-33 s after the onset of the heat stimulus (before: mean = 53 mm, during: mean = 31 mm; P = 0.03), matching the response profile of AMH-type I nociceptors. These results support the notion that AMH-type I nociceptors contribute to the perception of sustained heat, but also show that these afferents do not mediate secondary hyperalgesia.

Assessing signs of central sensitization: A critical review of physiological measures in experimentally induced secondary hyperalgesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Central sensitization (CS) is believed to play a role in many chronic pain conditions. Direct non-invasive recording from single nociceptive neurons is not feasible in humans, complicating CS establishment. This review discusses how secondary hyperalgesia (SHA), considered a manifestation of CS, affects physiological measures in healthy individuals and if these measures could indicate CS. It addresses controversies about heat sensitivity changes, the role of tactile afferents in mechanical hypersensitivity and detecting SHA through electrical stimuli. Additionally, it reviews the potential of neurophysiological measures to indicate CS presence. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Four databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Cochrane Library, were searched using terms linked to 'hyperalgesia'. The search was limited to research articles in English conducted in humans until 2023. RESULTS: Evidence for heat hyperalgesia in the SHA area is sparse and seems to depend on the experimental method used. Minimal or no involvement of tactile afferents in SHA was found. At the spinal level, the threshold of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (RIII) is consistently reduced during experimentally induced SHA. The RIII area and the spinal somatosensory potential (N13-SEP) amplitude are modulated only with long-lasting nociceptive input. At the brain level, pinprick-evoked potentials within the SHA area are increased. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical pinprick hyperalgesia is the most reliable behavioural readout for SHA, while the RIII threshold is the most sensitive neurophysiological readout. Due to scarce data on reliability, sensitivity and specificity, none of the revised neurophysiological methods is currently suitable for CS identification at the individual level. SIGNIFICANCE: Gathering evidence for CS in humans is a crucial research focus, especially with the increasing interest in concepts such as 'central sensitization-like pain' or 'nociplastic pain'. This review clarifies which readouts, among the different behavioural and neurophysiological proxies tested in experimental settings, can be used to infer the presence of CS in humans.

Multichannel transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may modulate the induction of secondary hyperalgesia, a double-blinded cross-over study in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Central sensitization is thought to play a critical role in the development of chronic pain, and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia is considered one of its hall-mark features. Consequently, interventions capable of modulating its development could have important therapeutic value. Non-invasive neuromodulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has shown potential to reduce pain, both in healthy volunteers and in patients. Whether it can modulate the induction of central sensitization, however, is less well known. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether multifocal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left DLPFC affects the development of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. METHODS: In this within-subjects, cross-over, double-blinded study, eighteen healthy volunteers participated in three experimental sessions. After 20 minutes of either anodal, cathodal, or sham multichannel tDCS over the left DLPFC, secondary mechanical hyperalgesia was induced using high-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of the volar forearm. We assessed intensity of perception to 128 mN mechanical pinprick stimuli at baseline and up to 240 minutes after HFS. We also mapped the area of mechanical hyperalgesia. RESULTS: HFS resulted in a robust and unilateral increase in the intensity of perception to mechanical pinprick stimuli at the HFS arm, which was not different between tDCS stimulation conditions. However, the area of hyperalgesia was reduced after anodal tDCS compared to sham. CONCLUSION: Anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC modestly modulates the size of the HFS-induced area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia, suggesting that non-invasive neuromodulation targeting the left DLPFC may be a potential intervention to limit the development of central sensitization.

The long-term effect of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 on disability and quality of life after foot injury.

PURPOSE: To study the long-term evolution of patients with lower-limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), focusing on functional and proprioceptive aspects and quality of life. METHODS: In 20 patients suffering from chronic distal lower-limb CRPS diagnosed using Budapest criteria, we assessed joint position sense and strength of the knee muscles at the CRPS and unaffected leg, functional exercise capacity, pain, CRPS severity score, quality of life and kinesiophobia. Similar assessments were performed in 20 age-matched controls. RESULTS: The joint position performance (at 45°) was significantly lower for the CRPS leg as compared to controls. The knee extensor strength of the CRPS leg was significantly reduced as compared to the unaffected leg (-27%) and controls (-42%). CRPS patients showed significantly reduced performance at the 6 min-walk test as compared to their age group predicted value and controls. Patients suffering from CRPS for 3.8 years in average still exhibit high pain, severity and kinesiophobia scores. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term deficits in strength and proprioceptive impairments are observed at the knee joint of the CRPS leg. This persistent functional disability has significant repercussions on the quality of life. We highlight the importance of including strength and proprioceptive exercises in the therapeutic approaches for CPRS patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe long-term evolution of patients suffering from lower-limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome is associated with persistent disability, pain and impacts the quality of life.Strength, proprioceptive, functional and subjective assessments are necessary to better identify deficits.Rehabilitation should focus on the overall deficit of the affected and contralateral limb.

Anodal Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) Selectively Inhibits the Synaptic Efficacy of Nociceptive Transmission at Spinal Cord Level.

Recently studies have aimed at developing transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) as a non-invasive technique to modulate spinal function in humans. Independent studies evaluating its after-effects on nociceptive or non-nociceptive somatosensory responses have reported comparable effects suggesting that tsDCS impairs axonal conduction of both the spino-thalamic and the medial lemniscus tracts. The present study aimed to better understand how tsDCS affects, in humans, the spinal transmission of nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory inputs. We compared the after-effects of anodal low-thoracic, anodal cervical and sham tsDCS on the perception and brain responses elicited by laser stimuli selectively activating Aδ-thermonociceptors of the spinothalamic system and vibrotactile stimuli selectively activating low-threshold Aß-mechanoreceptors of the lemniscal system, delivered to the hands and feet. Low-thoracic tsDCS selectively and significantly affected the LEP-N2 wave elicited by nociceptive stimulation of the lower limbs, without affecting the LEP-N2 wave elicited by nociceptive stimulation of the upper limbs, and without affecting the SEP-N2 wave elicited by vibrotactile stimulation of either limb. This selective and segmental effect indicates that the neuromodulatory after-effects of tsDCS cannot be explained by anodal blockade of axonal conduction and, instead, are most probably due to a segmental effect on the synaptic efficacy of the local processing and/or transmission of nociceptive inputs in the dorsal horn.