RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To compare optimal visualization of the four-chamber and outflow-tract views of the fetal heart on sonographic examination between morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m(2) ) and nonobese (BMI < 25 kg/m(2) ) pregnant women. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included records and images from 509 pregnant women who had first undergone sonographic examination between 18 and 36 weeks' fetal gestational age. RESULTS: Compared with the nonobese women, morbidly obese women had lower optimal visualization of the four-chamber and outflow-tract heart views: four-chamber view, morbidly obese, 83/186 (44.6%), versus nonobese, 283/323 (87.6%), and outflow-tract view, morbidly obese, 80/186 (43%) versus nonobese, 258/290 (89%); p < 0.0001 for each comparison. Similar outcomes were observed when the results from each subcategory of morbidly obese women (ie, BMI 40-49.9, 50-59.9, and ≥60 kg/m(2) ) were compared with that from nonobese women; p < 0.0001 for each comparison. These outcomes remained the same regardless of whether this comparison was made among those who had their examination before or at 19 weeks' or more gestational age. Among the morbidly obese women, there was no difference in optimal visualization of the four-chamber or outflow-tract views regardless of whether the examination was performed at <23 weeks' or at ≥23 weeks' gestational age: four-chamber view <23 weeks, 44.8% (78/174), versus four-chamber view ≥23 weeks, 41.7% (5/12); p = 0.8, and outflow-tract view <23 weeks, 43.1% (75/174), versus outflow-tract view ≥23 weeks, 41.7% (5/12); p = 0.9. After controlling for maternal age and race, the odds of visualizing the four-chamber and outflow-tract views in the morbidly obese were reduced compared with those in their nonobese counterparts: odds ratio (OR) for four-chamber, 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.21, and OR for outflow-tract, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.17. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal visualization of the fetal four-chamber and outflow-tract views was achieved in less than 50% of morbidly obese women, compared with almost 90% in nonobese women.
Assuntos
Coração Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) has become one of the most common permanent contraception methods in the U.S. However, recent evidence suggests that the failure rate may be higher than previously reported. We describe women with a history of HS presenting for abortion at a 3-site urban abortion clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series of patients with previous HS who presented to a 3-site urban abortion clinic for pregnancy termination from October 2012 to February 2015. RESULTS: In 28months, 9 patients with prior HS had failure of the method and then an abortion. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a number of failures from a setting previously unaccounted. It suggests that perhaps the failure rate is higher than previously reported. The cases here presented, from a 3-site urban abortion clinic over 28months, almost match and sometimes surpass the number of failures reported in multicenter case series in the literature. Surveys of other abortion clinics in the U.S. and elsewhere might also discover other patients whose HS had failed. IMPLICATIONS: We identified a number of hysteroscopic sterilization failures at termination of pregnancy at a 3-site urban abortion clinic. We hypothesize that the HS failure rate underestimates the true method failure because previous analysis have excluded cases such as these.
Assuntos
Gravidez não Planejada , Esterilização Tubária , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Anticoncepção/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia , Michigan , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Falha de Tratamento , População UrbanaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: New-onset postpartum preeclampsia is a poorly defined condition that accounts for a significant percentage of eclampsia cases. It is unclear whether new-onset postpartum preeclampsia is a different disorder from or belongs to the same spectrum of classic antepartum preeclampsia. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and pregnancy outcomes of antepartum preeclampsia and new-onset postpartum preeclampsia. METHODS: A retrospective study including 92 patients with antepartum preeclampsia and 92 patients with new-onset postpartum preeclampsia was performed. Clinical presentation and pregnancy outcomes were compared. Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test for numerical variables. P-values of <0.05 were used to indicate statistical signifi cance. RESULTS: Patients with antepartum preeclampsia and new-onset postpartum preeclampsia differ significantly in profile, symptoms at presentation, laboratory markers and pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: New-onset postpartum preeclampsia has a distinct patient profile and clinical presentation than antepartum preeclampsia, suggesting they may represent different disorders. Characterization of a patient profile with increased risk of developing this condition will help clinicians to identify patients at risk and provide early and targeted interventions to decrease the morbidity associated with this condition.