Long-term survival analysis in combined transarterial embolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus stereotactic body radiation monotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma >5 cm.

BACKGROUND: The survival following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone is still low in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with almost patients developing disease progression after treatment. There is need to investigate additional therapeutic options that would intensify the initial response to TACE. The present study was to retrospectively compare the outcome and evaluate the prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone or as an adjunct to transarterial embolization (TAE) or TACE in the treatment of HCC >5 cm. METHODS: From January 2011 to April 2015, 77 patients received SBRT followed by TAE or TACE (TAE/TACE + SBRT group) and 50 patients received SBRT alone (SBRT group). The dose of SBRT was 30-50 Gy which was prescribed in 3-5 fractions. Eligibility criteria were: a longest tumor diameter >5.0 cm and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Class A or B. Exclusion criteria included tumor thrombus, lymph node involvement and extrahepatic metastasis. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 20.5 months. Median tumor size was 8.5 cm (range, 5.1-21.0 cm). Median overall survival (OS) in the TAE/TACE + SBRT group was 42.0 months versus 21.0 months in the SBRT group. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS was 75.5, 50.8, and 46.9 % in the TAE/TACE + SBRT group and was 62.4, 32.9, and 32.9 % in the SBRT group, respectively (P = 0.047). The 1-, 3- and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 66.3, 44.3, and 40.6 % in the TAE/TACE + SBRT group and was 56.8, 26.1, and 17.4 % in the SBRT group, respectively (P = 0.049). The progression-free survival (PFS) and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) were not significantly different between the two groups. In the entire patient population, a biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥100 Gy and an equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) ≥74 Gy were significant prognostic factors for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT combined with TAE/TACE may be an effective complementary treatment approach for HCC >5 cm in diameter. BED10 ≥100 Gy and EQD2 ≥74 Gy should receive more attention when the SBRT plan is designed.

CDA-2 induces cell differentiation through suppressing Twist/SLUG signaling via miR-124 in glioma.

Cell differentiation agent-2 (CDA-2) is an extraction from healthy human urine consisting of primary organic acids and peptides, and it has been demonstrated to inhibit growth and induce differentiation in glioma and other cell lines. But the mechanism of CDA-2 remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that CDA-2 inhibited cell growth and induced differentiation of glioma cells, accompanied with decreased expression of SLUG, Twist and Vimentin in both SWO-38 and U251 cell lines. Overexpression of SLUG or Twist greatly eliminated the efficiency of CDA-2 in inducing differentiation. Further study showed that CDA-2 treatment resulted in great changed microRNAs (miRNAs) detected by quantitative PCR, in which miR-124 was one of the most changed miRNAs and its level was increased by fourfold. The result of miRNA target prediction showed that miR-124 could regulate hundreds of genes which were relative to cell differentiation, such as SLUG, Vimentin, actin cytoskeleton, focal adhesion, tight junction. Inhibition of miR-124 up-regulated SLUG, Twist and Vimentin proteins, and partly eliminated the function of CDA-2 on these mesenchymal markers. Our findings demonstrated for the first time that CDA-2 induced cell differentiation through suppressing Twist and SLUG via miR-124 in glioma cells.

Integrative analysis of epigenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics to identify key targets and pathways of Weining granule for gastric cancer.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Weining granule (WNG) is a "Qi-Enriching and Kidney-Tonifying, Spleen-Reinforcing and Stasis-Removing" formula for gastric cancer (GC). Past research we noted WNG inhibited cell growth and raised apoptosis in GC. However, the underlying mechanism of WNG for GC have yet to be systematically clarified. AIM OF THE STUDY: We sought to characterize the molecular landscape of GC cells in vitro after WNG treated, to identify the molecular targets and pathways that were associated with WNG for inducing the apoptosis of GC cells, and further to clarify underlying molecular mechanism of WNG for GC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed the techniques of RNA sequencing, tandem mass tags (TMT) based quantitative proteomics, and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) in WNG-treated/or untreated SGC-7901 GC cells to gain a comprehensive molecular portrait of WNG treatment. Then we integrated methylomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics data to carry out the bioinformatics analysis, and constructed the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network to identify molecular targets, and to discover the underlying signaling pathways associated with WNG for GC by network analysis. Besides, we verified the candidate target genes by Kaplan-Meier plotter database. RESULTS: We identified 1249 significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from RNA expression datasets, 191 significant differentially abunabundant proteins (DAPs) from proteomics datasets, and 8293 significant differentially methylated regions (DMRs) from DNA methylation datasets. GO and KEGG analysis showed DEGs, DAPs, and DMRs enriched in the cancer-related biological processes of calcium signaling pathway, pathways in cancer, metabolic pathways, MAPK signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and transcriptional misregulation in cancer. We integrated three profile datasets and performed network analysis to distinguish the hub genes, and finally the genes of SOD2, HMOX1, MMP1, SRXN1, NOTCH1, MAPK14, TXNIP, VEGFA, POLR2F, and HSPA9 were identified. The Kaplan-Meier plotter confirmed that SOD2, MMP1, SRXN1, NOTCH1, MAPK14, TXNIP, VEGFA, and HSPA9 were significantly correlated with OS in GC patients (P < 0.01), while HMOX1 and POLR2F expression were not significantly relevant to survival of GC patients (P > 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SOD2, MMP1, SRXN1, NOTCH1, MAPK14, TXNIP, VEGFA, and HSPA9 were the predictive pharmaceutical targets of WNG for GC. The anticancer function of WNG was significantly associated with the pathways of focal adhesion pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, and Wnt signaling pathway.

Effect of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma on hepatic toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and identify the treatment-related risk factors of hepatic toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and four HCC patients treated with CyberKnife SBRT were included in this study between August 2009 and December 2012. The average dose of prescribed radiation was 42.81±4.78 Gy (28-55 Gy) with the average fraction size of 8-16 Gy to the planning target volume. The average fractions were 3.31±0.81 (2-6 fractions). Response rates were determined, and the Child-Pugh (CP) score and class following CyberKnife SBRT were obtained to evaluate hepatic toxicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients experienced progression in CP class and 24 patients experienced CTCAE V. 4.0 grade 2-3 hepatic toxicity during the five-month follow-up period, while no patient experienced grade 4 liver toxicity. Multivariate analysis indicated that only V25 was an independent factor in grade 2-3 hepatic toxicity (P=0.029, <0.05). Radiation-induced hepatic toxicity (RIHT), defined as an increase of at least two points within three months following CyberKnife SBRT, occurred in 13 of the 104 patients (13/104, 12.5%), and only the normal liver tissue was found to be associated with RIHT (P=0.008, <0.05). CONCLUSION: CyberKnife SBRT is a feasible and safe treatment for HCC with regard to hepatic toxicity, while V25 and normal liver volume may be an independent factor of grade 2-3 hepatic toxicity and RIHT, respectively.