Effective relief of malignant ascites in patients with advanced ovarian cancer by a trifunctional anti-EpCAM x anti-CD3 antibody: a phase I/II study.

PURPOSE: Malignant ascites in ovarian carcinoma patients is associated with poor prognosis and reduced quality of life. The trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM x anti-CD3) enhances the antitumor activity by redirecting T cells and Fcgamma receptor I/III--positive accessory cells to the tumor. This multicenter phase I/II dose-escalating study investigated tolerability and efficacy of i.p. catumaxomab application in ovarian cancer patients with malignant ascites containing epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)--positive tumor cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-three women with recurrent ascites due to pretreated refractory ovarian cancer were treated with four to five i.p. infusions of catumaxomab in doses of 5 to 200 microg within 9 to 13 days. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose was defined at 10, 20, 50, 200, and 200 microg for the first through fifth doses. Side effects included transient fever (83%), nausea (61%), and vomiting (57%), mostly CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) grade 1 or 2. A total of 39 grade 3 and 2 grade 4 treatment-related adverse events (AE), 9 of them after the highest dose level (200 microg), were observed in 16 patients. Most AEs were reversible without sequelae. Treatment with catumaxomab resulted in significant and sustained reduction of ascites flow rate. A total of 22/23 patients did not require paracentesis between the last infusion and the end of study at day 37. Tumor cell monitoring revealed a reduction of EpCAM-positive malignant cells in ascites by up to 5 log. CONCLUSION: I.p. immunotherapy with catumaxomab prevented the accumulation of ascites and efficiently eliminated tumor cells with an acceptable safety profile. This suggests that catumaxomab is a promising treatment option in ovarian cancer patients with malignant ascites.

Effects of long-term intravenous ibandronate therapy on skeletal-related events, survival, and bone resorption markers in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: Bisphosphonates have been found to reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma. This is the first double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of ibandronate, a third-generation amino-bisphosphonate, in preventing SREs in advanced-stage multiple myeloma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with multiple myeloma stage II or III were randomly assigned to receive either ibandronate 2 mg or placebo as a monthly intravenous (IV) bolus injection for 12 to 24 months in addition to conventional chemotherapy. SREs such as peripheral pathologic or vertebral fractures, hypercalcemia, severe bone pain, and bone radiotherapy or surgery were analyzed. Bone-turnover markers were also studied. Finally, post hoc analyses of bone morbidity and survival were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients per treatment group were assessable for efficacy analysis. The occurrence of SRE per patient year and the time to first SRE were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. In overall evaluation, no differences were found between the treatment groups regarding bone pain, analgesic drug use, quality of life, and median survival (33.1 v 28.2 months, respectively). Explorative post hoc analyses revealed that ibandronate patients with strongly suppressed bone-turnover markers (> or = 30% and > or = 50% mean reduction of serum osteocalcin and urinary C-terminal telopeptides) developed significantly less bone morbidity. Ibandronate was tolerated well during as many as 25 therapy cycles. CONCLUSION: Monthly injections of ibandronate 2 mg IV neither reduced bone morbidity nor prolonged survival in the overall population of stage II/III multiple myeloma patients.

Health-related quality of life parameters as prognostic factors in a nonmetastatic breast cancer population: an international multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to evaluate whether baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) parameters are prognostic factors for survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients. Although the literature highlights the important role of HRQOL parameters in predicting survival in advanced metastatic disease, little evidence exists for earlier stages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The overall sample consisted of 448 patients randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Patients were enrolled in 12 countries. HRQOL baseline scores were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. In addition, a bootstrap resampling technique was used to assess the stability of the outcomes. Bootstrap results were then applied for model averaging purposes as a means to account for the observed model selection uncertainty. RESULTS: The final multivariate model retained inflammatory breast cancer (T4d) as the only factor predicting overall survival (OS) with a hazard ratio of 1.375 (95% CI, 1.027 to 1.840; P =.03). The presence of inflammatory breast cancer lowers the median survival time from 6.6 to 4.2 years (36% reduction). None of the preselected HRQOL variables were prognostic for OS or disease-free survival, in either the univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that baseline HRQOL parameters have no prognostic value in a nonmetastatic breast cancer population.

Oral ibandronate improves bone pain and preserves quality of life in patients with skeletal metastases due to breast cancer.

The objective of this study is to assess the effect of oral ibandronate on bone pain and quality of life in women with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer. In two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 564 patients were randomised to receive oral ibandronate, 50mg once daily, or placebo for up to 96 weeks. Throughout the studies, we assessed bone pain (on a 5-point scale from 0=none to 4=intolerable), analgesic use (7-point scale) and quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 [EORTC QLQ-C30], 100-point scale). Oral ibandronate significantly reduced and maintained bone-pain scores below baseline throughout the 96-week study period (at endpoint, -0.1 vs +0.2, P=0.001 vs placebo). Analgesic use increased in both groups; however, the increase was significantly less in the ibandronate group (0.60 vs 0.85, P=0.019). Although quality of life deteriorated during the study, the decrease in quality of life was significantly lower with ibandronate therapy (-8.3 vs -26.8, P=0.032). Drug-related adverse events were generally minor and as expected with oral bisphosphonates. Oral ibandronate had beneficial effects on bone pain and quality of life and was well tolerated. These results suggest that this treatment is of considerable clinical value as a co-analgesic to patients with painful bone metastases.

Renal safety of intravenous ibandronic Acid in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease.

INTRODUCTION: Renal adverse events are a troublesome complication of bisphosphonate therapy. This study investigated the effect of intravenous ibandronic acid (ibandronate) treatment on renal function in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. METHODS: 74 patients were randomised to double-blind (but not dose-blind) treatment with bolus injections of ibandronic acid 2mg (n = 23), 1-hour infusions of ibandronic acid 6mg (n = 28), or placebo injections or infusions (n = 23). According to randomisation, patients received either three injections or three infusions over the 3-month period, one at the start and two subsequent doses at 4-weekly intervals. Measurements of urinary excretion of total protein, albumin, alpha(1)-microglobulin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, haematuria and serum creatinine were performed before, during and after treatment. RESULTS: Treatment with ibandronic acid was not associated with impairment of renal function; the renal safety profiles of ibandronic acid 2 and 6mg were similar to that of placebo. Assessments of proteinuria, haematuria, enzymuria and serum creatinine indicated that there were no statistically significant changes between pre- and post-treatment levels in patients receiving ibandronic acid 2 or 6mg or between patients receiving ibandronic acid or placebo. Urine parameters varied during treatment in the same range with approximately similar frequency in the ibandronic acid and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term administration of intravenous ibandronic acid did not impair renal function in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. Because tolerability profiles vary between bisphosphonates, the lack of renal toxicity with ibandronic acid makes the drug an attractive treatment option for metastatic bone disease.

AVEREL: a randomized phase III Trial evaluating bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and trastuzumab as first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE The AVEREL trial [A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab)/Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer] evaluated first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable/evaluable HER2-positive LR/MBC who had not received trastuzumab or chemotherapy for LR/MBC were stratified by prior adjuvant trastuzumab, prior (neo)adjuvant taxane, hormone receptor status, and measurable disease and were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) plus trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg either with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or without bevacizumab, all administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included overall survival, response rate (RR), safety, quality of life, and translational research. Results Baseline characteristics of the 424 patients were balanced between treatment arms. Most patients had visceral metastases, 43% had a disease-free interval less than 12 months, and 85% had measurable disease. Median follow-up was 26 months. The hazard ratio for investigator-assessed PFS was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P = .0775; median PFS, 13.7 v 16.5 months in the non-bevacizumab and bevacizumab arms, respectively; PFS events in 72%). The Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS hazard ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.94; P = .0162; median PFS, 13.9 v 16.8 months, respectively; PFS events in 53%). The RR was 70% versus 74%, respectively (P = .3492). Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia and hypertension were more common with bevacizumab-containing therapy. High baseline plasma vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) concentrations were associated with greater bevacizumab benefit (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION Combining bevacizumab with docetaxel and trastuzumab did not significantly improve investigator-assessed PFS. The potential predictive value of plasma VEGF-A is consistent with findings in HER2-negative LR/MBC, warranting prospective evaluation.

Health-related quality of life in survivors of locally advanced breast cancer: an international randomised controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Dose-intensive chemotherapy has generated much interest in the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer because it might offer a survival benefit. We aimed to compare the effects of such an approach with those of standard chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: 224 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to 75 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide given orally on days 1-14, and 60 mg/m(2) epirubicin and 500 mg/m(2) fluorouracil both given intravenously on days 1 and 8, for six cycles every 28 days (6 months' treatment; standard treatment) and 224 patients to 830 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide and 120 mg/m(2) epirubicin both given intravenously on day 1, and 5 microg/kg filgrastim per day given subcutaneously on days 2-13, for six cycles every 14 days (3 months' treatment; dose-intensive treatment). HRQOL was assessed by use of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Baseline assessments were done before randomisation; then once a month for the first 3 months; and at months 6, 9, 12, 18, 26, 34, 42, 48, and 54. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints were HRQOL, response, safety, overall response, and health economics. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Previously reported data showed that groups did not differ in progression-free survival. Patients assigned shorter, intensified treatment had a significantly lower overall HRQOL score during the first 3 months than did those assigned standard treatment (mean score at 3 months 41.8 [SD 1.78] vs 49.6 [1.64], p=0.0015). However, scores returned to near baseline, with no difference between groups, at 12 months (62.6 [1.97] vs 65.6 [2.04], p=0.3007). Over the remaining 2 years, the groups showed few significant differences in HRQOL. INTERPRETATION: Dose-intensive treatment only has a temporary effect on HRQOL, thus enabling more research on intensive treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.