Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 20(6): 1000-1010, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29314582

RESUMO

AIMS: Circulating levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) are emergent promising biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. Altered expression of miRNAs has been related to heart failure (HF) and cardiac remodelling. We measured the concentration gradients across the coronary circulation to assess their usefulness to diagnose HF of different aetiologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Circulating miRNAs were measured in plasma samples simultaneously obtained from the aorta and the coronary venous sinus in patients with non-ischaemic HF (NICM-HF, n = 23) ischaemic HF (ICM-HF, n = 41), and in control patients (n = 11). A differential modulation of circulating levels of miR-423, -34a, -21-3p, -126, -199 and -30a was found across the aetiology groups. Interestingly, a positive transcoronary gradient was found for miR-423 (P < 0.001) and miR-34a (P < 0.001) only in the ICM-HF group. On the contrary, a positive gradient was found for miR-21-3p (P < 0.001) and miR-30a (P = 0.030) only in the NICM-HF group. Finally, no significant variations were observed in the transcoronary gradient of miR-126 or miR-199. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that circulating levels of miRNAs are differentially expressed in patients with HF of different aetiologies. The presence of a transcoronary concentration gradient suggests a selective release of miRNAs by the failing heart into the coronary circulation. The presence of aetiology-specific transcoronary concentration gradients in HF patients might provide important information to better understand their role in HF, and suggests they could be useful biomarkers to distinguish HF of different aetiologies.


Assuntos
MicroRNA Circulante/sangue , Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/sangue , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cateterismo Cardíaco , MicroRNA Circulante/genética , Angiografia Coronária , Vasos Coronários/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/genética , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 141(2): e34-6, 2010 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19136171

RESUMO

We observed a patient with syncope, who implanted a pacemaker with advanced algorithms such as "atrial-tachy response" and "dynamic atrio-ventricular delay". After one year, conventional ECG Holter showed pacemaker malfunction, wrongly attributed to exposure to electromagnetic field. In fact, telemetry revealed an inappropriate programming and solved our case. Holter monitoring is commonly performed in the evaluation of pacemaker malfunction, albeit it remains a quite shallow diagnostic method especially to detect electromagnetic interferences. New algorithms seem important, but it is reasonable to obtain more suitable analytical tools, too.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Marca-Passo Artificial , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Telemetria
4.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 67(1): 46-50, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17437514

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential alterations in electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). PATIENTS: Fifty PCOS patients and 50 age- and body mass index-matched healthy women were studied. METHODS: We assessed hormonal and metabolic pattern, and performed ECG analysis for evaluating PQ interval, QRS duration, minimum and maximum QT interval corrected for heart rate (QT(c)min and QT(c)max, respectively), corrected QT dispersion (QT(c)d), corrected J point/T-wave interval (JTend(c)), corrected JTmax interval (JTmax(c)), and corrected Tmax-end interval (Tmax-end(c)). RESULTS: QT(c)min (399 +/- 21 vs. 396 +/- 25 ms, P = 0.51); QT(c) max (445 +/- 25 vs. 443 +/- 27 ms, P = 0.70); and QT(c)d (46 +/- 13 vs. 47 +/- 15 ms, P = 0.72); JTend(c) (337 +/- 14 vs. 336 +/- 16 ms(1/2), P = 0.74); and JTmax(c) (256 +/- 22 vs. 258 +/- 21 ms(1/2), P = 0.64); Tmax-end(c) (81 +/- 18 vs. 78 +/- 19 ms(1/2), P = 0.42) were not significantly different between PCOS and healthy women. CONCLUSION: Despite profound differences in hormonal and metabolic pattern, our data demonstrate no significant difference in ECG pattern in PCOS compared to healthy controls.


Assuntos
Eletrocardiografia , Coração/fisiologia , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA