Structure-guided engineering of tick evasins for targeting chemokines in inflammatory diseases.

As natural chemokine inhibitors, evasin proteins produced in tick saliva are potential therapeutic agents for numerous inflammatory diseases. Engineering evasins to block the desired chemokines and avoid off-target side effects requires structural understanding of their target selectivity. Structures of the class A evasin EVA-P974 bound to human CC chemokine ligands 7 and 17 (CCL7 and CCL17) and to a CCL8-CCL7 chimera reveal that the specificity of class A evasins for chemokines of the CC subfamily is defined by conserved, rigid backbone-backbone interactions, whereas the preference for a subset of CC chemokines is controlled by side-chain interactions at four hotspots in flexible structural elements. Hotspot mutations alter target preference, enabling inhibition of selected chemokines. The structure of an engineered EVA-P974 bound to CCL2 reveals an underlying molecular mechanism of EVA-P974 target preference. These results provide a structure-based framework for engineering evasins as targeted antiinflammatory therapeutics.

Systematic Assessment of Chemokine Signaling at Chemokine Receptors CCR4, CCR7 and CCR10.

Chemokines interact with chemokine receptors in a promiscuous network, such that each receptor can be activated by multiple chemokines. Moreover, different chemokines have been reported to preferentially activate different signalling pathways via the same receptor, a phenomenon known as biased agonism. The human CC chemokine receptors (CCRs) CCR4, CCR7 and CCR10 play important roles in T cell trafficking and have been reported to display biased agonism. To systematically characterize these effects, we analysed G protein- and ß-arrestin-mediated signal transduction resulting from stimulation of these receptors by each of their cognate chemokine ligands within the same cellular background. Although the chemokines did not elicit ligand-biased agonism, the three receptors exhibited different arrays of signaling outcomes. Stimulation of CCR4 by either CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17) or CCL22 induced ß-arrestin recruitment but not G protein-mediated signaling, suggesting that CCR4 has the potential to act as a scavenger receptor. At CCR7, both CCL19 and CCL21 stimulated G protein signaling and ß-arrestin recruitment, with CCL19 consistently displaying higher potency. At CCR10, CCL27 and CCL28(4-108) stimulated both G protein signaling and ß-arrestin recruitment, whereas CCL28(1-108) was inactive, suggesting that CCL28(4-108) is the biologically relevant form of this chemokine. These comparisons emphasize the intrinsic abilities of different receptors to couple with different downstream signaling pathways. Comparison of these results with previous studies indicates that differential agonism at these receptors may be highly dependent on the cellular context.

The chemokine receptor CCR8 is not a high-affinity receptor for the human chemokine CCL18.

The primate-specific chemokine CCL18 is a potent chemoattractant for T cells and is expressed at elevated levels in several inflammatory diseases. However, the cognate receptor for CCL18 remains unconfirmed. Here, we describe attempts to validate a previous report that the chemokine receptor CCR8 is the human CCL18 receptor (Islam et al. J Exp Med. 2013, 210:1889-98). Two mouse pre-B cell lines (4DE4 and L1.2) exogenously expressing CCR8 exhibited robust migration in response to the known CCR8 ligand CCL1 but not to CCL18. Similarly, CCL1 but not CCL18 induced internalization of CCR8 on 4DE4 cells. CCR8 expressed on Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells mediated robust G protein activation, inhibition of cAMP synthesis and ß-arrestin2 recruitment in response to CCL1 but not CCL18. Several N- and C-terminal variants of CCL18 also failed to stimulate CCR8 activation. On the other hand, and as previously reported, CCL18 inhibited CCL11-stimulated migration of 4DE4 cells expressing the receptor CCR3. These data suggest that CCR8, at least in the absence of unidentified cofactors, does not function as a high affinity receptor for CCL18.

A novel series of histamine H4 receptor antagonists based on the pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold: comparison of hERG binding and target residence time with PF-3893787.

In this work we describe the optimization of a lead compound based on the quinazoline template to give a new series of potent pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidines as histamine H4 receptor antagonists. The pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidine ligands have significantly reduced hERG binding compared to clinical stage compound PF-3893787 while showing good affinities at the human and rodent histamine receptors. The receptor residence time of several of these new compounds was determined for the human H4R and compared with JNJ7777120 and PF-3893787. The pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidines showed residence times lower than JNJ7777120 but comparable to the residence time of PF-3893787. Overall, the pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidines show an excellent in vitro profile that warrants their further investigation in relevant models of human disease.

Identification and Characterization of ML321: A Novel and Highly Selective D2 Dopamine Receptor Antagonist with Efficacy in Animal Models That Predict Atypical Antipsychotic Activity.

We have developed and characterized a novel D2R antagonist with exceptional GPCR selectivity - ML321. In functional profiling screens of 168 different GPCRs, ML321 showed little activity beyond potent inhibition of the D2R and to a lesser extent the D3R, demonstrating excellent receptor selectivity. The D2R selectivity of ML321 may be related to the fact that, unlike other monoaminergic ligands, ML321 lacks a positively charged amine group and adopts a unique binding pose within the orthosteric binding site of the D2R. PET imaging studies in non-human primates demonstrated that ML321 penetrates the CNS and occupies the D2R in a dose-dependent manner. Behavioral paradigms in rats demonstrate that ML321 can selectively antagonize a D2R-mediated response (hypothermia) while not affecting a D3R-mediated response (yawning) using the same dose of drug, thus indicating exceptional in vivo selectivity. We also investigated the effects of ML321 in animal models that are predictive of antipsychotic efficacy in humans. We found that ML321 attenuates both amphetamine- and phencyclidine-induced locomotor activity and restored pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle in a dose-dependent manner. Surprisingly, using doses that were maximally effective in both the locomotor and PPI studies, ML321 was relatively ineffective in promoting catalepsy. Kinetic studies revealed that ML321 exhibits slow-on and fast-off receptor binding rates, similar to those observed with atypical antipsychotics with reduced extrapyramidal side effects. Taken together, these observations suggest that ML321, or a derivative thereof, may exhibit ″atypical″ antipsychotic activity in humans with significantly fewer side effects than observed with the currently FDA-approved D2R antagonists.

Ligand based design of novel histamine H4 receptor antagonists; fragment optimization and analysis of binding kinetics.

The histamine H(4) receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that has attracted much interest for its role in inflammatory and immunomodulatory functions. In our search for new H(4)R ligands, a low affinity isoquinoline fragment was optimized to 7-(furan-2-yl)-4-(piperazin-1-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (VUF11489), as a new H(4)R antagonist. Analysis of its binding kinetics at the human H(4)R showed this compound to have a very different dissociative half-life in comparison with reference antagonist JNJ7777120.

Identification of a novel allosteric binding site in the CXCR2 chemokine receptor.

We have shown previously that different chemical classes of small-molecule antagonists of the human chemokine CXCR2 receptor interact with distinct binding sites of the receptor. Although an intracellular binding site for diarylurea CXCR2 antagonists, such as N-(2-bromophenyl)-N'-(7-cyano-1H-benzotriazol-4-yl)urea (SB265610), and thiazolopyrimidine compounds was recently mapped by mutagenesis studies, we now report on an imidazolylpyrimidine antagonist binding pocket in the transmembrane domain of CXCR2. Using different CXCR2 orthologs, chimeric proteins, site-directed mutagenesis, and in silico modeling, we have elucidated the binding mode of this antagonist. Our in silico-guided mutagenesis studies indicate that the ligand binding cavity for imidazolylpyrimidine compounds in CXCR2 is located between transmembrane (TM) helices 3 (Phe130(3.36)), 5 (Ser217(5.44), Phe220(5.47)), and 6 (Asn268(6.52), Leu271(6.55)) and suggest that these antagonists enter CXCR2 via the TM5-TM6 interface. It is noteworthy that the same interface is postulated as the ligand entry channel in the opsin receptor and is occupied by lipid molecules in the recently solved crystal structure of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor, suggesting a general ligand entrance mechanism for nonpolar ligands to G protein-coupled receptors. The identification of a novel allosteric binding cavity in the TM domain of CXCR2, in addition to the previously identified intracellular binding site, shows the diversity in ligand recognition mechanisms by this receptor and offers new opportunities for the structure-based design of small allosteric modulators of CXCR2 in the future.

Molecular determinants of ligand binding to H4R species variants.

The histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) is the latest identified histamine receptor to emerge as a potential drug target for inflammatory diseases. Animal models are employed to validate this potential drug target. Concomitantly, various H(4)R orthologs have been cloned, including the human, mouse, rat, guinea pig, monkey, pig, and dog H(4)Rs. In this article, we expressed all these H(4)R orthologs in human embryonic kidney 293T cells and compared their interactions with currently used standard H(4)R ligands, including the H(4)R agonists histamine, 4-methylhistamine, guanidinylethyl isothiourea (VUF 8430), the H(4)R antagonists 1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine (JNJ 7777120) and [(5-chloro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine (VUF 6002), and the inverse H(4)R agonist thioperamide. Most of the evaluated ligands display significantly different affinities at the different H(4)R orthologs. These "natural mutants" of H(4)R were used to study ligand-receptor interactions by using chimeric human-pig-human and pig-human-pig H(4)R proteins and site-directed mutagenesis. Our results are a useful reference for ligand selection for studies in animal models of diseases and offer new insights in the understanding of H(4)R-ligand receptor interactions.

Distinct inactive conformations of the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors correspond to different extents of inverse agonism.

By analyzing and simulating inactive conformations of the highly homologous dopamine D2 and D3 receptors (D2R and D3R), we find that eticlopride binds D2R in a pose very similar to that in the D3R/eticlopride structure but incompatible with the D2R/risperidone structure. In addition, risperidone occupies a sub-pocket near the Na+ binding site, whereas eticlopride does not. Based on these findings and our experimental results, we propose that the divergent receptor conformations stabilized by Na+-sensitive eticlopride and Na+-insensitive risperidone correspond to different degrees of inverse agonism. Moreover, our simulations reveal that the extracellular loops are highly dynamic, with spontaneous transitions of extracellular loop 2 from the helical conformation in the D2R/risperidone structure to an extended conformation similar to that in the D3R/eticlopride structure. Our results reveal previously unappreciated diversity and dynamics in the inactive conformations of D2R. These findings are critical for rational drug discovery, as limiting a virtual screen to a single conformation will miss relevant ligands.

Almost a third of prescribed drugs work by acting on a group of proteins known as GPCRs (short for G-protein coupled receptors), which help to transmit messages across the cell's outer barrier. The neurotransmitter dopamine, for instance, can act in the brain and body by attaching to dopamine receptors, a sub-family of GPCRs. The binding process changes the three-dimensional structure (or conformation) of the receptor from an inactive to active state, triggering a series of molecular events in the cell. However, GPCRs do not have a single 'on' or 'off' state; they can adopt different active shapes depending on the activating molecule they bind to, and this influences the type of molecular cascade that will take place in the cell. Some evidence also shows that classes of GPCRs can have different inactive structures; whether this is also the case for the dopamine D₂ and D₃ receptors remained unclear. Mapping out inactive conformations of receptors is important for drug discovery, as compounds called antagonists can bind to inactive receptors and interfere with their activation. Lane et al. proposed that different types of antagonists could prefer specific types of inactive conformations of the dopamine D₂ and D₃ receptors. Based on the structures of these two receptors, the conformations of D₂ bound with the drugs risperidone and eticlopride (two dopamine antagonists) were simulated and compared. The results show that the inactive conformations of D₂ were very different when it was bound to eticlopride as opposed to risperidone. In addition D₂ and D₃ showed a very similar conformation when attached to eticlopride. The two drugs also bound to the inactive receptors in overlapping but different locations. These computational findings, together with experimental validations, suggest that D₂ and D₃ exist in several inactive states that only allow the binding of specific drugs; these states could also reflect different degrees of inactivation. Overall, the work by Lane et al. contributes to a more refined understanding of the complex conformations of GPCRs, which could be helpful to screen and develop better drugs.

Low intrinsic efficacy for G protein activation can explain the improved side effect profiles of new opioid agonists.

Biased agonism at G protein-coupled receptors describes the phenomenon whereby some drugs can activate some downstream signaling activities to the relative exclusion of others. Descriptions of biased agonism focusing on the differential engagement of G proteins versus ß-arrestins are commonly limited by the small response windows obtained in pathways that are not amplified or are less effectively coupled to receptor engagement, such as ß-arrestin recruitment. At the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), G protein-biased ligands have been proposed to induce less constipation and respiratory depressant side effects than opioids commonly used to treat pain. However, it is unclear whether these improved safety profiles are due to a reduction in ß-arrestin-mediated signaling or, alternatively, to their low intrinsic efficacy in all signaling pathways. Here, we systematically evaluated the most recent and promising MOR-biased ligands and assessed their pharmacological profile against existing opioid analgesics in assays not confounded by limited signal windows. We found that oliceridine, PZM21, and SR-17018 had low intrinsic efficacy. We also demonstrated a strong correlation between measures of efficacy for receptor activation, G protein coupling, and ß-arrestin recruitment for all tested ligands. By measuring the antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects of these ligands, we showed that the low intrinsic efficacy of opioid ligands can explain an improved side effect profile. Our results suggest a possible alternative mechanism underlying the improved therapeutic windows described for new opioid ligands, which should be taken into account for future descriptions of ligand action at this important therapeutic target.

Nonpeptidergic allosteric antagonists differentially bind to the CXCR2 chemokine receptor.

The chemokine receptor CXCR2 is involved in different inflammatory diseases, like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis; therefore, it is considered an attractive drug target. Different classes of small CXCR2 antagonists have been developed. In this study, we selected seven CXCR2 antagonists from the diarylurea, imidazolylpyrimide, and thiazolopyrimidine class and studied their mechanisms of action at human CXCR2. All compounds are able to displace (125)I-CXCL8 and inhibit CXCL8-induced beta-arrestin2 recruitment. Detailed studies with representatives of each class showed that these compounds displace and antagonize CXCL8, most probably via a noncompetitive, allosteric mechanism. In addition, we radiolabeled the high-affinity CXCR2 antagonist SB265610 [1-(2-bromophenyl)-3-(4-cyano-1H-benzo[d] [1,2,3]-triazol-7-yl)urea] and subjected [(3)H]SB265610 to a detailed analysis. The binding of this radioligand was saturable and reversible. Using [(3)H]SB265610, we found that compounds of the different chemical classes bind to distinct binding sites. Hence, the use of a radiolabeled low-molecular weight CXCR2 antagonist serves as a tool to investigate the different binding sites of CXCR2 antagonists in more detail.

Clobenpropit analogs as dual activity ligands for the histamine H3 and H4 receptors: synthesis, pharmacological evaluation, and cross-target QSAR studies.

Previous studies have demonstrated that clobenpropit (N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-S-[3-(4(5)-imidazolyl)propyl]isothiourea) binds to both the human histamine H(3) receptor (H(3)R) and H(4) receptor (H(4)R). In this paper, we describe the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a series of clobenpropit analogs, which vary in the functional group adjacent to the isothiourea moiety in order to study structural requirements for H(3)R and H(4)R ligands. The compounds show moderate to high affinity for both the human H(3)R and H(4)R. Furthermore, the changes in the functional group attached to the isothiourea moiety modulate the intrinsic activity of the ligands at the H(4)R, ranging from neutral antagonism to full agonism. QSAR models have been generated in order to explain the H(3)R and H(4)R affinities.

Cloning and characterization of dominant negative splice variants of the human histamine H4 receptor.

The H(4)R (histamine H(4) receptor) is the latest identified member of the histamine receptor subfamily of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) with potential functional implications in inflammatory diseases and cancer. The H(4)R is primarily expressed in eosinophils and mast cells and has the highest homology with the H(3)R. The occurrence of at least twenty different hH(3)R (human H(3)R) isoforms led us to investigate the possible existence of H(4)R splice variants. In the present paper, we report on the cloning of the first two alternatively spliced H(4)R isoforms from CD34+ cord blood-cell-derived eosinophils and mast cells. These H(4)R splice variants are localized predominantly intracellularly when expressed recombinantly in mammalian cells. We failed to detect any ligand binding, H(4)R-ligand induced signalling or constitutive activity for these H(4)R splice variants. However, when co-expressed with full-length H(4)R [H(4)R((390)) (H(4)R isoform of 390 amino acids)], the H(4)R splice variants have a dominant negative effect on the surface expression of H(4)R((390)). We detected H(4)R((390))-H(4)R splice variant hetero-oligomers by employing both biochemical (immunoprecipitation and cell-surface labelling) and biophysical [time-resolved FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer)] techniques. mRNAs encoding the H(4)R splice variants were detected in various cell types and expressed at similar levels to the full-length H(4)R((390)) mRNA in, for example, pre-monocytes. We conclude that the H(4)R splice variants described here have a dominant negative effect on H(4)R((390)) functionality, as they are able to retain H(4)R((390)) intracellularly and inactivate a population of H(4)R((390)), presumably via hetero-oligomerization.

A Thieno[2,3- d]pyrimidine Scaffold Is a Novel Negative Allosteric Modulator of the Dopamine D2 Receptor.

Recently, a novel negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of the D2-like dopamine receptors 1 was identified through virtual ligand screening. This ligand comprises a thieno[2,3- d]pyrimidine scaffold that does not feature in known dopaminergic ligands. Herein, we provide pharmacological validation of an allosteric mode of action for 1, revealing that it is a NAM of dopamine efficacy and identify the structural determinants of this allostery. We find that key structural moieties are important for functional affinity and negative cooperativity, while functionalization of the thienopyrimidine at the 5- and 6-positions results in analogues with divergent cooperativity profiles. Successive compound iterations have yielded analogues exhibiting a 10-fold improvement in functional affinity, as well as enhanced negative cooperativity with dopamine affinity and efficacy. Furthermore, our study reveals a fragment-like core that maintains low µM affinity and robust negative cooperativity with markedly improved ligand efficiency.

Molecular Determinants of the Intrinsic Efficacy of the Antipsychotic Aripiprazole.

Partial agonists of the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) have been developed to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia without causing the side effects elicited by antagonists. The receptor-ligand interactions that determine the intrinsic efficacy of such drugs, however, are poorly understood. Aripiprazole has an extended structure comprising a phenylpiperazine primary pharmacophore and a 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-2-one secondary pharmacophore. We combined site-directed mutagenesis, analytical pharmacology, ligand fragments, and molecular dynamics simulations to identify the D2R-aripiprazole interactions that contribute to affinity and efficacy. We reveal that an interaction between the secondary pharmacophore of aripiprazole and a secondary binding pocket defined by residues at the extracellular portions of transmembrane segments 1, 2, and 7 determines the intrinsic efficacy of aripiprazole. Our findings reveal a hitherto unappreciated mechanism for fine-tuning the intrinsic efficacy of D2R agonists.

Phenylalanine 169 in the second extracellular loop of the human histamine H4 receptor is responsible for the difference in agonist binding between human and mouse H4 receptors.

Using the natural variation in histamine H(4) receptor protein sequence, we tried to identify amino acids involved in the binding of H(4) receptor agonists. To this end, we constructed a variety of chimeric human-mouse H(4) receptor proteins to localize the domain responsible for the observed pharmacological differences between human and mouse H(4) receptors in the binding of H(4) receptor agonists, such as histamine, clozapine, and VUF 8430 [S-(2-guanidylethyl)-isothiourea]. After identification of a domain between the top of transmembrane domain 4 and the top of transmembrane domain 5 as being responsible for the differences in agonist affinity between human and mouse H(4)Rs, detailed site-directed mutagenesis studies were performed. These studies identified Phe(169) in the second extracellular loop as the single amino acid responsible for the differences in agonist affinity between the human and mouse H(4)Rs. Phe(169) is part of a Phe-Phe motif, which is also present in the recently crystallized beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. These results point to an important role of the second extracellular loop in the agonist binding to the H(4) receptor and provide a molecular explanation for the species difference between human and mouse H(4) receptors.

Fragment based design of new H4 receptor-ligands with anti-inflammatory properties in vivo.

Using a previously reported flexible alignment model we have designed, synthesized, and evaluated a series of compounds at the human histamine H 4 receptor (H 4R) from which 2-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-quinoxaline ( 3) was identified as a new lead structure for H 4R ligands. Exploration of the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of this scaffold led to the identification of 6,7-dichloro 3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinoxalin-2(1 H)-one (VUF 10214, 57) and 2-benzyl-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)quinoxaline (VUF 10148, 20) as potent H 4R ligands with nanomolar affinities. In vivo studies in the rat reveal that compound 57 has significant anti-inflammatory properties in the carrageenan-induced paw-edema model.

Cloning and pharmacological characterization of the dog histamine H4 receptor.

The histamine H4 receptor has been shown to have a role in chemotaxis and mediator release in various types of immune cells and has been implicated in mediating inflammation in vivo. Previous work has shown that there were differences in the histamine H4 receptor sequence of different species and these translated into changes in the pharmacology of the receptors. To help further understand the nature of these differences, we have cloned and expressed the histamine H4 receptor of dog (Canis familiaris). The dog histamine H4 receptor has a 61-71% homology with the receptors from other species, with a 71% homology to the human receptor. The affinity for histamine at the dog histamine H4 receptor is 18 nM and is 3-fold lower than the human ortholog. A number of previously described histamine H4 receptor ligands were tested for affinity at the dog histamine H4 receptor and histamine showed the highest affinity of the ligands tested. In addition, the histamine H4 receptor selective antagonist, JNJ 7777120, had a Ki value of 50 nM and acts as an antagonist at the dog receptor. In general, agonists of the human histamine H4 receptor were also agonists of the dog receptor albeit with different efficacy levels. The cloning and in vitro pharmacological characterization of the dog histamine H4 receptor provide useful information for future studies using dog models as well as in understanding the ligand-receptor interactions of the receptor.

Key determinants of selective binding and activation by the monocyte chemoattractant proteins at the chemokine receptor CCR2.

Chemokines and their receptors collectively orchestrate the trafficking of leukocytes in normal immune function and inflammatory diseases. Different chemokines can induce distinct responses at the same receptor. In comparison to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; also known as CCL2), the chemokines MCP-2 (CCL8) and MCP-3 (CCL7) are partial agonists of their shared receptor CCR2, a key regulator of the trafficking of monocytes and macrophages that contribute to the pathology of atherosclerosis, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Through experiments with chimeras of MCP-1 and MCP-3, we identified the chemokine amino-terminal region as being the primary determinant of both the binding and signaling selectivity of these two chemokines at CCR2. Analysis of CCR2 mutants showed that the chemokine amino terminus interacts with the major subpocket in the transmembrane helical bundle of CCR2, which is distinct from the interactions of some other chemokines with the minor subpockets of their receptors. These results suggest the major subpocket as a target for the development of small-molecule inhibitors of CCR2.

The emerging role of the histamine H4 receptor in anti-inflammatory therapy.

Antagonists for the Histamine H(1) receptor have been on the market for decades and continue to be successfully used in the treatment of a variety of allergic conditions. The recently discovered histamine H(4) receptor subtype is emerging as a new and complementary target for treating inflammatory conditions. In this review, we describe the receptor protein, its putative role in (patho)physiology and the latest ligands that are being developed to explore the feasibility of the H(4) receptor as a drug target.