The use of medial support screw was associated with axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of humeral fractures using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. We hypothesized that the use of medial support screw (MSS) would be associated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive 32 patients who underwent surgical treatments for proximal or midshaft humeral fractures. Of them, we included 26 patients who were examined by electromyography/nerve conduction (EMG/NCV) study at 3-4 weeks postoperatively. We excluded 6 patients because two of them were not compliant to EMG/NCV and the remaining two died due to unrelated medical illness. Outcome assessments included pain, functional scores, range of motion, and radiographic results. RESULTS: There were 8 male and 18 female patients with mean age of 67 ± 15 years. Mean duration of follow-up period was 31 ± 11 months. The mean time to EMG/NCS after surgery was 3.5 ± 0.6 weeks. EMG/NCS examinations revealed incomplete axillary nerve injury in 8 patients (31%) without complete nerve injury. Active forward elevation at 3 months postoperatively was significantly lower in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without it (99° ± 12 and 123° ± 37, respectively, p = 0.047), although final clinical outcomes were not different. At surgery, MSS was used in 17 patients (65%), and 8 of them were associated with nerve injury. The use of MSS was only correlated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury, because the axillary nerve injury developed only in MSS group (p = 0.047). The MMT grade 4 in abduction strength was more common in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary nerve injury was a concern after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. The use of medial support screw to improve the stability could increase a risk of axillary nerve injury when used with this approach.

Proximal vs Distal Approach of Ultrasound-guided Suprascapular Nerve Block for Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early clinical outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) using a proximal approach compared with a distal approach for outpatient treatment of adhesive capsulitis. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=47) with symptomatic adhesive capsulitis. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to either US-guided SSNB using a proximal approach (n=23, proximal group) or a distal approach (n=24, distal group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at week 12. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon's (ASES) score, University California Los Angeles score, Short Form-36 mental and physical component summaries, and range of motion. All patients completed clinical follow-up at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after treatment. On US images, depth and insertion angle of needle during injection were measured. RESULTS: The VAS significantly improved in both groups at week 12. After treatment, no significant differences were found in early clinical outcomes (weeks 2, 6, and 12) between groups (all P>.05), except that ASES at 2 weeks showed a significantly higher score in the distal group than in the proximal group (87.1±4.8 and 83.0±6.3, respectively; P=.014). The mean depth and insertion angle of needle was significantly lower (depth: 13.4±3.9 and 30.6±4.3 mm, respectively; P<.001; insertion angle: 19.6°±6.4° and 38.7°±5.8°; P<.001) in the proximal group than in the distal group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that proximal approach of US-guided SSNB provided favorable short-term outcomes of pain and functional improvement and that outcomes were comparable to those of the distal approach in adhesive capsulitis. The suprascapular nerve was located more superficially and easily identified in the proximal approach, suggesting that this method might improve the accuracy of injection.

Clinical outcome and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair significantly improved during the surgeon's learning curve.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Whether learning curve could affect the surgical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical learning curve for clinical outcome and retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs that were performed by the beginner shoulder surgeon. We hypothesized that clinical outcome and retear rate would improve over time with the accumulation of a surgeon's experience. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 200 consecutive patients who had arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2018. We included symptomatic rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus/infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging evaluations of repair integrity 6 months after surgery. Surgeon's learning was evaluated with calculation of cumulative retear rate and cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. Clinical outcomes and the retear rates were compared between group A (the first-half 100 patients) and group B (the latter-half of 100 patients). RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range, 12-55). The overall retear rate was 13% (26 patients). The CUSUM analysis showed that after patient number 97, the curve was maintained below the level of acceptable failure rate, suggesting the competency was obtained consistently. Comparing between groups, retear rate showed significant decrease from 18% in group A to 8% in group B (P = .036). Notably, retear rate in small to medium-sized tears (<3 cm) significantly decreased from 26% (12 of 46 patients) in group A to 2% (1 of 49 patients) in group B (P = .001). However, analysis in large to massive tears (≥3 cm) failed to show difference between groups (30%, 6 of 20, in group A and 25%, 6 of 24, in group B; P = .711). In multivariate analysis, higher fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle (P = .008), more severe muscle atrophy of the teres minor (P = .010), and belonging to group A (P = .011) were associated with retear. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes and retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs significantly improved during the learning curve period of a beginner shoulder surgeon.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an imaging overview.

Although not as common as hip or knee arthroplasty, shoulder arthroplasty is becoming a more common procedure. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is known to be an effective surgical procedure for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, comminuted proximal humerus fractures, and revision shoulder arthroplasty. The utilization of RTSA has been increasing, and although complications following reverse arthroplasty have been reported, there are few reports in the literature that focus on the imaging features of RTSA. Herein, we demonstrate the biomechanics of RTSA, prosthesis components, indications, and imaging features of the normal postoperative appearance and various complications after RTSA. Familiarization with the normal and abnormal imaging appearances after RTSA can be helpful for appropriate management of patients.

Editorial Commentary: Nonoperative Treatments Seem Unreliable in Posterior Shoulder Instability, But Let's Take a Closer Look.

Nonoperative treatment has been the initial treatment of choice in posterior shoulder instability. However, not much clinical data are available in the literature, and so many issues about nonoperative treatment, such as rehabilitation protocols, specific indications, expected outcomes, and predictable factors affecting outcomes, still remain unclear. With a paucity of clinical and no long-term data, shoulder surgeons need to wait a bit more to establish the optimal treatment strategy for posterior shoulder instability.

Editorial Commentary: Return to Sport After Surgical Treatments of the Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Seems to Be Almost Perfect in the Literature.

Systematic reviews identify completed studies that address a research question and evaluate the results of these studies to arrive at conclusions about a body of research. They should be encouraged because the findings, with power enhanced by the larger sample size available from the combined studies, often represent an important scientific contribution. The systematic review findings also can be a useful background for developing practice guidelines in the future. One of limitations of this approach is a risk of publication bias. Studies with negative results are more likely to remain unpublished or excluded from the review owing to a lack of reporting outcome of the specific interest. Although publication bias is difficult to eliminate, it should be addressed by the authors with appropriate statistical procedures that may be helpful in detecting its presence. Negative results should not be masked by overall good outcomes. This rather long caveat relates to a recent review showing that return to sport after surgical treatments of acromioclavicular joint dislocation seems to be almost perfect in the literature. Perfection is rare, so publication bias could be a limitation of the review.

Anatomic Tunnel Placement Is Not Feasible by Transclavicular-Transcoracoid Drilling Technique for Coracoclavicular Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of anatomic tunnel placement by a transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling technique and with reference to the coracoclavicular ligaments' insertional anatomy and their orientations. METHODS: We used 12 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders (6 matched pairs; mean age, 70 years; age range, 51-82 years) to simulate intraoperative tunnel placement with the transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling technique. After both the conoid and trapezoid ligaments were identified, two 2.5-mm guide pins were inserted from the clavicle to the coracoid, passing the centers of the clavicular and coracoid insertions of the conoid and the trapezoid ligaments, in a collinear fashion to the orientation of both ligaments. The entry point of the drill at the clavicle and the exit point at the coracoid undersurface, as well as the tunnel orientations, were measured. Complications due to the procedure, including a breach of the bone cortex of the clavicle and/or coracoid process, were recorded. RESULTS: The transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling technique for anatomic conoid ligament tunnel placement resulted in a medial cortical breach at the coracoid process in 6 of 12 shoulders. In the remaining 6 shoulders without a breach, the distance of the exit point from the medial cortex of the inferior coracoid process was only 3.6 ± 4.3 mm. For anatomic trapezoid ligament tunnel placement, no medial cortex breaching at the coracoid process occurred. However, the distance of the exit point was 3.1 ± 4.2 mm, indicating an eccentric location to the medial cortex of the coracoid process, similar to the conoid ligament. CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study showed that anatomic tunnel placement by the transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling technique would not be feasible without breaching or almost breaching the medial cortex of the coracoid process. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling technique for CC ligament reconstruction may not reproduce the anatomy of the CC ligaments but may place the coracoid process at high risk of fracture during tunnel placement.

Comparison between the patients with surgery and without surgery after recommendation of surgical repair for symptomatic rotator cuff tear.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears are often recommended for surgical repairs. However, some patients decide not to have surgery. The aim of this study was to see if there was any difference in preoperative variables between the two groups. METHODS: 137 consecutive patients recommended for surgery due to symptomatic full-thickness RC tear were evaluated. At mean 58.1 months after surgery-recommendation, the patients were asked whether they had surgery and their clinical outcome was assessed. Variables at the time of surgery-recommendation including demographics, range-of-motion (ROM), tear size, and fatty infiltration on MRI, and clinical score were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The 59 men and 78 women had a mean age of 64.4 years. Overall, 104 (75.9%) patients were treated with RC repair and 33 (24.1%) were not. The main three reasons for not having surgery were improvement of symptoms or minimal pain (55%), economic burden (12%), and concern for postoperative long rehabilitation (9%). Demography and ROM measured at the time of surgery-recommendation did not differ. All clinical scores at one year and final follow-up survey showed no difference between the two groups. The Constant and UCLA scores at the time of surgery-recommendation were significantly higher and tear size was smaller in the 'No-surgery' group. Fatty infiltration of supraspinatus (2.0 versus 1.2, p < 0.001) and global fatty degeneration index (1.4 versus 0.8, p = 0.011) were statistically lower in 'No-surgery' group as well. CONCLUSION: Patients with relatively preserved function and small size tear tend to select non-surgical treatment and lead to relatively good outcome.

Loss of reduction and complications of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous tendon graft in acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to report loss of reduction and complications after single-tunnel coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with acute, unstable AC dislocations (surgery within 6 weeks after trauma). We excluded patients with chronic injury and distal clavicle fractures with CC ligaments disruption. We measured the CC distance on anteroposterior radiographs of both clavicles, preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the final follow-up visit. We evaluated clinical outcomes using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment and the University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale scores and perioperative complications. RESULTS: There were 30 patients (27 men and 3 women) with mean age of 41 years (range, 19-70 years). The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range, 12-186 months). Mean CC distance was 15.5 ± 3.7 mm (84% ± 14% of the contralateral shoulder) preoperatively, 8.9 ± 2.6 mm (9% ± 40%) immediately postoperatively (P < .001), and 10.6 ± 3.3 mm (24% ± 39%) at the final assessment (P < .001), showing an increase of the CC distance during the follow-up. Loss of reduction (defined as >25% increase of CC distance) developed in 14 patients (47%), and complications occurred in 6 patients (20%), including 3 distal clavicle fractures through the tunnel. Final clinical scores were significantly lower in patients with complications (27 vs. 33 of the University of California, Los Angeles assessment [P < .001] and 81 vs. 95 of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder assessment [P < .001]). CONCLUSION: In acute AC joint dislocation, single-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction using autogenous tendon graft resulted in loss of reduction rate of 47% and a complication rate of 20%. The development of complications adversely affected clinical outcomes.

Pectoralis minor tendon in the rotator interval: arthroscopic, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and clinical significance.

BACKGROUND: Although insertional variation of the pectoralis minor on the rotator interval has been reported, more detailed characteristics as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or arthroscopy and clinical significance have been rarely discussed. This study evaluated the prevalence of tendinous insertion of the pectoralis minor by arthroscopy and diagnostic performances of MRI and suggests its clinical implication in rotator cuff repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 99 consecutive patients for arthroscopic exploration of pectoralis minor insertion. Preoperative MRIs were evaluated to detect tendinous insertion of the pectoralis minor by 2 independent, blinded observers, and these results were correlated with arthroscopy as the gold standard. During arthroscopy, the effect of this variation on supraspinatus tendon tear and repair was evaluated. RESULTS: Tendinous insertion of the pectoralis minor was found in 11 patients (11%) at arthroscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-89%), the specificity was 82% (95% CI, 72%-89%), and the accuracy was 80% (95% CI, 72%-88%). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability tests showed moderate agreements. In 7 patients, it tethered the retracted supraspinatus tendon from mobilization and gave rise to tension on the repaired cuff, which warranted complete resection of the pectoralis minor tendon for a tension-free cuff repair. CONCLUSIONS: Tendinous insertion of the pectoralis minor existed with 11% prevalence in our series and could be preoperatively detected on MRI. During arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, it can be an obstacle to supraspinatus tendon mobilization and repair.

Knot impingement after rotator cuff repair: is it real?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare morphologic features of the acromion after 2 different repair methods (single-row [SR] repair with a minimum of 4 knots and suture-bridge [SB] repair with minimal knots) in medium to large rotator cuff tears. METHODS: From May 2005 to July 2012, 1,693 rotator cuff repairs were performed, among them medium to large tears requiring more than 2 anchors for repair; those who had 6-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included (221 shoulders). They were divided into 2 groups; group A (SR repair) and group B (SB repair). Acromial morphologic characteristics were evaluated using MRI 6 months postoperatively. An acromial defect was defined as an irregular defect or erosion on the flat acromion. Clinical measurements were performed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: Erosion in the acromion was observed in 2 of 118 patients (1.7%) in group A and in 1 of 103 (1%) patients in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .796). A statistically significant improvement was observed in the clinical scores measured (P = .0043). ROM was not fully recovered to the preoperative level at 6 months postoperatively. Acromioplasty was performed in 2 of 3 patients with acromial erosion. There was acromial erosion in one patient in group A without performing subacromial decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that there was no difference in acromial erosion in high-profile knots made by an SR compared with double-row (DR) SB low-profile repairs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with 1 suture anchor in rotator cuff tear patients. METHODS: During a 2-year period, 84 consecutive patients (45 men; 39 women) who underwent arthroscopic tenodesis were evaluated retrospectively. Mean age was 58 years. The primary indication for surgery was rotator cuff tear in 96.4%. Tenodesis was performed with 1 suture anchor placed in the bicipital groove with 2 knots, 1 lasso-type and 1 that pierced the tendon. At final follow-up at a mean of 33.2 months, visual analog scale pain (pain-VAS) score, shoulder scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and Constant score), Popeye deformity (PD), anterior arm pain, and elbow flexion power were evaluated. Postoperative magnetic resonance images were evaluated in 60 patients to determine the integrity of the tenodesis and the location of the suture anchor. RESULTS: The average pain-VAS decreased from 5.3 to 1.4 (P < .001). ASES and Constant scores significantly increased, from 42.9 and 56.2 to 85.2 and 82.5, respectively. PD occurred in 11 patients (12.9%), and 2 (2.3%) had self-consciousness; however, no patients complained about the deformity and the PD did not correlate with poorer clinical scores. Six patients (7.1%) complained of anterior cramping pain. Elbow flexion power was similar compared with the contralateral side. In postoperative magnetic resonance imagine analysis, 15 patients (25%) showed distal migration of tenodesed biceps tendon, although only 6 (7.1%) had clinical PD. Postoperative clinical outcomes were not influenced by the location of the suture anchor within the bicipital groove. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with 1 suture anchor resulted in good clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. PD was seen in 12.9% of the patients.

Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: analysis of preoperative factors affecting outcome.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic débridement and to identify preoperative factors that influence the outcome. METHODS: Forty-three elbows with primary osteoarthritis in 43 patients treated with arthroscopic débridement were retrospectively evaluated. At a mean follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-77 months), the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, the arc of elbow motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score were assessed. The relationships between postoperative MEPI score and postoperative motion arc and preoperative factors including age, sex, involvement of the dominant arm, duration of symptoms, demand of elbow activity, VAS score, previous history of failed surgery, and arc of elbow motion were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The mean VAS score for pain, the mean arc of flexion-extension, and the mean MEPI score significantly improved after the operation (all P values < .001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that among preoperative variables, arc of motion was found to be the only independent prognostic factor that affected both postoperative elbow function (P = .024) and final arc of motion (P < .001). The cutoff value of preoperative arc of motion for the final arc of motion was determined to be 80° (P < .001). Involvement of the dominant arm was found to be another independent factor that affected postoperative MEPI scores (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic débridement for elbow osteoarthritis provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. Based on the fact that preoperative motion arc is the independent factor that can predict clinical outcome, arthroscopic treatment is highly recommended for patients who have a motion arc of 80° or more as it yields reliable results.

Doctor shopping trend of patients before undergoing rotator cuff repair in Korea: a multicenter study.

Background: To investigate the doctor shopping trend of patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) before undergoing surgery and the relevance of the results to the public. Methods: A survey was conducted of 326 patients from 10 hospitals (male, 176; female, 150) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for symptomatic RCT between September 2019 and February 2020. A questionnaire was used to obtain data regarding the type of medical care service, medical institutions visited before surgery, number of treatments received, and cost of treatment. Results: A total of 326 patients (87%) received treatment at least once at another medical institution before visiting the hospital where the surgery was performed. Patients visited an average of 9.4 health providers or physicians for shoulder pain before visiting the hospital where surgery was performed. Among the 326 patients, 148 (45%) visited more than two medical institutions and spent an average of 641,983 Korean won (KRW; $466, 50,000-5,000,000 KRW) before surgery. Medical expenses before surgery were proportional to the number of medical institutions visited (P=0.002), symptom duration (P=0.002), and initial visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.007) but were not associated with gender, age, VAS pain score immediately before surgery, or RCT size. Conclusions: Medical expense before ARCR was associated with the severity of preoperative pain and duration of symptoms. After onset of shoulder symptoms, patients should visit as soon as possible a hospital that has surgeons who specialize in shoulder repair to prevent unnecessary medical expense and proper treatment.

Inferior anchor cortical perforation with arthroscopic Bankart repair: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of anchor penetration of the far cortex of the glenoid neck after arthroscopic Bankart repair and to compare the biomechanical properties of anchors in the 4- and 5:30- to 6-o'clock positions on the glenoid. METHODS: Twelve (6 matched pairs) fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used to simulate arthroscopic Bankart repair in the lateral decubitus position. The most inferior anchor (5:30 to 6 o'clock) and that above it (4 o'clock) were inserted via the anteroinferior portal on the glenoid using the standard technique. After both anchor insertions, anchor perforation of the glenoid far cortex was identified. Biomechanical properties were measured to determine cyclic displacement of anchors at 100 and 500 cycles, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate failure strength. RESULTS: All 12 suture anchors (100%) at 5:30 to 6 o'clock penetrated throughout the far cortex, whereas only 4 anchors (33%) at 4 o'clock did so (P = .005). The mean distance the anchor tip traveled into far cortex was significantly longer at 5:30 to 6 o'clock than at 4 o'clock (6.8 ± 1.6 mm v 2.0 ± 1.6 mm, P = .001). In terms of mechanical strength, anchors at 5:30 to 6 o'clock had greater 100- and 500-cycle mean displacements than those at 4 o'clock (3.0 ± 0.5 mm v 2.5 ± 0.3 mm, P = .018 for 100 cycles; 3.5 ± 0.7 mm v 2.8 ± 0.3 mm, P = .018 for 500 cycles), although no differences in ultimate failure strength after cyclic loading were found between 2 positions (133.4 ± 40.3 and 133.7 ± 29.2 N, respectively; P = .985). CONCLUSIONS: For arthroscopic Bankart repair, insertion of the most inferior anchor via the anteroinferior portal with standard technique, in the lateral decubitus position, carries a high risk of perforating the inferior far cortex of the glenoid (100% in our study). This may result in mechanical weakness of the most inferior repair specifically in the early postoperative period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Perforation of the glenoid far cortex by the most inferior anchor and its mechanical weakness should be taken into consideration. Further study is needed to improve surgical technique to place the most inferior anchor in an optimal position by arthroscopy.

Treatment of avascular proximal pole scaphoid nonunions with vascularized distal radius bone grafting.

PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of vascularized distal radius pedicled bone grafting secured with K-wires for scaphoid nonunions with small avascular proximal fragments. METHODS: We included patients with scaphoid nonunions and small, avascular proximal fragments that were too small for screw fixation. The mean size of the proximal pole fragments was 21% (range, 9% to 28%) of the entire scaphoid, based on quantitative radiographic measurement. All patients had distal radius bone grafting based on the 1,2-intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicle and fixation with K-wires. There were 21 wrists in 18 men and 2 women with the mean age of 34 years (range, 22 to 57 y). The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 40 months (range, 12 to 103 mo). Radiographic union and clinical outcomes, including the ranges of wrist motion, grip strength, and the modified Mayo wrist score, were evaluated. RESULTS: Union was achieved in 18 of 21 wrists (86%) at a mean time of 14 weeks after surgery (range, 8 to 28 wk). Nonunions with proximal fragments less than 20% of the total scaphoid healed in 6 of 8 wrists. In a subset of these 8 wrists in which the proximal fragment was less than 15%, healing occurred in 2 of 4. The modified Mayo wrist score significantly improved from 46 to 78 points, and final wrist functions were rated as excellent in 5, good in 5, fair in 10, and poor in 1. Ranges of motion and grip strengths did not show significant changes after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Vascularized distal radius bone grafting and K-wire fixation can heal scaphoid nonunions with small avascular proximal fragments, although motion and grip strength remain unchanged. Healing may be related to the size of the proximal pole fragment.

Surgical release of elbow stiffness after internal fixation of intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus.

BACKGROUND: Loss of motion is common after intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus despite proper management. The purpose of the current study was to report the results of contracture release for stiffness that developed after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humeral intercondylar fractures. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with a stiff elbow after ORIF of intercondylar fractures (20 AO type C2 and 4 type C3 fractures) were managed with contracture release at a median of 13 months. The surgical indication was total arc of motion of less than 100° despite physical therapy for more than 6 months. Plates and screws for ORIF were removed concomitantly in 16 patients. Each patient was evaluated by final arc of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). RESULTS: The main lesions causing stiffness were heterotopic ossification or excessive callus in 13 patients and capsular fibrosis in 11. The mean total range of motion (ROM) was improved from 60.2° preoperatively to 104.8° postoperatively. At the final follow-up, 17 of the 24 elbows (71.8%) obtained a total ROM of more than 100°. The mean MEPS improved from 69 points preoperatively to 87 points at the final follow-up (P < .05). Refracture occurred during ROM exercise in 4 patients who had undergone concomitant implant removal during the contracture release. CONCLUSION: Surgical release of a stiff elbow that develops after ORIF of intercondylar fractures can result in satisfactory restoration of ROM in most patients. However, potential risk of refracture after release should be considered when implants are concomitantly removed.

Surgical treatment of elbow stiffness caused by post-traumatic heterotopic ossification.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is considered as a common extrinsic cause of elbow stiffness. The purpose of this study was to show the results of surgical treatment for post-traumatic elbow stiffness caused by HO in a large, consecutive series of patients in a single unit. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 77 surgically treated patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness caused by HO. Final motion arc and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) were assessed as final results. Univariable and multivariable analyses were done to determine which factors had an effect on the final motion arc. RESULTS: The average arc of elbow motion increased from 45° preoperatively to 112°, with an improvement of 67° at the final follow-up evaluation. The mean MEPI score was 91.9. At the final evaluation, 65 patients (84.4%) obtained a total motion arc of ≥100°. Recurrent HO was observed in 16 patients postoperatively, and 6 underwent repeated surgical release. The time from the initial injury to surgical release with a cutoff value of 19 months was the only independent factor affecting the final range of motion (ROM) in multivariable median regression analysis. With the numbers studied, no significant association was found between the final ROM and other clinical variables except for the recurrence of HO (93° vs 117°). CONCLUSIONS: From the results of our study, we can support the surgical treatment of elbow stiffness caused by post-traumatic HO regardless of preoperative ROM. However, recurrence of heterotopic bone and delay in surgery of more than 19 months are associated with less favorable results.

Position Statement: Atypical Femoral Fracture from the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research in 2023.

As the aging population increases, the number of patients with osteoporosis is gradually rising. Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mass and the microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, resulting in reduced bone strength and an increased risk of low-energy or fragility fractures. Thus, the use of anti-resorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates (BPs), to prevent osteoporotic fractures is growing annually. BPs are effective in reducing hip and other fractures. However, the longer a patient takes BPs, the higher the risk of an atypical femoral fracture (AFF). The exact mechanism by which long-term BP use affects the development of AFFs has not yet been clarified. However, several theories have been suggested to explain the pathogenesis of AFFs, such as suppressed bone remodeling, impaired bone healing, altered bone quality, and femoral morphology. The management of AFFs requires both medical and surgical approaches. BPs therapy should be discontinued immediately, and calcium and vitamin D levels should be evaluated and supplemented if insufficient. Teriparatide can be used for AFFs. Intramedullary nailing is the primary treatment for complete AFFs, and prophylactic femoral nailing is recommended if signs of an impending fracture are detected.

Serial structural and functional assessments of rotator cuff repairs: do they differ at 6 and 19 months postoperatively?

BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown that rotator cuff tendon (RCT) retears occur early after surgery and ultimate failure strength is reached at between 3 and 6 months. However, few clinical studies have been reported to support their theory. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the RCT integrity after repair showed any difference at 6 months and at 19 months postoperatively. METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent complete repair for full-thickness RCT tears that were medium-sized tears or larger and had 2 postoperative follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included in this study. Retear, fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy were evaluated during the first and second MRI sessions. Clinical assessment was performed by use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and pain visual analog scale preoperatively and at the time of the first and second MRI scans. RESULTS: The mean time for the two consecutive MRI scans was 5.9 months (range, 3.1-8.3 months) and 19.7 months (range, 10.1-24.3 months). On the first MRI scans, 24 patients had no retear, 5 had partial retears, and 2 had full-thickness retears. In terms of rotator cuff retears, the 2 sets of MRI scans showed exactly the same statuses. The only statistically significant improvement was a reduction in tendinosis on the second MRI scans. In addition, significant improvements in clinical status were observed between the 2 periods. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the structural status of RCTs after arthroscopic repair can be assessed at 6 months after surgery. Furthermore, although functional status improved with time after 6 months, the structural status of repaired cuffs remained unchanged.