Trans-oral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal carcinoma - A guide for general practitioners and patients.

BACKGROUND: Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery, or trans-oral laser surgery, for the treatment of some head and neck pathologies, particularly oropharyngeal carcinoma, which is rapidly increasing in incidence. OBJECTIVE: In this article we review current evidence regarding the use of TORS in head and neck surgery in a manner relevant to general practice. This information may be used to facilitate discussion with patients. DISCUSSION: Compared with open surgery or trans-oral laser surgery, TORS has numerous advantages, including no scarring, less blood loss, fewer complications, lower rates of admission to the intensive care unit, and reduced length of hospitalisation. The availability of TORS in Australia is currently limited and, therefore, public awareness about TORS is lacking. Details regarding the role of TORS and reliable, up-to-date, patient-friendly information sources are discussed in this article.

The impact of variations in care and complications within a colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on length of stay.

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become standard of care in colorectal surgery. However, there is not a universally accepted colorectal ERAS protocol and significant variations in care exist between institutions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of variations in ERAS interventions and complications on length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This study was a single-center review of the first 200 consecutive patients recruited into our prospectively collected ERAS database. The primary outcome of this study was to examine the rate of compliance to ERAS interventions and the impact of these interventions on LOS. The secondary outcome was to assess the impact of complications (anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infections) on LOS. ERAS interventions, rate of adherence, LOS, readmissions, morbidity, and mortality were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: ERAS variations and complications significantly influenced patient LOS on both univariate and multivariate analysis. ERAS interventions identified as the most important strategies in reducing LOS included laparoscopic surgery, mobilization twice daily postoperative day (POD) 0 to 1, discontinuation of intravenous fluids on POD 0 to 1, upgrading to solid diet by POD 0 to 2, removal of indwelling catheter by POD 0 to 2, avoiding nasogastric tube reinsertion and removing drains early. Both major and minor complications increased LOS. Anastomotic leak and ileus were associated with the greatest increase in LOS. CONCLUSION: Seven high-yield ERAS interventions reduced LOS. Major and minor complications increased LOS. Reducing variations in care and complications can improve outcomes following colorectal surgery.

A Simple, Accurate and Cost-Effective Capillary Electrophoresis Test with Computational Methods to Aid in Universal Microsatellite Instability Testing.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is important for the classification of Lynch syndrome, as a prognostic marker and as a guide for adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC). The gold standard for determining MSI status has traditionally been fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE). However, its use in the clinical setting has diminished and has been replaced by immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of loss of mismatch repair protein expression due to practicability and cost. The aim of this study was to develop a simple, cost-effective and accurate MSI assay based on CGE. METHOD: After amplification of microsatellites by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) panel (BAT 25, BAT26, D5S346, D2S123, D17S250) of MSI markers, parallel CGE was utilized to classify colorectal cancers as MSI-H, MSI-L and MSS using the 5200 Fragment Analyzer System. Cell lines and patient cancer specimens were tested. DNA from 56 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cancer specimens and matched normal tissue were extracted and CGE was performed. An automated computational algorithm for MSI status determination was also developed. RESULTS: Using the fragment analyser, MSI status was found to be 100% concordant with the known MSI status of cell lines and was 86% and 87% concordant with immunohistochemistry (IHC) from patient cancer specimens using traditional assessment and our MSI scoring system, respectively, for MSI determination. The misclassification rate was mainly attributed to IHC, with only one (1.8%) sampling error attributed to CGE testing. CGE was also able to distinguish MSI-L from MSI-H and MSS, which is not possible with IHC. An MSI score based on total allelic variability that can accurately determine MSI status was also successfully developed. A significant reduction in cost compared with traditional fluorescent multiplex PCR and CGE was achieved with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, cost-effective and reliable method of determining MSI status and an MSI scoring system based on an automatic computational algorithm to determine MSI status, as well as degree of allelic instability in colorectal cancer, has been developed using the 5200 Fragment Analyzer System.