Impact of glucocorticoids on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that glucocorticoids (GCs) promote the proliferation and development of colorectal cancer. Because GCs are broadly prescribed for treatment-related adverse events in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), it's essential to assess the effect of GCs on clinical outcomes. METHODS: LARC cases treated with NCRT followed by surgery were assessed retrospectively. Evaluation of the relationship between GCs use (GCs vs. non-GCs) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score (as a three-level categorical dependent variable) was performed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression (MLR). We also examined the relationship between the accumulated dose of GCs and NAR using multivariate MLR. Survival analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression was used to assess confounding factors that could influence OS and DFS. RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study included 790 patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic LARC (T3-4/N + M0) who received NCRT followed by surgery between January 2012 and April 2017. The end of the follow-up period was May 11, 2022. Among the 790 patients with LARC, 342 (43.2%) received GCs treatment and 448 (56.8%) did not during the NCRT-to-surgery period. GCs medication was significantly different between mid-NAR (8-16) and low-NAR (< 8) (odds ratio [OR], 0.615; 95% CI, 0.420-0.901; P = 0.013), and the high-NAR (> 16) and low-NAR (0.563; 0.352-0.900; 0.016). Patients exposed to GCs, had a decreased 5-year OS (GCs vs. non-GCs = 80.01% (95% CI, 75.87%-84.37%) vs. 85.30% (82.06%-88.67%), P = 0.023) and poorer 5-year DFS (73.99% (69.45%-78.82%) vs. 78.7% (75.14%-82.78%), P = 0.045). The accumulated dose of GCs was an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.007 [1.001-1.014], 0.036) and DFS (1.010 [1.004-1.017], 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study revealed that GCs were associated with reduced efficacy of NCRT and worse clinical outcomes in patients with LARC during the NCRT-to-surgery period.

Identification of a ferroptosis-related gene signature for the prognosis of pediatric neuroblastoma.

Background: Ferroptosis-related genes are correlated with the prognosis of patients with neuroblastoma (NB) remains unknown. This study aims to establish a prognostic ferroptosis-related gene model for predicting prognostic value in pediatric NB patients. Methods: The gene expression array and clinical characteristics of NB were downloaded from a public database. Correlations between ferroptosis-related genes and drug responses were analyzed by Childhood Cancer Therapeutics. The prognostic model was constructed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression and was validated in NB patients from the ICGC cohort. The survival analysis was performed by Cox regression analysis. single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to quantify the immune cell infiltration correlation. Results: Overall, 70 genes were identified as ferroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from 247 samples. Then, 13 ferroptosis-related genes were correlated with OS in the univariate Cox regression analysis. Five prognostic ferroptosis-related DEGs (pFR-DEGs) (STEAP3, MAP1LC3A, ULK2, MTOR and TUBE1), which were defined as the intersection of DEGs and prognostic ferroptosis-related genes, were identified and utilized to construct the prognostic signature. The correlation between five pFR-DEGs and drug responses was analyzed, and the box plots indicated that MTOR gene expression was highest, suggesting that MTOR expression is related to progressive NB disease. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the model had moderate predictive power. The survival analysis indicated that the high-risk group had poor overall survival (OS) (P=2.087×10-06). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the risk score as a significant prognostic risk factor [P=0.003, hazard ratio (HR) =1.933]. Immune cell infiltration correlation analysis showed that the high-risk group was related to more immune cells. Conclusions: The present study indicated a difference in ferroptosis-related gene expression between low- and high-risk NB patients. The ferroptosis-related signature could serve as a prognostic prediction tool. Additionally, immune infiltration might play an important role in different risk groups for NB patients.

The Effect of Lymph Node Harvest on Prognosis in Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between lymph node harvest and the prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with clinical LARC and treated with nCRT and radical surgery between June 2008 and July 2017 were included in this study. The relationship between lymph node retrieval and prognosis was analyzed. Other lymph node-related indicators were explored. RESULTS: A total of 837 patients with a median follow-up of 61 (7-139) months were included in the study. The five-year DFS and OS rates of all patients were 74.9% and 82.3%, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis suggested that dissection of ≥ 12 lymph nodes did not improve OS or DFS. 7 was selected as the best cutoff value for the total number of lymph nodes retrieved by Cox multivariate analysis (χ2 = 10.072, HR: 0.503, P=0.002). Dissection of ≥ 5 positive lymph nodes (PLNs) was an independent prognostic factor for poorer DFS (HR: 2.104, P=0.004) and OS (HR: 3.471, p<0.001). A positive lymph node ratio (LNR) of more than 0.29 was also an independent prognostic factor for poorer DFS (HR: 1.951, P=0.002) and OS (HR: 2.434, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The recommends that at least 7 harvested lymph nodes may be more appropriate for LARC patients with nCRT. PLN and LNR may be prognostic factors for LARC patients with ypN+ after nCRT.

Hyperprogressive disease in advanced cancer patients with liver metastasis treated with PD-1 inhibitors: two case reports.

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a phenomenon defined as extremely rapid tumor progression within a short time following immunotherapy. To date, distinguishing which subgroups may be eligible for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment has presented a clinical challenge. Moreover, no sufficiently convincing biomarkers of HPD have been identified. Herein, we present two cases of cancer patients who suffered from liver metastasis before immunotherapy. A 63-year-old man presented with cough and pain in right collarbone. He was finally diagnosed as suffering from right upper lobe adenocarcinoma with cTxN3M1c and stage IVB. First-line carboplatin plus pemetrexed chemotherapy combined with sintilimab anti-PD-1 was initiated after a multi-disciplinary discussion. In the second case, a 46-year-old female was diagnosed as moderately differentiated cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Widespread recurrence 2 years after extensive total hysterectomy for early cervical carcinoma. After six cycles of first-line chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the disease progressed and new-onset liver metastasis was detected. Pembrolizumab plus abraxane was administered as second-line therapy. After the first cycle of anti-PD-1 therapy, in both cases, an extremely rapid radiological progression was observed in the liver metastases with obvious symptoms, while the primary tumor site and other metastatic lesions remained stable or shrunken. These aberrations were confirmed as HPD. The risk of HPD appears to be higher in patients with liver metastases. We believe that further research will pave the way for the discovery of more significant biomarkers of HPD.

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival of Resected Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The overall survival (OS) of resected locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) was significantly different, even among patients with the same tumor stage. The nomogram was designed to predict OS of rectal cancer with nCRT and divide the patients into different risk groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on materials from 911 rectal cancer patients with nCRT, the multivariable Cox regression model was carried out to select the significant prognostic factors for overall survival. And then, the nomogram was formulated using these independent prognostic factors. The discrimination of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (C-index), calibration curves and time-dependent area under curve (AUC). The patients respective risk scores were calculated through the nomogram. The best cut-off risk score was calculated to stratify the patients. The survival curves of the two different risk cohorts were performed, which assessed the predictive ability of the nomogram. RESULTS: Age, cT stage, pretreatment CEA, pretreatment CA19-9, surgery, posttreatment CEA, posttreatment CA19-9, pT stage, pN stage and adjuvant chemotherapy were selected for the construction of the nomogram. And then the nomogram was constructed with independent prognostic factors. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.724, which showed the nomogram provided good discernment. The acceptable agreement between the predictions of nomogram and actual observations was illustrated by calibration plots for 3-, 5- and 10-year OS in the cohort. Time-dependent AUC with 6-fold cross-validation also showed consistent results of the nomogram. Risk group stratification confirmed that the nomogram had great capacity for distinguishing the prognosis. CONCLUSION: The nomogram was developed and validated to predict overall survival of resected locally advanced rectal cancer patients with nCRT. The proposed nomogram might help clinicians to develop individualized treatment strategies. However, further studies are warranted to optimize the nomogram by finding out other unknown prognostic factors, and more external validation is still required.

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in resected stage I to II pancreatic cancer: A propensity-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: The survival time of patients with early pancreatic cancer (PC) is still disappointing, even after surgical resection. PC has an extremely poor prognosis. Herein, we aimed to investigate the survival effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on resected stage I to II PC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A large eligible sample of patients was identified from 2010 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of PORT. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias and to make the groups comparable. RESULTS: A total of 3219 patients with resected stage I to II PC was included after rigid screening. The median overall survival (OS) was 26 months with PORT (n = 1055) versus 21 months with non-PORT (n = 2164) before matching (p<0.001). By multivariable analysis, PORT remained a favorable prognostic predictor for OS. In PSM analysis, receiving PORT was associated with improved OS (median, 26 months vs. 23 months; at 2 years, 51.7% vs. 46.7%; at 5 years, 23.3% vs. 17.4% (P = 0.006). After further meticulous exploration, only the stage IIB subgroup benefited from PORT (p<0.001). This result was due to the positive lymph node state (N+), whose mortality risk was cut by 23.4% (p<0.001) by PORT. CONCLUSION: Addition of PORT to the treatment of patients with resected stage I to II PC conveys a survival benefit, particularly among those with N-positive or stage IIB disease.