A cross-sectional survey of patient attitudes towards telemedicine in head and neck surgical oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient attitudes towards desire for and barriers to utilizing telemedicine visits for head and neck oncology care. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of data from cross-sectional survey responses collected via prospectively administered questionnaire to 616 adult patients during their clinical visit to a tertiary care head and neck surgical oncology clinic. Responses to questions investigating interest in telemedicine and potential barriers were collated with patient demographics, measures of rurality, and insurance status. Interest in telemedicine appointments was the assessed primary outcome. RESULTS: Of 616 survey respondents, 315 (51 %) indicated interest in telemedicine visits. Limitations in access to technology (17.5 %) and lack of reliable internet connection (13.14 %) were identified as key barriers to telemedicine use. Lack of interest in telemedicine was associated with older age (OR 0.97 [95%CI 0.96-0.98]), governmental insurance (0.43 [0.31-0.60]) and, retired work status (0.48 [0.33-0.69]). Women (1.43 [1.04-1.97]) and patients who reported access to compatible electronic devices (41.05 [14.88-113.20]) and reliable internet connection (20.94 [8.34-52.60]) were more likely to be interested in telemedicine appointments. Respondents also indicated preference for a "hands on" examination over telemedicine appointments. CONCLUSION: Nearly 1 in 2 patients evaluated in a tertiary care head and neck surgical oncology clinic expressed reticence regarding telemedicine for clinical visits. Limited access to technology platforms and unreliable internet remain key concerns for these patients. Understanding the needs and attitudes of specific patient populations may be important for organizations pivoting to telemedicine platforms to ensure equity in healthcare access. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cross-sectional survey.

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans in "Slow Mohs-tion": Multidisciplinary Approach of A Pediatric Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of the Scalp with Slow Mohs Micrographic Surgery and A Double Rotational-Advancement Scalp Flap.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft-tissue sarcoma with primary incidence of 4.1 per million person-years and accounts for 0.1% of all malignancies. In patients under the age of 19, DFSP comprises 6% of cases with an annual incidence of 1 in 1,000,000. It is a slow-growing malignancy with low metastatic potential. However, DFSP is notable for its high rates of local recurrence due to local invasion with its classic "finger-like" projections into normal tissue. We discuss a case of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans on the scalp of a 14-year-old male with delayed diagnosis, which required extensive resection through slow Mohs Micrographic Surgery (sMMS). This resection created a sizeable scalp defect of nearly 100 cm2, which mandated creative reconstruction using a novel double rotational-advancement scalp flap to close the defect while maintaining the patient's hairline for optimal cosmesis.

Assessing Surgical Task Load and Performance: A Comparison of Simulation and Maritime Operation.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the effects of simulated and actual vessel motion at high seas on task load and surgical performance. METHODS: This project was performed in phases. Phase I was a feasibility study. Phase II utilized a motion base simulator to replicate vessel motion. Phase III was conducted aboard the U.S. Naval Ship Brunswick. After performing surgical tasks on a surgical simulation mannequin, participants completed the Surgical Task Load Index (TLX) designed to collect workload data. Simulated surgeries were evaluated by subject matter experts. RESULTS: TLX scores were higher in Phase III than Phase II, particularly at higher sea states. Surgical performance was not significantly different between Phase II (84%) and Phase III (89%). Simulated motions were comparable in both phases. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated motion was not associated with a significant difference in surgical performance or deck motion, suggesting that this simulator replicates the conditions experienced during surgery at sea on the U.S. Naval Ship Brunswick. However, Surgical TLX scores were dramatically different between the two phases, suggesting increased workload at sea, which may be the result of time at sea, the stress of travel, or other factors. Surgical performance was not affected by sea state in either phase.