Transfusion-transmitted and community-acquired babesiosis in New York, 2004 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Babesiosis is a potentially life-threatening zoonotic infection most frequently caused by the intraerythrocytic parasite Babesia microti. The pathogen is usually tickborne, but may also be transfusion or vertically transmitted. Healthy persons, including blood donors, may be asymptomatic and unaware they are infected. Immunocompromised patients are at increased risk for symptomatic disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All reported community-acquired babesiosis cases in New York from 2004 to 2015 were evaluated, enumerated, and characterized. All potential transfusion-transmitted babesiosis (TTB) cases reported through one or more of three public health surveillance systems were investigated to determine the likelihood of transfusion transmission. In addition, host-seeking ticks were actively collected in public parks and other likely sites of human exposure to B. microti. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2015, a total of 3799 cases of babesiosis were found; 55 (1.4%) of these were linked to transfusion. The incidence of both community-acquired babesiosis and TTB increased significantly during the 12-year study period. The geographic range of both ticks and tickborne infections also expanded. Among TTB cases, 95% of recipients had at least one risk factor for symptomatic disease. Implicated donors resided in five states, including in 10 New York counties. More than half of implicated donors resided in counties known to be B. microti endemic. CONCLUSION: The increasing incidence of TTB correlated with increases in community-acquired babesiosis and infection of ticks with B. microti. Surveillance of ticks and community-acquired cases may aid identification of emerging areas at risk for Babesia transfusion transmission.

Transfusion-associated babesiosis in the United States: a description of cases.

BACKGROUND: Babesiosis is a potentially life-threatening disease caused by intraerythrocytic parasites, which usually are tickborne but also are transmissible by transfusion. Tickborne transmission of Babesia microti mainly occurs in 7 states in the Northeast and the upper Midwest of the United States. No Babesia test for screening blood donors has been licensed. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain and summarize data on U.S. transfusion-associated Babesia cases identified since the first described case in 1979. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: Case patients were transfused during 1979-2009 and had posttransfusion Babesia infection diagnosed by 2010, without reported evidence that another transmission route was more likely than transfusion. Implicated donors had laboratory evidence of infection. Potential cases were excluded if all pertinent donors tested negative. MEASUREMENTS: Distributions of ascertained cases according to Babesia species and period and state of transfusion. RESULTS: 159 transfusion-associated B. microti cases were included; donors were implicated for 136 (86%). The case patients' median age was 65 years (range, <1 to 94 years). Most cases were associated with red blood cell components; 4 were linked to whole blood-derived platelets. Cases occurred in all 4 seasons and in 22 (of 31) years, but 77% (122 cases) occurred during 2000-2009. Cases occurred in 19 states, but 87% (138 cases) were in the 7 main B. microti-endemic states. In addition, 3 B. duncani cases were documented in western states. LIMITATION: The extent to which cases were not diagnosed, investigated, reported, or ascertained is unknown. CONCLUSION: Donor-screening strategies that mitigate the risk for transfusion transmission are needed. Babesiosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of unexplained posttransfusion hemolytic anemia or fever, regardless of the season or U.S. region. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Clostridium infections associated with musculoskeletal-tissue allografts.

BACKGROUND: Allografts are commonly used in orthopedic reconstructive surgery. In 2001, approximately 875,000 musculoskeletal allografts were distributed by U.S. tissue banks. After the death from Clostridium sordellii sepsis of a 23-year-old man who had received a contaminated allograft from a tissue bank (Tissue Bank A), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated an investigation, including enhanced case finding, of the methods used for the recovery, processing, and testing of tissue. METHODS: A case of allograft-associated clostridium infection was defined as a culture-proven infection of a surgical site within one year after allograft implantation, from January 1998 to March 2002. We traced tissues to tissue banks that recovered and processed these tissues. We also estimated the rates of and risk ratios for clostridium infections for tissues processed by the implicated tissue bank and reviewed processing and testing methods used by various tissue banks. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified, all of whom had received allografts processed by Tissue Bank A. The rates of clostridium infection were 0.12 percent among patients who received sports-medicine tissues (i.e., tendons, femoral condyles, menisci) from Tissue Bank A and 0.36 percent among those who received femoral condyles in particular. The risk-ratio estimates for clostridium infections from tissues processed by Tissue Bank A, as compared with those from other tissue banks, were infinite (P<0.001) for musculoskeletal allografts, sports-medicine tissues, or tendons. Because Tissue Bank A cultured tissues only after treating them with a nonsporicidal antimicrobial solution, some test results were probably false negatives. Tissues from implicated donors were released despite the isolation of clostridium or bowel flora from other anatomical sites or reports of infections in other recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Clostridium infections were traced to allograft implantation. We provide interim recommendations to enhance tissue-transplantation safety. Tissue banks should validate processes and culture methods. Sterilization methods that do not adversely affect the functioning of transplanted tissue are needed to prevent allograft-related infections.

Factor concentrate usage in persons with hemophilia in New York State.

BACKGROUND: Persons with a congenital deficiency of FVIII or F IX (hemophilia A and hemophilia B, respectively) receive factor concentrate to treat or prevent bleeding. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A population-based study of all persons with hemophilia residing in New York State at any time during 1993 through 1998 was conducted. All available medical records for each patient were reviewed to determine type of therapy. RESULTS: Case finding yielded 1160 cases, for a prevalence of 63.9 per 1 million population in 1998. Recombinant factor concentrates were used by 56 percent of patients. Patients with severe disease used more (158,234 IU/patient) factor concentrate than did patients with moderate disease (46,315 IU) or mild disease (5794 IU). Over half (57%) of all factor concentrate was prescribed for patients with severe disease on prophylactic therapy. Patients undergoing immune tolerance therapy used the most per person-455,116 IU each. Hemophilia treatment centers provided factor concentrate for 62 percent of all patients who used factor and 73 percent of patients with severe disease. CONCLUSION: Hemophilia patients, especially patients with severe disease, use large amounts of expensive factor concentrates to prevent and to treat bleeding episodes. Specialized hemophilia treatment centers play a key role in the care of these patients.

Transfusion-associated babesiosis after heart transplant.

We describe a 54-year-old spleen-intact man with transfusion-associated Babesia microti infection after a heart transplant. Adult respiratory distress syndrome developed in the patient, and he required mechanical ventilation. Our experiences with this patient suggest that babesiosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of transplant patients who have fever and hemolytic anemia.