RESUMO
Being out of HIV care (OOC) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We assessed implementation of Lost & Found, a clinic-based intervention to reengage OOC patients. OOC patients were identified using a nurse-validated, real-time OOC list within the electronic medical records (EMR) system. Nurses called OOC patients. Implementation occurred at the McGill University Health Centre from April 2018 to 2019. Results from questionnaires to nurses showed elevated scores for implementation outcomes throughout, but with lower, more variable scores during pre-implementation to month 3 [e.g., adoption subscales (scale: 1-5): range from pre-implementation to month 3, 3.7-4.9; thereafter, 4.2-4.9]. Qualitative results from focus groups with nurses were consistent with observed quantitative trends. Barriers concerning the EMR and nursing staff shortages explained reductions in fidelity. Strategies for overcoming barriers to implementation were crucial in early months of implementation. Intervention compatibility, information systems support, as well as nurses' team processes, knowledge, and skills facilitated implementation.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Grupos Focais , Pacientes , Instituições de Assistência AmbulatorialRESUMO
Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among short-term sentenced prison populations will require improved access to HCV care and specific strategies dedicated to linkage upon release. Prison-based HCV care has lagged behind HIV care, but much can be learned from HIV studies. We performed a systematic review to identify individual-, provider- and system-level barriers and facilitators to linkage to HCV and HIV care among released inmates. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase, and performed a grey literature search for English articles published up to November 2018. Two searches were conducted, one each for HCV and HIV; 323 and 684 unique articles were identified of which two and 27 studies were included, respectively. Facilitators to linkage to HCV care included social support, having an existing primary care provider, and receipt of methadone, whereas barriers included a perceived lack of healthcare information and a lack of specialized linkage to care programs. The principal facilitators to linkage to HIV care included social support, treatment for substance use and mental illness, the provision of education, case management, discharge planning and transportation assistance. Important barriers were unstable housing, age <30 years, HIV-related stigma, poor providers' attitudes and the lack of post-release reintegration assistance. While HCV care-specific studies are needed, much can be learned from linkage to HIV care studies. Ultimately, a multi-pronged approach, addressing several individual-level social determinants of health, and key provider- and system-level barriers may be an appropriate starting point for the development of HCV linkage to care strategies.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Hepatite C Crônica/terapia , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estigma Social , Apoio SocialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Migrants represent an increasing proportion of people living with HIV in many developed countries. We aimed to describe the HIV care cascade and baseline genotypic resistance for newly diagnosed asylum seekers referred to the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients linked to the MUHC from June 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018. We calculated the median time (days; interquartile range (IQR)) from: 1) entry into Canada to immigration medical examination (IME) (i.e. HIV screening); 2) IME to patient notification of diagnosis; 3) notification to linkage to HIV care (defined as a CD4 or viral load (VL) measure); 4) linkage to HIV care to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) prescription; and 5) cART prescription to viral suppression (defined as a VL < 20 copies/mL). We reviewed baseline genotypes and interpreted mutations using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. We calculated the proportion with full resistance to > 1 antiretroviral. RESULTS: Overall, 43% (60/139) of asylum seekers were newly diagnosed in Canada. Among these, 62% were late presenters (CD4 < 350 cells/µl), 22% presented with advanced HIV (CD4 < 200 cells/µl), and 25% with high-level viremia (VL > 100,000 copies/ml). Median time from entry to IME: 27 days [IQR:13;55]; IME to notification: 28 days [IQR:21;49]; notification to linkage: 6 days [IQR:2;19]; linkage to cART prescription: 11 days [IQR:6;17]; and cART to viral suppression: 42 days [IQR:31;88]; 45% were linked to HIV care within 30 days. One-fifth (21%) had baseline resistance to at least one antiretroviral agent; the K103 N/S mutation was the most common mutation. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of newly diagnosed asylum seekers were late presenters, only 45% were linked to care within 30 days. Once linked, care and viral suppression were rapid. Delays in screening and linkage to care present increased risk for onward transmission, and in the context of 21% baseline resistance, consideration of point-of-care testing and immediate referral at IME screening should be made.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/terapia , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Resistência a Medicamentos/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Negative health outcomes associated with being out of HIV care (OOC) warrant reengagement strategies. We aimed to assess effectiveness of Lost & Found, a clinic-based intervention to identify and reengage OOC patients. METHODS: Developed and delivered using implementation science, Lost & Found consists of two core elements: identification, operationalized through nurse validation of a real-time list of possible OOC patients; and contact, via nurse-led phone calls. It was implemented over a 12-month period (2018-2019) at the Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre (CVIS-MUHC) during a type-II implementation-effectiveness hybrid pilot study. Descriptive outcomes of interest were identification as possibly OOC, OOC confirmation, contact, and successful reengagement. We present results from a pre-post analysis comparing overall reengagement to the year prior, using robust Poisson regression controlled for sex, age, and Canadian birth. Time to reengagement is reported using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Over half (56%; 1312 of 2354) of CVIS-MUHC patients were identified as possibly OOC. Among these, 44% (nâ=â578) were followed elsewhere, 19% (nâ=â249) engaged in care, 3% (nâ=â33) deceased, 2% (nâ=â29) otherwise not followed, and 32% (nâ=â423) OOC. Of OOC patients contacted (85%; 359/423), 250 (70%) reengaged and 40 (11%) had upcoming appointments; the remainder were unreachable, declined care, or missed given appointments. Pre-post results indicate people who received Lost & Found were 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.36] times more likely to reengage, and reengaged a median 55âdays (95% CI 14-98) sooner. CONCLUSION: Lost & Found may be a viable clinic-based reengagement intervention for OOC patients. More robust evaluations are needed.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Canadá , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Modelos de Riscos ProporcionaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: People who use drugs (PWUD) have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to examine changes in illicit opioid use and related factors among incarcerated PWUD in Quebec, Canada, during the pandemic. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conducted an observational, cross-sectional study in three Quebec provincial prisons. Participants completed self-administered questionnaires. The primary outcome, "changes in illicit opioid consumption," was measured using the question "Has your consumption of opioid drugs that were not prescribed to you by a medical professional changed since March 2020?" The association of independent variables and recent changes (past six months) in opioid consumption were examined using mixed-effects Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. Crude and adjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. FINDINGS: A total of 123 participants (median age 37, 76% White) were included from January 19 to September 15, 2021. The majority (72; 59%) reported decreased illicit opioid consumption since March 2020. Individuals over 40 were 11% less likely (95% CI 14-8 vs 18-39) to report a decrease, while those living with others and with a history of opioid overdose were 30% (95% CI 9-55 vs living alone) and 9% (95% CI 0-18 vs not) more likely to report decreased illicit opioid consumption since March 2020, respectively. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The authors identified possible factors associated with changes in illicit opioid consumption among incarcerated PWUD in Quebec. Irrespective of opioid consumption patterns, increased access to opioid agonist therapy and enhanced discharge planning for incarcerated PWUD are recommended to mitigate the harms from opioids and other drugs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Maximizing uptake of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among people in prison is essential in mitigating future outbreaks. We aimed to determine factors associated with willingness to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination before vaccine availability. METHODS: We chose 3 Canadian federal prisons based on their low uptake of influenza vaccines in 2019-2020. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on knowledge, attitude and beliefs toward vaccines. The primary outcome was participant willingness to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, measured using a 5-point Likert scale to the question, "If a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine becomes available in prison, how likely are you to get vaccinated?" We calculated the association of independent variables (age, ethnicity, chronic health conditions, 2019-2020 influenza vaccine uptake and prison security level), identified a priori, with vaccine willingness using logistic regression and crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We recruited 240 participants from Mar. 31 to Apr. 19, 2021 (median age 46 years; 19.2% female, 25.8% Indigenous). Of these, 178 (74.2%) were very willing to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants who received the 2019-2020 influenza vaccine (adjusted OR 5.20, 95% CI 2.43-12.00) had higher odds of vaccine willingness than those who did not; those who self-identified as Indigenous (adjusted OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.60) and in medium- or maximum-security prisons (adjusted OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.12-0.92) had lower odds of vaccine willingness than those who identified as white or those in minimum-security prisons, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Most participants were very willing to receive vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 before vaccine roll-out. Vaccine promotion campaigns should target groups with low vaccine willingness (i.e., those who have declined influenza vaccine, identify as Indigenous or reside in high-security prisons).
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Prisioneiros , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Prisões , Estudos Transversais , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Canadá/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The HIV care cascade is an indicators-framework used to assess achievement of HIV clinical targets including HIV diagnosis, HIV care initiation and retention, initiation of antiretroviral therapy, and attainment of viral suppression for people living with HIV. METHODS: The HIV Care Cascade Research Development Team at the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Clinical Care and Management Core hosted a two-day virtual workshop to present HIV care cascade data collected nationally from local and provincial clinical settings and national cohort studies. The article summarizes the workshop presentations including the indicators used and available findings and presents the discussed challenges and recommendations. RESULTS: Identified challenges included (1) inconsistent HIV care cascade indicator definitions, (2) variability between the use of nested UNAIDS's targets and HIV care cascade indicators, (3) variable analytic approaches based on differing data sources, (4) reporting difficulties in some regions due to a lack of integration across data platforms, (5) lack of robust data on the first stage of the care cascade at the sub-national level, and (6) inability to integrate key socio-demographic data to estimate population-specific care cascade shortfalls. CONCLUSION: There were four recommendations: standardization of HIV care cascade indicators and analyses, additional funding for HIV care cascade data collection, database maintenance and analyses at all levels, qualitative interviews and case studies characterizing the stories behind the care cascade findings, and employing targeted positive-action programs to increase engagement of key populations in each HIV care cascade stage.
HISTORIQUE: La cascade des soins du VIH est un cadre d'indicateurs utilisé pour évaluer l'atteinte des cibles cliniques du VIH, y compris le diagnostic, le début et le maintien des soins, le début du traitement antirétroviral et l'obtention de la suppression virale chez les personnes qui vivent avec le VIH. MÉTHODOLOGIE: L'équipe de développement de la recherche sur la cascade des soins du VIH située au noyau de perfectionnement de la gestion clinique du Réseau canadien pour les essais VIH des IRSC a organisé un atelier virtuel de deux jours pour présenter les données sur la cascade des soins du VIH amassées dans les milieux cliniques locaux et provinciaux et les études de cohorte de tout le pays. L'article résume les présentations d'ateliers, y compris les indicateurs utilisés et les observations disponibles, et présente les défis et recommandations abordés. RÉSULTATS: Les défis mis en évidence incluaient 1) les définitions hétérogènes des indicateurs de la cascade des soins sur le VIH, 2) la variabilité entre l'utilisation des cibles d'ONUSIDA imbriquées et les indicateurs de cascade des soins du VIH, 3) des approches analytiques variables d'après diverses sources de données, 4) la déclaration des difficultés dans certaines régions à cause de l'absence d'intégration entre les plateformes de données, 5) l'absence de données vigoureuses sur la première étape de la cascade des soins infranationaux et 6) l'incapacité d'intégrer les principales données sociodémographiques pour évaluer les écueils de la cascade des soins populationnels. CONCLUSION: Quatre recommandations ont été formulées : la standardisation des indicateurs et des analyses de la cascade des soins du VIH, le financement supplémentaire de la collecte de la cascade des soins du VIH, l'entretien des bases de données et les analyses à tous les échelons, les entrevues qualitatives et les études de cas qui caractérisent les histoires qui se cachent derrière les observations tirées de la cascade des soins et le recours à des programmes d'action positive ciblés pour accroître la participation de populations clés à chaque étape de la cascade des soins du VIH.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: At the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), 10% of patients living with HIV do not return for care annually. Currently, no formal system exists to re-engage out-of-care (OOC) patients. Lost & Found, developed using an implementation science approach, is an intervention to re-engage OOC patients. It is based on existing evidence-based interventions and will be adapted for use by nurses at the MUHC. The aims of this study are to simultaneously assess both implementation and effectiveness of Lost & Found in order to determine the viability of a future multisite stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. METHODS: Lost & Found consists of two core elements: identifying and contacting OOC patients. Based on formative work involving MUHC nurses, and the use of a combined implementation framework (enhanced Replicating Effective Programs, Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases, and Proctor et al.'s implementation outcomes), we will adapt the intervention to our clinic. Adaptations include the creation of an OOC risk prediction tool, an automated real-time OOC list, and prioritization of high-risk OOC patients for re-engagement. Delivery and ongoing adaptation of the intervention will follow a three-pronged implementation strategy consisting of (1) promoting adaptability; (2) planning, engaging, executing, evaluating, and reflecting cycles; and (3) internal facilitation. This 15-month quasi-experimental pilot study adopts a type II implementation-effectiveness hybrid design. To evaluate implementation, a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach will guide the mixing of qualitative and quantitative data at time points throughout the study. In addition, descriptive and pre-post analyses, for each of the implementation and sustainability phases, will inform evaluations of the cumulative effectiveness and sustainability of the Lost & Found intervention. DISCUSSION: This study will provide preliminary evidence for (1) the utility of our chosen implementation strategies and (2) the effectiveness of the intervention. Ultimately, this information may be used to inform future re-engagement efforts using implementation science in other HIV care centres. In addition, the procedures and measurement tools developed for this study will be foundational to the development of a multi-site, randomised stepped wedge study that would provide more robust evidence in support of the Lost & Found intervention.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While the burden of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is significantly higher among people in prisons compared to the general population, testing and treatment uptake remain suboptimal. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to increase HCV testing, linkage to care and treatment uptake among people in prisons. METHODS: We searched Medline (Ovid 1996-present), Embase (Ovid 1996-present), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English language articles published between January 2007 and November 2017. Studies evaluating interventions to enhance HCV testing, linkage to care and treatment uptake for people in prison were included. Two independent reviewers evaluated articles selected for full-text review. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 475 unique articles were identified, 29 were eligible for full text review, and six studies were included. All but one study was conducted in the pre-direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era; no studies were conducted in low- or middle-income countries. Of the six studies, all but one focused on testing. Only two were randomised controlled trials; the remaining were single arm studies. Interventions to enhance HCV testing in prison settings included combination risk-based and birth-cohort screening strategies, on-site nurse-led opt-in screening clinics with pre-test counselling and education, and systematic dried blood spot testing. All interventions increased HCV testing, but risk of study bias was high in all studies. Interventions to enhance linkage to care included facilitated referral for HCV assessment and scheduling of specialist appointments; however, risk of study bias was critical. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of recent data on interventions to improve the HCV care cascade in people in prisons. With the introduction of short-course, well-tolerated DAAs, rigorous controlled studies evaluating interventions to improve testing, linkage and treatment uptake for people in prison are necessary.
Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Hepatite C Crônica/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Prisioneiros/psicologia , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been appraised. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of all digital innovations for all HIV/STIs. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All settings/all participants. INTERVENTION: We classified digital innovations into (1) mobile health-based (mHealth: SMS (short message service)/phone calls), (2) internet-based mobile and/or electronic health (mHealth/eHealth: social media, avatar-guided computer programs, websites, mobile applications, streamed soap opera videos) and (3) combined innovations (included both SMS/phone calls and internet-based mHealth/eHealth). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, acceptability, impact. METHODS: We searched databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science, abstracted data, explored heterogeneity, performed a random effects subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed 99 studies, 63 (64%) were from America/Europe, 36 (36%) from Africa/Asia; 79% (79/99) were clinical trials; 84% (83/99) evaluated impact. Of innovations, mHealth based: 70% (69/99); internet based: 21% (21/99); combined: 9% (9/99).All digital innovations were highly accepted (26/31; 84%), and feasible (20/31; 65%). Regarding impacted measures, mHealth-based innovations (SMS) significantly improved antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (pooled OR=2.15(95%CI: 1.18 to 3.91)) and clinic attendance rates (pooled OR=1.76(95%CI: 1.28, 2.42)); internet-based innovations improved clinic attendance (6/6), ART adherence (4/4), self-care (1/1), while reducing risk (5/5); combined innovations increased clinic attendance, ART adherence, partner notifications and self-care. Confounding (68%) and selection bias (66%) were observed in observational studies and attrition bias in 31% of clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Digital innovations were acceptable, feasible and generated impact. A trend towards the use of internet-based and combined (internet and mobile) innovations was noted. Large scale-up studies of high quality, with new integrated impact metrics, and cost-effectiveness are needed. Findings will appeal to all stakeholders in the HIV/STI global initiatives space.