Role of islet amyloid in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common metabolic diseases worldwide and its prevalence is rapidly increasing. Due to its chronic nature (diabetes mellitus can be treated but as yet not cured) and its serious complications, it is one of the most expensive diseases with regard to total health care costs per patient. The elevated blood glucose levels in diabetes mellitus are caused by a defect in production and/or secretion of the polypeptide hormone insulin, which normally promotes glucose-uptake in cells. Insulin is produced by the pancreatic 'beta-cells' in the 'islets of Langerhans', which lie distributed within the exocrine pancreatic tissue. In type 2 diabetes mellitus, the initial defect in the pathogenesis of the disease in most of the patients is believed to be 'insulin resistance'. Hyperglycemia (clinically overt diabetes mellitus) will not develop as long as the body is able to produce enough insulin to compensate for the reduced insulin action. When this compensation fails ('beta-cell failure') blood glucose levels will become too high. In this review, we discuss one of the mechanisms that have been implicated in the development of beta-cell failure, i.e. amyloid formation in the pancreatic islets. This islet amyloid is a characteristic histopathological feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus and both in vitro and in vivo studies have revealed that its formation causes death of islet beta-cells. Being a common pathogenic factor in an otherwise heterogeneous disease, islet amyloidosis is an attractive novel target for therapeutic intervention in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Bone marrow dosimetry and safety of high 131I activities given after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to treat metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer.

UNLABELLED: Recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) recently was introduced as a radioiodine administration adjunct that avoids levothyroxine (LT-4) withdrawal and resultant hypothyroidism. The pharmacokinetics of 131I after rhTSH administration are known to differ from those after LT-4 withdrawal but are largely nondelineated in the radioiodine therapy setting. We therefore sought to calculate the red marrow absorbed dose of high therapeutic activities of 131I given after rhTSH administration to patients with metastatic or inoperable locally recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer. We also sought to evaluate the clinical and laboratory effects of this therapy on the bone marrow. METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients received in total 17 131I treatments (7.4 GBq). Blood and urine samples were obtained at fixed intervals, and their activities were measured in a well counter. Based on blood activity, renal clearance of the activity, and residence times in red marrow and the remainder of the body, the red marrow absorbed dose was calculated using the MIRD schema. Additionally, we monitored for potential hematologic toxicity and compared platelet counts before and 3 mo after treatment. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD absorbed dose per unit of administered (131)I in the red marrow was 0.16 +/- 0.07 mGy/MBq. The corresponding total red marrow absorbed dose was 1.15 +/- 0.52 Gy (range, 0.28-1.91 Gy). In none of the patients was hematologic toxicity observed. The mean +/- SD platelet count (n = 13 treatments) was 243 +/- 62 x 10(9)/L before treatment and 233 +/- 87 x 10(9)/L 3 mo later, a slight and statistically insignificant decrease. After rhTSH-aided administration of high activities of 131I, the bone marrow absorbed dose remained under 2 Gy, the level long considered the safety threshold for all radioiodine therapy. CONCLUSION: Our specific findings imply that when clinically warranted, rhTSH should allow an increase in the therapeutic radioiodine activity. Such an increase might improve efficacy while preserving safety and tolerability; this possibility should be assessed in further studies.

Role of islet amyloid in type 2 diabetes mellitus: consequence or cause?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is characterized metabolically by defects in both insulin secretion and insulin action, resulting in hyperglycemia. Histopathologically, DM2 is characterized by depositions of protein in the pancreatic islets. This 'islet amyloid' is present in >90% of patients with DM2, as well as in monkeys and cats with DM2. The pathogenesis of DM2 is heterogeneous and multifactorial, although insulin resistance seems to be the predominant initiating factor for development of the disease. In the longer term, an insulin secretion defect is also revealed (referred to as 'beta-cell failure'), resulting in clinically manifest diabetes. Recent data, particularly from transgenic mouse studies, indicate that islet amyloidosis is a diabetogenic factor, which is both consequence (of insulin resistance) and cause (of beta-cell failure) of DM2. Available transgenic mouse models with islet amyloid formation in vivo will provide the opportunity to assess the effectiveness of novel anti-amyloidogenic therapies, for which promising results are emerging.

The glucagonoma syndrome and necrolytic migratory erythema: a clinical review.

The glucagonoma syndrome is a rare disease in which a typical skin disorder, necrolytic migratory erythema, is often one of the first presenting symptoms. Weight loss and diabetes mellitus are two other prevalent characteristics of this syndrome. Necrolytic migratory erythema belongs to the recently recognized family of deficiency dermatoses of which zinc deficiency, necrolytic acral erythema and pellagra are also members. It is typically characterized on skin biopsies by necrolysis of the upper epidermis with vacuolated keratinocytes. In persistent hyperglucagonemia, excessive stimulation of basic metabolic pathways results in diabetes mellitus at the expense of tissue glycogen stores, and muscle and fat mass. Multiple (essential) nutrient and vitamin B deficiencies develop, which contribute to the dermatosis. In addition, glucagonomas may produce various other products, like pancreatic polypeptide, that add to the catabolic effects of glucagon.

Tumour dosimetry and response in patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer using recombinant human thyrotropin before radioiodine therapy.

The development of recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) has given clinicians new options for diagnostic follow-up and treatment of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). This paper evaluates the tumour dosimetry and response following -iodine-131 treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer patients after rhTSH stimulation instead of classical hormone withdrawal-induced hypothyroidism. Nineteen consecutive (131)I treatments in 16 patients were performed after rhTSH stimulation. All patients had undergone a near-total thyroidectomy followed by an ablative dosage of (131)I. They all suffered from metastatic or recurrent disease showing tumoral (131)I uptake on previous post-treatment scintigraphy. Dosimetric calculations were performed using (131)I tumour uptake measurements from post-treatment (131)I scintigrams and tumour volume estimations from radiological images. Response was assessed by comparing pre-treatment serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level with the Tg level 3 months post treatment. In 18 out of 19 treatments, uptake of (131)I in metastatic or recurrent lesions was seen. The median tumour radiation dose was 26.3 Gy (range 1.3-368 Gy), and the median effective half-life was 2.7 days (range 0.5-6.5 days). Eleven of 19 treatments (10/16 patients) were evaluable for response after 3 months. (131)I therapy with rhTSH resulted in a biochemical partial response in 3/11 or 27% of treatments (two patients), biochemical stable disease in 2/11 or 18% of treatments and biochemical progressive disease in 6/11 or 55% of treatments. Our study showed that although tumour doses in DTC patients treated with (131)I after rhTSH were highly variable, 45% of treatments led to disease stabilisation or partial remission when using rhTSH in conjunction with (131)I therapy, without serious side-effects and with minimal impact on quality of life. RhTSH is therefore adequately satisfactory as an adjuvant tool in therapeutic settings and is especially suitable in advanced recurrent or metastatic DTC patients who may be intolerant to TSH stimulation by levothyroxine withdrawal.