Impact of pregnancy on the natural history of women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Whether pregnancy is a modifier of the long-term course and outcome of women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is unknown. We assessed the association of pregnancy with long-term outcomes in HCM women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective evaluation of women with HCM from 1970 to 2021. Only women with pregnancy-related information (pregnancy present or absent) and a follow-up period lasting ≥1 year were included. The peri-partum period was defined as -1 to 6 months after delivery. The primary endpoint was a composite for major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE: cardiovascular death, sudden cardiac death, appropriate defibrillator shock and heart failure (HF) progression]. Overall, 379 (58%) women were included. There were 432 pregnancies in 242 (63%) patients. In 29 (7.6%) cases, pregnancies (n = 39) occurred after HCM diagnosis. Among these, three carrying likely pathogenic sarcomeric variants suffered MACEs in the peri-partum period. At 10 ± 9 years of follow-up, age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.018-1.050, P < 0.001] and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (II vs. I: HR 1.944, 95% CI 0.896-4.218; III vs. I: HR 5.291, 95% CI 2.392-11.705, P < 0.001) were associated with MACE. Conversely, pregnancy was associated with reduced risk (HR 0.605; 95% CI 0.380-0.963, P = 0.034). Among women with pregnancy, multiple occurrences did not modify risk. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy is not a modifier of long-term outcome in women with HCM and mostly occurs before a cardiac diagnosis. Most patients tolerate pregnancy well and do not show a survival disadvantage compared to women without. Pregnancy should not be discouraged, except in the presence of severe HF symptoms or high-risk features.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic disorder of the myocardium and is characterized by important gender-related differences: women are typically 5 years older than men at diagnosis, over half are diagnosed >50 years of age and consistently show greater propensity than men for heart failure (HF)-related complications and adverse outcome. Whether pregnancy is a modifier of the long-term course and outcome of women with HCM is unknown. In this study, pregnancy was not a modifier of long-term outcome in women with HCM. In particular: At 10 ± 7 years, most patients tolerated pregnancy well and did not show a survival disadvantage compared to women without pregnancies. Only baseline heart failure symptoms and age were associated with adverse outcome.Pregnancy should not be discouraged, except in the presence of severe HF symptoms or high-risk features. Nevertheless, cardio-obstetric counselling and close supervision are key in all instances, particularly in the peri-partum period.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of meropenem and imipenem in critically ill patients with sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of imipenem and meropenem in a population of critically ill patients with sepsis to find possible differences that may help in selecting the most appropriate drug and/or dosage in order to optimise empiric antimicrobial therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomised, nonblind study of the pharmacokinetics of both intravenous imipenem 1g and meropenem 1g in 20 patients admitted to an intensive care unit with sepsis in whom antimicrobial therapy was indicated on clinical grounds. Patients were divided into two groups: group I received intravenous imipenem 1g plus cilastatin 1g, and group II received intravenous meropenem 1g over 30 minutes. Peripheral blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5 (end of infusion), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours after the first dose and were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4 masculineC. Urine samples were collected during the 8 hours after antimicrobial administration at 2-hour intervals: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8 hours. The total volume of urine was recorded; the serum and urine samples were immediately frozen and stored at -80 masculineC until assayed. Pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out through computerised programs using the least-square regression method and a two-compartment open model. Statistical differences were evaluated by means of one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The following pharmacokinetic differences between the two drugs were observed: the imipenem mean peak serum concentration was significantly higher than for meropenem (90.1 +/- 50.9 vs 46.6 +/- 14.6 mg/L, p < 0.01); the area under the serum concentration-time curve was significantly higher for imipenem than for meropenem (216.5 +/- 86.3 vs 99.5 +/- 23.9 mg . h/L, p < 0.01), while the mean volume of distribution and mean total clearance were significantly higher for meropenem than for imipenem (25 +/- 4.1 vs 17.4 +/- 4.5L, p < 0.01 and 191 +/- 52.2 vs 116.4 +/- 42.3 mL/min, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: The more favourable pharmacokinetic profile of imipenem compared with meropenem in critically ill patients with sepsis might balance the possibly greater potency demonstrated in vitro for meropenem against Gram-negative strains. Hence, the clinical efficacy of the two carbapenems depends mostly on their correct dosage.

Circulating levels of FAS/APO-1 in patients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Resolution of inflammation/infection involves removal of neutrophils and other inflammatory cells by the induction of apoptosis. Fas/Apo-1 is a widely occurring apoptotic signal receptor molecule expressed by almost any type of cell, which is also released in a soluble circulating form. In this study we investigated the role of circulating Fas/Apo-1 in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We evaluated 57 critically ill patients, 34 with infectious SIRS (sepsis and septic shock), and 23 patients with noninfectious SIRS. Circulating Fas/Apo-1 was determined by a commercially available immunoassay. Our results clearly show that levels of Fas/Apo-1 were significantly elevated in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS (10.4 +/- 8.1 pg/mL, controls: 5.0 +/- 0.7 pg/mL; p < 0.0001). In addition, Fas/Apo-1 levels were not able in predicting in predicting poor outcome of patients with SIRS. In conclusion, these results show that increased levels of Fas/Apo-1 from patients with SIRS is a mechanism which contribute to inflammatory response through accumulation of neutrophils at sites of inflammation/infection.

Circulating levels of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a key regulator cytokine that modulates the proliferation and maturation of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear progenitors. This study was designed to investigate and clarify the role of GM-CSF in 52 critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). METHODS: Serum levels of GM-CSF were detected by an immunoenzyme assay. RESULTS: Our results clearly show that the serum concentrations of GM-CSF were significantly elevated in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS (33.2+/-45.7pg/ml, controls: 17.2+/-9.8pg/ml; p=0.0303). In addition, GM-CSF levels significantly decreased in patients with SIRS, particularly in patients with infectious SIRS, 5 and 7 days later. There was a clear tendency toward higher levels of GM-CSF in patients with poor, as compared with those having a good outcome of the disease. CONCLUSION: These results show that GM-CSF may play an important role in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS, and that GM-CSF levels progressively and significantly decrease in patients with infectious SIRS.