Desempeño de las ecuaciones para estimar la tasa de filtración glomerular en pacientes mexicanos receptores de trasplante renal.

INTRODUCTION: The management of kidney transplant recipients requires glomerular filtration rate (GFR) monitoring, which is an indicator of graft primary function and patient survival. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of different creatinine or cystatin-based formulas in the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in Mexican patients receiving kidney transplantation. METHOD: 30 transplant recipients were included, in whom the glomerular filtration rate was measured by means of iothalamate, and was also calculated using seven equations based on cystatin or creatinine. RESULTS: The formula with the best performance was the one proposed by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), with a bias of -2.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 and an accuracy of 9.6; 96.7 % of patients were within 30 % of the measured GFR. The second best formula was the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. Cystatin-based equations showed a poor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that, in Mexican patients receiving kidney transplantations, the best equations to estimate GFR are the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El manejo de los pacientes receptores de trasplante renal requiere vigilancia de la tasa de filtrado glomerular (TFG), la cual es un indicador de la función primaria del injerto y de la supervivencia del paciente. OBJETIVO: Evaluar el rendimiento en la estimación de la función renal de diferentes fórmulas basadas en creatinina o cistatina en pacientes mexicanos receptores de trasplante renal. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 30 pacientes receptores de trasplante renal en quienes se midió tasa de filtrado glomerular por iodotalamato, la cual también se calculó por siete ecuaciones basadas en cistatina o creatinina. RESULTADOS: La fórmula con mejor desempeño fue la propuesta por CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration), con un sesgo de −2.4 mL/minuto/1.73 m2 y precisión de 9.6; 96.7 % estaba dentro de 30 % de la tasa de filtrado glomerular medida. La segunda mejor ecuación fue la MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease). Las ecuaciones basadas en cistatina mostraron pobre desempeño. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestro estudio sugiere que en pacientes mexicanos receptores de trasplante renal las mejores ecuaciones para estimar la TFG son CKD y MDRD.

Renal function assessment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Few studies have evaluated the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Even though the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) suggests using the equations to estimate GFR, rheumatologists continue using creatinine clearance (CCl). The main objective of our study was the assessment of different equations to estimate GFR in patients with SLE: Simplified MDRD study equation (sMDRD), CCl, Cockcroft Gault (CG), CG calculated with ideal weight (CGi), Mayo Clinic Quadratic (MCQ), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation (CKD-EPI). CKD-EPI was considered as the reference standard, and it was compared with the other equations to evaluate bias, correlation (r), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), percentage of measurement of GFR between 70-130% of GFR measured through CKD-EPI (P30) and to compute the ROC curves. Adequacy of the 24-h urine collection was evaluated. To classify patients into GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the best sensitivity and NVP were obtained with sMDRD: the best PPV and specificity with MCQ. P30 was 99.3% with sMDRD, 77.5% CCl, 91.7% CG, 96.7% CGi, and 77.2% with MCQ. The lowest bias was for sMDRD and the highest for CCl. Only 159 (52.6%) urine collections were considered adequate, and when these patients were re-evaluated, the statistical results improved for CCl. CGi was better in general than CG. CCl should not be considered as an adequate GFR estimation. Ideal weight is better than real weight to calculate GFR through CG in patients with SLE.

Highly suggestive preliminary evidence that the renal interstitium contracts in vivo.

To learn more about controlling renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure (RIHP), we assessed its response to renal medullary direct interstitial volume expansion (rmDIVE = 100 µL bolus infusion/30 sec). Three experimental series (S) were performed in hydropenic, anesthetized, right-nephrectomized, acute left renal-denervated and renal perfusion pressure-controlled rats randomly assigned to groups in each S. S1: Rats without hormonal clamp were contrasted before and after rmDIVE induced via 0.9% saline solution bolus (SS group) or 2% albumin in SS bolus (2% ALB + SS group). Subcapsular ΔRIHP rose slowly, progressively and similarly in both groups by ~3 mmHg. S2: Rats under hormonal clamp were contrasted before and after sham rmDIVE (time CTR group) and real rmDIVE induced via either SS bolus (SS group) or SS bolus containing the subcutaneous tissue fibroblast relaxant dibutyryl-cAMP (SS + db-cAMP group). ΔRIHP showed time, group, and time*group interaction effects with a biphasic response (early: ~1 mmHg; late: ~4 mmHg) in the SS group that was absent in the SS + db-cAMP group. S3: Two groups of rats (SS and SS + db-cAMP) under hormonal clamp were contrasted as in S2, producing similar ΔRIHP results to those of S2 but showing a slow, progressive, and indistinct decrease in renal outer medullary blood flow in both groups. These results provide highly suggestive preliminary evidence that the renal interstitium is capable of contracting reactively in vivo in response to rmDIVE with SS and demonstrate that such a response is abolished when db-cAMP is interstitially and concomitantly infused.

Performance of the equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate in Mexican patients receiving kidney transplantation / Desempeño de las ecuaciones para estimar la tasa de filtración glomerular en pacientes mexicanos receptores de trasplante renal

Abstract Introduction: The management of kidney transplant recipients requires glomerular filtration rate (GFR) monitoring, which is an indicator of graft primary function and patient survival. Objective: To evaluate the performance of different creatinine or cystatin-based formulas in the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in Mexican patients receiving kidney transplantation. Method: 30 transplant recipients were included, in whom the glomerular filtration rate was measured by means of iothalamate, and was also calculated using seven equations based on cystatin or creatinine. Results: The formula with the best performance was the one proposed by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), with a bias of −2.4 mL/min/1.73 m2: and an accuracy of 9.6; 96.7 % of patients were within 30 % of the measured GFR. The second best formula was the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. Cystatin-based equations showed a poor performance. Conclusions: Our study suggests that, in Mexican patients receiving kidney transplantations, the best equations to estimate GFR are the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations.

CKD-EPI is the most reliable equation to estimate renal function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: No study has determined the best equation for estimating renal function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), starting from a gold standard test. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of cistatin/creatinine based equations for estimating renal function in patients with SLE. METHODS: We conducted two phases: the first phase included 14 patients in which iothalamate clearance was used to determine the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and compared with different equations based on cystatin C and/or creatinine. In the second phase, we used the best equation (a cystatin and creatinine-based equation) as "reference standard" to compare 5 creatinine-based equations in 55 patients with SLE. RESULTS: In the first phase the equation developed by Stevens and colleagues (based on creatinine and cystatin C), was the best equation. In phase 2, the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation was the best equation with bias of -2. 1 ml/min/1.73, accuracy (P30) of 94.5% and precision (interquartile range of differences) of -2.1 ml/min/1.73. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CKD-EPI is the best creatinine-based equation to estimate GFR in patients with SLE.