A Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab Followed by Evaluation for Resection in Patients With Metastatic KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Only.

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for potentially curative resection may become resectable with more aggressive chemotherapy regimens. In this nonrandomized trial, we evaluated folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor panitumumab as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC with liver-only metastasis. METHODS: Patients received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, 3,200 mg/m(2), 48-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion; leucovorin, 200 mg/m(2) i.v.; irinotecan, 125 mg/m(2); oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m(2) i.v.) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg i.v.) on day 1 of 14-day cycles. Patients were restaged and evaluated for surgery every four cycles. Planned enrollment was originally 49 patients. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (median age: 55 years; 87% male) received a median 6 cycles of treatment (range: 1-33 cycles); 10 patients (67%) were surgical candidates at baseline. Twelve patients were evaluable for clinical response; 9 (60%) achieved partial response. Ten patients underwent surgery; all were complete resections and pathologic partial response. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea (33%) and rash (20%). Enrollment was halted because of emerging data on expanded KRAS/NRAS mutations beyond the region we initially examined, and the potential for negative interaction with oxaliplatin-based therapy. Eight patients underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis outside exon 2; no additional mutations were found. CONCLUSION: KRAS/NRAS mutations outside the region tested in this study were recently shown to be associated with inferior survival on similar treatment regimens. Therefore, this trial was stopped early. This regimen remains a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC in the KRAS/NRAS wild-type population. Enrollment criteria on future studies should include testing for the newly identified mutations.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant weekly nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, with bevacizumab and trastuzumab, as treatment for women with locally advanced HER2+ breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab is standard care for women with locally advanced, HER2-positive (HER2(+)) breast cancer. HER2 has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor upregulation. We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with trastuzumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for women with locally advanced HER2(+) breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight women with locally advanced HER2(+) breast cancer received nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) intravenously [I.V.] days 1,8, and 15) and carboplatin (AUC = 6 I.V. day 1) every 28 days × 6 cycles. Concurrent with chemotherapy, trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg I.V.) were administered weekly × 23 weeks. Patients then underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery; pathologic responses were assessed. After surgery, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg were administered every 3 weeks (54 weeks total); locoregional radiotherapy and/or antiestrogen therapy was administered per standard guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (90%) completed neoadjuvant therapy, with objective responses in 86%. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was confirmed in 14 of the 26 patients (54%) who had surgery. However, bevacizumab-related complications were common postoperatively and during adjuvant trastuzumab/bevacizumab therapy. Ten patients had wound-healing delays or infections (6 patients discontinued therapy); 4 patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreases (1 patient discontinued therapy). Other severe treatment-related toxicity was uncommon. Only 9 patients (31%) completed all protocol therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab was feasible in most patients, producing a pCR rate comparable to that in chemotherapy/trastuzumab combinations. In contrast, prolonged bevacizumab/trastuzumab therapy after surgical treatment was not well tolerated, primarily due to bevacizumab-related toxicity. The role of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy remains undefined.