Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.

BACKGROUND: Miscommunications are a leading cause of serious medical errors. Data from multicenter studies assessing programs designed to improve handoff of information about patient care are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective intervention study of a resident handoff-improvement program in nine hospitals, measuring rates of medical errors, preventable adverse events, and miscommunications, as well as resident workflow. The intervention included a mnemonic to standardize oral and written handoffs, handoff and communication training, a faculty development and observation program, and a sustainability campaign. Error rates were measured through active surveillance. Handoffs were assessed by means of evaluation of printed handoff documents and audio recordings. Workflow was assessed through time-motion observations. The primary outcome had two components: medical errors and preventable adverse events. RESULTS: In 10,740 patient admissions, the medical-error rate decreased by 23% from the preintervention period to the postintervention period (24.5 vs. 18.8 per 100 admissions, P<0.001), and the rate of preventable adverse events decreased by 30% (4.7 vs. 3.3 events per 100 admissions, P<0.001). The rate of nonpreventable adverse events did not change significantly (3.0 and 2.8 events per 100 admissions, P=0.79). Site-level analyses showed significant error reductions at six of nine sites. Across sites, significant increases were observed in the inclusion of all prespecified key elements in written documents and oral communication during handoff (nine written and five oral elements; P<0.001 for all 14 comparisons). There were no significant changes from the preintervention period to the postintervention period in the duration of oral handoffs (2.4 and 2.5 minutes per patient, respectively; P=0.55) or in resident workflow, including patient-family contact and computer time. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the handoff program was associated with reductions in medical errors and in preventable adverse events and with improvements in communication, without a negative effect on workflow. (Funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and others.).

Do Standardized Patients Have Concerns About Students Not Captured by Traditional Assessment Forms?

Construct: Traditionally, standardized patients (SPs) assess students' clinical skills principally through numerical rating forms-an approach that may not fully capture SPs' concerns. SPs are students' closest approximation to real patients. To maximally benefit students' clinical training and evaluation it is important to find ways to give voice to the totality of SPs' perspectives. BACKGROUND: SPs have been shown to be a reliable and valid means to assess medical students' clinical skills in clinical skills examinations. We noticed, however, that SPs often express "off the record" concerns about students, which they do not include on traditional assessment forms. APPROACH: To explore these "off the record" concerns, we designed a Concerns item and added it to the traditional assessment form for an end-of-3rd-year clinical skills examination shared by three medical schools. We asked SPs to use this Concerns item to identify students about whom they had any "gut-level" concerns and provided them with a narrative opportunity to explain why. SPs were informed that the purpose of the item was to help students with difficulties and was not part of the student's grade. RESULTS: We analyzed the concerns data using quantitative and qualitative methods. Of 551 students at three schools, 223 (∼40%) had concerns recorded. Seventy students received two or more concerns. Qualitative analysis of SPs' comments revealed 3 major categories of concern: communication and interpersonal skills, history taking, and physical exam. Grouped under each were several subcategories. More than half of the written comments from the SPs related to the communication/interpersonal skills category and included subcategories commonly addressed in communications courses: lack of empathy, good listening skills, and lack of connection to the patient. They also included subcategories that in our experience are less commonly addressed: odd or off-putting mannerisms, lack of confidence, unprofessional behavior, domineering behavior, and biased behavior. Another 47% of concerns identified deficiencies in history taking and physical examination. Of the students with concerns noted by two or more SPs, SPs' narrative comments on 84%, 42%, and 48% of the students in the domains of communications, history, and physical exam respectively indicated potential problems not identified by scores on the traditional assessment form. CONCLUSION: The Concerns item is a narrative assessment method that may add value to traditional quantitative scoring by identifying and characterizing problematic student performance not captured by the traditional assessment form. It may thus contribute to giving fuller voice to the totality of SPs' perspective.

Retention of pediatric resuscitation performance after a simulation-based mastery learning session: a multicenter randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Using simulation-based mastery learning, residents can be trained to achieve a predefined performance standard in resuscitation. After mastery is achieved, performance degradation occurs over time. Prior investigations have shown performance retention of 12-14 months following intensive simulation-based mastery learning sessions. We sought to investigate the duration of mastery-level resuscitation performance retention after a single 1- to 2-hour simulation-based mastery learning session. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective trial. SETTING: Medical simulation laboratory. SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 42 pediatric residents. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline resuscitation performance was determined on four standardized simulation scenarios. After determination of baseline performance, each resident repeated each scenario, as needed, until mastery-level performance was achieved. Residents were then randomized and retested 2, 4, or 6 months later. Statistical analysis on scores at baseline and retesting were used to determine performances changes from baseline and performance retention over time. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-two residents participated in the study (12 in 2 mo group, 14 in 4 mo group, and 16 in 6 mo group). At baseline, postgraduate year-3 residents performed better than postgraduate year-1 residents (p = 0.003). Overall performance on each of the four scenarios improved at retesting. The percent of residents maintaining mastery-level performance showed a significant linear decline (p = 0.039), with a drop at each retesting interval; 92% retained mastery at 2 months, 71% at 4 months, and 56% at 6 months. There was no difference in retention between postgraduate year-1, postgraduate year-2, and postgraduate year-3 residents (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Residents displayed significant improvements in resuscitation performance after a single simulation-based mastery learning session, but performance declined over time, with less than 60% retaining mastery-level performance at 6 months. Our results suggest that relatively frequent refresher training is needed after a single simulation-based mastery learning session. Additional research is needed to determine the duration of performance retention following any specific simulation-based mastery learning intervention.

A Review of Verbal and Written Patient Handoffs Applicable to the U.S. Military's Expeditionary Care System.

INTRODUCTION: Long considered a danger point in patient care, handoffs and patient care transitions contribute to medical errors and adverse events. Without standardization of patient handoffs, communication breakdowns arise and critical patient information is lost. Minimal training and informal learning have led to a lack of understanding the process involved in this vital aspect of patient care. In 2017, the U.S. Army commissioned a report to study the process of patient handoffs and identify training gaps. Our report summarizes that process and makes recommendations for implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scoping literature review of 139 articles published between 1999 and 2017 using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Medline databases. Verbal tools for handoffs were evaluated against 12 criteria including patient ID, history, current situation, contingency planning, ability to ask questions, ownership, and read back. Written tools were evaluated against a matrix of 126 casualty/treatment attributes. RESULTS: Among verbal communication protocols, the highest scoring handoff mnemonics were HAND ME AN ISOBAR, IPASS the BATON, and I-SBARQ. Among written handoff tools, the highest scoring documents were the Special Operations Forces (SOF) Mechanism, Injuries, Signs, and Treatment (MIST) Casualty Treatment Card and the Department of Defense (DD) Form 1380 Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Card. Four critical process elements for patient handoffs and transfers were identified: (1) interactive communications, (2) limited interruptions, (3) a process for verification, and (4) an opportunity to review any relevant historical data. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review highlight the need for standardized tools and techniques for patient handoffs in the U.S. Military's expeditionary care system. Future research is needed to trial verbal and nonverbal handoffs under field conditions to gather observational data to assess effectiveness. The results of our gap analyses may provide researchers insight for determining which handoffs to study. If standardized handoffs are utilized, training programs should incorporate the four critical elements into their curricula.

Using an Innovative Model to Improve Performance of the Infant Hip Examination.

OBJECTIVES: Determine if a new teaching bundle targeting developmental dysplasia of the hip screening improved interns' examination skills across multiple pediatric residency programs. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included interns across 6 pediatric residency sites within the Academic Pediatric Association's Better Outcomes through Research for Newborns Network in 2022. Participants underwent a baseline hip examination assessment on models using a checklist derived from textbook descriptions of Galeazzi, Ortolani, and Barlow maneuvers before receiving a teaching bundle. Repeat testing occurred after instruction. Data were analyzed using t-test for continuous and χ2 test for categorical variables. Semistructured focus groups provided qualitative feedback regarding the teaching bundle. RESULTS: We enrolled 117 of 155 interns across 6 sites (76%) for participation in the teaching bundle. Only 2% of participants (n = 2) identified a positive Galeazzi sign at baseline, whereas 88% (n = 103, P < .001) did so on the postinstructional assessment. Although 27% of participants (n = 32) correctly identified a positive Barlow sign at baseline, 69% (n = 81, P < .001) did so on the postinstructional assessment. The ability to correctly detect a positive Ortolani sign increased from 22% (n = 26) to 92% (n = 108, P < .001). Fifteen interns participated in the semistructured focus groups, with resultant themes reinforcing the limited experience of the infant hip examination before this intervention and the positive impact of the teaching bundle. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants in this study did not have strong infant hip examination skills at entry into residency. A standardized teaching bundle significantly improved skills in examination technique and identifying abnormalities.

Retention of En Route Cricothyroidotomy Skills in Novice Providers Following a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Curriculum.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical cricothyroidotomy (SC) is a vital skill that combat first responders must master as airway obstruction is the third most preventable cause of death on the battlefield. Degradation of skills over time is a known problem, and there is inadequate knowledge regarding the rate of SC skill retention. Our prior study showed that simulation-based mastery learning was effective in training 89 novices how to reliably perform an en route SC to mastery performance standards. This study aims to assess the durability of this skill by bringing participants back in 3 separate cohorts at 6, 12, or 24 months following the initial training to perform SC in the same test environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized prospective trial. Random cohorts of equal subjects who previously underwent SC simulation-based mastery learning training were selected to return at 6, 12, and 24 months to retest in the same en route medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) helicopter scenario. A total of 22, 14, and 10 subjects returned at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, due to Coronavirus-19 impacts and travel limitations. Participants in the 24-month cohort received a refresher training prior to retesting. All attempts were recorded and blindly graded using the same 10 item standardized SC checklist used in initial training. Our previous work found that mastery criteria for performing a SC were ≤40 seconds and completion of 9/10 items on the checklist. Outcome measures in this study were time to complete the procedure and percent of subjects who completed at least 9/10 items on the SC checklist. RESULTS: There was an increase in time required to complete the procedure compared to initial training in all three retesting cohorts (initial: median 27.50, interquartile range 25.38-31.07 seconds; 6 months: median 36.33, interquartile range 31.59-55.22 seconds; 12 months: median 49.50, interquartile range 41.75-60.75 seconds; 24 months: median 38.79, interquartile range 30.20-53.08 seconds; P < .0001, P < .0001, P = .0039). There was a decline in median value checklist scores compared to initial training in the 6- and 12-month retesting cohorts (initial: median 10.00/10, interquartile range 9.50-10.00; 6 months: median 8.00/10, interquartile range 6.75-9.00; 12 months: median 8.00/10, interquartile range 6.75-9.25; P < .0001, P < .001). There was no difference in median checklist scores between the initial and 24-month retesting scenario (initial: median 10.00/10, interquartile range 9.50-10.00; 24 months: 10.00/10, interquartile range 9.00-10.00; P= .125). There was a decrease in retention of skills as only 31.82% of subjects at 6 months and 14.29% at 12 months met the defined passing criteria of time to completion of ≤40 seconds and checklist score of ≥9/10. A brief refresher course several months prior to the 24-month cohort retesting greatly increased the retention of SC procedural skills, with 60% of subjects meeting the time and checklist criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the skill required to perform a SC after initial mastery training does decay significantly. A brief refresher course can help increase retention of skills. Based on our findings SC skills should be refreshed at a minimum of every 6 months to assure optimal proficiency.

The SOAP Feedback Training Program.

BACKGROUND: Accessible and efficient opportunities for health professional faculty to hone feedback skills are limited. In addition, feedback models to apply to the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) setting are lacking. APPROACH: Annually, paediatric interns from Children's National Hospital and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center participate in an OSCE, which includes faculty observation and immediate feedback to trainees. In 2018, we incorporated the subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) Feedback Training Program during 20 min of the pre-OSCE faculty orientation. The SOAP Feedback Training Program introduced the SOAP feedback model (subjective, objective, assessment, plan), facilitated practice in pairs and distributed a cognitive aid referencing the model. We evaluated the quality of faculty feedback exchanges during the 2018 OSCE via retrospective video review using the Direct Observation of Clinical Skills Feedback Scale (DOCS-FBS). We compared the results to the 2015 initial evaluation and used focus groups to understand how and why faculty feedback changed. EVALUATION: Comparison of the initial evaluation to the post-SOAP Feedback Training Program intervention data using a Wilcoxon signed rank test showed statistically significant improvement in six of eight feedback items on the DOCS-FBS. Causal coding of focus group transcripts revealed that the SOAP Feedback Training Program evoked affective responses, reinforced prior practice in feedback delivery, improved feedback organisation and increased feedback delivery preparation. IMPLICATIONS: The SOAP Feedback Training Program is an effective intervention to teach the SOAP feedback model and improve faculty feedback quality in an OSCE setting. It is efficient and low resource, facilitating its potential use in settings beyond the OSCE.

Innovative Curriculum to Train Medical Students on Lateral Canthotomy and Cantholysis.

PURPOSE: Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is an ocular emergency requiring prompt decompression with a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC) within 2 hours. This study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of a standardized LCC curriculum to train medical students to identify and treat OCS. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative cohort study of 39 novice first-year medical students with no prior LCC training who underwent a standardized LCC curriculum incorporating both didactic and hands-on procedural training. Didactic knowledge of orbital anatomy and OCS was evaluated with written pre- and post-knowledge testing. Expert performance criteria were determined by expert consensus based on the performance of three oculoplastic surgeons and were defined as correctly performing all 12 critical checklist steps of an LCC within 3 minutes twice consecutively on a Sonalyst LCC training system eye model. Utilizing the principles of mastery learning, participants learned how to perform an LCC in a classroom environment and were evaluated on a final test of proficiency in a training lane designed to simulate an austere military environment. RESULTS: Participants required a median of 3.0 practice iterations to achieve expert performance in the classroom environment. During the testing phase, all participants correctly identified the eye with OCS, and 77% (n = 30) of learners successfully performed an LCC at the expert level within their first attempt. The median completion time of those who passed on their first testing was 130 seconds. The mean LCC knowledge test scores significantly improved from 48.7% to 71.2% (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study successfully developed a standardized LCC curriculum utilizing the principles of hands-on mastery learning to train novice learners to perform an LCC efficiently and effectively.

Development of a Simulation Surgical Cricothyroidotomy Curriculum for Novice Providers: A Learning Curve Study.

INTRODUCTION: Airway obstruction is the third most common cause of preventable death on the battlefield, accounting for 1%-2% of total combat fatalities. No previous surgical cricothyroidotomy (SC) studies have analyzed the learning curve required to obtain proficiency despite being studied in numerous other surgical technique training experiments. The aims of this study were to establish expert SC performance criteria, develop a novel standardized SC curriculum, and determine the necessary number of practice iterations required by a novice to reach this pre-determined performance goal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized checklist and SC performance standards were established based on the performance of 12 board certified Military Health System surgeons with prior experience on performing a SC using a simulated trauma mannequin. Expert-level criteria were defined as a SC time to completion of 40 s or less and checklist score of at least 9/10, including all critical steps. Study subjects included 89 novice providers (54 active-duty first- and second-year medical students and 35 Navy corpsmen). Subjects received instruction on performing a SC using the principles of mastery learning and performed a final test of SC proficiency on a trauma mannequin within a realistic simulated MEDEVAC helicopter. The total number of subject practice attempts, checklist scores, and time to completion were measured and/or blindly scored. Learning curve and exponential plateau equations were used to characterize their improvement in mean time to SC completion and checklist scores. RESULTS: Mean pre-test knowledge scores for the entire group were 11.8 ± 3.1 out of 24 points. Total mean practice learning plateaued at checklist scores of 9.9/10 after 7 iterations and at a mean completion time of 30.4 s after 10 iterations. During the final test performance in the helicopter, 67.4% of subjects achieved expert-level performance on the first attempt. All subjects achieved expert-level performance by the end of two additional attempts. While a significantly larger proportion of medical students (79.9%) successfully completed the helicopter test on the first attempt compared to corpsmen (54.3%), there were no statistically significant differences in mean SC completion times and checklist scores between both groups (P > 0.05). Medical students performed a SC only 1.3 s faster and scored only 0.16 points higher than corpsmen. The effect size for differences were small to negligible (Cohen's d range 0.18-0.33 for SC completion time; Cohen's d range 0.45-0.46 for checklist scores). CONCLUSION: This study successfully defined SC checklist scores and completion times based on the performance of experienced surgeons on a simulator. Using these criteria and the principles of mastery learning, novices with little knowledge and experience in SC were successfully trained to the level of experienced providers. All subjects met performance targets after training and overall performance plateaued after approximately seven iterations. Over two-thirds of subjects achieved the performance target on the first testing attempt in a simulated helicopter environment. Performance was comparable between medical student and corpsmen subgroups. Further research will assess the durability of maintaining SC skills and the timing for introducing refresher courses after initial skill acquisition.

Breastfeeding practices in military families: a 12-month prospective population-based study in the national capital region.

Breastfeeding practices in military families have not been widely investigated. The objective of this study was to measure the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding among uniformed families and identify factors associated with breastfeeding. We conducted a prospective study of 253 mothers of new infants from July to December 2004. Initial information gathered included demographic data, feeding choices, and intended duration of breastfeeding. Follow-up surveys were conducted until 12 months postpartum. 51% of mothers were breastfeeding at 6 months and 25% at 1 year. Mothers on active duty were equally likely to breastfeed than non-active duty mothers. Officer mothers were 3 times more likely to breastfeed compared to enlisted mothers (p = 0.005). Mothers with higher education were twice as likely to breastfeed longer (p = 0.015). Families participating in Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) were 2.5 times less likely to breastfed at 1 year (p < 0.001). Our study shows a higher percentage of women initiating and maintaining breastfeeding compared to national data, but still less than current American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Our study suggests that to improve breastfeeding rates among uniformed families, more attention may need to be directed to younger, enlisted mothers and those families in a lower socioeconomic status or receiving WIC assistance.

Reticulocyte hemoglobin content testing for iron deficiency in healthy toddlers.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate reticulocyte hemglobin content (CHr) as a primary screening test to detect iron deficiency (ID) in healthy toddlers. Demographic and dietary risk factors associated with ID were studied for an association with low CHr. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study of healthy toddlers aged 12 to 36 months coming to well-child visits at two military pediatric ambulatory clinics in the Washington, DC, area from August 2006 to November 2007. Data were collected on medical, demographic, and dietary intake by parental questionnaire. A sample of blood was drawn from each subject for complete blood count and CHr. A logistic regression model was used to determine which factors may be predictive of ID. RESULTS: A total of 144 children were studied. An abnormal low CHr of 27.5 was identified in 18.8% of our toddler population. Two variables were determined to be independent predictors of low CHr; an age of 12 to 23 months and black race. CONCLUSIONS: Used alone as a primary screening marker, CHr identified a high prevalence of ID in our population of toddlers. Black race and younger age were associated with a lower CHr. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Validation of a Modified Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Observers to Assess Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: "Demonstrate insight and understanding into emotion" is a competency amenable to simulation-based assessment. The Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) has validity evidence for patients to assess provider empathy. A version adapted for a third-party observers does not exist. Our aim was to modify the JSPPPE and use recorded standardized encounters to obtain validity evidence. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used video and data collected from 2 pediatric residencies. In 2018, 4 raters reviewed 24 videos of 12 interns communicating with standardized patients (SP) in 2 encounters and completed a modified JSPPE for observers (JSEO). Reliability between raters was established using Intraclass Correlations (ICC). JSEO mean scores were correlated to Essential Elements of Communication (EEC), JSPPPE, and faculty composite interpersonal communication (IC) scores using Spearman Rank. RESULTS: The mean ICC for all 4 raters was 0.573 (0.376-0.755). When ICC was calculated for pairs of raters, Rater 1 was an outlier. ICCs for mean scores for pairs among the 3 remaining raters was 0.81 to 0.84. Mean JSEO scores from the four raters correlated with the JSPPPE (rho = 0.45, P = .03) and IC (rho = 0.68, P < .001), but not the EEC (rho = 0.345, P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: We found validity evidence for the use of a modified JSPPPE for an observer to assess empathy in a recorded encounter with a SP. This may be useful as medical educators shift toward competency-based tracking. The brevity of this tool and potential assessment using video are also appealing.

Teaching breaking bad news using mixed reality simulation.

BACKGROUND: Our novel teaching approach involved having students actively participate in an unsuccessful resuscitation of a high fidelity human patient simulator with a gun shot wound to the chest, followed immediately by breaking bad news (BBN) to a standardized patient wife (SPW) portrayed by an actress. METHODS: Brief education interventions to include viewing a brief video on the SPIKES protocol on how to break bad news, a didactic lecture plus a demonstration, or both, was compared to no pretraining by dividing 553 students into four groups prior to their BBN to the SPW. The students then self-assessed their abilities, and were also evaluated by the SPW on 21 items related to appearance, communication skills, and emotional affect. All received cross-over training. RESULTS: Groups were equal in prior training (2 h) and belief that this was an important skill to be learned. Students rated the experience highly, and demonstrated marked improvement of self-assessed skills over baseline, which was maintained for the duration of the 12-wk clerkship. Additionally, students who received any of the above training prior to BBN were rated superior to those who had no training on several communication skills, and the observation of the video seemed to offer the most efficient way of teaching this skill in a time delimited curriculum. CONCLUSION: This novel approach was well received and resulted in improvement over baseline. Lessons learned from this study have enhanced our curricular approach to this vital component of medical education.

Introduction of a direct observation program into a pediatric resident continuity clinic: feasibility, acceptability, and effect on resident feedback.

BACKGROUND: Direct observations of trainee performance are essential to the evaluation of clinical skills, and are now required by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). PURPOSE: We sought to describe the feasibility and acceptability of a direct observation program in a pediatric resident clinic, and evaluate its effect on feedback. METHODS: We modified the Structured Clinical Observation (SCO) for use in a pediatric resident clinic. Preceptors and residents were asked about the frequency and content of feedback given before and after the introduction of the observations. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-six structured clinical observations were performed. Their use increased the frequency of feedback provided, and resulted in more feedback on listening skills and less feedback on medical knowledge and decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Structured clinical observations can be successfully introduced into a pediatric resident continuity clinic. This is a valuable supplement to the traditional precepting, and fulfills the mandate to include direct observations in the assessment of residents' clinical competence.

Rapid Application Temporary Tattoos for Medical Moulage: From Development to Testing and Commercialization.

Military medical education and training often utilize theatrical makeup, or moulage, to simulate injuries or pathologies. Traditional methods of moulage application are incredibly realistic when expertly applied. However, moulage can be expensive in terms of supplies, manpower, and time. We proposed that by creating a library of illustrations for use with temporary tattoos, the overall cost of moulage could decrease with little to no impact on training goals and objectives. The development, detailed testing and plans for commercialization are outlined herein.

I-PASS Mentored Implementation Handoff Curriculum: Frontline Provider Training Materials.

Introduction: The I-PASS Handoff Program is a comprehensive handoff curriculum that has been shown to decrease rates of medical errors and adverse events during patient handoffs. Frontline providers are the key individuals participating in handoffs of patient care. It is important they receive robust handoff training. Methods: The I-PASS Mentored Implementation Handoff Curriculum frontline provider training materials were created as part of the original I-PASS Study and adapted for the Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) I-PASS Mentored Implementation Program. The adapted materials embrace a flipped classroom approach with an emphasis on adult learning theory principles. The training includes an overview of I-PASS handoff techniques, TeamSTEPPS team communication strategies, verbal handoff simulation scenarios, and a printed handoff document exercise. Results: As part of the SHM I-PASS Mentored Implementation Program, 2,735 frontline providers were trained at 32 study sites (16 adult and 16 pediatric) across North America. At the end of their training, 1,762 frontline providers completed the workshop evaluation form (64% response rate). After receiving the training, over 90% agreed/strongly agreed that they were able to distinguish a good- from a poor-quality handoff, articulate the elements of the I-PASS mnemonic, construct a high-quality patient summary, advocate for an appropriate environment for handoffs, and participate in handoff simulations. Universally, the training provided them with knowledge and skills relevant to their patient care activities. Discussion: The I-PASS frontline training materials were rated highly by those trained and are an integral part of a successful I-PASS Handoff Program implementation.

A Focus on Feedback: Improving Learner Engagement and Faculty Delivery of Feedback in Hospital Medicine.

Feedback is an integral part of medical education. However, there is great variation of training and effectiveness of feedback delivery, especially in the inpatient setting. The unique learning environment provided in hospital medicine allows teachers the opportunity to provide feedback on learner performance under several longitudinal observations in areas such as direct patient care, procedural tasks, and interdisciplinary team leadership skills. Most important, feedback should occur on more than one occasion to truly empower change in knowledge, attitude, and skills. This article aims to provide the reader with foundational theories on feedback and strategies to use best practices for delivery.

I-PASS Mentored Implementation Handoff Curriculum: Champion Training Materials.

Introduction: The I-PASS Handoff Program is a comprehensive handoff curriculum that has been shown to decrease rates of medical errors and adverse events during patient handoffs. I-PASS champions are a critical part of the implementation and sustainment of this curriculum, and therefore, a rigorous program to support their training is necessary. Methods: The I-PASS Handoff champion training materials were created for the original I-PASS Study and adapted for the Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) I-PASS Mentored Implementation Program. The adapted materials embrace a flipped classroom approach and adult learning theory. The training includes an overview of I-PASS handoff techniques, an opportunity to practice evaluating handoffs with the I-PASS observation tools using a handoff video vignette, and other key implementation principles. Results: As part of the SHM I-PASS Mentored Implementation Program, 366 champions were trained at 32 sites across North America and participated in a total of 3,491 handoff observations. A total of 346 champions completed the I-PASS Champion Workshop evaluation form at the end of their training (response rate: 94.5%). After receiving the training, over 90% agreed/strongly agreed that it provided them with knowledge or skills critical to their patient care activities and that they were able to distinguish the difference between high- and poor-quality handoffs, competently use the I-PASS handoff assessment tools, and articulate the importance of handoff observations. Conclusion: The I-PASS champion training materials were rated highly by those trained and are an integral part of a successful I-PASS Handoff Program implementation.

Multiple Patient Casualty Scenarios: A Measurement Tool for Teamwork.

INTRODUCTION: Teamwork is a critical aspect of patient care and is especially salient in response to multiple patient casualties. Effective training and measurement improve team performance. However, the literature currently lacks a scientifically developed measure of team performance within multiple causality scenarios, making training and feedback efforts difficult. The present effort addresses this gap by integrating the input of subject matter experts and the science of multicasualty teams and training to (1) identify overarching teamwork processes and corresponding behaviors necessary for team performance and (2) develop a behavioral observation tool to optimize teamwork in multicasualty training efforts. METHOD: A search of articles including team performance frameworks associated with team training was conducted, leading to the identification of a total of 14 articles. Trained coders extracted teamwork processes and the corresponding team behaviors indicative of effective performance from these articles. Five subject matter experts were interviewed using the critical incident technique to identify additional behaviors. RESULTS: Team situation awareness, team leadership, coordination, and information exchange emerged as the four core team processes required for team performance in scenarios with multiple patient casualties. Relevant behaviors and subbehaviors within these overarching processes were identified to inform a pilot behavioral framework of team performance. CONCLUSIONS: The processes and associated behaviors identified within this effort serve as scientifically grounded behaviors of team performance in the case of multiple patient casualties simulated training scenarios. Future work can use and further refine these results to ensure that measures of team performance are grounded in specific, observable, and scientifically delineated behaviors.

Validity Evidence for a Serious Game to Assess Performance on Critical Pediatric Emergency Medicine Scenarios.

INTRODUCTION: We developed a first-person serious game, PediatricSim, to teach and assess performances on seven critical pediatric scenarios (anaphylaxis, bronchiolitis, diabetic ketoacidosis, respiratory failure, seizure, septic shock, and supraventricular tachycardia). In the game, players are placed in the role of a code leader and direct patient management by selecting from various assessment and treatment options. The objective of this study was to obtain supportive validity evidence for the PediatricSim game scores. METHODS: Game content was developed by 11 subject matter experts and followed the American Heart Association's 2011 Pediatric Advanced Life Support Provider Manual and other authoritative references. Sixty subjects with three different levels of experience were enrolled to play the game. Before game play, subjects completed a 40-item written pretest of knowledge. Game scores were compared between subject groups using scoring rubrics developed for the scenarios. Validity evidence was established and interpreted according to Messick's framework. RESULTS: Content validity was supported by a game development process that involved expert experience, focused literature review, and pilot testing. Subjects rated the game favorably for engagement, realism, and educational value. Interrater agreement on game scoring was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-0.9). Game scores were higher for attendings followed by residents then medical students (Pc < 0.01) with large effect sizes (1.6-4.4) for each comparison. There was a very strong, positive correlation between game and written test scores (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute validity evidence for PediatricSim game scores to assess knowledge of pediatric emergency medicine resuscitation.