The butterfly effect: How an outpatient quality improvement project affected inpatient opioid's prescribing habits.

Background: The aim of the study was to assess whether a quality improvement project focused on providers' education of responsible opioid prescribing, creating order sets to facilitate pre- and post-operative adjunct use, and decreasing the number of opioids prescribed following elective outpatient surgery affected opioid prescribing habits and the use of adjunct pain medication on the inpatient Emergency General Surgery (EGS) service. Methods: Inpatient EGS opioid prescribing habits following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair, or open umbilical hernia repair during the pre- and post-Acute Care Surgery Division-Quality Improvement (QI) periods were recorded retrospectively. Demographics, type and dose of opioids, and non-opioid adjuncts prescribed were collected. Opioids were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME). Pre- and post-QI data were compared. Post-QI discharge opioids prescribed were compared to reported use of opioids. Patients' rating of pain management is reported. Results: One hundred twenty-two and 62 patients were included during the pre- and post- QI periods, respectively. Post-QI, opioid prescribing decreased, and adjunct prescribing increased (31.1% vs. 72.6%; p < 0.001) at discharge. Interestingly, higher 24 h pre-discharge OME was associated with a higher OME prescribed at discharge (B = 1.255 [0.377 - 2.134]; p = 0.005). Of the 47 EGS patients who followed up in clinic post-ACS QI, 89.4% rated their pain management as excellent/good, 8.5% as fair, and 2.1% as poor. Conclusions: Implementation of a multifaceted approach to decrease opioid prescribing in the outpatient setting organically affected opioid prescribing habits at discharge for inpatients.

Conditionally Essential Amino Acid Supplementation Reduces Postoperative Complications and Muscle Wasting After Fracture Fixation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications and substantial loss of physical function are common after musculoskeletal trauma. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of conditionally essential amino acid (CEAA) supplementation on complications and skeletal muscle mass in adults after operative fixation of acute fractures. METHODS: Adults who sustained pelvic and extremity fractures that were indicated for operative fixation at a level-I trauma center were enrolled. The subjects were stratified based on injury characteristics (open fractures and/or polytrauma, fragility fractures, isolated injuries) and randomized to standard nutrition (control group) or oral CEAA supplementation twice daily for 2 weeks. Body composition (fat-free mass [FFM]) was measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications were prospectively collected. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The relative risk (RR) of complications for the control group relative to the CEAA group was determined, and linear mixed-effects models were used to model the relationship between CEAA supplementation and changes in FFM. RESULTS: Four hundred subjects (control group: 200; CEAA group: 200) were enrolled. The CEAA group had significantly lower overall complications than the control group (30.5% vs. 43.8%; adjusted RR = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55 to 0.92; p = 0.008). The FFM decreased significantly at 6 weeks in the control subjects (-0.9 kg, p = 0.0205), whereas the FFM was maintained at 6 weeks in the CEAA subjects (-0.33 kg, p = 0.3606). This difference in FFM was not seen at subsequent time points. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that CEAA supplementation has a protective effect against common complications and early skeletal muscle wasting after operative fixation of extremity and pelvic fractures. Given the potential benefits of this inexpensive, low-risk intervention, multicenter prospective studies in focused trauma populations are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.

BACKGROUND: Parents often access online resources to educate themselves when a child is diagnosed with clubfoot and/ or prior to treatment initiation. In order to be fully understood by the average adult American, online health information must be written at an elementary school reading level. It was hypothesized that current available online resources regarding clubfoot would score poorly on objective measures of readability (syntax reading grade-level), understandability (ability to process key messages), and actionability (providing actions the reader may take). Additionally, it was hypothesized that the outcomes measured would not correlate with the order of listed search results. METHODS: Patient education materials were identified utilizing two independent online searches (Google.com) of the term "Clubfoot". From the top 50 search results, websites were included if directed at educating patients and their families regarding clubfoot. News articles, non-text material (video), research and journal articles, industry websites, and articles not related to clubfoot were excluded. The readability of included resources was quantified using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Grade, Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Gunning-Fog Index( GFI) and Automated Reading Index (ARI). The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) was used to assess actionability and understandability using a 0-100% scale for both measures of interest. RESULTS: Of the 55 unique websites, 37 websites (65.2%) met inclusion criteria. The mean FKGL was 9.2 (+/- 2.1) with only three websites (7.32%) having a reading level ≤6. Mean understandability and actionability scores were 67.2±12.6 and 25.4±25.2, respectively. Thirteen (35%) websites met the understandability threshold of ≥70% but no websites met the actionability criteria. No readability statistics were statistically associated with Google™ search rank (p=0.07). There was no association between readability (p=0.94) nor actionability (p=0.18) scores and Google™ rank. However, understandability scores did correlate with Google™ rank (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Overall, online clubfoot educational materials scored poorly with respect to readability, understandability, and actionability. There is an association with Google™ search rank for understandability of clubfoot materials. However, readability and actionability are not significantly associated with search rank. In the era of shared decision-making, efforts should be made by medical professionals to improve the readability, understandability, and actionability of online resources in order to optimize parent understanding and facilitate effective outcomes.Level of Evidence.