Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Idioma
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 97(12): 934-939, 2017 Mar 28.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28355756

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the effect of intravenous infusion with lidocaine on rapid recovery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial. From February to August 2016 in Affiliated Yiwu Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 60 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were involved and randomly divided into control group (n=30) and lidocaine group (n=30). Patients in lidocaine group received lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously before induction and followed by 2.0 mg·kg(-1)·h(-1) to the end of surgery. Patients in control group received equal volumes of saline intravenously. Anesthesia induction in both groups were given intravenous midazolam 0.03 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.2 µg/kg, propofol 2.0 mg/kg and cisatracuium 0.2 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol 0.05-0.20 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1) and remifentanil 0.1-0.5 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1) for laryngeal mask airway which bispectral index (BIS) value maintained at 40-60. BIS, heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure(MAP) were recorded before anesthesia induction, before and immediately after laryngeal mask implantation, intraoperative 30 min and anesthesia awake. Pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (VAS) at postoperation immediately, 30 min during postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time of PACU retention, postoperative ambulation, first intestine venting and discharge were recorded. The dosage of propofol and remifentanil, the frequency of sufentanil used, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using Simple Restoration Quality Score (QoR-9). Results: BIS values before and after laryngeal mask implantation in lidocaine group were 50.50±3.47 and 54.63±1.25 respectively, which was lower than those in control group(54.30±4.78, 55.80±2.33; t=3.542, 2.423, all P<0.05). The VAS score at postoperation immediately, PACU 30 min, postoperative 2, 6, 12 h in lidocaine group were 2.76±0.97, 2.37±0.93, 2.10±1.12, 1.76±0.97, 1.20±0.76 respectively, which was lower than those in control group (3.83±1.34, 3.27±1.26, 3.06±1.20, 2.63±0.88, 1.90±0.84; t=3.528, 3.154, 3.217, 3.603, 3.372, all P<0.05 ). The frequency of additional sufentanil at postoperation immediately and PACU 30 min in lidocaine group was 5(17%), 3(10%), which were less than those in control group(12(40%), 9(30%); χ(2)=4.022, 3.950, all P<0.05). The dosage of propofol and remifentanil in lidocaine group were (4.33±0.75) mg·kg(-1)·h(-1) and (9.00±1.66) µg·kg(-1)·h(-1) respectively, which were less than those in control group ((5.20±1.39) mg·kg(-1)·h(-1) and (10.43±2.20) µg·kg(-1)·h(-1;) t= 2.982, 2.842, all P<0.05). The time of PACU retention, postoperative ambulation and first intestine venting were (39.90 ± 8.06) min, (11.93±1.68) h and (10.16±1.05) h respectively in lidocaine group, which were shorter than those in control group ((48.23±10.04) min, (13.16±1.58) h and (11.13±1.30) h; t=3.514, 2.931, 3.156, all P<0.05). The QoR-9 score in lidocaine group was 15.60±1.07, which was higher than that in control group(14.73±0.74, t=-3.649, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting and the discharge time between two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine can effectively reduce the dosages of propofol and remifentanil, postoperative early VAS score, postoperative ambulation time and first intestine venting time which could improve the satisfaction of patients.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Piperidinas , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 97(46): 3636-3641, 2017 Dec 12.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275607

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the effects of multi-day low dose ketamine infusion for postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) after breast cancer surgery. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial. From June 2015 to May 2016 in Affiliated Yiwu Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 66 patients with breast cancer surgery were randomly divided into control group (group C) and ketamine group (group K). Patients in group K were infused with 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine mixed in 250 ml of 0.9% normal saline in 1 h daily for 7 days. Patients in group C were infused the same dose of 0.9% normal saline. Anesthesia induction in both groups were given intravenous midazolam, sufentanil, propofol, vecuronium and intermittent positive pressure ventilation after tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil. After awakening, all patients were monitored in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and given patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA). Pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (VAS) during PACU, 4 h, 24 h and 2-5 d after surgery, simultaneously analgesic requirement were recorded. Patients were evaluated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 5 d after surgery . The patients were followed up for 6 months. At 3 m, 6 m after surgery, the incidence of PMPS, the level of pain, pain site and HADS scale were assessed. Results: The VAS score uring PACU, 4 h, 24 h and 2-5 d after surgery in group K( (2.5±0.8), (2.4±0.5), (2.4±0.5), (2.0±0.4), (1.5±0.5), (1.0±0.4), 1(1), respectively) was lower than those in group C ((2.9±1.0), (2.9±0.6), (2.6±0.5), (2.3±0.5), (1.8±0.6), (1.5±0.5), 1(0), respectively). There was statistically difference between the two groups (all P<0.05). The consumption of analgesics required at each time postoperation in group K were also lower than that of group C(all P<0.05). Followed up for 6 months, 2 lost in group C, 1 lost in group K. The incidence of PMPS in group K at 3 months and 6 months after surgery was significantly lower(25% and 22%) than that in group C(52% and 45%)(χ(2)=4.729, 3.842, all P<0.05). There were no significant difference in pain level and site between two groups of PMPS patients (all P>0.05). There were no significant difference of HADS scale preoperative and 5 d after surgery between two groups (all P>0.05); and HADS scale in group K at 3 m and 6 m after surgery was significantly lower than that in group C(all P<0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative continuous multi-day low dose ketamine infusion can effectively reduce the incidence of PMPS after breast cancer surgery.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA