Comprehensive beam delivery latency evaluation for gated proton therapy system using customized multi-channel signal acquisition platform.

PURPOSE: Beam delivery latency in respiratory-gated particle therapy systems is a crucial issue to dose delivery accuracy. The aim of this study is to develop a multi-channel signal acquisition platform for investigating gating latencies occurring within RPM respiratory gating system (Varian, USA) and ProBeam proton treatment system (Varian, USA) individually. METHODS: The multi-channel signal acquisition platform consisted of several electronic components, including a string position sensor for target motion detection, a photodiode for proton beam sensing, an interfacing board for accessing the trigger signal between the respiratory gating system and the proton treatment system, a signal acquisition device for sampling and synchronizing signals from the aforementioned components, and a laptop for controlling the signal acquisition device and data storage. RPM system latencies were determined by comparing the expected gating phases extracted from the motion signal with the trigger signal's state turning points. ProBeam system latencies were assessed by comparing the state turning points of the trigger signal with the beam signal. The total beam delivery latencies were calculated as the sum of delays in the respiratory gating system and the cyclotron proton treatment system. During latency measurements, simulated sinusoidal motion were applied at different amplitudes and periods for complete beam delivery latency evaluation under different breathing patterns. Each breathing pattern was repeated 30 times for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The measured gating ON/OFF latencies in the RPM system were found to be 104.20 ± 13.64 ms and 113.60 ± 14.98 ms, respectively. The measured gating ON/OFF delays in the ProBeam system were 108.29 ± 0.85 ms and 1.20 ± 0.04 ms, respectively. The total beam ON/OFF latencies were determined to be 212.50 ± 13.64 ms and 114.80 ± 14.98 ms. CONCLUSION: With the developed multi-channel signal acquisition platform, it was able to investigate the gating lags happened in both the respiratory gating system and the proton treatment system. The resolution of the platform is enough to distinguish the delays at the millisecond time level. Both the respiratory gating system and the proton treatment system made contributions to gating latency. Both systems contributed nearly equally to the total beam ON latency, with approximately 100 ms. In contrast, the respiratory gating system was the dominant contributor to the total beam OFF latency.

Proton vs. photon radiotherapy for MR-guided dose escalation of intraprostatic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Dose escalation has been associated with improved biochemical control for prostate cancer. Focusing the high dose on the MRI-defined intraprostatic lesions (IL) could spare the surrounding organs at risk and hence allow further escalation. We compare treatment efficacy between state-of-the-art focally-boosted proton and photon-based radiotherapy, and investigate possible predictive guidelines regarding individualized treatment prescriptions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten prostate cancer patients with well-defined ILs were selected. Multiparametric MRI was used to delineate ILs, which were transferred to the planning CT via image registration. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans, were created for each patient. Each modality featured 6 plans: (1) moderately hypofractionated dose: 70 Gy to the prostate in 28 fractions, (2)-(6) plan 1 plus additional simultaneous-integrated-boost to ILs to 75.6, 81.2, 86.6, 98 and 112 Gy in 28 fractions. Equivalent dose to 2 Gy-per-fraction (EqD2) was used to calculate tumor control (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for ILs and organs-at-risk. RESULTS: For both modalities, the maximum necessary dose to achieve TCP > 99% was 98 Gy for very high-risk ILs. For lower risk ILs lower doses were sufficient. NTCP was <25% and 35% for protons and photons at the maximum dose escalation, respectively. For the cases and beam characteristics considered, proton therapy was dosimetrically superior when IL was >4 cc or located <2.5 mm from the rectum. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrated the potential role for proton therapy in the setting of prostate focal dose escalation. We propose that anatomical characteristic could be used as criteria to identify patients who would benefit from proton treatment.

Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton relative biological effectiveness associated with anterior-oblique beams.

AIM: Anterior-oblique (AO) proton beams can form an attractive option for prostate patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as they avoid the femoral heads. For a cohort with hydrogel prostate-rectum spacers, we asked whether it was possible to generate AO proton plans robust to end-of-range elevations in linear energy transfer (LET) and modeled relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Additionally we considered how rectal spacers influenced planned dose distributions for AO and standard bilateral (SB) proton beams versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied three treatment strategies for 10 patients with rectal spacers: (A) AO proton beams, (B) SB proton beams and (C) IMRT. For strategy (A) dose and LET distributions were simulated (using the TOPAS Monte Carlo platform) and the McNamara model was used to calculate proton RBE as a function of LET, dose per fraction, and photon α/ß. All calculations were performed on pretreatment scans: inter- and intra-fractional changes in anatomy/set-up were not considered. RESULTS: For 9/10 patients, rectal spacers enabled generation of AO proton plans robust to modeled RBE elevations: rectal dose constraints were fulfilled even when the variable RBE model was applied with a conservative α/ß = 2 Gy. Amongst a subset of patients the proton rectal doses for the planning target volume plans were remarkably low: for 2/10 SB plans and 4/10 AO plans, ≤10% of the rectum received ≥20 Gy. AO proton plans delivered integral doses a factor of approximately three lower than IMRT and spared the femoral heads almost entirely. CONCLUSION: Typically, rectal spacers enabled the generation of anterior beam proton plans that appeared robust to modeled variation in RBE. However, further analysis of day-to-day robustness would be required prior to a clinical implementation of AO proton beams. Such beams offer almost complete femoral head sparing, but their broader value relative to IMRT and SB protons remains unclear.

Time-resolved diode dosimetry calibration through Monte Carlo modeling for in vivo passive scattered proton therapy range verification.

PURPOSE: Our group previously introduced an in vivo proton range verification methodology in which a silicon diode array system is used to correlate the dose rate profile per range modulation wheel cycle of the detector signal to the water-equivalent path length (WEPL) for passively scattered proton beam delivery. The implementation of this system requires a set of calibration data to establish a beam-specific response to WEPL fit for the selected 'scout' beam (a 1 cm overshoot of the predicted detector depth with a dose of 4 cGy) in water-equivalent plastic. This necessitates a separate set of measurements for every 'scout' beam that may be appropriate to the clinical case. The current study demonstrates the use of Monte Carlo simulations for calibration of the time-resolved diode dosimetry technique. METHODS: Measurements for three 'scout' beams were compared against simulated detector response with Monte Carlo methods using the Tool for Particle Simulation (TOPAS). The 'scout' beams were then applied in the simulation environment to simulated water-equivalent plastic, a CT of water-equivalent plastic, and a patient CT data set to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: Simulated detector response in water-equivalent plastic was validated against measurements for 'scout' spread out Bragg peaks of range 10 cm, 15 cm, and 21 cm (168 MeV, 177 MeV, and 210 MeV) to within 3.4 mm for all beams, and to within 1 mm in the region where the detector is expected to lie. CONCLUSION: Feasibility has been shown for performing the calibration of the detector response for three 'scout' beams through simulation for the time-resolved diode dosimetry technique in passive scattered proton delivery.

Dosimetric impacts of endorectal balloon in CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: In SBRT for prostate cancer, higher fractional dose to the rectum is a major toxicity concern due to using smaller PTV margin and hypofractionation. We investigate the dosimetric impact on rectum using endorectal balloon (ERB) in prostate SBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty prostate cancer patients were included in a retrospective study, ten with ERB and 10 without ERB. Optimized SBRT plans were generated on CyberKnife MultiPlan for 5 × 7.25 Gy to PTV under RTOG-0938 protocol for early-stage prostate cancer. For the rectum and the anterior half rectum, mean dose and percentage of volumes receiving 50%, 80%, 90%, and 100% prescription dose were compared. RESULTS: Using ERB, mean dose to the rectum was 62 cGy (P = 0.001) lower per fraction, and 50 cGy (P = 0.024) lower per fraction for the anterior half rectum. The average V50% , V80% , V90% , and V100% were lower by 9.9% (P = 0.001), 5.3% (P = 0.0002), 3.4% (P = 0.0002), and 1.2% (P = 0.005) for the rectum, and lower by 10.4% (P = 0.009), 8.3% (P = 0.0004), 5.4% (P = 0.0003), and 2.1% (P = 0.003) for the anterior half rectum. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions of dose to the rectum using ERB were observed. This may lead to improvement of the rectal toxicity profiles in prostate SBRT.

Using CBCT for pretreatment range check in proton therapy: a phantom study for prostate treatment by anterior-posterior beam.

This study explores the potential of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for monitoring relative beam range variations due to daily changes in patient anatomy for prostate treatment by anterior proton beams. CBCT was used to image an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom, in eight sessions on eight different days. In each session, the phantom was scanned twice, first at a standard position as determined by the room lasers, and then after it was shifted by 10 mm translation randomly along one of the X, Y, or Z directions. The filling of the phantom bladder with water was not refreshed from day to day, inducing gradual change of the water-equivalent path length (WEPL) across the bladder. MIMvista (MIM) software was used to perform image registration and re-alignment of all the scans with the scan from the first session. The XiO treatment planning system was used to perform data analysis. It was found that, although the Hounsfield unit numbers in CBCT have substantially larger fluctuations than those in diagnostic CT, CBCT datasets taken for daily patient positioning could potentially be used to monitor changes in patient anatomy. The reproducibility of the WEPL, computed using CBCT along anterior-posterior (AP) paths across and around the phantom prostate, over a volume of 360 cc, is sufficient for detecting daily WEPL variations that are equal to or larger than 3 mm. This result also applies to CBCT scans of the phantom after it is randomly shifted from the treatment position by 10 mm. limiting the interest to WEPL variation over a specific path within the same CBCT slice, one can detect WEPL variation smaller than 1 mm. That is the case when using CBCT for tracking daily change of the WEPL across the phantom bladder that was induced by spontaneous change in the bladder filling due to evaporation. In summary, the phantom study suggests that CBCT can be used for monitoring day to day WEPL variations in a patient. The method can detect WEPL variation equal to or greater than 3 mm. The study calls for further investigation using the CBCT data from real patients. If confirmed with real patients' data, CBCT could become, in addition to patient setup, a standard tool for proton therapy pretreatment beam range check.

Automating checks of plan check automation.

While a few physicists have designed new plan check automation solutions for their clinics, fewer, if any, managed to adapt existing solutions. As complex and varied as the systems they check, these programs must gain the full confidence of those who would run them on countless patient plans. The present automation effort, planCheck, therefore focuses on versatility and ease of implementation and verification. To demonstrate this, we apply planCheck to proton gantry, stereotactic proton gantry, stereotactic proton fixed beam (STAR), and IMRT treatments.

Development of an algorithm for proton dose calculation in magnetic fields.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of proton therapy can be further enhanced with online magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. One of the challenges in the realization of MRI-guided proton therapy (MRPT) is accurately calculating the radiation dose in the presence of magnetic fields. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an efficient and accurate proton dose calculation algorithm adapted to the presence of magnetic fields. METHODS: An analytical-numerical radiation dose calculation algorithm, Proton and Ion Dose Engine (PRIDE), was developed. The algorithm combines the pencil beam algorithm (PBA) with a novel iterative voxel-based ray-tracing algorithm. The new ray-tracing method uses fewer assumptions and ensures broader applicability for proton beam trajectory prediction in magnetic fields, and has been compared to Wolf's method and Schellhammer's method. The accuracy of PRIDE algorithm was validated on three phantoms and two practical plans (one single-field water plan and one prostate tumor plan) in different magnetic field strengths up to 3.0 T. The validation was performed by comparing the results against the Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, using the global gamma index criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm with a 10% threshold. RESULTS: PRIDE showed good agreement with MC in homogeneous and slab heterogeneous phantom, achieving gamma passing rates (%GPs) above 99% for 2%/2 mm criteria when magnetic field strength is not greater than 1.5 T. Although the agreement decreased for scenarios involving high proton energy (240 MeV) and strong magnetic field (3.0 T), the 2%/2 mm %GPs still remained above 98%. In lateral heterogeneous phantom, the accuracy of PRIDE decreased due to the PBA's limitation. For the two practical plans in different magnetic fields, %GPs exceeded 98% and 99% for 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PRIDE can perform efficient and accurate proton dose calculation in magnetic fields up to 3.0 T, and is expected to work as a useful tool for proton dose calculation in MRPT.

Development of a proton CT imaging system using scintillator-based range detection.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of proton therapy and preclinical proton irradiation experiments is susceptible to proton range uncertainties, which partly stem from the inaccurate conversion between CT numbers and relative stopping power (RSP). Proton computed tomography (PCT) can reduce these uncertainties by directly acquiring RSP maps. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a novel PCT imaging system based on scintillator-based proton range detection for accurate RSP reconstruction. METHODS: The proposed PCT system consists of a pencil-beam brass collimator with a 1 mm aperture, an object stage capable of translation and 360° rotation, a plastic scintillator for dose-to-light conversion, and a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera for light distribution acquisition. A calibration procedure based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was implemented to convert the obtained light ranges into water equivalent ranges. The water equivalent path lengths (WEPLs) of the imaged object were determined by calculating the differences in proton ranges obtained with and without the object in the beam path. To validate the WEPL calculation, measurements of WEPLs for eight tissue-equivalent inserts were conducted. PCT imaging was performed on a custom-designed phantom and a mouse, utilizing both 60 and 360 projections. The filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm was employed to reconstruct the RSP from WEPLs. Image quality was assessed based on the reconstructed RSP maps and compared to reference and simulation-based reconstructions. RESULTS: The differences between the calibrated and reference ranges of 110-150 MeV proton beams were within 0.18 mm. The WEPLs of eight tissue-equivalent inserts were measured with accuracies better than 1%. Phantom experiments exhibited good agreement with reference and simulation-based reconstructions, demonstrating average RSP errors of 1.26%, 1.38%, and 0.38% for images reconstructed with 60 projections, 60 projections after penalized weighted least-squares algorithm denoising, and 360 projections, respectively. Mouse experiments provided clear observations of mouse contours and major tissue types. MC simulation estimated an imaging dose of 3.44 cGy for decent RSP reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed PCT imaging system enables RSP map acquisition with high accuracy and has the potential to improve dose calculation accuracy in proton therapy and preclinical proton irradiation experiments.

Impact of iodinated oil in proton therapy on relative stopping power of liver post-cTACE.

Objective. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is a common treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), often with unsatisfactory local controls. Combining cTACE with radiotherapy shows a promise for unresectable large HCC, with proton therapy preserving healthy liver tissue. However, the proton therapy benefits are subject to the accuracy of tissue relative stopping power (RSP) prediction. The RSP values are typically derived from computed tomography (CT) images using stoichiometric calibration. Lipiodol deposition significantly increases CT numbers in liver regions of post-cTACE. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of RSP in liver regions of post-cTACE.Approach. Liver, water, and iodinated oil samples were prepared. Some liver samples contained iodinated oil. The water equivalent path length (WEPL) of sample was measured through the pullbacks of spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) depth-dose profiles scanned in a water tank with and without sample in the beam path. Measured RSP values were compared to estimated RSP values derived from the CT number based on the stoichiometric calibration method.Main results. The measured RSP of water was 0.991, confirming measurement system calibration. After removing the RSP contribution from container walls, the pure iodinated oil and liver samples had RSP values of 1.12 and 1.06, while the liver samples mixed with varying oil volumes (5 ml, 10 ml, 15 ml) showed RSP values of 1.05, 1.05 and 1.06. Using the stoichiometric calibration method, pure iodinated oil and liver samples had RSP values of 2.79 and 1.06. Liver samples mixed with iodinated oil (5 ml, 10 ml, 15 ml) had calculated RSP values of 1.21, 1.34, and 1.46. The RSP discrepancy reached 149.1% for pure iodinated oil.Significance.Iodinated oil notably raises CT numbers in liver tissue. However, there is almost no effect on its RSP value. Proton treatment of post-cTACE HCC patients can therefore be overshooting if no proper measures are taken against this specific effect.

A practical and robust method for beam blocker-based cone beam CT scatter correction.

Objective. In the traditional beam-blocker based cone beam CT (CBCT) scatter correction, the scatter measured in the region shaded by lead strips was multiplied by a correction factor to directly represent the scatter in the unblocked region. The correction factor optimization is a tedious process and lacks an objective stop criterion. To skip the optimization process, an indirect scatter estimation method was developed and validated in phantom imaging.Approach.A beam-blocker made of lead strips was mounted between the x-ray source and object for scatter estimation. The primary signal between lead strips in the blocked region was first calculated by subtracting the measured scatter, and then used to calculate the scatter signal in the unblocked region corresponding to the same attenuation path. The calculated scatter signal was smoothed via local filtration and used to correct the measured projection in the unblocked region. Finally, the CBCT was reconstructed via Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm. A Catphan and a head phantom were used to verify the performance of the proposed method in both full- and half-blocker scenarios, and with and without a bow-tie filter.Main Results. For scans without the bow-tie filter, the CT number error was reduced to 3.97±2.27 and 5.51±3.90 HU in the full- and half-blocker scenarios, respectively, for the Catphan, and to 4.01±2.18 and 7.97 ± 4.05 HU for the head phantom. When the bow-tie filter was applied, the CT number error was reduced to 2.29±1.42 and 6.72±0.77 HU in the full- and half-blocker scenarios, respectively, for the Catphan, and 2.35±1.25 and 4.96 ± 1.89 HU for the head phantom.Significance. The proposed method effectively avoids the influence of the inserted beam blocker itself on the scatter intensity estimation, and proves a more practical and robust way for the beam-blocker based scatter correction in CBCT scanning.

Improvement of proton beam range uncertainty in breast treatment using tissue samples.

Objective.Proton therapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can substantially reduce the dose to lung and cardiac structures. However, these dosimetric benefits are subject to beam range uncertainty in patient. The conversion of the CT-Hounsfield unit (HU) into relative stopping power (RSP) is the primary contribution to range uncertainty. Hence, an accurate HU-RSP conversion is essential.Approach.Real tissue samples, including muscle and adipose, were prepared. The water equivalent path length (WEPL) of these samples was measured under homogeneous conditions using a 12-diode detector array of our time-resolvedin vivorange verification system (IRVS). The HU-RSP conversion was improved using the measured WEPL and HU for adipose tissue. The measured WEPL values were compared with the treatment planning calculation results based on the stoichiometric CT-HU calibration technique. The effect was investigated for both with and without adipose tissue in HU-RSP conversion.Main results.The IRVS was calibrated based on the solid water phantom. The relative differences in WEPL (RSP) between measurements and calculations for muscle, adipose, and water was -1.19% (-0.75%), -4.25%(-4%), and -0.23%(-0.07%), respectively. Based on the improved HU-RSP conversion, the relative differences in WEPL was reduced to -0.97%(-0.62%), -1.50%(-1.46%), and -0.22% (0.00%), respectively.Significance.The WEPL deviation of adipose tissue is larger than the testing limit of 3.5% for beam range robustness in current clinical practice. However, the improved HU-RSP conversion reduced this deviation. The main component of breast tissue is adipose. Hence, the proton treatment of BCS can be undershooting if no proper measures are taken against this specific uncertainty.

Technical note: Does the greater power of pencil beam scanning reduce the need for a proton gantry? A study of head-and-neck and brain tumors.

PURPOSE: Proton therapy systems without a gantry can be more compact and less expensive in terms of capital cost and therefore more available to a larger patient population. Would the advances in pencil beam scanning (PBS) and robotics make gantry-less treatment possible? In this study, we explore if the high-quality treatment plans can be obtained without a gantry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We recently showed that proton treatments with the patient in an upright position may be feasible with a new soft robotic immobilization device and imaging which enables multiple possible patient orientations during a treatment. In this study, we evaluate if this new treatment geometry could enable high quality treatment plans without a gantry. We created PBS treatment plans for seven patients with head-and-neck or brain tumors. Each patient was planned with two scenarios: one with a gantry with the patient in supine position and the other with a gantry-less fixed horizontal beam-line with the patient sitting upright. For the treatment plans, dose-volume-histograms (DVHs), target homogeneity index (HI), mean dose, D 2 ${D_2}$ , and D 98 ${D_{98}}$ are reported. A robustness analysis of one plan was performed with ± $ \pm $ 2.5-mm setup errors and ± $ \pm $ 3.5% range uncertainties with nine scenarios. RESULTS: Most of the PBS-gantry-less plans had similar target HI and organs-at-risk mean dose as compared to PBS-gantry plans and similar robustness with respect to range uncertainties and setup errors. CONCLUSIONS: PBS provides sufficient power to deliver high quality treatment plans without requiring a gantry for head-and-neck or brain tumors. In combination with the development of the new positioning and immobilization methods required to support this treatment geometry, this work suggests the feasibility of further development of a compact proton therapy system with a fixed horizontal beam-line to treat patients in sitting and reclined positions.

A deep LSTM autoencoder-based framework for predictive maintenance of a proton radiotherapy delivery system.

INTRODUCTION: Unscheduled machine downtime can cause treatment interruptions and adversely impact patient treatment outcomes. Conventional Quality Assurance (QA) programs of a proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) system ensure its operational performance by keeping the beam parameters within clinical tolerances but often do not reveal the underlying issues of the device prior to a machine malfunction event. In this study, we propose a Predictive Maintenance (PdM) approach that leverages an advanced analytical tool built on a deep neural network to detect treatment delivery machine issues early. METHODS: Beam delivery log file data from daily QA performed at the Burr Proton Center of Massachusetts General Hospital were collected. A novel PdM framework consisting of long short-term memory-based autoencoder (LSTM-AE) modeling of the proton PBS delivery system and a Mahalanobis distance-based error metric evaluation was constructed to detect rare anomalous machine events. These included QA beam pauses, clinical operational issues, and treatment interruptions. The model was trained in an unsupervised fashion on the QA data of normal sessions so that the model learned characteristics of normal machine operation. The anomaly is quantified as the multivariate deviation between the model predicted data and the measured data of the day using Mahalanobis distance (M-Score). Two-layer and three-layer Long short-term memory-based stacked autoencoder (LSTM-SAE) models were optimized for exploring model performance improvement. Model validation was performed with two clinical datasets and was analyzed using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). RESULTS: LSTM-SAE models showed strong performance in predicting QA beam pauses for both clinical validation datasets. Despite severe skew in the dataset, the model achieved AUPRC of 0.60 and 0.82 and AUROC of 0.75 and 0.92 in the respective 2018 and 2020 datasets. Moreover, these amount to 2.8-fold and 10.7-fold enhancement compared to the respective baseline event rates. In addition, in terms of treatment interruption events, model prediction enabled 3.88-fold and 51.2-fold detection improvement, while the detection improvement for clinical operational issues was 1.04-fold and 1.37-fold, respectively, in the 2018 and 2020 datasets. CONCLUSION: Our novel deep LSTM-SAE-based framework allows for highly discriminative prediction of anomalous machine events and demonstrates great promise for enabling PdM for proton PBS beam delivery.

Accelerate treatment planning process using deep learning generated fluence maps for cervical cancer radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a deep learning method that skips the time-consuming inverse optimization process for automatic generation of machine-deliverable intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. METHODS: Ninety cervical cancer clinical IMRT plans were collected to train a two-stage convolution neural network, of which 66 plans were assigned for training, 11 for validation, and 13 for test. The neural network took patients' computed tomography (CT) anatomy as the input and predicted the fluence map for each radiation beam. The predicted fluence maps were then imported into a treatment planning system and converted to multileaf collimators motion sequences. The automatic plan was evaluated against its corresponding clinical plan, and its machine deliverability was validated by patient-specific IMRT quality assurance (QA). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in dose parameters between automatic and clinical plans for all 13 test patients, indicating a good prediction of fluence maps and a decent quality of automatic plans. The average dice similarity coefficient of isodose volumes encompassed by 0%-100% isodose lines ranged from 0.94 to 1. In patient-specific IMRT QA, the mean gamma passing rate of automatic plans achieved 99.5% under 3%/3 mm criteria, and 97.3% under 2%/2 mm criteria, with a low dose threshold of 10%. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed deep learning framework can produce machine-deliverable IMRT plans with quality similar to the clinical plans in the test set. It skips the inverse plan optimization process and provides an effective and efficient method to accelerate treatment planning process.

Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.

PURPOSE: To quantify interfractional anatomical variations and their dosimetric impact during the course of fractionated proton therapy (PT) of prostate cancer and to assess the robustness of the current treatment planning techniques. METHODS: Simulation and daily in-room CT scans from ten prostate carcinoma patients were analyzed. PT treatment plans (78 Gy in 39 fractions of 2 Gy) were created on the simulation CT, delivering 25 fractions to PTV1 (expanded from prostate and seminal vesicles), followed by 14 boost fractions to PTV2 (expanded from prostate). Plans were subsequently applied to daily CT, with beams aligned to the prostate center in the sagittal plane. For five patients having a sufficiently large daily imaging volume, structure contours were manually drawn, and plans were evaluated for all CT sets. For the other five patients, the plans were evaluated for six selected fractions. The daily CT was matched to the simulation CT through deformable registration. The registration accuracy was validated for each fraction, and the three patients with a large number of accurately registered fractions were used for dose accumulation. RESULTS: In individual fractions, the coverage of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and PTV1 was generally maintained at the corresponding prescription dose. For PTV2, the volume covered by the fractional prescription dose of 2 Gy (i.e., V2) was, on average, reduced by less than 3% compared to the simulation plan. Among the 225 (39 x 5 + 6 x 5) fractions examined, 15 showed a V2 reduction larger than 5%, of which ten were caused by a large variation in rectal gas, and five were due to a prostate shift in the craniocaudal direction. The fractional dose to the anterior rectal wall was found to increase for one patient who had large rectal gas volume in 25 of the 39 fractions, and another who experienced significant prostate volume reduction during the treatment. The fractional bladder dose generally increased with decreasing fullness. In the total accumulated dose for the three patients after excluding a few fractions with inaccurate registration due to a large amount of rectal gas (a condition inconsistent with RTOG protocol), 98.5%, 96.6%, and 98.2% of the PTV2 received the prescription dose of 78 Gy. The V75 and V70 of the anterior rectal wall and bladder both remained within tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that the PT planning techniques and dose constraints used at our institution ensure that target coverage to the prescription dose is maintained in the presence of interfractional anatomical variations. Dose coverage in individual fractions can be compromised, and normal tissue dose increased, due to deviations in the bladder and rectal volume compared to the simulation plans or progressive changes in the prostate volume during the treatment. Deviations from the plan can be reduced with efforts aimed at maintaining consistent daily patient anatomy.

Investigating beam range uncertainty in proton prostate treatment using pelvic-like biological phantoms.

This study aims to develop a method for verifying site-specific and/or beam path specific proton beam range, which could reduce range uncertainty margins and the associated treatment complications. It investigates the range uncertainties from both CT HU to relative stopping power conversion and patient positioning errors for prostate treatment using pelvic-like biological phantoms. Three 25 × 14 × 12 cm3phantoms, made of fresh animal tissues mimicking the pelvic anatomies of prostate patients, were scanned with a general electric CT simulator. A 22 cm circular passive scattering beam with 29 cm range and 8 cm modulation width was used to measure the water equivalent path lengths (WEPL) through the phantoms at multiple points using the dose extinction method with a MatriXXPT detector. The measured WEPLs were compared to those predicted by TOPAS simulations and ray-tracing WEPL calculations. For the three phantoms, the WEPL differences between measured and theoretical prediction (WDMT) are below 1.8% for TOPAS, and 2.5% for ray-tracing. WDMT varies with phantom anatomies by about 0.5% for both TOPAS and ray-tracing. WDMT also correlates with the tissue types of a specific treated region. For the regions where the proton beam path is parallel to sharp bone edges, the WDMTs of TOPAS and ray-tracing respectively reach up to 1.8% and 2.5%. For the region where proton beams pass through just soft tissues, the WDMT is mostly less than 1% for both TOPAS and ray-tracing. For prostate treatments, range uncertainty depends on the tissue types within a specific treated region, patient anatomies and the range calculation methods in the planning algorithms. Our study indicates range uncertainty is less than 2.5% for the whole treated region with both ray-tracing and TOPAS, which suggests the potential to reduce the current 3.5% range uncertainty margin used in the clinics by at least 1% even for single-energy CT data.

A proof of concept treatment planning study of gated proton radiotherapy for cardiac soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies on radiotherapy of cardiac targets exist, and none using a gating method according to cardiac movement. This study aimed to evaluate the dose-volume advantage of using cardiac-respiratory double gating (CRDG) in terms of target location with additional ECG signals in comparison to respiratory single gating (RSG) for proton radiotherapy of targets in the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cardiac motion was modeled using a cardiac-gated four-dimensional computed tomography scan obtained at the end-expiration. Plans with the prescription dose of 50 Gy (RSG and CRDG plans at diastole and systole phases) were compared in terms of clinically relevant dose-volume criteria for various target sizes and seven cardiac subsites. Potential dose sparing by utilizing CRDG over RSG was quantified in terms of surrounding organ at risk (OAR) doses while the dose coverage to the targets was fully ensured. RESULTS: The average mean dose reductions were 28 ± 10% when gated at diastole and 21 ± 12% at systole in heart and 30 ± 17% at diastole and 8 ± 9% at systole in left ventricle compared to respiratory single gating. The diastole phase was optimal for gated treatments for all target locations except right ventricle and interventricular septum. The right ventricle target was best treated at the systole phase. However, an optimal gating phase for the interventricular septum target could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: We have studied the dose-volume benefits of CRDG for each cardiac subsite, and demonstrated that CRDG may spare organs at risk better than RSG.

Targeting the DNA replication stress phenotype of KRAS mutant cancer cells.

Mutant KRAS is a common tumor driver and frequently confers resistance to anti-cancer treatments such as radiation. DNA replication stress in these tumors may constitute a therapeutic liability but is poorly understood. Here, using single-molecule DNA fiber analysis, we first characterized baseline replication stress in a panel of unperturbed isogenic and non-isogenic cancer cell lines. Correlating with the observed enhanced replication stress we found increased levels of cytosolic double-stranded DNA in KRAS mutant compared to wild-type cells. Yet, despite this phenotype replication stress-inducing agents failed to selectively impact KRAS mutant cells, which were protected by CHK1. Similarly, most exogenous stressors studied did not differentially augment cytosolic DNA accumulation in KRAS mutant compared to wild-type cells. However, we found that proton radiation was able to slow fork progression and preferentially induce fork stalling in KRAS mutant cells. Proton treatment also partly reversed the radioresistance associated with mutant KRAS. The cellular effects of protons in the presence of KRAS mutation clearly contrasted that of other drugs affecting replication, highlighting the unique nature of the underlying DNA damage caused by protons. Taken together, our findings provide insight into the replication stress response associated with mutated KRAS, which may ultimately yield novel therapeutic opportunities.

Clinical commissioning of intensity-modulated proton therapy systems: Report of AAPM Task Group 185.

Proton therapy is an expanding radiotherapy modality in the United States and worldwide. With the number of proton therapy centers treating patients increasing, so does the need for consistent, high-quality clinical commissioning practices. Clinical commissioning encompasses the entire proton therapy system's multiple components, including the treatment delivery system, the patient positioning system, and the image-guided radiotherapy components. Also included in the commissioning process are the x-ray computed tomography scanner calibration for proton stopping power, the radiotherapy treatment planning system, and corresponding portions of the treatment management system. This commissioning report focuses exclusively on intensity-modulated scanning systems, presenting details of how to perform the commissioning of the proton therapy and ancillary systems, including the required proton beam measurements, treatment planning system dose modeling, and the equipment needed.