The epidemiology of sepsis in paediatric intensive care units in Brazil (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database in Pediatric population, SPREAD PED): an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence and mortality of paediatric sepsis in resource-poor settings are scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence and in-hospital mortality of severe sepsis and septic shock treated in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Brazil, and risk factors for mortality. METHODS: We performed a nationwide, 1-day, prospective point prevalence study with follow-up of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, using a stratified random sample of all PICUs in Brazil. Patients were enrolled at each participating PICU on a single day between March 25 and 29, 2019. All patients occupying a bed at the PICU on the study day (either admitted previously or on that day) were included if they were aged 28 days to 18 years and met the criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock at any time during hospitalisation. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge or death, censored at 60 days. Risk factors for mortality were assessed using a Poisson regression model. We used prevalence to generate national estimates. FINDINGS: Of 241 PICUs invited to participate, 144 PICUs (capacity of 1242 beds) included patients in the study. On the day of the study, 1122 children were admitted to the participating PICUs, of whom 280 met the criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock during hospitalisation, resulting in a prevalence of 25·0% (95% CI 21·6-28·8), with a mortality rate of 19·8% (15·4-25·2; 50 of 252 patients with complete clinical data). Increased risk of mortality was associated with higher Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (relative risk per point increase 1·21, 95% CI 1·14-1·29, p<0·0001), unknown vaccination status (2·57, 1·26-5·24; p=0·011), incomplete vaccination status (2·16, 1·19-3·92; p=0·012), health care-associated infection (2·12, 1·23-3·64, p=0·0073), and compliance with antibiotics (2·38, 1·46-3·86, p=0·0007). The estimated incidence of PICU-treated sepsis was 74·6 cases per 100 000 paediatric population (95% CI 61·5-90·5), which translates to 42 374 cases per year (34 940-51 443) in Brazil, with an estimated mortality of 8305 (6848-10 083). INTERPRETATION: In this representative sample of PICUs in a middle-income country, the prevalences of severe sepsis or septic shock and in-hospital mortality were high. Modifiable factors, such as incomplete vaccination and health care-associated infections, were associated with greater risk of in-hospital mortality. FUNDING: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. TRANSLATION: For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention in Brazilian intensive care units: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The uptake of evidence-based therapies in the intensive care environment is suboptimal, particularly in limited-resource countries. Checklists, daily goal assessments, and clinician prompts may improve compliance with best practice processes of care and, in turn, improve clinical outcomes. However, the available evidence on the effectiveness of checklists is unreliable and inconclusive, and the mechanisms are poorly understood. We aim to evaluate whether the use of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention, including the use of a checklist and the definition of daily care goals during multidisciplinary daily rounds and clinician prompts, can improve the in-hospital mortality of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Our secondary objectives are to assess the effects of the study intervention on specific processes of care, clinical outcomes, and the safety culture and to determine which factors (the processes of care and/or safety culture) mediate the effect of the study intervention on mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a cluster randomized trial involving 118 ICUs in Brazil conducted in two phases. In the observational preparatory phase, we collect baseline data on processes of care and clinical outcomes from 60 consecutive patients with lengths of ICU stay longer than 48 h and apply the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) to 75% or more of the health care staff in each ICU. In the randomized phase, we assign ICUs to the experimental or control arm and repeat data collection. Experimental arm ICUs receive the multifaceted quality improvement intervention, including a checklist and definition of daily care goals during daily multidisciplinary rounds, clinician prompting, and feedback on rates of adherence to selected care processes. Control arm ICUs maintain usual care. The primary outcome is in-hospital mortality, truncated at 60 days. Secondary outcomes include the rates of adherence to appropriate care processes, rates of other clinical outcomes, and scores on the SAQ domains. Analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle, and the primary outcome is analyzed using mixed effects logistic regression. DISCUSSION: This is a large scale, pragmatic cluster-randomized trial evaluating whether a multifaceted quality improvement intervention, including checklists applied during the multidisciplinary daily rounds and clinician prompting, can improve the adoption of proven therapies and decrease the mortality of critically ill patients. If this study finds that the intervention reduces mortality, it may be widely adopted in intensive care units, even those in limited-resource settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01785966.