A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients.

Many transplantation programs utilize noninvasive abdominal and pelvic imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of recipient candidates. Practice patterns vary, and consensus guidelines addressing the risks and benefits of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-transplant evaluation process do not currently exist. In this single-center study, we examined the frequency, clinical significance, and associated costs of CT and MRI findings during the pre-transplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review of 3041 adult patients who underwent a CT/CTA or MRI/MRA of the abdomen and pelvis for pre-transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Pre-transplant imaging with MRI offered a more sensitive evaluation in comparison with CT, with the notable exception of abnormalities in which calcium was detected. Patients imaged with CT had a significantly greater proportion of subsequent clinical actions arising from imaging findings. The total financial cost of MRI was greater than that of CT. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients who received MultiHance gadolinium contrast were reported. In conclusion, the risks, benefits, and costs of CT/CTA and MRI/MRA must be carefully considered to optimize the pre-operative evaluation of renal transplant recipients.

Liver MRI and histological correlates in chronic liver disease on multiphase gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient echo imaging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intrinsic hepatic enhancement patterns on multiphase, gadolinium-enhanced, fat-suppressed, 3D T1-weighted, gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a quantitative correlate for severity of pathological changes in chronic liver disease (CLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was HIPAA-compliant and Institutional Review Board-approved. In all, 75 patients were studied by contrast-enhanced multiphase abdominal MRI. CLD patients had liver histology correlation derived from right lobe liver biopsies. Contrast-enhanced arterial- and delayed-phase 3D gradient recalled echo (GRE) liver MRI were scored using feature categorization templates to quantify enhancement patterns by three independent readers. Liver histopathology was staged/graded for fibrosis/inflammation using the Scheuer system. Statistical testing for MRI histology correlates used a Pearson's product moment correlation and a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two-sample rank-sum test. Reader agreement was analyzed by a modified Fleiss' kappa test. RESULTS: MRI histology correlation was high for delayed-phase MRI versus fibrosis stage (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.941 < r < 0.976, P = 5 × 10(-7)), but lower for all other comparisons (delayed-phase vs. inflammation and arterial-phase vs. inflammation or fibrosis all showed a CI no greater than 0.64). Paired testing between delayed-phase MRI score and histology fibrosis staging incremental levels was significant (from P < 10(-2) to P < 10(-5)). CONCLUSION: A standard gadolinium-enhanced liver MRI may provide a correlate measure of hepatic fibrosis over a spectrum of severity.

Hepatocellular carcinoma lesion characterization: single-institution clinical performance review of multiphase gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging--comparison to prior same-center results after MR systems improvements.

PURPOSE: To measure diagnostic performance in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by using the most recent technology and multiphase gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to compare with earlier results at the same institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained. Between January 2008 and April 2010, 101 patients underwent liver transplantation and pretransplantation abdominal MR imaging within 90 days. Prospective image interpretations from the clinical record were reviewed for documentation of HCC, including size, number, and location. Liver explant histologic examination provided the reference standard for lesion analysis and was performed in axial gross slices in conjunction with the MR imaging report for direct comparison. Tumors were categorized according to size (≥ 2 cm or <2 cm), and MR imaging detection sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy were calculated according to category. The Fisher exact test was used to compare results from this study against prior reported results. RESULTS: Thirty-five (34.7%) of 101 patients had HCC at explant analysis. Patient-based analysis of all lesions showed a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% (34 of 35) and 100% (66 of 66), respectively. For lesions 2 cm or larger, MR imaging had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (23 of 23) and 100% (78 of 78), respectively. For lesions smaller than 2 cm, MR imaging had a sensitivity and specificity of 82.6% (19 of 23) and 100% (78 of 78), respectively. Lesion-based sensitivity for all tumors was 91.4% (53 of 58) in the current study, compared with 77.8% in 2007 (P = .07). For lesions smaller than 2 cm, the sensitivity was 87.5% (28 of 32) in the current study, compared with 55.6% previously (P = .02). CONCLUSION: MR imaging remains a highly accurate diagnostic method for the preoperative evaluation of HCC, and detection of small (<2 cm) tumors has been significantly improved compared with that of earlier studies.