Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) regression normograms for patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide and vincristine) chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We present normograms for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) regression in patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) successfully treated with multiagent chemotherapy in order to predict treatment resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data for 46 patients with high-risk GTN treated with EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide and vincristine) who had hCG values available. Patients were classified as having methotrexate (MTX)-resistant disease (n = 22) or primary high-risk disease (n = 24). The 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles of the hCG before every chemotherapy course were calculated and plotted in normograms. RESULTS: Half of the patients treated for MTX-resistant disease and primary high-risk disease had normal hCG levels before the third and sixth course of chemotherapy, respectively. In patients with MTX-resistant disease, the 90th percentile line fell below normal before the start of the fourth course, whereas in patients with primary high-risk disease this was not the case until the eighth course of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Resistance to EMA/CO treatment for high-risk GTN, as illustrated by examples, could be predicted using normograms for hCG resistance. Normograms differed depending on the indication for multiagent chemotherapy due to much higher initial hCG values in patients with primary high-risk disease compared with those treated for MTX-resistant disease.

Relapse rates after two versus three consolidation courses of methotrexate in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) alternating with folinic acid is a commonly used treatment regimen for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). In The Netherlands, two courses of MTX are administered after normalization of serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels (consolidation courses), whereas in the United Kingdom, three consolidation courses are given. In a retrospective setting we compared relapse rates of women completing MTX therapy for low-risk GTN in The Netherlands and the UK. METHODS: From 1980 to 2008, 351 patients were collected from the Dutch Central Registry for Hydatidiform Moles and records from the Dutch Working Party on Trophoblastic Disease. From the Charing Cross Hospital Trophoblast Disease Centre (London), 600 low-risk GTN patients were identified from 1992 to 2008. RESULTS: In 4.0% of patients relapse occurred after MTX treatment with three consolidation courses, whereas 8.3% of patients relapsed after MTX treatment with two consolidation courses (p=0.006). Although patients from The Netherlands had a higher level of hCG (p<0.001) and more patients had metastases before the start of treatment (p=0.012), the number of courses of MTX to achieve a normal hCG did not differ significantly between patients from The Netherlands and the UK (p=0.375). CONCLUSIONS: Relapse rates were higher in patients treated with two consolidation courses of MTX. Although other factors might have influenced the observed difference in relapse rates, three courses of consolidation chemotherapy may be preferable to two in the treatment of low-risk GTN in order to decrease the risk of disease relapse. A prospective randomized study would be required to confirm these findings.

Fatal cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia over four decades in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe fatal cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) over four decades and evaluate whether treatment was given according to the protocol and reveal possible implications for future management. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Netherlands. POPULATION: Women who died from GTN from 1971 to 2011. METHODS: Records from the Dutch Central Registry for Hydatidiform Moles and the Working Party on Trophoblastic Disease were used to identify fatal cases of GTN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease extent, risk classification, treatment regimens and cause of death. RESULTS: Twenty-six women died from GTN. In five cases GTN developed after a hydatidiform mole and in 19 cases following term pregnancy. Half of the women died between 1971 and 1980, when women were not yet classified as having low-risk or high-risk disease and were therefore not yet treated accordingly. A major decline in the number of deaths was seen after the first decade, with a further decrease from 1981 to 2011. Early death occurred in nine women. In four of these women, death was treatment-related. Women who died more than 4 weeks after the start of treatment mostly died from metastatic tumour (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: The yearly number of women who died from GTN decreased considerably over the last four decades. Appropriate risk classification is essential to start optimal initial therapy and to prevent therapy resistance. Women with post-term choriocarcinoma represented a large proportion of the dead women and we propose that these women are considered as having high-risk disease.

Comparing cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy with EMA/CO chemotherapy for the treatment of high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) days 1-5, methotrexate 300 mg/m(2) day 1, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) day 1, actinomycin D 0.6 mg/m(2) day 2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) day 4, EMACP) was compared to EMA/CO (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) days 1-2, methotrexate 300 mg/m(2) day 1 and actinomycin D 0.5 mg i.v. bolus day 1 and 0.5 mg/m(2) day 2, alternating with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) day 8 and vincristine 1 mg/m(2) day 8) for the treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the Netherlands, 83 patients were treated with EMACP and 103 patients with EMA/CO. Outcome measures were remission rate, median number of courses to achieve normal human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) concentrations, toxicity, recurrent disease rate and disease specific survival. RESULTS: Remission rates were similar (EMACP 91.6%, EMA/CO 85.4%). The median number of courses of EMA/CO to reach hCG normalisation for single-agent resistant disease and primary high-risk disease was three and five courses, respectively, compared to 1.5 (p=0.001) and three (p<0.001) courses of EMACP. Patients treated with EMACP more often developed fever, renal toxicity, nausea and diarrhoea compared to patients treated with EMA/CO. Patients treated with EMA/CO more often had anaemia, neuropathy and hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: EMACP combination chemotherapy is an effective treatment for high-risk GTN, with a remission rate comparable to EMA/CO. However, the difference in duration of treatment is only slightly shorter with EMACP. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the form of EMACP in this study was not proven more effective than EMA/CO.