Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(7): e286-e296, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936387

RESUMO

Detection of extranodal extension on histopathology in surgically treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma indicates poor prognosis. However, there is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria, interpretation, and reporting of histology detected extranodal extension, which has contributed to conflicting evidence in the literature, and likely clinical inconsistency. The Head and Neck Cancer International Group conducted a three-round modified Delphi process with a group of 19 international pathology experts representing 15 national clinical research groups to generate consensus recommendations for histology detected extranodal extension diagnostic criteria. The expert panel strongly agreed on terminology and diagnostic features for histology detected extranodal extension and soft tissue metastasis. Moreover, the panel reached consensus on reporting of histology detected extranodal extension and on nodal sampling. These consensus recommendations, endorsed by 19 organisations representing 34 countries, are a crucial development towards standardised diagnosis and reporting of histology detected extranodal extension, and more accurate data collection and analysis.


Assuntos
Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Extensão Extranodal , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Extensão Extranodal/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Terminologia como Assunto
2.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(7): e297-e307, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936388

RESUMO

Extranodal extension of tumour on histopathology is known to be a negative prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Compelling evidence suggests that extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging is also a negative prognostic factor. Furthermore, if imaging detected extranodal extension could be identified reliably before the start of treatment, it could be used to guide treatment selection, as patients might be better managed with non-surgical approaches to avoid the toxicity and cost of trimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy together). There are many aspects of imaging detected extranodal extension that remain unresolved or are without consensus, such as the criteria to best diagnose them and the associated terminology. The Head and Neck Cancer International Group conducted a five-round modified Delphi process with a group of 18 international radiology experts, representing 14 national clinical research groups. We generated consensus recommendations on the terminology and diagnostic criteria for imaging detected extranodal extension to harmonise clinical practice and research. These recommendations have been endorsed by 19 national and international organisations, representing 34 countries. We propose a new classification system to aid diagnosis, which was supported by most of the participating experts over existing systems, and which will require validation in the future. Additionally, we have created an online educational resource for grading imaging detected extranodal extensions.


Assuntos
Consenso , Extensão Extranodal , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Extensão Extranodal/diagnóstico por imagem , Extensão Extranodal/patologia , Técnica Delphi , Terminologia como Assunto , Prognóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA