Investigation of the safety and feasibility of AAV1/SERCA2a gene transfer in patients with chronic heart failure supported with a left ventricular assist device - the SERCA-LVAD TRIAL.

The SERCA-LVAD trial was a phase 2a trial assessing the safety and feasibility of delivering an adeno-associated vector 1 carrying the cardiac isoform of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (AAV1/SERCA2a) to adult chronic heart failure patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device. The SERCA-LVAD trial was one of a program of AAV1/SERCA2a cardiac gene therapy trials including CUPID1, CUPID 2 and AGENT trials. Enroled subjects were randomised to receive a single intracoronary infusion of 1 × 1013 DNase-resistant AAV1/SERCA2a particles or a placebo solution in a double-blinded design, stratified by presence of neutralising antibodies to AAV. Elective endomyocardial biopsy was performed at 6 months unless the subject had undergone cardiac transplantation, with myocardial samples assessed for the presence of exogenous viral DNA from the treatment vector. Safety assessments including ELISPOT were serially performed. Although designed as a 24 subject trial, recruitment was stopped after five subjects had been randomised and received infusion due to the neutral result from the CUPID 2 trial. Here we describe the results from the 5 patients at 3 years follow up, which confirmed that viral DNA was delivered to the failing human heart in 2 patients receiving gene therapy with vector detectable at follow up endomyocardial biopsy or cardiac transplantation. Absolute levels of detectable transgene DNA were low, and no functional benefit was observed. There were no safety concerns in this small cohort. This trial identified some of the challenges of performing gene therapy trials in this LVAD patient cohort which may help guide future trial design.

Management of cardiac disease in cancer patients throughout oncological treatment: ESMO consensus recommendations.

Cancer and cardiovascular (CV) disease are the most prevalent diseases in the developed world. Evidence increasingly shows that these conditions are interlinked through common risk factors, coincident in an ageing population, and are connected biologically through some deleterious effects of anticancer treatment on CV health. Anticancer therapies can cause a wide spectrum of short- and long-term cardiotoxic effects. An explosion of novel cancer therapies has revolutionised this field and dramatically altered cancer prognosis. Nevertheless, these new therapies have introduced unexpected CV complications beyond heart failure. Common CV toxicities related to cancer therapy are defined, along with suggested strategies for prevention, detection and treatment. This ESMO consensus article proposes to define CV toxicities related to cancer or its therapies and provide guidance regarding prevention, screening, monitoring and treatment of CV toxicity. The majority of anticancer therapies are associated with some CV toxicity, ranging from asymptomatic and transient to more clinically significant and long-lasting cardiac events. It is critical however, that concerns about potential CV damage resulting from anticancer therapies should be weighed against the potential benefits of cancer therapy, including benefits in overall survival. CV disease in patients with cancer is complex and treatment needs to be individualised. The scope of cardio-oncology is wide and includes prevention, detection, monitoring and treatment of CV toxicity related to cancer therapy, and also ensuring the safe development of future novel cancer treatments that minimise the impact on CV health. It is anticipated that the management strategies discussed herein will be suitable for the majority of patients. Nonetheless, the clinical judgment of physicians remains extremely important; hence, when using these best clinical practices to inform treatment options and decisions, practitioners should also consider the individual circumstances of their patients on a case-by-case basis.

European Society of Cardiology quality indicators for the prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in cancer treatment.

AIMS: To develop quality indicators (QIs) for the evaluation of the prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We followed the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) methodology for QI development which comprises (i) identifying the key domains of care for the prevention and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in patients on cancer treatment, (ii) performing a systematic review of the literature to develop candidate QIs, and (iii) selecting of the final set of QIs using a modified Delphi process. Work was undertaken in parallel with the writing of the 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology and in collaboration with the European Haematology Association, the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. In total, 5 main and 9 secondary QIs were selected across five domains of care: (i) Structural framework, (ii) Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment, (iii) Cancer therapy related cardiovascular toxicity, (iv) Predictors of outcomes, and (v) Monitoring of cardiovascular complications during cancer therapy. CONCLUSION: We present the ESC Cardio-Oncology QIs with their development process and provide an overview of the scientific rationale for their selection. These indicators are aimed at quantifying and improving the adherence to guideline-recommended clinical practice and improving patient outcomes.

What Does a Cardio-oncology Service Offer to the Oncologist and the Haematologist?

Cardio-oncology is an emerging subspecialty arising from the need for multidisciplinary collaboration to address the increasing prominence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among cancer patients. This overview outlines the case for establishing cardio-oncology services and defines the ways in which these services benefit cancer patients. The primary objective of cardio-oncology is to manage CVDs in order to allow cancer patients to complete the best cancer treatments safely and with minimal interruption. In the decades since the first discovery of heart failure induced by anthracycline chemotherapy, both cardiovascular and oncological science have advanced considerably. Cardio-oncology services aim to bring together expertise from these two fast moving fields in order to provide optimal evidence-based care for cancer patients with CVDs. Here we discuss the basis of cardio-oncology services by presenting their rationale and key components, as well as their essential roles in education, training and research. At each stage of the cancer care pathway, a cardio-oncology service can add value by ensuring cancer patients have timely access to specialist care backed up by cutting edge diagnostic tools and treatment options, as well as holistic supports. We highlight areas of recent and upcoming developments in the field that are likely to change established clinical practice. Improved cardiac imaging modalities can detect chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction earlier and are also essential for the prompt diagnosis of an expanding range of cardiovascular effects complicating newer cancer therapeutics, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted therapies. Modern cancer therapy has dramatically improved cancer survival and as such CVD is becoming one of the principal determinants of overall outcome for cancer patients. A dedicated cardio-oncology service can facilitate the optimisation of cardiovascular treatment and enable the completion of cancer therapy. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach is key to achieving these objectives.

The prevalence of iron deficiency and anemia and their impact on survival in patients at a cardio-oncology clinic.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency (ID) and anemia are common in both heart failure (HF) and cancer patients and are associated with poor quality of life and survival. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the prevalence, types, and confounding factors of ID and anemia in patients referred to cardio-oncology clinic, and (2) identify the association between iron metabolism parameters and survival of cardio-oncology patients. METHODS: We assessed iron, ferritin, hemoglobin concentrations, transferrin saturation (TSAT), cancer type, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), kidney function, cardiovascular risk factors and survival in 599 patients who were referred to cardio-oncology clinic from 2011 to 2017. ID was defined by a TSAT < 20%, absolute iron deficiency (AID) with a serum ferritin level < 100 µg/L while serum ferritin level of ≥ 100 µg/L was considered as functional iron deficiency (FID) and TSAT ≥ 20% was considered as no ID. RESULTS: The prevalence of ID, AID, and FID was 46, 31, and 15% of study patients, respectively. Anemia was present in approximately half (54%) of the patients with any ID. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that male gender (HR 1.704 [1.207-2.404] p = 0.002); previous cancer history (HR 1.879 [1.079-3.272] p = 0.026); elevated BNP (HR 2.126 [1.258-3.590] p = 0.005); TSAT< 20% (HR 1.721 [1.214-2.439] p = 0.002); ferritin ≥ 100 µg/L (HR 2.008 [1.088-3.706] p = 0.026); serum iron concentration < 12 µmol/L (HR 2.292 [1.614-3.255] p < 0.001); FID (HR 2.538 [1.1618-3.981] p < 0.001) and anemia (HR 2.462 [1.734-3.495] p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: About half of cardio-oncology patients had anemia and iron deficiency, with the absolute type being twice as prevalent as the functional one. Patients with breast, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary cancer were affected more often. Both anemia and iron deficiency independently predicted all-cause mortality. Future studies are required to confirm ID as a risk factor and evaluate the clinical benefits of iron replacement therapy.

Expert Consensus on the Management of Adverse Events During Treatment with Lenvatinib for Thyroid Cancer.

AIMS: Lenvatinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with progressive, locally advanced or metastatic, differentiated thyroid carcinoma refractory to radioactive iodine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was undertaken to inform the development of consensus-based guidance for the routine management of adverse events associated with lenvatinib. PubMed was searched on 24 October 2017; the search terms were 'lenvatinib' and 'thyroid cancer'. RESULTS: Hypertension, diarrhoea, weight loss, skin toxicities and cardiovascular adverse events were considered. For grade 1/2 diarrhoea, initial treatment should be loperamide with a 1-week treatment interruption if diarrhoea persists and dose reduction if diarrhoea recurs on reinitiation of lenvatinib. Blood pressure should be monitored daily in patients with pre-existing hypertension, otherwise from 1 week after the initiation of lenvatinib and weekly for the first 2 months. For patients with systolic blood pressure ≥135 mmHg to <160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mmHg to <100 mmHg, lenvatinib should be continued but antihypertensive therapy initiated/intensified. For patients who remain hypertensive, a treatment break can be considered with lenvatinib reinitiated at a reduced dose once the patient's blood pressure has stabilised for at least 48 h. Weight loss of 10% of baseline body weight or the onset of anorexia should be managed with a 1-week treatment break; patients should maintain a healthy, active lifestyle. For patients with grade 2 proteinuria, lenvatinib may be continued, but an angiotensin II receptor blocker or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor should be commenced. For grade >3 proteinuria, lenvatinib should be interrupted until proteinuria returns to 1+. For chronic proteinuria, lenvatinib should be stopped. Skin toxicities should be managed with moisturisers or emollients and soap substitutes. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis, regular monitoring and symptomatic management with appropriate short treatment breaks and, for persistent adverse events, dose reductions, are recommended to enable patients to remain on the optimal dose regimen.

Cardiotoxicity Following Cancer Treatment.

More than half of those born after 1960 will develop cancer during their lifetime. Fortunately, owing to improved diagnosis and treatment, cure rates have risen steadily over the last three decades. With an increased survivorship, more will experience adverse effects of cancer therapeutics on the heart. As the oncologist's focus begins to encompass the issues of cancer survivorship, awareness of the management of cardiac toxicity would be prudent for all physicians looking after patients with cancer.

Myocardial MiR-30 downregulation triggered by doxorubicin drives alterations in ß-adrenergic signaling and enhances apoptosis.

The use of anthracyclines such as doxorubicin (DOX) has improved outcome in cancer patients, yet associated risks of cardiomyopathy have limited their clinical application. DOX-associated cardiotoxicity is frequently irreversible and typically progresses to heart failure (HF) but our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying this and essential for development of cardioprotective strategies remains largely obscure. As microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to play potent regulatory roles in both cardiovascular disease and cancer, we investigated miRNA changes in DOX-induced HF and the alteration of cellular processes downstream. Myocardial miRNA profiling was performed after DOX-induced injury, either via acute application to isolated cardiomyocytes or via chronic exposure in vivo, and compared with miRNA profiles from remodeled hearts following myocardial infarction. The miR-30 family was downregulated in all three models. We describe here that miR-30 act regulating the ß-adrenergic pathway, where preferential ß1- and ß2-adrenoceptor (ß1AR and ß2AR) direct inhibition is combined with Giα-2 targeting for fine-tuning. Importantly, we show that miR-30 also target the pro-apoptotic gene BNIP3L/NIX. In aggregate, we demonstrate that high miR-30 levels are protective against DOX toxicity and correlate this in turn with lower reactive oxygen species generation. In addition, we identify GATA-6 as a mediator of DOX-associated reductions in miR-30 expression. In conclusion, we describe that DOX causes acute and sustained miR-30 downregulation in cardiomyocytes via GATA-6. miR-30 overexpression protects cardiac cells from DOX-induced apoptosis, and its maintenance represents a potential cardioprotective and anti-tumorigenic strategy for anthracyclines.

Physiological, pharmacological and toxicological considerations of drug-induced structural cardiac injury.

The incidence of drug-induced structural cardiotoxicity, which may lead to heart failure, has been recognized in association with the use of anthracycline anti-cancer drugs for many years, but has also been shown to occur following treatment with the new generation of targeted anti-cancer agents that inhibit one or more receptor or non-receptor tyrosine kinases, serine/threonine kinases as well as several classes of non-oncology agents. A workshop organized by the Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science (University of Liverpool) on 5 September 2013 and attended by industry, academia and regulatory representatives, was designed to gain a better understanding of the gaps in the field of structural cardiotoxicity that can be addressed through collaborative efforts. Specific recommendations from the workshop for future collaborative activities included: greater efforts to identify predictive (i) preclinical; and (ii) clinical biomarkers of early cardiovascular injury; (iii) improved understanding of comparative physiology/pathophysiology and the clinical predictivity of current preclinical in vivo models; (iv) the identification and use of a set of cardiotoxic reference compounds for comparative profiling in improved animal and human cellular models; (v) more sharing of data (through publication/consortia arrangements) on target-related toxicities; (vi) strategies to develop cardio-protective agents; and (vii) closer interactions between preclinical scientists and clinicians to help ensure best translational efforts.

Gene therapy: targeting the myocardium.

Effective clinical delivery of gene therapy to the heart requires understanding and design of complex biological systems to deliver therapeutic gene expression. The development of vectors that specifically target the myocardium, in particular bioengineered recombinant viruses, has improved the efficiency of gene delivery to the heart. These tools, coupled with advances in selection and design of the genetic payload, have led to effective cardiac gene therapy in preclinical models. This technology is currently translating to the clinic with a new wave of gene therapy trials for myocardial disease.

Myocardial tissue engineering: a review.

Myocardial tissue engineering, a concept that intends to overcome the obstacles to prolonging patients' life after myocardial infarction, is continuously improving. It comprises a biomaterial based 'vehicle', either a porous scaffold or dense patch, made of either natural or synthetic polymeric materials, to aid transportation of cells into the diseased region in the heart. Many different cell types have been suggested for cell therapy and myocardial tissue engineering. These include both autologous and embryonic stem cells, both having their advantages and disadvantages. Biomaterials suggested for this specific tissue-engineering application need to be biocompatible with the cardiac cells and have particular mechanical properties matching those of native myocardium, so that the delivered donor cells integrate and remain intact in vivo. Although much research is being carried out, many questions still remain unanswered requiring further research efforts. In this review, we discuss the various approaches reported in the field of myocardial tissue engineering, focusing on the achievements of combining biomaterials and cells by various techniques to repair the infarcted region, also providing an insight on clinical trials and possible cell sources in cell therapy. Alternative suggestions to myocardial tissue engineering, in situ engineering and left ventricular devices are also discussed.