First year internal medicine residents' self-report point-of-care ultrasound knowledge and skills: what (Little) difference three years make.

BACKGROUND: With increasing availability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) education in medical schools, it is unclear whether or not learning needs of junior medical residents have evolved over time. METHODS: We invited all postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents at three Canadian internal medicine residency training programs in 2019 to complete a survey previously completed by 47 Canadian Internal Medicine PGY-1 s in 2016. Using a five-point Likert scale, participants rated perceived applicability of POCUS to the practice of internal medicine and self-reported skills in 15 diagnostic POCUS applications and 9 procedures. RESULTS: Of the 97 invited residents, 58 (60 %) completed the survey in 2019. Participants reported high applicability but low skills across all POCUS applications and procedures. The 2019 cohort reported higher skills in assessing pulmonary B lines than the 2016 cohort (2.3 ± SD 1.0 vs. 1.5 ± SD 0.7, adjusted p-value = 0.01). No other differences were noted. CONCLUSIONS: POCUS educational needs continue to be high in Canadian internal medicine learners. The results of this needs assessment study support ongoing inclusion of basic POCUS elements in the current internal medicine residency curriculum.

On embedding assessments of self-regulated learning into licensure activities in the health professions: a call to action.

How well have healthcare professionals and trainees been prepared for the inevitable demands for new learning that will arise in their future? Given the rapidity with which 'core healthcare knowledge' changes, medical educators have a responsibility to audit whether trainees have developed the capacity to effectively self-regulate their learning. Trainees who engage in effective self-regulated learning (SRL) skillfully monitor and control their cognition, motivation, behaviour, and environment to adaptively meet demands for new learning. However, medical curricula rarely assess trainees' capacity to engage in these strategic processes. In this position paper, we argue for a paradigm shift toward assessing SRL more deliberately in undergraduate and postgraduate programs, as well as in associated licensing activities. Specifically, we explore evidence supporting an innovative blend of principles from the science on SRL, and on preparation for future learning (PFL) assessments. We propose recommendations for how program designers, curriculum developers, and assessment leads in undergraduate and postgraduate training programs, and in licensing bodies can work together to develop integrated assessments that measure how and how well trainees engage in SRL. Claims about lifelong learning in health professions education have gone unmatched by responsive curricular changes for far too long. Further neglecting these important competencies represents a disservice to medical trainees and a potential risk to the future patients they will care for.

Dans quelle mesure les professionnels de la santé et les étudiants ont-ils été préparés aux exigences inévitables de nouveaux apprentissages qui se présenteront à eux à l'avenir? Étant donné la rapidité avec laquelle les «connaissances de base en matière de soins de santé¼ évoluent, les enseignants en médecine ont la responsabilité de vérifier si les étudiants ont développé la capacité d'autoréguler adéquatement leurs apprentissages. Ceux qui pratiquent efficacement l'apprentissage autorégulé (AAR) surveillent et contrôlent habilement leur cognition, leur motivation, leur comportement et leur environnement pour s'adapter à la nécessité de nouveaux apprentissages. Cependant, les programmes d'études médicales évaluent rarement la capacité des étudiants à s'engager dans ce processus stratégique. Dans cet exposé de position, nous plaidons en faveur d'un changement de paradigme vers une évaluation plus ciblée de l'AAR dans les formations doctorale et postdoctorale, ainsi que pour les activités d'évaluation. Plus précisément, nous explorons les résultats convaincants de l'emploi d'un mélange innovant de principes issus de la recherche en matière d'AAR et d'évaluations de la préparation à l'apprentissage futur. Nous proposons des recommandations pour une collaboration entre les responsables de la conception de programmes d'études, ceux de l'élaboration du cursus, ceux chargés de l'évaluation dans les programmes d'études prédoctorales et postdoctorales et les organismes responsables de l'octroi d'un titre de compétence en vue de créer des évaluations intégrées qui mesurent la méthode et la qualité de l'AAR chez les étudiants. Les programmes d'études tardent encore à traduire dans la pratique la reconnaissance de l'importance de l'apprentissage tout au long de la vie dans l'éducation médicale. Continuer à négliger ces compétences importantes ne ferait que nuire aux étudiants en médecine et potentiellement à leurs futurs patients.

Who is teaching and supervising our junior residents' central venous catheterizations?

BACKGROUND: The extent to which medical residents are involved in the teaching and supervision of medical procedures is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the teaching and supervision of junior residents in central venous catheterization (CVC) by resident-teachers. METHODS: All PGY-1 internal medicine residents at two Canadian academic institutions were invited to complete a survey on their CVC experience, teaching, and supervision prior to their enrolment in a simulator CVC training curriculum. RESULTS: Of the 69 eligible PGY-1 residents, 32 (46%) consenting participants were included in the study. There were no significant baseline differences between participants from the two institutions in terms of sex, number of ICU months completed, previous CVC training received, number of CVCs observed and performed. Only 16 participants (50%) received any CVC training at baseline. Of those who received any training, 63% were taught only by senior resident-teachers. A total of 81 CVCs were placed by 17 participants. Thirty-two CVCs (45%) were supervised by resident-teachers. CONCLUSIONS: Resident-teachers play a significant role both in the teaching and supervision of CVCs placed by junior residents. Educational efforts should focus on preparing residents for their role in teaching and supervision of procedures.

Effectiveness of simulation-based training for obstetric internal medicine: Impact of cognitive load and emotions on knowledge acquisition and retention.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training's impact on learning outcomes may be related to cognitive load or emotions during training. We evaluated the association of validated measures of cognitive load and emotion with learning outcomes in simulation-based obstetric internal medicine cases. METHODS: All internal medicine learners (n = 15) who completed the knowledge test pre-training, post-training (knowledge acquisition), and at 3-6 months (knowledge retention) for all three simulation cases were included. RESULTS: Mean knowledge scores differed over time in all three cases (p < 0.0001 for all). Knowledge retention scores were significantly higher only for cases 1 and 3. Cognitive load associated with frustration was positively associated with knowledge acquisition for case 2 (beta = 5.18, P = 0.007), while excitement was negatively associated with knowledge retention in case 1 (beta = -33.07, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Simulation-based education for obstetric internal medicine can be effective in select cases. Attention to cognitive load and emotion may optimize learning outcomes.

Measuring competence in central venous catheterization: a systematic-review.

OBJECTIVES: Central venous catheterization is a complex procedural skill. This study evaluates existing published tools on this procedure and systematically summarizes key competencies for the assessment of this technical skill. METHODS: Using a previously published meta-analysis search strategy, we conducted a systematic review of published assessment tools using the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Education Resource Information Center (ERIC), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two independent investigators abstracted information on tool content and characteristics. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were identified assessing a total of 147 items. Tools used for assessment at the bedside (clinical tools) had a higher % of items representing "preparation" and "infection control" than tools used for assessment using simulation (67 ± 26% vs. 32 ± 26%; p = 0.003 for "preparation" and 60 ± 41% vs. 11 ± 17%; p = 0.002 for "infection control", respectively). Simulation tools had a higher % of items on "procedural competence" than clinical tools (60 ± 36% vs. 17 ± 15%; p = 0.002). Items in the domains of "Team working" and "Communication and working with the patient" were frequently under-represented. CONCLUSION: This study presents a comprehensive review of existing checklist items for the assessment of central venous catheterization. Although many key competencies are currently assessed by existing published tools, some domains may be under-represented by select tools.