Pharmacological comparison of a recombinant CB1 cannabinoid receptor with its G(alpha 16) fusion product.

The pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors is widely accepted to depend on the G protein subunit to which the agonist-stimulated receptor couples. In order to investigate whether CB(1) agonist-mediated signal transduction via an engineered G(alpha 16) system is different than that of the G(i/o) coupling normally preferred by the CB(1) receptor, we transfected the human recombinant CB(1) receptor (hCB(1)) or a fusion protein comprising the hCB(1) receptor and G(alpha 16) (hCB(1)-G(alpha 16)) into HEK293 cells. From competition binding studies, the rank order of ligand affinities at the hCB(1)-G(alpha 16) fusion protein was found to be similar to that for hCB(1): HU 210 > CP 55,940 > or = SR 141716A > WIN 55212-2 > anandamide > JWH 015. Agonists increased [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding or inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP, presumably by coupling to G(i/o), in cells expressing hCB(1) but not hCB(1)-G(alpha 16). However, an analogous rank order of potencies was observed for these agonists in their ability to evoke increases in intracellular calcium concentration in cells expressing hCB(1)-G(alpha 16) but not hCB(1). These data demonstrate that ligand affinities for the hCB(1) receptor are not affected by fusion to the G(alpha 16) subunit. Furthermore, there is essentially no difference in the function of the hCB(1) receptor when coupled to G(i/o) or G (alpha 16).

[3H]OSIP339391, a selective, novel, and high affinity antagonist radioligand for adenosine A2B receptors.

Until recently, the characterization of adenosine A(2B) receptors has been hampered by the lack of high affinity radioligands. This study describes the synthesis and in vitro characterization of the radiolabeled derivative of OSIP339391, a novel, potent, and selective pyrrolopyrimidine A(2B) antagonist. OSIP339391 had a selectivity of greater than 70-fold for A(2B) receptors over other human adenosine receptor subtypes. The radiolabel was introduced by hydrogenation of the acetylenic precursor with tritium gas resulting in the incorporation (on average) of three tritium atoms in the molecule, yielding a ligand with specific activity of 87Ci/mmol (3.2TBq/mmol). Using membranes from HEK-293 cells expressing the human recombinant A(2B) receptor, [3H]OSIP339391 was characterized in kinetic, saturation, and competition binding experiments. From the association and dissociation rate studies, the affinity was 0.41nM and in close agreement with that found in saturation binding experiments (0.17nM). In competition, binding studies using 0.5nM [3H]OSIP339391, the affinity of a range of agonists and antagonists was consistent with previously reported data. Thus, [3H]OSIP339391 is a novel, selective, and high affinity radioligand that can be a useful tool in the further exploration and characterization of recombinant and endogenous adenosine A(2B) receptors.

Skin permeability and pharmacokinetics of diclofenac epolamine administered by dermal patch in Yorkshire-Landrace pigs.

PURPOSE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic profile, and systemic and local absorption of diclofenac, following dermal patch application and oral administration in Yorkshire-Landrace pigs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve anesthetized, female, Yorkshire-Landrace pigs were randomized to receive either the dermal patch (FLECTOR(®) patch, 10 × 14 cm; Alpharma Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc, New York, NY) or 50 mg oral diclofenac (Voltaren(®); Novartis, East Hanover, NJ). Tissue (skin area of 2 × 2 cm and underlying muscles approximately 2-3 cm in depth) and blood (10 mL) samples were collected at timed intervals up to 11.5 hours after initial patch application or oral administration. The concentrations of diclofenac in plasma, skin, and muscle samples were analyzed using validated ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric methods. RESULTS: Peak systemic exposure of diclofenac was very low by dermal application compared with oral administration (maximum concentration [C(max)] values of 3.5 vs 9640 ng/mL, respectively). Absorption of diclofenac into underlying muscles beneath the dermal patch was sustained, and followed apparently zero-order kinetics, with the skin serving as a depot with elevated concentrations of diclofenac. Concentrations of diclofenac in muscles beneath the patch application site were similar to corresponding tissues after oral administration (C(max) values of 879 and 1160 ng/mL, respectively). In contrast to the wide tissue distribution of diclofenac after oral administration, dermal patch application resulted in high concentrations of diclofenac only on the treated skin and immediate tissue underneath the patch. Low concentrations of diclofenac were observed in the skin and muscles collected from untreated areas contralateral to the site of dermal patch application. CONCLUSION: Dermal patch application resulted in low systemic absorption and high tissue penetration of diclofenac compared with oral administration.