Hypoglycemia-associated electroencephalogram and electrocardiogram changes appear simultaneously.

BACKGROUND: Tight glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may be accomplished only if severe hypoglycemia can be prevented. Biosensor alarms based on the body's reactions to hypoglycemia have been suggested. In the present study, we analyzed three lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and single-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in T1DM patients during hypoglycemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electrocardiogram and EEG recordings during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in nine patients were used to assess the presence of ECG changes by heart rate, and estimates of QT interval (QTc) and time from top of T wave to end of T wave corrected for heartbeat interval and EEG changes by extraction of the power of the signal in the delta, theta, and alpha bands. These six features were assessed continuously to determine the time between changes and severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: QT interval changes and EEG theta power changes were detected in six and eight out of nine subjects, respectively. Rate of false positive calculations was one out of nine subjects for QTc and none for EEG theta power. Detection time medians (i.e., time from significant changes to termination of experiments) was 13 and 8 min for the EEG theta power and QTc feature, respectively, with no significant difference (p = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Severe hypoglycemia is preceded by changes in both ECG and EEG features in most cases. Electroencephalogram theta power may be superior with respect to timing, sensitivity, and specificity of severe hypoglycemia detection. A multiparameter algorithm that combines data from different biosensors might be considered.

Subdural to subgaleal EEG signal transmission: the role of distance, leakage and insulating affectors.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the area of cortex affecting the extracranial EEG signal. METHODS: The coherence between intra- and extracranial EEG channels were evaluated on at least 10 min of spontaneous, awake data from seven patients admitted for epilepsy surgery work up. RESULTS: Cortical electrodes showed significant extracranial coherent signals in an area of approximately 150 cm(2) although the field of vision was probably only 31 cm(2) based on spatial averaging of intracranial channels taking into account the influence of the craniotomy and the silastic membrane of intracranial grids. Selecting the best cortical channels, it was possible to increase the coherence values compared to the single intracranial channel with highest coherence. The coherence seemed to increase linearly with an accumulation area up to 31 cm(2), where 50% of the maximal coherence was obtained accumulating from only 2 cm(2) (corresponding to one channel), and 75% when accumulating from 16 cm(2). CONCLUSION: The skull is an all frequency spatial averager but dominantly high frequency signal attenuator. SIGNIFICANCE: An empirical assessment of the actual area of cerebral sources generating the extracranial EEG provides better opportunities for clinical electroencephalographers to determine the location of origin of particular patterns in the EEG.

Channel selection for automatic seizure detection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of epileptic seizure detection using only a few of the recorded EEG channels and the ability of software to select these channels compared with a neurophysiologist. METHODS: Fifty-nine seizures and 1419 h of interictal EEG are used for training and testing of an automatic channel selection method. The characteristics of the seizures are extracted by the use of a wavelet analysis and classified by a support vector machine. The best channel selection method is based upon maximum variance during the seizure. RESULTS: Using only three channels, a seizure detection sensitivity of 96% and a false detection rate of 0.14/h were obtained. This corresponds to the performance obtained when channels are selected through visual inspection by a clinical neurophysiologist, and constitutes a 4% improvement in sensitivity compared to seizure detection using channels recorded directly on the epileptic focus. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our dataset, automatic seizure detection can be done using only three EEG channels without loss of performance. These channels should be selected based on maximum variance and not, as often done, using the focal channels. SIGNIFICANCE: With this simple automatic channel selection method, we have shown a computational efficient way of making automatic seizure detection.