RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The association between paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) and trigeminal neuralgia-the so-called PH-tic syndrome-has rarely been described. However, a correct diagnosis is crucial since both disorders require specific treatments. Little is known about pathophysiological mechanisms, and, to date, there are no electrophysiological studies in patients with PH-tic syndrome. CASE: We describe the case of a 52-year-old man with a PH-tic syndrome successfully treated with an association of carbamazepine (1200 mg/day) and indomethacin (150 mg/die). Patient underwent trigeminal reflex testing, including blink and masseter inhibitory reflex, and laser-evoked potential (LEP) recording after supraorbital region stimulation in the affected and unaffected side. Both neurophysiological investigations resulted normal; LEPs failed to detect any latency asymmetry between both sides. CONCLUSIONS: Neurophysiological findings demonstrate for the first time the integrity of somatosensory system in a primary PH-tic syndrome case. Central pathophysiological mechanisms and hypothalamic dysregulation may contribute to the development of this rare syndrome.
Assuntos
Hemicrania Paroxística , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Hemicrania Paroxística/fisiopatologia , Hemicrania Paroxística/diagnóstico , Hemicrania Paroxística/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/fisiopatologia , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Despite successful recanalization after Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT), approximately 25 % of patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) due to Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) show unfavorable clinical outcomes, namely Futile Recanalization (FR). We aimed to use a Machine Learning (ML) Non-Contrast brain CT (NCCT) imaging predictive model to identify FR in patients undergoing MT. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between July 2022 and December 2022, 70 consecutive patients with LVO undergoing a complete recanalization (eTICI 3) with MT within 8 h from onset at our Centre were analyzed. Two NCCT images per patient of middle cerebral artery vascular territory and patients' clinical characteristics were classified by the presence of ischemic features on 24 h NCCT after MT. Each slice was segmented with "Mazda" software ver.4.6 by placing a Region Of Interest (ROI) on the whole brain by two radiologists in consensus. A total of 381 features were extracted for each slice. The dataset was split into train and test set with a 70:30 ratio. RESULTS: Eleven classification models were trained. An Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) model was obtained by averaging the predictions of models with accuracy on a test set >70 %, with and without patients' clinical characteristics. The EML model combined with clinical data showed an accuracy of 0.76, a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.69 with a NPV of 0.90, a PPV of 0.64, with AUC of 0.84. CONCLUSION: NCCT and ML analysis shows promise in predicting FR after complete recanalization following MT in AIS patients. Larger studies are required to confirm these preliminary results.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion have pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≥2. We aimed to investigate the safety and outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with AIS with moderate pre-stroke disability (mRS score 3) in an extended time frame (ie, 6-24 hours from the last time known well). METHODS: Data were collected from five centers in Europe and the USA from January 2018 to January 2023 and included 180 patients who underwent EVT in an extended time frame. Patients were divided into two groups of 90 each (Group 1: pre-mRS 0-2; Group 2: pre-mRS 3; 71% women, mean age 80.3±11.9 years). Primary outcomes were: (1) 3-month good clinical outcome (Group 1: mRS 0-2, Group 2: mRS 0-3) and ΔmRS; (2) any hemorrhagic transformation (HT); and (3) symptomatic HT. Secondary outcomes were successful and complete recanalization after EVT and 3-month mortality. RESULTS: No between-group differences were found in the 3-month good clinical outcome (26.6% vs 25.5%, P=0.974), any HT (26.6% vs 22%, P=0.733), and symptomatic HT (8.9 vs 4.4%, P=0.232). Unexpectedly, ΔmRS was significantly smaller in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (1.64±1.61 vs 2.97±1.69, P<0.001). No between-group differences were found in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with pre-stroke mRS 3 are likely to have similar outcomes after EVT in the extended time frame to those with pre-stroke mRS 0-2, with no difference in safety.