Enterococcal endocarditis complicated with ruptured infected-intracranial aneurysm: with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic documentation in proof of the successful antimicrobial treatment.

A 74-year-old man presented with sudden onset of aphasia and apraxia. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the brain disclosed a left frontal hemorrhage. The concomitant low grade fever suggestive of infection was unresponsive to cefazolin 1 g q12h, and refractory to piperacillin (PIPC) 2 g q8h. Blood culture grew enterococci, establishing together with echocardiography the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. The angiography revealed cerebral hemorrhage to have resulted from the rupture of the infected intracranial aneurysm. The antimicrobial therapy was switched to ampicillin (ABPC) 2 g q4h plus gentamicin (GM) 60 mg q8h. The positive blood culture was subsequently identified Enterococcus faecium to which the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of PIPC, and ABPC was 16 mcg/mL, and 4 mcg/mL, respectively. The peak concentration of serum ABPC was 83.1, median 50.8, and trough 25.8 mcg/mL. Thus, the percent time > MIC for ABPC was 100%, and the time > minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) as well. On the other hand, time > MIC for PIPC, was found nearly 30% in retrospective analysis using population pharmacokinetics. The neurological deficit of the patient was completely restored to the normal status after 4-weeks' antimicrobial therapy with ABPC plus GM, then he underwent cardiac surgery for valvular replacement, where microbiological culture of the resected valve was negative. The constellation of the clinical, pharmacological and microbiological outcome in our case provides scientific evidence that the antibiotic therapy given to our case is the best available strategy as an antimicrobial treatment of severe enterococcal endocarditis complicated by disseminated lesion as infected intracranial aneurysm.

[Influenza virus infection: clinical diagnosis and current considerations].

Point-of-care diagnosis of influenza requires sound recognition of the prevalence of the signs and symptoms of the patients, which would help to define the pattern of clinical presentation of this infection. In severely ill patients, however, clinical features of influenza could be erroneously modified by the exacerbation of co-morbid conditions, resulting in a delay of the diagnosis. Enzymatic rapid diagnostic tests, although establishing the diagnosis with positive result especially when the virus is in high circulation, has relatively poor sensitivity for the 2009 A/H1N1 virus and it varies among the different age groups. Given the likelihood of long-term circulation of the novel H1N1 virus, patients' clinical features and the performance of the rapid tests should continuously be monitored.