Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Exp Ther Oncol ; 12(1): 43-49, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28472563

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use is considered to be global pandemic. The study was done to assess the effectiveness of smoking cessation intervention among workers by motivational interviewing among handicraft factories, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. METHODOLOGY: An interventional study was carried out among 400 handicraft factory workers on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criterion. Twenty one handicraft factories were taken into consideration. Training, Standardization and Calibration of Examiners was carried out in the public health department. The structured pre-tested proforma and Fagerstrom questionnaire was used to record the data. Four sessions of intervention were given to workers. Follow ups were carried out after 1 month, 3month and 6month. Paired t-test was used to compare Fagerstrom/smoking analysis mean scores among study and control groups before and after intervention. RESULTS: showed that in study group, a percentage change of +1.2%, seen in high dependence category and -1.5 in very high dependence and after 6 months the change was+14.2%, 18.7%, -19.2% in Very low dependence, Low dependence, Medium dependence, -11.8% was seen in high dependence category and -1.8 in very high dependence. When comparison was done among Fagerstrom/smoking analysis mean scores among study subjects before and after intervention. It was found that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of Fagerstrom/smoking analysis between baseline - 3 months, 3 months to 6 months and 6 months to 9 months among study group as compared to control group. CONCLUSION: Tobacco addiction produces neurological and behavioural change, optima; approach involving behavioural change and pharmacotherapy are needed.


Assuntos
Fumar/psicologia , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/psicologia , Tabagismo/psicologia , Tabagismo/terapia , Calibragem , Educação/métodos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Índia , Instalações Industriais e de Manufatura , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Padrões de Referência , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 14(8): 910-8, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22259147

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about preferences, intentions, and behaviors regarding evidence-based cessation treatment for smoking cessation among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered (GLBT) adults. METHODS: We obtained and analyzed questionnaire responses from GLBT smokers (n= 1,633) surveyed in 129 GLBT-identified Colorado venues and online during 2007. RESULTS: Most respondents (80.4%) smoked daily. Nearly one-third smoked 20 or more cigarettes/day. Fewer than half (47.2%) had attempted quitting in the previous year, and only 8.5% were preparing to quit in the next month. More than one-fourth (28.2%) of quit attempters had used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and a similar proportion said they intended to use NRT in their next quit attempt. Lesbians were significantly less likely than gay men to have used or intend to use NRT. One-fourth of respondents said they were uncomfortable talking to their doctor about quitting smoking. Four factors (daily smoking, ever having used NRT, a smoke-free home rule, and comfort asking one's doctor for cessation advice) were associated with preparation to quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: GLBT self-identification was not associated with lower than average acceptance of evidence-based smoking cessation strategies, especially NRT, but a large minority of GLBT smokers were unlikely to seek cessation assistance through clinical encounters. Public health campaigns should focus on supporting motivation to quit and providing nonclinical access to evidence-based treatments.


Assuntos
Nicotina/uso terapêutico , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Fumar/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Bissexualidade/psicologia , Bissexualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Colorado , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde , Homossexualidade Feminina/psicologia , Homossexualidade Feminina/estatística & dados numéricos , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Intenção , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Fumar/epidemiologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Pessoas Transgênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(11): 1759-75, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20730623

RESUMO

Obesity is associated with increased risks of several cancers including colon and female breast. Pesticide use in agricultural populations has also been linked with higher risks of various cancers. However, the interaction between obesity and pesticide use on cancer risk has not been well studied. Using data from the Agricultural Health Study, we examined the association between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of cancer at 17 sites and the interaction between BMI and pesticide use. Pesticide applicators residing in Iowa and North Carolina and their spouses were enrolled between 1993 and 1997 and given a self-administered questionnaire to obtain pesticide use and other information. This analysis included 39,628 men and 28,319 women with height and weight data who were cancer-free at enrollment. Among these participants, 4,432 were diagnosed with cancer between enrollment and 2005 and 64% were overweight or obese. BMI (per 1 kg/m(2)) was positively associated with colon cancer in men (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.09) and breast cancer in postmenopausal women (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06). In contrast, BMI was inversely associated with lung cancer in men, with a significant association in ever smokers (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.97) and a null association in never smokers. The positive association between BMI and colon cancer in men was significant in those who ever used carbofuran (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17; p-interaction = 0.04) or metolachlor (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15; p-interaction = 0.02) but was null in non-users of these pesticides. Among male ever smokers, the inverse association between BMI and lung cancer was significant in non-users of carbofuran (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.82-0.92) but was null in users of carbofuran (p-interaction = 0.02). These findings suggest that certain pesticides may modify the effects of BMI on the risks of colon and lung cancers.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Índice de Massa Corporal , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Praguicidas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Neoplasias/etiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Environ Res ; 109(7): 860-8, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19615679

RESUMO

Although limited, epidemiologic studies suggest possible associations between butylate use and cancer risk, specifically prostate cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We examined butylate use and cancer risk more broadly in the AHS, a cohort of licensed pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina. Pesticide use information was collected using self-administered questionnaires. Poisson regression was used to calculate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two exposure metrics were used: lifetime exposure days (LD) and intensity-weighted lifetime exposure days (IWLD). We used two referent groups: unexposed to butylate and the lowest butylate usage category. This analysis included 19,655 applicators with complete butylate use information; 5297 applicators were exposed to butylate, making this the largest study of butylate to date. The mean follow-up time since enrollment was 9 years. Prostate cancer risk was significantly elevated among applicators in the highest LD category in both referent groups (low-exposed referent: RR(LD)=2.09, 95% CI=1.27-3.44). We observed a significantly elevated joint effect of prostate cancer family history and high butylate usage across both exposure metrics and both referent groups (low-exposed referent: RR(LD)=2.00, 95% CI=1.07-3.74), and a non-significant, elevated interaction between butylate use and prostate cancer family history, similar to a previous AHS finding. Statistically significant increased risks and exposure-response trends were seen for all lymphohematopoietic cancers (AL) and NHL for both exposure metrics and referent groups (low-exposed referent: AL:RR(LD)=2.27, 95% CI=1.18-4.37; NHL: RR(LD)=3.44, 95% CI=1.29-9.21). Our analysis did not find meaningful associations for other cancers analyzed. Further study is warranted for AL, NHL and prostate cancers.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/induzido quimicamente , Linfoma não Hodgkin/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Praguicidas/intoxicação , Neoplasias da Próstata/induzido quimicamente , Tiocarbamatos/intoxicação , Adulto , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 10(3): 249-57, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18652794

RESUMO

Although safer than tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, the newer antidepressants may be associated with certain medically serious adverse effects, of which cardiovascular adverse effects, seizures, abnormal bleeding, hyponatremia, and agranulocytosis are discussed in this review. Data regarding the incidence and risk factors are summarized, and strategies for reducing the risk of these adverse effects and managing them are suggested. Identification of risk factors, appropriate antidepressant choice, and, when possible, careful monitoring may substantially reduce the incidence of these adverse effects and the morbidity associated with them.


Assuntos
Agranulocitose/induzido quimicamente , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hiponatremia/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Monoaminoxidase/efeitos adversos , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Humanos
6.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 38(9): 626-33, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18687755

RESUMO

Host immune responses are known determinants of gastric cancer susceptibility. We previously reported an increased gastric cancer risk associated with common variants of several T helper type 1 (Th1) cytokine genes in a population-based case-control study in Warsaw, Poland. In the present study, we augmented our investigation to include additional Th1 genes as well as key genes in the Th2 and Th3 pathways. Analysis of 378 cases and 435 age- and sex-matched controls revealed associations for polymorphisms in the Th1 IL7R gene and one polymorphism in the Th2 IL5 gene. The odd ratios (ORs) for IL7R rs1494555 were 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-1.9] for A/G and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0-2.4) for G/G carriers relative to A/A carriers (P = 0.04). The ORs for IL5 rs2069812 were 0.9 (95% CI, 0.7-1.3) for C/T and 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.0) T/T carriers compared with C/C carriers (P = 0.03). These results suggest that IL5 rs2069812 and IL7R rs1389832, rs1494556 and rs1494555 polymorphisms may contribute to gastric cancer etiology.


Assuntos
Antígenos CD/genética , Interleucinas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Linfócitos T Auxiliares-Indutores/metabolismo , Fatores de Crescimento Transformadores/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Antígeno CTLA-4 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Infecções por Helicobacter/imunologia , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia/epidemiologia , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Células Th1/imunologia , Células Th2/imunologia , População Branca/genética
7.
Environ Res ; 108(3): 400-3, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18801479

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chlorothalonil is a broad spectrum, non-systemic fungicide widely used to control diseases affecting over 50 fruit, vegetable, and agricultural crops. Despite its extensive use for over 30 years, little is known about the potential human carcinogenicity associated with the routine application of chlorothalonil. Rodent studies have shown evidence of renal tubular carcinomas and adenomas. We explored cancer incidence with chlorothalonil exposure using data from the Agricultural Health Study, a prospective cohort of licensed pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina. METHODS: Licensed private and commercial pesticide applicators were recruited into this study from 1993 to 1997. Detailed information regarding pesticide use was obtained via self-administered questionnaires. Cancer incidence was followed through December 31, 2004. Chlorothalonil exposure was classified by lifetime exposure days and intensity-weighted lifetime exposure days, and then categorized into tertiles. The intensity-weighted lifetime exposure days metric was calculated based on a complex algorithm which includes pesticide application methods among other factors. This may increase or decrease exposure. RESULTS: Of the 47,625 pesticide applicators included in this analysis, 3657 applicators reported using chlorothalonil with a median of 3.5 application days per year. Chlorothalonil was not associated with overall cancer incidence, nor did we find any association with colon, lung, and prostate cancers--the only cancers for which we had sufficient numbers to explore associations. CONCLUSION: We did not find any strong evidence for an association between chlorothalonil and the cancers investigated. Although animal studies have suggested renal cancer may be associated with chlorothalonil, we had insufficient data to evaluate this cancer.


Assuntos
Agricultura/estatística & dados numéricos , Fungicidas Industriais/toxicidade , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Nitrilas/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
8.
Environ Health Perspect ; 114(8): 1205-9, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16882526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We recently reported a link between use of the organophosphate pesticide phorate and risk of prostate cancer among applicators with a family history of prostate cancer in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS). OBJECTIVE: This finding, together with findings of associations between other organophosphate pesticides and cancer more broadly, prompted us to examine phorate exposure and overall cancer incidence in the AHS. Adding 3 years of follow-up and using more detailed exposure information allowed us to see whether the prostate cancer finding held. METHODS: The AHS is a prospective study of licensed restricted-use pesticide applicators from North Carolina and Iowa. To our knowledge, this is the largest examination of workers occupationally exposed to phorate. Pesticide exposure and other information was collected using two self-administered questionnaires completed from 1993 to 1997. Poisson regression was used to calculate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Phorate use was not related to the incidence of all cancers combined or to any individual cancer, although we had insufficient numbers to study non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia, which have been linked to organophosphates in other studies. Although prostate cancer risk was not significantly related to phorate use overall or among those without a family history, the risk tended to increase among applicators with a family history of prostate cancer. The interaction RR was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.99-2.37). CONCLUSION: The observed statistical interaction suggests a gene-environment interaction between family history and phorate exposure in the incidence of prostate cancer, but other explanations are also possible.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/epidemiologia , Inseticidas/efeitos adversos , Inseticidas/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Forato/efeitos adversos , Forato/análise , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Seguimentos , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Zea mays
9.
Environ Health Perspect ; 114(12): 1838-42, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17185272

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) is a prospective cohort study of licensed pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina enrolled 1993-1997 and followed for incident cancer through 2002. A previous investigation in this cohort linked exposure to the organophosphate fonofos with incident prostate cancer in subjects with family history of prostate cancer. OBJECTIVES: This finding along with findings of associations between organophosphate pesticides and cancer more broadly led to this study of fonofos and risk of any cancers among 45,372 pesticide applicators enrolled in the AHS. METHODS: Pesticide exposure and other data were collected using self-administered questionnaires. Poisson regression was used to calculate rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Relative to the unexposed, leukemia risk was elevated in the highest category of lifetime (RR = 2.24; 95% CI, 0.94-5.34, Ptrend = 0.07) and intensity-weighted exposure-days (RR = 2.67; 95% CI, 1.06-6.70, Ptrend = 0.04), a measure that takes into account factors that modify pesticide exposure. Although prostate cancer risk was unrelated to fonofos use overall, among applicators with a family history of prostate cancer, we observed a significant dose-response trend for lifetime exposure-days (Ptrend = 0.02, RR highest tertile vs. unexposed = 1.77, 95% CI, 1.03-3.05; RRinteraction = 1.28, 95% CI, 1.07-1.54). Intensity-weighted results were similar. No associations were observed with other examined cancer sites. CONCLUSIONS: Further study is warranted to confirm findings with respect to leukemia and determine whether genetic susceptibility modifies prostate cancer risk from pesticide exposure.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Fonofos/intoxicação , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/induzido quimicamente , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Saúde da Família , Feminino , Fonofos/análise , Humanos , Incidência , Iowa/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/genética , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Intoxicação por Organofosfatos , Compostos Organofosforados/análise , Compostos Organotiofosforados/análise , Compostos Organotiofosforados/intoxicação , Praguicidas/análise , Praguicidas/intoxicação , Distribuição de Poisson , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Harv Rev Psychiatry ; 22(6): 363-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25377611

RESUMO

Nonadherence to medications is common and associated with poor or limited clinical outcomes in the treatment of bipolar disorder. A review of the literature discloses that adverse effects are one of the commonly reported reasons for nonadherence to mood stabilizers by patients with bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, other than such broad summaries, relatively little attention has been given to the role of adverse effects in relation to nonadherence. This review article is the first to consolidate the available data on this topic. Weight gain, perceived cognitive impairment, tremors, and sedation are the adverse effects most likely to lead to nonadherence. Further research is needed to anticipate, identify, manage, and potentially minimize the impact of adverse effects.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Tremor/induzido quimicamente , Vigília/efeitos dos fármacos , Aumento de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos
11.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 7(2): 137-45, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24524592

RESUMO

Levomilnacipran is a novel serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) for the treatment of major depressive disorder. This paper reviews up-to-date data on the pharmacology, short- and long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of levomilnacipran. The drug differs from previously available SNRIs in having twice the potency for norepinephrine versus serotonin reuptake inhibition. In four of the six short-term clinical trials, levomilnacipran was statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo. The only available relapse prevention study did not show reduction in time to relapse, perhaps because relapse rates were low. The commonest adverse events occurring twice as often as on placebo were nausea, hyperhidrosis, constipation, tachycardia, vomiting, erectile dysfunction, palpitations, and ejaculation disorder. In a few patients, hypertension or orthostatic hypotension may occur. Levomilnacipran has been shown to be effective in the short-term treatment of major depressive disorder and may represent an incremental advance. However, further research about its efficacy in subgroups of patients and comparing it to other antidepressants is needed.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Ciclopropanos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/farmacologia , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Ciclopropanos/efeitos adversos , Ciclopropanos/farmacologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Milnaciprano , Prevenção Secundária , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo
12.
Cancer Causes Control ; 19(1): 59-65, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17943454

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated cancer risk from DDVP (2,2-Dichloroethenyl dimethylphosphate) exposure among pesticide applicators enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) cohort. METHODS: The AHS is a cohort of 57,311 pesticide applicators in North Carolina and Iowa, enrolled from 1993 to 1997 and followed for cancer through 2004. A comprehensive questionnaire collected information on exposure to DDVP and potential confounders. Among the 49,762 licensed pesticide applicators eligible for analysis, 4,613 reported use of DDVP. DDVP exposure was classified as intensity-weighted cumulative exposure days (IWED), calculated as [years of use x days per year x intensity level]. Poisson regression analysis was used to calculate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the association of DDVP exposure among 2,943 incident cases of cancer. RESULTS: DDVP exposure was not associated with any cancer studied here. We observed no elevation in risk among lymphohematopoietic cancers, RR = 1.00 (95% CI 0.51, 1.96) and a small excess risk associated with exposure among those with a family history of prostate cancer (RR = 1.18 (95% CI 0.73, 1.82). CONCLUSION: We find little evidence of an association between cumulative lifetime use of DDVP and risk of any cancer at this stage of follow up of the AHS.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/induzido quimicamente , Diclorvós/efeitos adversos , Inseticidas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/epidemiologia , Agricultura , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
13.
Int J Cancer ; 121(8): 1799-805, 2007 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17534892

RESUMO

Carbaryl is a carbamate insecticide with a broad spectrum of uses in agricultural, commercial and household settings. It has previously been linked with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) but studies of cancer risk in humans are limited. We examined occupational carbaryl use and risk of all cancers in the Agricultural Health Study, a prospective study of a cohort of pesticide applicators in North Carolina and Iowa. This analysis included 21,416 subjects (1,291 cases) enrolled from 1993-1997 and followed for cancer incidence through 2003. Pesticide exposure and other data were collected using self-administered questionnaires. Poisson regression was used to calculate rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) while controlling for potential confounders. Carbaryl was not associated with cancer risk overall. Relative to subjects who never used carbaryl, melanoma risk was elevated with >175 lifetime exposure-days (RR = 4.11; 95%CI, 1.33-12.75; p-trend = 0.07), >10 years of use (RR = 3.19; 95%CI, 1.28-7.92; p-trend = 0.04), or >or=10 days of use per year (RR = 5.50; 95%CI, 2.19-13.84; p-trend < 0.001). Risk remained after adjusting for sunlight exposure. Although not significant, there appeared to be a trend of decreasing prostate cancer risk with increasing level of exposure. A small increase in NHL risk was observed using some, but not all, exposure measures. No associations were observed with other examined cancer sites. Because the observed results were not hypothesized a priori and because of limited study of their biological plausibility, they should be interpreted with caution.


Assuntos
Carbaril/toxicidade , Inseticidas/toxicidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Iowa/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Masculino , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Distribuição de Poisson , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA