RESUMO
The reality is that the majority of the CKD population have one or more co-morbid conditions with a known higher prevalence in ethnic minorities and lower socio-economic groups; combine this with the increase in childhood obesity and prevalence of diabetes and it is clear why we have an epidemic of CKD. Without effective prevention and early detection programmes, this will continue to escalate. Early detection and referral of CKD patients to nephrology teams is pivotal in slowing the progression to ESRD and reducing the demand for dialysis.
Assuntos
Saúde Global , Falência Renal Crônica/prevenção & controle , Comorbidade , Complicações do Diabetes/complicações , Progressão da Doença , Diagnóstico Precoce , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Grupos Minoritários , Nefrologia , Obesidade/complicações , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sildenafil in male peritoneal dialysis patients with erectile dysfunction. METHODS: Sixteen peritoneal dialysis patients were recruited to this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of sildenafil during a period of 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by using the International Index of Erectile Function and a Global Assessment Question. Penile arterial supply was assessed by means of Doppler ultrasound in all patients, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Three patients failed to complete the study (1 patient received a renal transplant, 1 patient died unrelated to the study, and 1 patient withdrew for personal reasons). In the remainder, there was a significant improvement in erectile function with sildenafil compared with placebo (P = 0.01) and the baseline assessment (P = 0.002). There were also significant improvements in intercourse satisfaction (P = 0.002) and overall satisfaction (P = 0.005) compared with baseline. In response to the Global Assessment Question, 75% of patients reported improvement in erections. Only 1 adverse event was reported: a headache, which resolved after the third dose of sildenafil. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil caused a significant improvement in erectile function in peritoneal dialysis patients, with a success rate at least as high as that reported in other patient groups. The drug was well tolerated, with few adverse events.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pênis/irrigação sanguínea , Pênis/diagnóstico por imagem , Pênis/patologia , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Purinas , Citrato de Sildenafila , Sulfonas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
The investigations which have been discussed above are by no means exhaustive. Since those with renal disease usually have multifactorial disease processes, many other specific investigations may be indicated. Although techniques and tests will continue to be updated and improved, it is hoped that by nurses understanding something of the current techniques used in renal investigations, they will be able to inform and reassure their patients reliably.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Insuficiência Renal , Angiografia , Biomarcadores/análise , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/urina , Biópsia , Contagem de Células Sanguíneas/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico/normas , Eletrólitos/metabolismo , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Insuficiência Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal/metabolismo , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Urinálise/métodos , UrografiaRESUMO
Approximately 20-30% of patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) have cognitive impairment. Less is known about the prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients with advanced kidney disease awaiting the initiation of dialysis. Routine cognitive assessment was implemented in the pre-dialysis clinic, which enabled the Nephrologist and Pre-dialysis Nurse to identify those patients with impaired cognitive function and utilise this information to assess the suitability for self-care treatments, such as peritoneal dialysis, as well as to adapt information to meet their needs. Subsequently, a cross-sectional single-centre audit was undertaken to identify the prevalence of cognitive impairment in 132 consecutive new referrals to the pre-dialysis clinic using the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE). Twenty percent (95% CI = 0.13, 0.27) were classified as cognitively impaired. Those with cognitive impairment were significantly older, and had lower eGFR and higher serum creatinine. It can be concluded that approximately 1 in 5 patients attending the pre-dialysis clinic has cognitive impairment, which may not be apparent on a routine clinical history. Cognitive function assessment is recommended for all, but particularly to the older patient, before advising on choice of dialysis modality or opting for conservative treatment.