Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs Between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. DESIGN: Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. SETTING: University hospital, a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p<0.001), a lower need for blood transfusion (12.8% v 22.6%, p = 0.04), a shorter length of stay (6 [4-9]) v 7 [5-11] days, p = 0.001), a shorter ICU stay (31 [24-49] hours v 52 [32-96.5] hours, p<0.001) and lower NY state complications composite rate (4.26% v 13.48%, p = 0.01). In spite of that, the cost of robotic procedures was not significantly different from matched conventional cases ($18,717.35 [11,316.1-34,550.6] versus $18,601 [13,137-50,194.75], p = 0.13), except 26 hybrid coronary revascularizations in which angioplasty was performed on the same admission (hybrid 25,311.1 [18,537.1-41,167.85] versus conventional 18,966.13 [13,337.75-56,021.75], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Robotically assisted CABG does not increase the cost of the index hospitalization when compared to conventional CABG unless hybrid revascularization is performed on the same admission.

Thromboelastograph with Platelet Mapping(TM) predicts postoperative chest tube drainage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of Thromboelastograph with Platelet Mapping (TEG-PM(TM)) to predict postoperative bleeding tendency in patients with a history of recent anti-platelet therapy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. Association between predictor variables (MAADP [maximum amplitude produced by adenosine diphosphate], MAAA [maximum amplitude produced by arachidonic acid], percent of platelets inhibited by clopidogrel, percent of platelets inhibited by aspirin) and the outcomes as elevated chest tube drainage (CTD) and blood transfusion were investigated by logistic regression model. CTD was considered elevated if it was ≥ 600 mL within 12 hours after surgery. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients on antiplatelet therapy scheduled to undergo CABG that had TEG-PM(TM) done as a point-of-care test. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients had preoperative TEG-PM(TM) test and on-pump CABG surgeries performed on the same day. Among them, 20 patients (25.6%) had elevated CTD. Decreased MAADP (odds ratio [OR] 0.94), increased percent inhibition of platelets by clopidogrel (OR 1.03), and lower body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.78) were significantly associated with elevated CTD. The same parameters were also associated with platelets transfusion: MAADP (OR 0.94), percent of inhibition of platelets by clopidogrel (OR 1.03) and BMI (OR 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: TEG-PM(TM) parameters and BMI are predictive of elevated CTD and platelets transfusion. A 1 mm decrease in MAADP increases the likelihood of elevated CTD and the likelihood of platelets transfusion by 6% whereas 1 unit decrease in BMI is associated with an increased likelihood of elevated CTD and platelets transfusion by 22% and 23% respectively.

Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting decreases 30-day complication rate, length of stay, and acute care facility discharge rate compared with conventional surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: The study population included 2091 consecutive patients who underwent either conventional or robotic CABG from January 2007 to March 2012. Preoperative, intraoperative, and 30-day postoperative variables were collected for each group. To compare the incidence of rapid recovery between conventional and robotic CABG, the surrogate variables of early discharge and discharge to home (vs rehabilitation or acute care facility) were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: One hundred fifty robotic and 1619 conventional CABG cases were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that robotic surgery was a strong predictor of lower 30-day complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.24; P = 0.005], short length of stay (OR, 3.31; P < 0.001), and decreased need for an acute care facility (OR, 0.55; P = 0.032). In the presence of complications (New York State Complication Composite), the robotic technique was not associated with a change in discharge status. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective review, robotic CABG was associated with a lower 30-day complication rate, a shorter length of stay, and a lower incidence of acute care facility discharge than conventional on-pump CABG. It may suggest a more rapid recovery to preoperative status after robotic surgery; however, only a randomized prospective study could confirm the advantages of a robotic approach.