RESUMO
Independently of age, evidence-based guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary treatment approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). But actually, elderly patients are grossly underrepresented in clinical trials, accounting < 10% of enrolled cases. Therefore, LARC management in elderly patients remains a crucial issue in daily practice, especially due to their frailty. Multiple clinical factors, including general health status, cognitive status, co-morbidity, disability, and life expectancy should be considered to understand the complexities of geriatric assessment and then define therapy. We use a patient-centered approach in order to tailor the optimal treatment strategy. We treat fit elderly patients as younger patients, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas, in vulnerable and frail patients, we propose standard CRT (vulnerable patients) or radiotherapy alone (frail patients).
Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Algoritmos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Retais/etiologia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: A single-institution prospective study was conducted to evaluate hearing loss rate after intensity modulated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck cancer and identify cochlear dosimetric parameters associated with hearing loss risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hearing assessment, patients' characteristics, tumor-related variables, and cochlear quantitative dosimetric factors for adults with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with CRT were prospectively collected. Each patient repeated audiometry at baseline (pre-CRT), 1 month after CRT, and then every 3 to 6 months. For each cochlea minimum dose (Dmin), mean dose (Dmean), and maximum dose (Dmax) were extracted from treatment plans. Logistic analysis was used for multivariate modeling. The relation between cochlear dosimetric factors and significant hearing loss was also analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and December 2018, 35 patients (70 cochleae) were included. Most patients (n=29; 82.9%) had primary cancer in a low-risk region (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx). All patients completed the programmed CRT. During follow-up, significant hearing loss was recorded in 13 cases (37.1%). The ROC areas for significant hearing loss in relation to Dmin, Dmean, and Dmax were 0.70, 0.66, and 0.66, respectively. A dose-dependent relationship was noted between cochlear Dmin and significant hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Dmin <14.4 Gy is associated with reduced rates of significant hearing loss after concomitant cisplatin-based CRT in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Perda Auditiva , Adulto , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Perda Auditiva/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
AIM: To assess feasibility, complications and efficacy of induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with bulky anal canal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal, staged bulky tumor with or without nodal involvement were prospectively enrolled. Before standard chemoradiotherapy, patients received induction chemotherapy with 3 cycles of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin and 750 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil. Patients were followed-up routinely until recurrence or death. RESULTS: Seven patients with bulky anal canal cancer were evaluable for this pilot phase of the study. All patients had human papillomavirus-negative disease. Five completed the scheduled induction chemotherapy and all patients completed the programmed concomitant chemoradiotherapy. None had severe hematological toxicity. The majority of patients (6/7) had tumor downsizing after induction treatment. Six months after chemoradiotherapy, complete response was documented in three patients and salvage surgery was performed in two cases. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range=28-48 months), two patients are disease-free survivors. CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy has the potential to become a standard approach in patients with bulky human papillomavirus-negative anal canal cancer.