Patterns of care and outcomes among elderly individuals with primary malignant astrocytoma.

OBJECT: This study was undertaken to evaluate the association between age at diagnosis, patterns of care, and outcome among elderly individuals with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, the authors identified 1753 individuals with primary GBM and 205 individuals with primary AA (diagnosed between June 1991 and December 1999) who were 66 years and older and whose records were linked to Medicare information. To facilitate gathering of prediagnosis comorbidity and postdiagnosis treatment information, only those individuals were included who had the same Medicare coverage for 6 months before and 12 months after diagnosis. The odds of undergoing various combinations of treatments and the associations with outcome were calculated by tumor type and age and adjusted by various predictors. RESULTS: Age was not associated with treatment differences in individuals with AA. Very elderly individuals (>or= 75 years old) with GBM were more likely to have biopsy only (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-3.59), surgery only (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.15-1.87), or biopsy and radiation (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.07-1.82) and were less likely to receive multimodal therapy. Regardless of patient age or lesion histological characteristics, survival was decreased in patients treated with biopsy only. Individuals with GBM who had surgery only or biopsy and radiation had worse outcomes than individuals treated with surgery and radiation. There were no differences in survival by lesion histological characteristics. Very elderly individuals with malignant astrocytomas were more likely to receive limited treatment (most pronounced in individuals with GBM). Survival variation correlated with treatment combinations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in clinical neurooncology patient age is associated with not receiving effective therapies and hence worse prognosis.

Incidence trends in primary malignant penile cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the incidence of primary, malignant penile cancer in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1,817 men with primary, malignant penile cancer diagnosed between 1973 and 2002 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program Public-use data were used for analysis. Incidence rates were calculated by clinical and demographic variables of interest and decade of diagnosis (1973-1982, 1983-1992, and 1993-2002) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Stat 6.1, and trends were examined using the annual percent change statistic. Additional incidence calculations were performed to examine further racial/ethnic differences. RESULTS: The overall incidence of primary, malignant penile cancer from 1973 to 2002 was 0.69 per 100,000. Incidence decreased significantly over time: 0.84 per 100,000 in 1973-1982 to 0.69 per 100,000 in 1982-1992 to 0.58 per 100,000 in 1993-2002. Incidence increased with increasing age at diagnosis. The majority of cases had squamous cell carcinomas, graded as I or II, and originated at the glans penis. Incidence of unknown grade primary, malignant penile cancer decreased significantly over the last 30 years, as did incidence of primary site penis, not otherwise specified primary, malignant penile cancer. The incidence of regional stage disease also increased over time. From 1993 to 2002, White Hispanics had the highest incidence rates (1.01 per 100,000) followed by Alaska Native/American Indians (0.77 per 100,000) and Blacks (0.62 per 100,000). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of primary, malignant penile cancer in the United States has decreased, and these rates varied by race/ethnicity. Incidence rates increased with increasing age at diagnosis, and the incidence of regional stage disease increased over time, while incidence of unknown grade primary, malignant penile cancer decreased over the last 30 years.

Racial/ethnic differences in survival among elderly patients with a primary glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed racial/ethnic differences in survival after primary glioblastoma diagnosis. We investigate these differences, incorporating information on White, Hispanics and Asians, as well as White, non-Hispanics and Blacks, among elderly individuals with a primary glioblastoma utilizing the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program-Medicare linked database. METHODS: A total of 1,530 individuals diagnosed > = 66 years of age from 6/1/91 to 12/31/99 in the SEER data were linked with Medicare information from 1/1/91 to 12/31/01. All individuals had Medicare Parts A and B and were non-HMO for 6 months before and 12 months after diagnosis to gather pre-diagnosis co-morbidities and post-diagnosis first course of treatment. Survival differences by race/ethnicity and by race/ethnicity stratified by treatment type and/or median household income were examined using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Significant racial/ethnic differences existed between White, non-Hispanics and Blacks in marital status, income and SEER registry region for the entire US. In analysis limited to the West region, significant racial/ethnic differences existed for income only. Overall there were no differences in survival between White, non-Hispanics and Blacks, however, in analysis limited to the West region, Asians had a lower risk of death compared to White, non-Hispanics [HR = 0.67, 95% CI (0.43, 1.03)]. Asians who had multiple treatments also had a lower risk of death compared to White, non-Hispanics [HR = 0.65, 95% CI (0.41, 1.01)]. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic differences in survival after primary glioblastoma diagnosis exist and may be partially explained by racial/ethnic differences in treatment and income.

Open-label pilot study of levetiracetam (Keppra) for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease.

We evaluated the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV; Keppra) in reducing levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease (PD) in an open-label pilot study. Nine PD patients who were experiencing peak-dose dyskinesias for at least 25% of the awake day and were at least moderately disabling were treated with LEV in doses up to 3,000 mg for up to 60 days. The primary outcome measure was the percent of the awake day that patients spent on without dyskinesia or with nontroublesome dyskinesia (good on time). The mean dose of LEV at endpoint was 625+/-277 mg/day. LEV significantly improved percent of the awake day on without dyskinesia or with nontroublesome dyskinesia at endpoint compared to baseline (43% +/- 12% vs. 61% +/- 17%; P=0.02). Percent on time with troublesome dyskinesia decreased from 23% +/- 10% at baseline to 11% +/- 6% at endpoint, although not significantly. There was no significant increase in off time from baseline to endpoint. There was a 56% dropout rate, mostly due to somnolence. In PD patients who experienced peak-dose dyskinesia for at least 25% of the awake day, LEV significantly improved on time without dyskinesia or with nontroublesome dyskinesia.