EuroEco (European Health Economic Trial on Home Monitoring in ICD Patients): a provider perspective in five European countries on costs and net financial impact of follow-up with or without remote monitoring.

AIM: Remote follow-up (FU) of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) allows for fewer in-office visits in combination with earlier detection of relevant findings. Its implementation requires investment and reorganization of care. Providers (physicians or hospitals) are unsure about the financial impact. The primary end-point of this randomized prospective multicentre health economic trial was the total FU-related cost for providers, comparing Home Monitoring facilitated FU (HM ON) to regular in-office FU (HM OFF) during the first 2 years after ICD implantation. Also the net financial impact on providers (taking national reimbursement into account) and costs from a healthcare payer perspective were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 312 patients with VVI- or DDD-ICD implants from 17 centres in six EU countries were randomised to HM ON or OFF, of which 303 were eligible for data analysis. For all contacts (in-office, calendar- or alert-triggered web-based review, discussions, calls) time-expenditure was tracked. Country-specific cost parameters were used to convert resource use into monetary values. Remote FU equipment itself was not included in the cost calculations. Given only two patients from Finland (one in each group) a monetary valuation analysis was not performed for Finland. Average age was 62.4 ± 13.1 years, 81% were male, 39% received a DDD system, and 51% had a prophylactic ICD. Resource use with HM ON was clearly different: less FU visits (3.79 ± 1.67 vs. 5.53 ± 2.32; P < 0.001) despite a small increase of unscheduled visits (0.95 ± 1.50 vs. 0.62 ± 1.25; P < 0.005), more non-office-based contacts (1.95 ± 3.29 vs. 1.01 ± 2.64; P < 0.001), more Internet sessions (11.02 ± 15.28 vs. 0.06 ± 0.31; P < 0.001) and more in-clinic discussions (1.84 ± 4.20 vs. 1.28 ± 2.92; P < 0.03), but with numerically fewer hospitalizations (0.67 ± 1.18 vs. 0.85 ± 1.43, P = 0.23) and shorter length-of-stay (6.31 ± 15.5 vs. 8.26 ± 18.6; P = 0.27), although not significant. For the whole study population, the total FU cost for providers was not different for HM ON vs. OFF [mean (95% CI): €204 (169-238) vs. €213 (182-243); range for difference (€-36 to 54), NS]. From a payer perspective, FU-related costs were similar while the total cost per patient (including other physician visits, examinations, and hospitalizations) was numerically (but not significantly) lower. There was no difference in the net financial impact on providers [profit of €408 (327-489) vs. €400 (345-455); range for difference (€-104 to 88), NS], but there was heterogeneity among countries, with less profit for providers in the absence of specific remote FU reimbursement (Belgium, Spain, and the Netherlands) and maintained or increased profit in cases where such reimbursement exists (Germany and UK). Quality of life (SF-36) was not different. CONCLUSION: For all the patients as a whole, FU-related costs for providers are not different for remote FU vs. purely in-office FU, despite reorganized care. However, disparity in the impact on provider budget among different countries illustrates the need for proper reimbursement to ensure effective remote FU implementation.

Primary prevention of atrial fibrillation: does the atrial lead position influence the incidence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with sinus node dysfunction? Results from the PASTA Trial.

INTRODUCTION: PASTA (pacing of the atria in sinus node disease) is a prospective and randomized trial, assessing the effect of different atrial lead positions on the atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence in patients with sinus node disease (SND). METHOD: The atrial lead position is randomized to: (a) free right atrial wall, (b) right atrial appendage (RAA), (c) coronary sinus ostium (CS-Os), or (d) dual site right atrial pacing (CS-Os + RAA). The pacemakers (Vitatron Selection 9000 or Prevent AF, Vitatron B.V., Arnhem, The Netherlands) are programmed in DDDR 70 mode and the total follow-up duration is 24 months. To describe the atrial rhythm state, pacemaker-derived data (arrhythmia counter) were assessed for AF episodes. AF was considered as evident, if the AF burden (time in AF related to follow-up interval) was >1% (i.e., 15 min/d). Follow-up data after 24 months were evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis evaluates 142 patients (77 male, 74.5 +/- 7.8 years). There was no statistical significant difference with respect to the occurrence of AF between the four groups after 24 months (A: 36%; B: 38%, C: 32%, D: 48%). The percentage of atrial/ventricular pacing was in A: 78/76%, in B: 84/81%, in C: 70/65%, and in D: 79/69%. These differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the AF burden >1% and the total AF burden after 24 months did not show differences in the incidence of AF in patients with dual chamber pacemaker therapy for SND. We were not able to demonstrate a significant influence of right atrial lead position on the incidence of AF recurrence.

Closed loop stimulation and accelerometer-based rate adaptation: results of the PROVIDE study.

AIMS: We compared pacing rate adaptation based on closed loop stimulation (CLS) or accelerometer sensor (AS) during acute mental and physical stress in the same patient. METHODS AND RESULTS: One month after Protos (Biotronik, Germany) pacemaker implantation, 131 chronotropically incompetent patients were randomized to AS or CLS for 3 months with crossover. Arithmetic and 6 min walk tests were performed in the non-rate-adaptive mode and AS and CLS rate-adaptive modes, respectively. At the end, patients had to select the individually preferred pacemaker sensor. Heart rate during mental stress was higher (3.0 +/- 9.2 bpm) in the CLS than in the AS mode (P = 0.004). Benefit in the walking distance compared with non-rate-adaptive pacing was similar for the two modes: added 27 +/- 96 m (AS, P = 0.013) and 30 +/- 116 m (CLS, P = 0.025). At the end of the walk, heart rate was higher by 4.8 +/- 21.4 bpm in AS than in CLS (P = 0.049). Twice as many patients preferred CLS over AS (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The arithmetic test was associated with a significantly higher heart rate for CLS than for AS, showing a greater sensitivity of CLS-based rate adaptation to mental stress. Performance during physical stress was comparable. Patients preferred CLS.

Effect of left ventricular function on long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold.

BACKGROUND: The effect of left ventricular (LV) systolic function on the long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the effect of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on the LV pacing and sensing threshold in 56 patients (mean age: 70.2 +/- 10.5 years) underwent permanent LV pacing using a self-retaining coronary sinus lead (Model 1055 K, St Jude Medical, USA). In 49 patients, the LV lead was implanted for conventional pacemaker indication (sick sinus syndrome = 14, heart block = 26 or slow atrial fibrillation = 9). The remaining 7 patients were implanted for congestive heart failure. The LV pacing and sensing threshold, and lead impedance were compared between patients with LVEF <40% (Group 1, n = 28) and LVEF >40% (Group 2, n = 28) during implant and at 3-month follow up. The LV pacing lead was successfully implanted in all patients without any lead dislodgement on follow-up. At implant, Group 1 patients had a significant lower R wave amplitude, but similar LV pacing threshold and lead impedance as compared to Group 2. However, at 3-month follow-up, Group 1 patients had a significantly higher LV pacing threshold compared to Group 2 patients. There were no significant differences in the sensing threshold and lead impedance between the two groups. Furthermore, there was also a significant interval increase in LV pacing threshold in Group 1 patients (0.94 +/- 0.12 V) after 3 months, but not in Group 2 patients (0.16 +/- 0.08 V, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the LV systolic function has a significant impact on the long-term LV pacing threshold. The long-term left ventricular pacing threshold in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction increased after implant and was higher than patients with normal left ventricular systolic function.

Potential value of automated daily screening of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator diagnostics for prediction of major cardiovascular events: results from Home-CARE (Home Monitoring in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study.

AIM: To investigate whether diagnostic data from implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds) retrieved automatically at 24 h intervals via a Home Monitoring function can enable dynamic prediction of cardiovascular hospitalization and death. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-seven heart failure patients received CRT-Ds with Home Monitoring option. Data on all deaths and hospitalizations due to cardiovascular reasons and Home Monitoring data were collected prospectively during 1-year follow-up to develop a predictive algorithm with a predefined specificity of 99.5%. Seven parameters were included in the algorithm: mean heart rate over 24 h, heart rate at rest, patient activity, frequency of ventricular extrasystoles, atrial-atrial intervals (heart rate variability), right ventricular pacing impedance, and painless shock impedance. The algorithm was developed using a 25-day monitoring window ending 3 days before hospitalization or death. While the retrospective sensitivities of the individual parameters ranged from 23.6 to 50.0%, the combination of all parameters was 65.4% sensitive in detecting cardiovascular hospitalizations and deaths with 99.5% specificity (corresponding to 1.83 false-positive detections per patient-year of follow-up). The estimated relative risk of an event was 7.15-fold higher after a positive predictor finding than after a negative predictor finding. CONCLUSION: We developed an automated algorithm for dynamic prediction of cardiovascular events in patients treated with CRT-D devices capable of daily transmission of their diagnostic data via Home Monitoring. This tool may increase patients' quality of life and reduce morbidity, mortality, and health economic burden, it now warrants prospective studies. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00376116.

A new endocardial "over-the-wire" or stylet-driven left ventricular lead: first clinical experience.

Transvenous left ventricular (LV) leads are primarily inserted "over-the-wire" (OTW). However, a stylet-driven (SD) approach may be a helpful alternative. A new polyurethane-coated, unipolar LV lead can be placed either by a stylet or a guide wire, which can be inserted into the lead body from both ends. The multicenter OVID study evaluates the clinical performance of this new steroid- and nonsteroid eluting lead. The primary endpoint is the LV lead implant success rate after identification of the coronary sinus (CS). Secondary endpoints include complication rate, short- and long-term lead characteristics, overall procedure and LV lead placement duration, total fluoroscopy time, and lead handling characteristics ratings. To date, 96 patients with heart failure (68 +/- 9 years old, 76% men) are enrolled. The CS was identified in 95 patients and, in 85 (88.5%), the LV lead was successfully implanted. The final lead positioning was lateral in 41%, posterolateral in 35%, anterolateral in 18%, and great cardiac vein in 6% of patients. In 70%, the 85 successful implantations, both stylet-driven and guide-wire techniques were used, a stylet only was used in 22%, and a guide wire only in 8%. Mean overall duration of 85 successful procedures was 112 +/- 40 minutes, total fluoroscopy time 28 +/- 15 minutes, and the duration of LV lead placement was 35 +/- 29 minutes. During a 3-month follow-up, the loss of LV capture occurred in three and phrenic nerve stimulation in six patients. The mean long-term pacing threshold is 0.8 V/0.5 ms and pacing impedance is 550 Omega. The OVID data suggest that these new leads are safe and effective. The choice of both OTW and SD techniques during lead implantation offers greater procedural flexibility.

Spontaneous conversion of permanent atrial fibrillation into stable sinus rhythm after 17 months of biventricular pacing.

A 68-year-old woman with drug refractory congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III, ejection fraction 35%, moderate to severe mitral regurgitation) and permanent atrial fibrillation uninterrupted for >3 years, underwent implantation of a biventricular pacing system. Seventeen months later, atrial fibrillation spontaneously converted into sinus rhythm, which has been maintained for more than 6 months (to date).

Pacing of the atria in sick sinus syndrome trial: preventive strategies for atrial fibrillation.

This study examines the effects of various atrial lead positions in physiological pacing on the incidence of AF in patients with sick sinus syndrome. The lead is implanted in the RA free wall, in the RA appendage, near the coronary sinus ostium (CSO) or, in dual site RA pacing, in the appendage and the CSO. Since CSO and dual site right atrial pacing aim at modifying the pathological substrate, pacing of two-thirds of all cardiac cycles is attempted by adapting the basic rate and the rate response option. The results of this study are expected to assist in the development of guidelines for the placement of atrial pacing leads in sick sinus syndrome.

The influence of concomitant drug therapy on the efficacy of atrial overdrive stimulation for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Data from the completed "Suppression of Atrial Fibrillation by DDD+ Overdrive Pacing with Inos2 CLS (closed-loop system) Pacemakers" multicenter trial were retrospectively evaluated to examine the influence of concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs on the clinical success of conventional single site right atrial overdrive pacing compared with DDD pacing. The DDD+ overdrive algorithm provided > 90% atrial pacing at a rate slightly above the intrinsic atrial rate. Seventy-five patients with conventional pacing indications and paroxysmal, recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia have completed the study. They were randomized to 6 months of DDD or DDD+ pacing, followed by mode crossover and an additional 6-month follow-up in the alternate mode. The incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmia during each period was compared using data on sustained (> 60 s) mode switch episodes stored in the pacemaker memory. A stable antiarrhythmic drug regimen was allowed during the study. beta-Adrenergic blockers and Class III antiarrhythmics, prescribed to 54.7% and 40.0% of patients respectively, were linked to minimal or no benefit of overdrive pacing compared with DDD pacing. In contrast, patients untreated with beta-adrenergic blockers or Class III drugs had a significant reduction in atrial tachyarrhythmia burden of > 5 hours/patient per week (P < 0.05) during overdrive. Changes with Class I and Class IV antiarrhythmic drugs, prescribed to 18.7% and 13.3% of patients, respectively, were insignificant. Our data indicate that clinical trials that prohibit the use of beta-adrenergic blockers may record more favorable outcomes with dynamic atrial overdrive algorithms versus conventional DDDR pacing, than studies allowing concomitant beta-adrenergic blockade.