Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Respir Care ; 64(10): 1181-1192, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113857

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung expansion therapy is often ordered after surgery to improve alveolar ventilation and reduce risks of postoperative pulmonary complications. The impact of lung expansion therapy at altering ventilation in patients who are not intubated has not been described. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in dorsal redistribution of ventilation and incidences of postoperative pulmonary complications when comparing incentive spirometry (IS) with EzPAP lung expansion therapy after upper abdominal surgery. Our a priori null hypothesis was that there are no differences. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult human subjects after upper- abdominal surgery from January 2017 to November 2018. The subjects were allocated to receive IS or EzPAP 3 times a day on postoperative days 1-5. An electrical impedance tomography device was connected to the subjects for a single lung expansion therapy session on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 to measure the change in post-lung expansion therapy dorsal end-expiratory lung impedance (ΔEELI%). Lung expansion therapy sessions with electrical impedance tomography included 2 min of normal breathing, 3 cycles of 10 breaths, and 2 min of normal breathing after cycle 3. Postoperative pulmonary complications were screened until hospital discharge. Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were applied. Data were reported as count (n), percentage, and median (interquartile range) for primary and secondary outcomes. Alpha (2-tailed) was < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 112 subjects were enrolled to receive IS (n = 56) or EzPAP (n = 56). Baseline characteristics were equal. Post-lung expansion therapy dorsal ΔEELI% increased for both groups, but the dorsal ΔEELI% for IS versus EzPAP on postoperative day 1 (16% versus 12%, P = .39), postoperative day 3 (6% versus 6%, P = .68), and postoperative day 5 (9% versus 6%, P = .46) was not significantly different. Hospital length of stay (4 d; P = .30) and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (3.6% versus 7.1%, P = .19) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant post-lung expansion therapy dorsal ΔEELI% or postoperative pulmonary complications among the adults who received IS or EzPAP 3 times a day after upper abdominal surgery. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02892773.).


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Pneumopatias/prevenção & controle , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Espirometria , Idoso , Impedância Elétrica , Feminino , Humanos , Hipóxia/etiologia , Hipóxia/prevenção & controle , Capacidade Inspiratória , Tempo de Internação , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumopatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/etiologia , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia , Atelectasia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Ventilação Pulmonar , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Tomografia
2.
Respir Care Clin N Am ; 10(2): 235-51, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15177248

RESUMO

An essential responsibility of the modern respiratory care manager is to establish and monitor a particular level of quality and service being provided by a department. Focusing on quality and performance improvement fosters an environment that empowers and encourages all employees to be innovative and resolve roadblocks that limit organizational performance. This article discusses the issues regarding quality and performance improvement that arise in the daily operations of a respiratory care department.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Terapia Respiratória/normas , Gestão da Qualidade Total , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
Respir Care Clin N Am ; 10(2): 253-68, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15177249

RESUMO

Health care organizations are complex adaptive systems, a set of connected or interdependent parts or agents that include caregivers, patients, and processes. Consequently, health care organizations are prone to problems and are not always predictable environments. Fundamental changes are needed in the organization and in the delivery of health care in the United States. This article presents a proven method of instituting and tracking the changes that can ensure a respiratory care department is delivering the appropriate level of care.


Assuntos
Benchmarking , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Unidades de Cuidados Respiratórios/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Terapia Respiratória/normas , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA