The Influence of an Unexpected Symbolic Gift on Postoperative Arthroplasty Patients' Press Ganey Scores.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals use Press Ganey surveys to evaluate patient satisfaction. The goal of our study was to evaluate whether surgeon-driven gifting to patients postoperatively affects Press Ganey Survey responses. METHODS: There were 1,468 patients undergoing arthroplasty at our institution who were randomized to receive a thank-you gift, a small bouquet of flowers, and a note from their provider after surgery, or nothing for completing their preoperative arthroplasty registry questionnaire. Press Ganey surveys were sent to patients who received and did not receive flowers immediately after their hospital stay and after the patients' first postoperative visit. Scores were reported as the mean score and the fraction of responses with a top-box rating. One-sided student t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess statistical significance. RESULTS: Hospital Discharge: Patients who received flowers had higher Press Ganey survey scores than patients who did not receive flowers. For example, for "physician's concerns for questions," they had higher scores (mean difference: 3.7 ± 1.6 points, P = .012) and a 9% higher top-box rating (P = .032). For "staff attitude toward visitors," they also had higher scores (mean difference: 2.8 ± 1.3 points, P = .019) and a 7% higher top-box rating (P = .049). First Follow-up: Patients who received flowers had a higher top-box rating for "concern provider showed for questions" and "amount of time provider spent with you" by 6% (P = .046) and 11% (P = .009), respectively. They also had higher scores for "information provider gave about medications" (mean difference: 4.0 ± 1.6 points, P = .009) and 11% higher top-box rating (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Press Ganey Surveys were higher in orthopaedic patients who received bouquets of flowers from their arthroplasty surgeons compared to patients who did not. At follow-up, improved Press Ganey scores persisted if the patient received flowers. The gift of flowers generates patient loyalty to their surgeon.

How Research Improves Clinical Care: The Case for Orthopaedic Surgeon Research Leadership and Collaboration: AOA Critical Issues Symposium.

ABSTRACT: Improving the performance and impact of orthopaedic research is a critical leadership challenge. Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are a leading cause of disability worldwide, for which research investment and performance lags far behind the burden of disease. In the United States, MSK disorders account for the highest health care costs, have increased in incidence at the fastest rate, and exceed the combined costs of cardiovascular diseases and neoplasms. Despite the cost to society, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), with primary responsibility for MSK research, receives <1.4% of the funds allocated to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Although orthopaedic surgeons are leading providers of MSK clinical care, the dearth of orthopaedic clinician-scientists also greatly reduces representation of MSK scientific and clinical expertise among academic and scientific leaders. The goals of this symposium were to highlight the critical need for greater prioritization and investment in orthopaedic research and to engage orthopaedic leaders in addressing these needs. Compelling stories of research success from 3 orthopaedic chairs were featured to highlight how orthopaedic surgeon leadership in bench-to-bedside research substantially advances MSK clinical care. Seminar participants also emphasized the need to improve evidence-based clinical practice for which multicenter prospective cohort and registry studies represent opportunities for broader involvement. Prioritization of orthopaedic clinician-scientist development and formation of multidisciplinary partnerships with basic and translational scientists were emphasized as critical needs to advance MSK health. It is critical for orthopaedic chairs to "be invested in" and to "invest in" the success of orthopaedic research. This investment includes developing a professional climate that values research achievement and collaboration as well as implementing strategies to support and sustain research success. Finally, orthopaedic leaders need to advocate for federal research funding to be proportional to the economic burden of disease for which MSK conditions carry the highest current and projected costs. With health-care costs accounting for nearly one-fifth of the U.S. economy, increasing the investment in orthopaedic research to reduce the prevalence, disability, and morbidity from MSK disease needs to be a top orthopaedic and national leadership priority.

The outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty for instability.

Aims: Instability is a common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, even after the initial revision, some patients continue to have recurrent dislocation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk for recurrent dislocation after revision THA for instability. Methods: Between 2009 and 2019, 163 patients underwent revision THA for instability at Stanford University Medical Center. Of these, 33 (20.2%) required re-revision due to recurrent dislocation. Cox proportional hazard models, with death and re-revision surgery for periprosthetic infection as competing events, were used to analyze the risk factors, including the size and alignment of the components. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess the outcome using the Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical and VR-12 mental scores, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) pain and function, and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR). Results: The median follow-up was 3.1 years (interquartile range 2.0 to 5.1). The one-year cumulative incidence of recurrent dislocation after revision was 8.7%, which increased to 18.8% at five years and 31.9% at ten years postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (hazard ratio (HR) 2.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 to 6.60)), BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2 (HR 4.31 (95% CI 1.52 to 12.27)), the use of specialized liners (HR 5.39 (95% CI 1.97 to 14.79) to 10.55 (95% CI 2.27 to 49.15)), lumbopelvic stiffness (HR 6.03 (95% CI 1.80 to 20.23)), and postoperative abductor weakness (HR 7.48 (95% CI 2.34 to 23.91)) were significant risk factors for recurrent dislocation. Increasing the size of the acetabular component by > 1 mm significantly decreased the risk of dislocation (HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.96)). The VR-12 physical and HHS (pain and function) scores improved significantly at mid term. Conclusion: Patients requiring revision THA for instability are at risk of recurrent dislocation. Higher ASA grades, being overweight, a previous lumbopelvic fusion, the use of specialized liners, and postoperative abductor weakness are significant risk factors.

Strengthening the Pipeline: Promoting Diversity into Orthopedic Surgery.

The United States is a nation of diverse racial and ethnic origins. Athletes represent the full spectrum of the nation's population. However, the orthopedic surgeons who serve as team physicians are Caucasian and male with staggeringly few exceptions. This manuscript provides an overview of the current status and barriers to diversity among orthopedic team physicians, along with strategies to address the issue. Specifically, pipeline initiatives implemented at one academic medical school and orthopedic surgery department are summarized as potential models that can be further developed by other institutions to enhance diversity in orthopedic surgery.