Do all patients with advanced HER2 positive breast cancer need upfront-chemo when receiving trastuzumab? Randomized phase III trial SAKK 22/99.

Background: HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is standard treatment in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Trastuzumab alone followed by addition of chemotherapy at disease progression versus upfront combination therapy has not been elucidated. Patients and methods: One-hundred seventy-five patients with measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease without previous HER2-directed therapy were randomized to trastuzumab alone followed, at disease progression, by the combination with chemotherapy (Arm A) or upfront trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (Arm B). Chemotherapy could be stopped after ≥6 cycles in responding patients, trastuzumab was continued until progression. The primary endpoint of this superiority trial was time to progression (TTP) on combined trastuzumab-chemotherapy (Combination-TTP) in both arms. Secondary endpoints included response rate, TTP, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. Results: Combination-TTP was longer than expected in both arms, 12.2 months in Arm A and 10.3 months in Arm B and not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.1; P =0.1). Overall survival was also not significantly different (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6-1.5; P = 0.55). In Arm A, the median TTP before introduction of chemotherapy was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.4), yet at 2 years 6% of patients were still on trastuzumab alone. Patients without visceral disease had a Combination-TTP of 21.8 months in arm A, compared with 10.1 months in arm B (unplanned analysis HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.2, P = 0.03). Patients with visceral disease showed no difference. Toxicity was chemotherapy-related. Conclusion: The outcome of patients receiving sequential trastuzumab-chemotherapy or upfront combination was similar. We failed to demonstrate superiority of the sequential approach. These results nevertheless suggest chemotherapy and its toxicity can be deferred, especially in patients with indolent, non-visceral disease. Despite a larger non-inferiority confirmatory study would be needed, these findings represent an additional proof of concept that de-escalation strategies can be discussed in individual patients.

First-line temozolomide combined with bevacizumab in metastatic melanoma: a multicentre phase II trial (SAKK 50/07).

BACKGROUND: Oral temozolomide has shown similar efficacy to dacarbazine in phase III trials with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.1 months. Bevacizumab has an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of melanoma and sprouting endothelial cells. We evaluated the addition of bevacizumab to temozolomide to improve efficacy in stage IV melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic melanoma patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of two or more were treated with temozolomide 150 mg/m(2) days 1-7 orally and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg body weight i.v. day 1 every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was disease stabilisation rate [complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD)] at week 12 (DSR12); secondary end points were best overall response, PFS, overall survival (OS) and adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (median age 59 years) enrolled at nine Swiss centres. DSR12 was 52% (PR: 10 patients and SD: 22 patients). Confirmed overall response rate was 16.1% (CR: 1 patient and PR: 9 patients). Median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 9.6 months. OS (12.0 versus 9.2 months; P = 0.014) was higher in BRAF V600E wild-type patients. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point was surpassed showing promising activity of this bevacizumab/temozolomide combination with a favourable toxicity profile. Response and OS were significantly higher in BRAF wild-type patients.

Targeting immunoliposomes to EGFR-positive glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the capacity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted immunoliposomes to deliver cargo to brain tumor tissue in patients with relapsed glioblastoma harboring an EGFR amplification. We aimed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of anti-EGFR immunoliposomes loaded with doxorubicin (anti-EGFR ILs-dox) in glioblastoma multiforme patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with EGFR-amplified, relapsed glioblastoma were included in this phase I pharmacokinetic trial. Patients received up to four cycles of anti-EGFR ILs-dox. Twenty-four hours later, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained. In addition, we also treated three patients with anti-EGFR ILs-dox before resection of their relapsed glioblastoma. Doxorubicin concentrations were measured in plasma, CSF, and tumor tissue. Safety and efficacy parameters were also obtained. RESULTS: There were no or negligible levels of doxorubicin found in the CSF demonstrating that anti-EGFR ILs-dox are not able to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, significant levels were detected in glioblastoma tissue 24 h after the application, indicating that the disruption of BBB integrity present in high-grade gliomas might enable liposome delivery into tumor tissue. No new safety issues were observed. The median progression-free survival was 1.5 months and the median overall survival was 8 months. One patient undergoing surgery had a very long remission suggesting that neoadjuvant administration may have a positive effect on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We clearly demonstrate that anti-EGFR-immunoliposomes can be targeted to EGFR-amplified glioblastoma and cargo-in this case doxorubicin-can be delivered, although these immunoliposomes do not cross the intact BBB. (The GBM-LIPO trial was registered as NCT03603379).

The addition of deep hyperthermia to gemcitabine-based chemoradiation may achieve enhanced survival in unresectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

INTRODUCTION: Driven by the current unsatisfactory outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), a biologically intensified clinical protocol was developed to explore the feasibility and efficacy of FOLFORINOX chemotherapy followed by deep hyperthermia concomitant with chemoradiation and subsequent FOLFORINOX chemotherapy in patients with LAPC. METHODS: Nine patients with LAPC were treated according to the HEATPAC Phase II trial protocol which consists of 4 cycles of FOLFORINOX chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation to 56 Gy combined with weekly deep hyperthermia and then a further 8 cycles of FOLFORINOX chemotherapy. RESULTS: One grade three related toxicity was reported and two tumours became resectable. The median overall survival was 24 months and 1 year overall survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Intensification of chemoradiation with deep hyperthermia was feasible in nine consecutive patients with LAPC.

Evidence for the involvement of 5-lipoxygenase products in the regulation of the expression of the proenkephalin gene in cultured astroglial cells.

Cultured astroglial cells secrete eicosanoids which are produced by the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenases. These cells also transcribe the proenkephalin gene. In the present study, it was investigated whether agents which inhibit the metabolism of arachidonic acid affect the basal and stimulated expression of the gene. Tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA; 1-1000 nmol/l) increases the concentration of proenkephalin mRNA in these cells by activating protein kinase C. The enhancement in proenkephalin mRNA caused by TPA (10 nmol/l) was not affected by the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (5 mumol/l). However, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, which blocks cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenases, potentiated the effect of TPA on proenkephalin mRNA, when used at concentrations of 0.5-50 mumol/l. Two selective inhibitors of 5-lipoxygenase, i.e. MK886 (5 mumol/l) and BAY X1005 (1 mumol/l), also enhanced the effect of TPA (10 nmol/l) without affecting the basal expression of the gene. When added to the incubation medium, leukotriene E4 (10-1000 nmol/l) diminished in a dose-dependent manner the basal and TPA-induced expression of the proenkephalin gene. It is concluded that in astroglial cells derived from cortex of new-born rats products of 5-lipoxygenase can diminish the action of protein kinase C on the proenkephalin gene.

Infrequent mutation of the tumour-suppressor gene Smad4 in early-stage colorectal cancer.

Smad4 is a candidate tumour-suppressor gene identified recently on chromosome 18q21.1. Both alleles are inactivated in nearly one-half of pancreatic carcinomas, but its role in the tumorigenesis of other tumours is still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential involvement of the Smad4 locus in early-stage colorectal cancers (stages I-III) in tumour samples from a randomised multicentre trial. Of a large collection of DNA samples, 73 with a loss of one allele of the Smad4 gene were analysed for the presence of point mutations in the remaining gene. Patients, from whom biopsies were isolated, were part of a previous randomised multicentre study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research on the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (SAKK study 40/81). Mutation analysis was restricted to the highly conserved C-terminal domain (exons 8, 9, 10 and 11) of Smad4, using PCR and single-strand conformational variant analysis. Two of the 73 patients (3%) with loss of one allele of Smad4 had a point mutation in the remaining allele. These results indicate that whereas Smad4 point mutations are prevalent in pancreatic carcinoma, they are infrequent in early stages (I-III) of colorectal cancer.