Current Use, Training, and Barriers of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Anesthesiology: A National Survey of Veterans Affairs Hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine current use, training needs, and barriers to point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use among anesthesiologists in practice. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational study. SETTING: Anesthesiology departments in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Chiefs of staff and chiefs of anesthesiology departments. INTERVENTIONS: A web-based survey was conducted between June 2019 and March 2020. Chiefs of staff answered questions about facility-level POCUS use, training, competency, and policies. Anesthesiology chiefs responded to a follow-up survey with specialty-specific POCUS questions. The results of the 2020 survey were compared with a similar survey conducted by the authors' group in 2015. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All chiefs of staff (n = 130) and 77% of anesthesiology chiefs (n = 96) completed the survey. The most common POCUS applications used were central and peripheral vascular access (69%-72%), peripheral nerve blocks (66%), and evaluation of cardiac function (29%-31%). Compared with 2015, there was a statistically significant increase in desire for training (p = 0.00015), but no significant change in POCUS use (p = 0.31). Training was most desired for volume-status assessment (52%), left ventricular function (47%), pneumothorax (47%), central line placement (40%), peripheral nerve blocks (40%), and pleural effusion (40%). The most common barriers to POCUS use were lack of funding for training (35%), trained providers (33%), and training opportunities (28%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in desire for POCUS training was seen among anesthesiologists practicing in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system since 2015, and lack of training continues to be a top barrier for POCUS use among anesthesiologists.

Addressing Inter-Rater Variability in the ASA-PS Classification System.

INTRODUCTION: The American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status (ASA-PS) Classification System was established to grade a patient's physical status prior to surgery. The literature shows inconsistencies in the application of the ASA-PS classification among providers. The many uses of the ASA-PS class require reliable ASA-PS class designations between providers. While much literature illustrates the inconsistency, there is limited research on how to improve inter-rater agreement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following an educational intervention targeted at medicine providers, a retrospective chart review was completed to determine the long-term impact of an educational intervention on ASA-PS class agreement among providers of different specialties. To assess the overall agreement between the data sets following the intervention, kappa statistics were calculated for the medicine and anesthesia data sets. These values were compared to the kappa statistics from a similar study completed prior to the educational intervention. RESULTS: Overall, the kappa score, or agreement, between medicine and anesthesia providers improved from the range generally accepted to indicate slight agreement to the range indicating moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: While there was improvement in agreement following an education intervention, the agreement seen was not statistically significant. More research needs to be done to determine how to improve inter-rater reliability of the ASA-PS classification system with a focus on non-anesthesia providers.