Mortality Predictors in Elderly Patients With Cardiogenic Shock on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support. Analysis From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Because significantly higher mortality is observed in elderly patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock, decision-making in this setting is challenging. We aimed to elucidate predictors of unfavorable outcomes in these elderly (≥ 70 yr) patients. DESIGN: Analysis of international worldwide extracorporeal life support organization registry. SETTING: Refractory cardiogenic shock due to various etiologies (cardiac arrest excluded). PATIENTS: Elderly patients (≥ 70 yr). INTERVENTIONS: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three age groups (70-74, 75-79, ≥80 yr) were in-depth analyzed. Uni- and multivariable analysis were performed. From January 1997 to December 2018, 2,644 patients greater than or equal to 70 years (1,395 [52.8%] 70-74 yr old, 858 [32.5%] 75-79 yr, and 391 [14.8%] ≥ 80 yr old) were submitted to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock with marked increase in the most recent years. Peripheral access was applied in majority of patients. Median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support duration was 3.5 days (interquartile range: 1.6-6.1 d), (3.9 d [3.7-4.6 d] in patients ≥ 80 yr) (p < 0.001). Weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was possible in 1,236 patients (46.7%). Overall in-hospital mortality was estimated at 68.3% with highest crude mortality rates observed in 75-79 years old subgroup (70.1%). Complications were mostly cardiovascular and bleeding, without apparent differences between subgroups. Airway pressures, 24-hour pH after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation start, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration, and renal replacement therapy were predictive of higher mortality. In-hospital mortality was lower in heart transplantation recipients, posttranscatheter aortic valve replacement, and pulmonary embolism; conversely, higher mortality followed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation institution after coronary artery bypass + valve and in decompensated chronic heart failure, and nearly 100% mortality followed in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the remarkable increase of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in elderly affected by refractory cardiogenic shock. Despite in-hospital mortality remains high, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should still be considered in such setting even in elderly patients, since increasing age itself was not linked to increased mortality, whereas several predictors may guide indication and management.

Clinical relevance of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus classification of primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (P-GD) is the leading cause of early mortality after heart transplantation (HT). In this 2-center study we analyze outcomes and risk factors of P-GD according to the recent consensus conference classification endorsed by International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. METHODS: We included all adult HTs performed between 1999 and 2013. P-GD was graded as mild, moderate, and severe, according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation recommendations, and analyzed separately from secondary GD. The primary end point was the combined occurrence of in-hospital death or emergency retransplantation. RESULTS: Early GD was found in 118 of 518 patients (23%), and 72 (13.9%) met the criteria for P-GD. Of these, 4 (5%) were mild, 33 (46%) moderate, and 35 (49%) severe and mostly characterized by biventricular involvement (78%). The end point occurred in 53 patients (10.2%). Overall, GD was a strong predictor of death-graft loss (odds ratio, 15.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.9-33.5; p < 0.01), with non-significant worse outcomes in P-GD (37%) vs secondary GD (27%) patients (p = 0.2). The study end point was more frequent in severe P-GD patients (65%) than in moderate (12%) or mild (0%; p < 0.01). Several known risk factors influenced the risk for P-GD, and the combination of specific donor and recipient risk factors accounted for approximately 22-times increased odds for P-GD. Donor age, recipient diabetes, ischemic time, and post-operative dialysis predicted non-recovery from P-GD. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus-defined P-GD identifies patients at major risk for early death and graft loss after HT, although the "mild" grade appeared under-represented and clinically irrelevant. The amplified negative effect of donor and recipient factors on P-GD risk underscores the need for appropriate donor-recipient match.