Image quality comparisons of coil setups in 3T MRI for brain and head and neck radiotherapy simulations.

PURPOSE: MRI is increasingly used for brain and head and neck radiotherapy treatment planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast. Flexible array coils can be arranged to encompass treatment immobilization devices, which do not fit in diagnostic head/neck coils. Selecting a flexible coil arrangement to replace a diagnostic coil should rely on image quality characteristics and patient comfort. We compared image quality obtained with a custom UltraFlexLarge18 (UFL18) coil setup against a commercial FlexLarge4 (FL4) coil arrangement, relative to a diagnostic Head/Neck20 (HN20) coil at 3T. METHODS: The large American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI phantom was scanned monthly in the UFL18, FL4, and HN20 coil setup over 2 years, using the ACR series and three clinical sequences. High-contrast spatial resolution (HCSR), image intensity uniformity (IIU), percent-signal ghosting (PSG), low-contrast object detectability (LCOD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and geometric accuracy were calculated according to ACR recommendations for each series and coil arrangement. Five healthy volunteers were scanned with the clinical sequences in all three coil setups. SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and artifact size were extracted from regions-of-interest along the head for each sequence and coil setup. For both experiments, ratios of image quality parameters obtained with UFL18 or FL4 over those from HN20 were formed for each coil setup, grouping the ACR and clinical sequences. RESULTS: Wilcoxon rank-sum tests revealed significantly higher (p < 0.001) LCOD, IIU and SNR, and lower PSG ratios with UFL18 than FL4 on the phantom for the clinical sequences, with opposite PSG and SNR trends for the ACR series. Similar statistical tests on volunteer data corroborated that SNR ratios with UFL18 (0.58 ± 0.19) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than with FL4 (0.51 ± 0.18) relative to HN20. CONCLUSIONS: The custom UFL18 coil setup was selected for clinical application in MR simulations due to the superior image quality demonstrated on a phantom and volunteers for clinical sequences and increased volunteer comfort.

Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Benefits of a Novel Tattoo-less Workflow for Nonspine Bone Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Integrating Surface-Guidance With Triggered Imaging Reduces Treatment Time and Eliminates the Need for Tattoos.

PURPOSE: Oligometastatic disease has expanded the indications for nonspine bone stereotactic body radiation therapy (NSB SBRT). We investigated whether optical surface monitoring systems (OSMS) could enable tattoo-less setup and substitute for 2-dimensional/3-dimensional or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based mid-imaging in NSB SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: OSMS was incorporated in parallel with an existing workflow using pretreatment CBCT and 2-dimensional/3-dimensional kV/kV mid-imaging beginning November 2019. The ability of OSMS to detect out-of-tolerance (>2 mm/>2°) and commanded couch shifts was analyzed. A workflow incorporating OSMS reference captures, CBCT for pretreatment verification, and OSMS/triggered imaging (TI) for intrafraction monitoring was developed for rib/sternum SBRT beginning November 2021 and all NSB SBRT beginning February 2022. Treatment time and CBCT-related radiation dose between the OSMS and the non-OSMS intrafraction monitoring group was analyzed pre- and post-OSMS/TI workflow adoption. All fractions were analyzed through statistical process control with use of an XmR chart of treatment time per quarter from February 2019 to February 2023. Special cause rules were based on Institute for Healthcare Improvement criteria. RESULTS: From February 2019 to February 2023, 1993 NSB SBRT fractions were delivered, including 234 rib, 109 sternum, 214 ilium, and 682 multisite. Over 20 commanded shifts, OSMS could detect 2-mm shifts to within 0.4 mm 67% of the time and 0.8 mm 95% of the time. All NSB SBRT sites showed significant reductions in treatment time, including the greatest improvement in rib total treatment (21.6-13.4 minutes; P = 1.16 × 10-17) and beam time (7.9-3.2 minutes; P = 7.32 × 10-27). Significant reductions in CBCT-related radiation were also observed for several NSB sites. These process improvements were associated with OSMS adoption. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of a novel NSB SBRT workflow incorporating OSMS/TI for bone intrafraction motion monitoring reduced treatment time and CBCT-related radiation exposure while also allowing for more continuous intrafraction motion monitoring for NSB SBRT. OSMS/TI enabled the transition to a tattoo-less workflow.