Editor's Choice - Long Term Outcomes of the Advanta V12 Covered Bridging Stent for Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in 1 675 Target Vessels.

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of the Advanta V12 as a covered bridging stent in fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: Patients treated with F/BEVAR and followed in a single centre receiving the Advanta V12 as a covered bridging stent between January 2010 and May 2020 were included. RESULTS: A total of 636 patients (543 men) were analysed. A total of 1 675 target vessels (TVs) were bridged with the Advanta V12. Estimated TV patency at one, five, and eight years was 99.1% ± 0.2%, 96.9% ± 0.5% and 96.2% ± 0.7%, respectively. Estimated patency at eight years was 98.1% ± 0.5% for fenestrations and 87.3% ± 2.9% for branches (p < .001). Estimated patency of renal arteries was statistically significantly lower for those targeted with branches compared with fenestrations (p = .001). Multivariable analysis showed that targeting a TV with a branch compared with a fenestration was the only independent risk factor for occlusion during follow up (hazard ratio 6.41, 95% CI 3.4 - 11.9; p < .001). Estimated freedom from endoleak at one, five, and eight years was 99.4% ± 0.2%, 96.4% ± 0.6%, and 95.4% ± 0.8%, respectively. Estimated freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) at one, five, and eight years was 98.5% ± 0.3%, 93.0% ± 0.8%, and 91.3% ± 1%, respectively. Estimated freedom from TVI at eight years was 93.2% ± 0.9% for fenestrations and 82.7% ± 3.5% for branches (p < .001). Estimated freedom from TVI was statistically significantly lower for renal arteries targeted with branches compared with those targeted with fenestrations (p < .001) CONCLUSION: The Advanta V12 shows excellent technical success rates as a covered bridging stent in F/ΒEVAR. Late outcomes remain good with low rates of TV occlusion, endoleak, and re-intervention. Renal arteries targeted with branches demonstrated a higher risk of occlusion and instability compared with those targeted with fenestrations.

Editor's Choice - Single Centre Midterm Experience with Primary Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair for Short Neck, Juxtarenal, and Suprarenal Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The use of fenestrated stent grafts to treat short neck, juxta- and suprarenal aortic aneurysms is increasing worldwide, but midterm outcome reports are scarce. This study aimed to report peri-operative results and midterm outcomes after five years from a single centre. METHODS: Patients treated with primary fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) for short neck, juxta- or suprarenal aortic aneurysms within the period January 2010 to May 2020 with follow up in the centre were included. Early (technical success, operative mortality, spinal cord ischaemia) and five year outcomes (cumulative survival, freedom from aortic related death, target vessel patency, target vessel instability [TVI], re-interventions) were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients (313 male, mean age 72.3 ± 7.7 years) were included in the study. Technical success was 98% (342/349). The thirty day mortality rate was 0.9% (3/349). Estimated survival at five years was 69.3 ± 3.1%. Freedom from aneurysm related death at five years was 98.8% ± 0.7%. Estimated target vessel patency at five years was 98.7 ± 0.4%. Estimated freedom from TVI at five years was 97.2 ± 0.6%. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at five years was 86.5 ± 2.3%. Survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without re-interventions (p = .088). CONCLUSION: Midterm results of FEVAR remain good as indicated by sustained target vessel patency and low aortic related mortality rates. An important proportion of patients require re-interventions, which do not have a negative impact on midterm survival.

Outcomes of Upper Extremity Access with Surgical Exposure of the Axillary Artery in Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the safety of upper extremity access with surgical exposure of the axillary artery in fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR), evaluating neurological and local complications as well as re-interventions associated with the technique. METHODS: All patients undergoing an F/B-EVAR procedure with surgical exposure of the axillary artery between January 2010 and March 2020 were included in this retrospective single centre study. Endpoints were neurological and access related complications and re-interventions related to the upper extremity access. Complications related to the technique included stroke/transient ischaemic attack, wound infection, peripheral nerve injury, and arterial complications. RESULTS: 264 patients (192 male, mean age 70 ± 7 years) were included. Upper extremity access was performed over the left axillary artery in 257 (97%) of the cases, and over the right axillary artery in the remaining seven cases. Six (2.2%) patients had early complications related to the arterial access: four with post-operative bleeding and two with acute arm ischaemia. Two patients with post-operative bleeding and both patients with ischaemic complications required re-intervention. One of these patients with arm ischaemia died five weeks after the re-intervention due to sepsis complications related to patch infection. Sixteen (6%) patients presented with transient arm paraesthesia or sensory neurological deficit post-operatively. The symptoms completely recovered in all cases with no residual deficits. Peri-operative ischaemic stroke occurred in three (1%) patients (two minor, one major). No other access related complications were recorded during follow up in any of the patients with no cases of late stenosis/occlusion. CONCLUSION: Upper extremity access with surgical exposure of the axillary artery is a safe method for antegrade catheterisation of fenestrations and branches in complex endovascular aneurysm repair.

Reasons for and Outcomes of Open Abdominal Aortic Repair in the Endovascular Era.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the treatment of choice for most patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Open aneurysm repair (OAR) is still being used in a number of patients for specific reasons. The aim of the present study was to investigate the reasons and perioperative outcomes of OAR in a high-volume endovascular center. METHODS: All patients who underwent OAR in a single center institution during the period April 2010 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 222 patients underwent OAR. One hundred and forty-one (63.5%) patients underwent elective surgery, and eighty-one (36.5%) patients were treated acutely. The reasons for the decision to perform OAR instead of EVAR were as follows: anatomical in 89 (40.1%) cases, rupture in unstable patient in 57 (25.7%) cases, AAA with concomitant iliac arterial occlusive disease in 44 (19.8%) cases, previous EVAR with complications in 14 (6.3%) cases, large pararenal aneurysm considered risky to wait for a customized fenestrated stent graft in 7 (3.2%) cases, young patient age in 4 (1.8%) cases, the patient's preference in 3 (1.4%) cases, infected/mycotic AAA in 2 (0.9%) cases, and simultaneous OAR with colon cancer resection (n = 1, 0.5%) and renal transplantation (n = 1, n = 0.5). Thirty-day mortality in elective cases was 5% (7/141) and in acute cases 34.6% (28/81). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that OAR is still used for selected patients despite improvements in EVAR technology. The most common reason for OAR was an unsuitable anatomy for EVAR. Perioperative mortality of OAR both for acute and elective cases as observed in this study is in line with published outcomes of other centers.

Limb Occlusion Rate after EVAR With Individualized Graft Limb Selection and a Liberal Protocol of Primary Relining.

BACKGROUND: This study analyses limb occlusion rates after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a strategy including stent-graft limb selection and liberal primary stenting (relining) in anatomies at higher risk for occlusion with uncovered self-expandable or balloon-expandable stents. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective EVAR with a bifurcated stent-graft between January 2010-August 2018 were included. A protocol involving personalized stent-graft selection and liberal primary relining based on preoperative imaging was followed during the whole period. Primary endpoints were technical success and primary limb patency during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included mortality and limb reintervention rates. Risk factors associated to limb patency and reintervention rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifteen patients (548 males; mean age 72.9 ± 9 years) were included. Overall technical success was 98.5% (606/615). One (0.16%) patient died during the first 30 days. Of the 1230 limbs, 96 (8%) were deemed at risk for occlusion in view of the anatomy, and primarily relined in 62 patients. Estimated primary limb patency at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years was 99.5 ± 0.2%, 99.2 ± 0.3% and 98.5 ± 0.5%, respectively. Freedom from limb-related reintervention at 6 months, 1 year and 3 years was 98.1 ± 0.4%, 97.4 ± 0.5% and 95.6 ± 0.7%, respectively. Only one (1%) of the 96 relined limbs occluded during follow-up. No differences were found in terms of patency or freedom from reintervention between limbs at risk that were primary stented and limbs without adjunctive stents. Gore Excluder stent-grafts presented better patency (Breslow P = 0.005) and lower reintervention rates (Breslow P = 0.001) than other devices during follow-up. Peripheral artery disease was also a risk factor for reintervention (Breslow P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Liberal use of primary limb relining in patients with iliac anatomy at higher risk for occlusion appears to be a safe and effective strategy to preserve limb patency after EVAR. Gore Excluder graft limbs present better patency and lower reintervention rates than other stent-graft types.

A systematic review of outcomes of upper extremity access for fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Upper extremity access (UEA) is an important component of complex fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). Open and percutaneous UEA approaches have been reported during these procedures. The aim of this review was to assess the outcomes of UEA done to facilitate F/BEVAR. METHODS: A systematic review of studies focusing on upper extremity arterial access during F/BEVAR was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Three databases including PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried. Outcomes of interest included UEA-related and other unrelated early and late morbidity and mortality, such as arterial occlusion, neurologic deficit, bleeding complications, and stroke, in patients undergoing UEA during F/BEVAR. RESULTS: Five full-text manuscripts and one abstract met criteria to be included, accounting for a total of 495 patients. The median age of patients who underwent UEA during F/BEVAR was 73.4 years. Predominantly male patients (371 [74.9%]) were treated. Indications for F/BEVAR were thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 325 (65.6%), pararenal aneurysms in 96 (19.4%), juxtarenal aneurysms in 44 (8.9%), and suprarenal aortic aneurysms in 30 (6.1%). Axillary conduits were created in 29 (5.8%) patients. A total of 41 (8.2%) UEA-related complications were reported. Of those 41 complications, 17 (41.5%) were access bleeding, 10 (24.4%) were ischemic strokes, 7 (17.1%) were arterial occlusions, 4 (9.7%) were upper extremity neurologic deficits, 2 (4.9%) were arterial stenoses, and 1 (2.4%) was pseudoaneurysm. UEA-related complications were reported in 15 of 56 (26.8%) patients undergoing percutaneous UEA and 26 of 439 (5.9%) undergoing open UEA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate associated with UEA during F/BEVAR is low, with 2% stroke rate reported. The percutaneous approach showed a higher UEA-related complication rate compared with open UEA. More studies on percutaneous UEA and randomized studies comparing open vs percutaneous UEA during F/BEVAR are warranted to determine the safest and most efficient UEA approach strategy during complex aortic procedures.

Aneurysm Rupture and Mortality During the Waiting Time for a Customised Fenestrated/Branched Stent Graft in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of complex aortic pathologies with customised fenestrated/branched stent grafts (F/BEVAR) is associated with a longer waiting time to the procedure. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of aneurysm rupture and mortality during the waiting time for a fenestrated/branched stent graft in a single centre. METHODS: All patients with a pararenal (PAA), thoraco-abdominal (TAAA), or aortic arch aneurysm planned to be treated with a customised F/BEVAR between January 2010 and December 2018 were included. Patients planned for F/BEVAR who in the end did not undergo the procedure were analysed. RESULTS: 906 patients were planned to undergo F/BEVAR during the study period. Of those, 862 (95.1%) underwent the procedure as planned (FEVAR for PAA; n = 494, F/BEVAR for TAAA; n = 348, F/BEVAR for arch aneurysm; n = 20). In 44 (4.9%) patients, the procedure was cancelled. Thirty-seven (4.1%) patients died before the procedure, four (0.4%) patients turned down the procedure, two (0.2%) were cancelled because of worsened general condition, and one (0.1%) ruptured but underwent emergency open repair in another institution. Causes of death during the waiting time were: aneurysm rupture, n = 15 (1.7%); cardiac, n = 7 (0.8%); stroke, n = 3 (0.3%); gastrointestinal, n = 3 (0.3%); death after complete arch debranching, n = 2 (0.2%); infection, n = 2 (0.2%); death after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, n = 1 (0.1%); death after urological surgery, n = 1 (0.1%); unknown, n = 3 (0.3%). Aneurysm diameter was larger in patients who died of aneurysm rupture compared with patients who died as a result of other causes (79.2 ± 13 mm vs. 66.7 ± 12 mm, respectively, p = .005). CONCLUSION: Aneurysm rupture during the waiting time for F/BEVAR can occur but is rare. Patients with a larger aneurysm diameter may be at higher risk of rupture. Measures to reduce the risk of rupture during the waiting time might include the use of off the shelf devices for larger aneurysms, quicker measurement and graft plan order processes, and quicker graft construction and delivery.

Prognostic Value of Initial Aneurysmal Sac Regression after EVAR.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of initial aneurysmal sac reduction after endovascular aneurysm repair on the evolution of aneurysmal sac over follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was made of patients subjected to elective treatment between January 2005 and December 2014, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. An analysis was made of the evolution of the aneurysmal sac according to its condition one year after surgery, defining of two groups: A (sac reduction) and B (stable sac). Follow-up by computed tomography (CT) angiography was made after one month and then every 6 months or annually, depending on the presence of endoleak. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included. Fifty-one patients (39.8%) showed a significant decrease in diameter during the first year (group A), whereas 77 patients (60.2%) showed no initial decrease (group B). Preoperative CT angiography showed the patients in group A to have larger aneurysms (63.5 mm vs. 59.25; P = 0.048), a greater presence of posterior thrombus (68.6% vs. 30.7%; P < 0.001), and fewer patent lumbar vessels (56.9% vs. 83.1%; P = 0.001). The prevalence of endoleak at some point during follow-up was lower in group A (31.4% vs. 74% in group B; P < 0.001), and 100% of all aneurysmal growths were associated to the presence of endoleak. After 5 years, significant differences were observed in the growth-free rate (96.9% in group A vs. 85.2% in group B; hazard ratio [HR] 4.8 [1.1-21.4; P = 0.036]) and in the reintervention-free rate (95,7% vs. 84.6%; HR 6.6 [0.8-52.4; P = 0.07]). No reoperation in group A was due to type II endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The aneurysmal sac can be expected to take a favorable course in those cases characterized by initial aneurysmal sac reduction. These findings may imply a change in the follow-up protocol, even in cases with type II endoleak.

Use of Bilateral Cook Zenith Iliac Branch Devices to Preserve Internal Iliac Artery Flow During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVES: Iliac branch devices (IBD) have become a widespread option to preserve antegrade internal iliac artery (IIA) flow during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Reported experience with bilateral implantation of IBDs is limited. This study aimed to describe the indications, technical options, and outcomes with the use of bilateral IBDs. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective implantation of bilateral Cook Zenith IBD between January 2010 and September 2017 in a single centre were included. Bilateral IBD was indicated in physically active, anatomically suitable patients and those with previous or concomitant surgery for a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm or impaired collateral circulation to the IIA. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (29 male, mean age 64.1 ± 10 years) were included. Of the 58 IBDs, 48 (83%) were implanted in one procedure and 10 (17%) in two procedures (mean time between procedures 30.4 ± 9 months). Nineteen patients (65%) had a previous or simultaneous EVAR and the remaining 10 (35%) a previous or simultaneous complex aortic repair. Mean CIA diameter was 35.2 ± 8 mm. Technical success was achieved in 55 of the 58 IBDs (95%) with no mortality. Axillary artery access was used in 13 (38%) procedures. During follow up, four (7%) IIA branches occluded (1 bilateral occlusion and 2 unilateral). Estimated IIA branch patency at one and three years was 97.8% ± 2% and 88.5% ± 7%, respectively. All patients with late IIA occlusion remained asymptomatic. Re-intervention was needed in four patients (14%): two bridging stent graft extensions for type Ib endoleak, one relining of the external iliac artery because of mural in-stent thrombus and one femoro-femoral crossover bypass to treat an external iliac limb occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral implantation of IBDs is a safe and effective technique to preserve IIA flow in selected patients with suitable anatomy, showing similar technical success and mid-term outcomes to the unilateral use of the device.

Mid-Term Results of Fenestrated/Branched Stent Grafting to Treat Post-dissection Thoraco-abdominal Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Patients surviving acute aortic dissection are at risk of developing a post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (PD-TAAA) during follow up, regardless of the type of treatment in the acute setting. Fenestrated and branched stent grafting (F/B-TEVAR) has been used with success to treat PD-TAAA, albeit reported only with short-term results. The aim of this study was to report mid-term results in a cohort of 71 patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including all patients with PD-TAAAs who underwent F/B-TEVAR within the period January 2010 - April 2017 at two vascular institutions experienced in endovascular techniques. RESULTS: A total of 71 consecutive patients (56 male, mean age 63.8 ± 10.6 years) were treated. Technical success was achieved in 68/71 (95.8%) patients. In hospital mortality was four (5.6%) patients. Peri-operative morbidity was 19.6%. Three (4.2%) patients developed severe spinal cord ischaemia, one of these patients 12 months post-operatively. Mean follow up was 25.3 months (1-77 months). Cumulative survival rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 84.7 ± 4.5%, 80.7 ± 5.1%, and 70.0 ± 6.7%, respectively. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at 12, 24, and 36 months was 80.7 ± 5.3%, 63.0 ± 6.9%, and 52.6 ± 8.0%, respectively. The main reasons for re-intervention were endoleak from visceral/renal arteries and iliac endoleak requiring extension. Target vessel occlusion occurred in 8/261 (3.1%) vessels (renal artery n = 4; superior mesenteric artery n = 2; coeliac artery n = 2). Mean aneurysm sac regression during follow up was 9.2 ± 8.8 mm, with a false lumen thrombosis rate of 85.4% for patients with a follow up longer than 12 months. No ruptures occurred during follow up. CONCLUSION: F/B-TEVAR for post-dissection TAAA is feasible and associated with low peri-operative mortality and peri-operative morbidity. Mid-term results demonstrate a high rate of aneurysm sac regression. Rigorous follow up is required because of the significant re-intervention rate. Longer bridging covered stents for target vessels are advised.

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with narrow aortic bifurcation using Excluder bifurcated stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the influence of the aortic bifurcation anatomy on the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) bifurcated stent grafts. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study of patients treated with the Excluder stent graft. Analysis included anatomical factors of the aortic bifurcation (aortic bifurcation diameter [ABD], calcification, thrombus), characteristics of the stent graft limbs (sum of stent graft limbs diameters [SLD]), and the SLD/ABD ratio. Narrow bifurcation was defined as ABD <20 mm. Primary outcomes were intraoperative stenosis, need for additional intraoperative measures, limb stenosis, and occlusion during follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 232 patients. Mean ABD was 24.6 ± 6 mm, with 53 patients (23%) presenting with narrow bifurcation (range, 12.5-19.5 mm). Median SLD in these patients was 28 mm, and the SLD/ABD ratio was 1.64. Calcification involving >50% of the bifurcation circumference was present in 32% of the patients, with 17% presenting thrombus in this area. Of 53 patients with narrow bifurcation, intraoperative stenosis >50% occurred in three (5.7%), which required adjunctive treatment. Computed tomography at 1 month showed limb stenosis >50% in nine patients (17%). No limb occlusions were recorded with a median follow-up of 34 months. Multivariate analysis of the overall series showed a higher risk of limb stenosis on the computed tomography at 1 month in patients with peripheral artery disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-24.4; P = .032), narrow bifurcation (HR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2-15.8; P = .001), higher SLD/ABD ratio (HR, 29.3; 95% CI, 4-215.2; P = .001), and calcium >50% (HR, 3; 95% CI, 1.1-8; P = .03), and lower in bifurcations with thrombus (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal aortic aneurysms with narrow bifurcation can be treated with the bifurcated Excluder device without additional adjunctive measures. The presence of limb stenosis during follow-up is not associated with occlusion. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm these results.

Early Experience with the Use of Inner Branches in Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal and Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Visceral arteries in fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (F/BEVAR) have been addressed by fenestrations or directional side branches. Inner branches, as used in the arch branched device, could provide an extra option for visceral arteries "unsuitable" for fenestrations or directional side branches. Early experience with the use of inner branches for visceral arteries in F/BEVAR is described. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated by F/BEVAR for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (TAAA) using stent grafts with inner branches were included. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (28 male, mean age 71.6 ± 8.3 years) were included. Seven (21.9%) patients had a complex AAA and 25 (78.1%) had a TAAA. A stent graft with inner branches only was used in four (12.5%) patients. The remaining 28 (87.5%) patients received a stent graft with fenestrations and inner branches. In total 52 vessels were targeted with inner branches. Technical success was achieved in all 32 (100%) patients. All 38 inner branch target vessels in grafts including fenestrations and inner branches were instantly catheterised (<1 minute), whereas catheterisation of target vessels in "inner branch only" grafts proved more difficult (<1 minute, n = 3; 1-3 min, n = 4; and >3 min, n = 7). The 30 day operative mortality was 3.1% (1/32). Estimated survival at 1 year was 80.0% ± 8.3%. During follow-up, four renal inner branches occluded in three patients. The estimated inner branch target vessel stent patency at 1 year was 91.9 ± 4.5%. The estimated freedom from re-intervention at 1 year was 78.4% ± 8.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Early data suggest that visceral inner branches might represent a feasible third option to address selected target vessels in F/BEVAR. Stent grafts with inner branch(es) in combination with fenestrations seem to be a better configuration than stent grafts with inner branches alone. Durability of the inner branch design needs further investigation.

Impact of the Repositionable C3 Excluder System on the Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With Unfavorable Neck Anatomy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the midterm clinical outcomes among patients with favorable and unfavorable neck morphology for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), specifically the impact of the repositionable C3 Excluder stent-graft on type I endoleak in patients with unfavorable neck. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 249 patients (mean age 74.3 years; 241 men) who underwent successful EVAR from January 2000 to December 2014 using either the traditional Excluder (n=140) or the C3 repositionable system (n=109). Unfavorable proximal aortic neck anatomy was defined by length <15 mm, angulation >60°, >50% circumferential thrombus, or >50% neck calcification. By these criteria, unfavorable neck anatomy was present in 71 (28.5%) patients (41 traditional Excluder and 30 C3 Excluder). The main endpoint was the incidence of type Ia endoleak and the need for a proximal cuff according to the type of neck anatomy. Comparisons between groups are reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A proximal extension cuff for type Ia endoleak was needed in 4 (2.2%) patients with favorable neck anatomy compared to 7 (9.9%) patients with unfavorable neck (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.3 to 16.8, p=0.014). Among the patients with unfavorable neck, a proximal cuff was implanted in 6/41 (14.6%) traditional Excluder stent-grafts vs 1/30 (3.3%) in the C3 Excluder group (OR 4.39, 95% CI 0.55 to 34.58, p=0.23). Median follow-up was 30.5 and 38 months for favorable vs unfavorable neck groups, respectively (p=0.29). Only 1 case of type Ia endoleak was registered at 6.5 years' follow-up (traditional Excluder), with no device migration. CONCLUSION: Both Excluder stent-grafts provide good midterm clinical outcomes after EVAR in patients with unfavorable neck anatomy. Investigation of a larger cohort will be needed to identify if the C3 Excluder device offers any improvement over the traditional Excluder in terms of freedom from endoleaks.

Open Versus Endovascular Treatment for Patients with Post-Carotid Endarterectomy Restenosis: Early and Long-term Results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess and compare the short- and long-term results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and redo surgery in patients with restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: From January 1988 to December 2014, 44 consecutive patients were treated for carotid restenosis (CR): 23 redo-CEA (52.3%) and 21 CAS (47.7%). Data from these patients were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Early results and 3-year end points were analyzed and compared between groups with χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Breslow test. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and comorbidity were similar in both groups, except for arterial hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency which were higher in the CAS group. CR was symptomatic in 7 patients in the redo-CEA group (30.4%) and 1 (4.8%) in CAS (P = 0.04). No differences were found in the time period between primary CEA and reintervention, critical carotid stenosis, or contralateral carotid occlusion. Median follow-up was 61.5 months. In the redo-CEA group, 1 patient (4.3%) had a perioperative transient ischemic attack and 3 (13%) experienced cranial nerve injury with complete regression at 30 days. No differences were found between groups in terms of early and long-term mortality, neurologic morbidity, and overall morbidity. The rate of secondary restenosis and freedom from reintervention was similar in both groups during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both CAS and redo-CEA are suitable options for patients with CR. CAS might be the treatment of choice due to the risk of cranial nerve injuries in redo-CEA. When CAS is contraindicated, redo-CEA remains a safe and effective treatment option.

Outcomes of the Endovascular Treatment of Stenotic Lesions versus Chronic Total Occlusions in the Iliac Sector.

BACKGROUND: This study compares outcomes of the endovascular treatment (EVT) of iliac artery occlusive disease according to whether the treated lesion is a stenosis or a chronic total occlusion (CTO). METHODS: Patients undergoing EVT from 2003 to 2013 for iliac artery occlusive disease were identified and the lesions treated stratified into stenotic (Group 1, n = 375) or CTO (Group 2, n = 87). Patients were followed clinically and hemodynamically (thigh-brachial index, TBI). Comorbidities, procedural factors, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using Kaplan-Meier, Breslow, and Cox models. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-two iliac endovascular procedures in 378 patients were included in a retrospective study. The 2 groups only differed in preprocedural TBI [0.77 (Group 1) vs. 0.67 (Group 2), P < 0.001], lesion length [39.7 mm (Group 1) vs. 49.9 mm (Group 2), P < 0.001], and the use of a covered stent [11.6% (Group 1) vs. 46.2% (Group 2), P < 0.001]. The technical success rate was higher in Group 1 (99.2% vs. 89.7%, P < 0.001). Five early occlusions were recorded in Group 1 and 3 in Group 2 (1.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.146). Median follow-up was 34 months (1-113). At 12 and 36 months, stenotic lesions showed better primary (P1) and secondary (P2) patency rates [P1 93.0% and 85.8% vs. 83.1% and 74.7%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.90 (1.15-3.14), P = 0.018; P2 97.8% and 96.8% vs. 93.0% and 87.4%, HR 2.86 (1.39-5.90), P = 0.007] and freedom from reintervention (FFR) rates [91.6% and 83.5% vs. 84.1% and 78.9%, HR 1.51 (0.90-2.53), P = 0.132]. In a multivariate analysis, CTO showed a worse P2 than stenotic lesions [HR 2.81 (1.17-6.76), P = 0.021], yet no differences emerged in P1 [HR 1.41 (0.76-2.63), P = 0.277] or FFR [HR 1.43 (0.79-2.57), P = 0.237]. A lower preprocedural TBI was correlated with a greater risk of EVT failure in terms of patency and FFR (P < 0.05). The use of a stent shorter than 40 mm emerged as a protective factor with an HR for P1 of 3.68 (1.53-8.87) (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: EVT for iliac artery disease offers good outcomes in terms of long-term patency, although improved results were observed here for the treatment of stenotic lesions over CTO. Procedures performed in patients with a lower TBI and the use of a stent >40 mm were related to a worse stent patency.

Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment Failure in Patients with Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical impact derived from endovascular treatment failure on patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease (FPOD) regarding their preoperative clinical stage. METHODS: Retrospective review for primary endovascular procedures for FPOD from 2008 to 2013. Primary end point included clinical deterioration defined as acute limb ischemia (ALI) or clinical worsening by, at least, one Rutherford's classification category, related to procedure's failure (restenosis >70% or occlusion). RESULTS: Ninety procedures were analyzed in 85 patients, 87.8% operated due to critical limb ischemia. The lesion treated was classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)-A/B in 76.7%, with a mean length of 98.5 ± 54 mm. Covered stent graft (SG) was used in 31.1% of the cases. Median follow-up was 14.5 months and treatment failure occurred in 33.3% of cases (n = 30, 9 restenosis and 21 occlusions). Clinical worsening was assessed in 40% of treatment failures and 6 of 21 (28.6%) presented as ALI. Twenty-two major adverse limb events (MALEs) were recorded and 8 major amputations. Regarding the type of stent, more occlusions were recorded on patients treated with SG compared with bare metal stent (39.3% vs. 16%; P = 0.02). However, no differences were found between groups regarding clinical worsening attributable to treatment failure (HR, 1.33; CI 95%, 0.5-3.5; P = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, TASC-C/D lesions (HR, 5.5; CI 95%, 2.3-13.3; P < 0.001) and female sex (HR, 4.9; CI 95%, 1.9-12.5; P = 0.001) behaved as significant predictors for failure and dual-antiplatelet therapy as a protective factor (HR, 0.3; CI 95%, 0.3-0.13; P = 0.03). No predictors were obtained regarding clinical worsening and occurrence of MALEs in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with failure of endovascular procedures on FPOD appeared with clinical worsening in a no negligible number of cases in our sample regarding their preoperative clinical situation. Thus, we believe that endovascular treatment should be carefully deliberated.

Systematic nasogastric tube in aortic surgery: is it necessary?

BACKGROUND: Routine nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression has been traditionally used to prevent nausea and vomiting after abdominal surgery. Besides, many studies having demonstrated no benefits derived from this practice after an elective laparotomy, little evidence has been published regarding its use in aortic surgery. In this study, we analyze the effects of the selective use of the NGT in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery in our center. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including patients who underwent elective infrarenal aortic surgery between January 2011 and December 2012. Patients were prospectively included in group A (systematic NGT placement) and group B (nonsystematic NGT). The main end point was the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Secondary end points were postoperative complications, time to first oral intake, and hospital stay. RESULTS: One hundred patients were finally included in the study, 50 patients per group. Preoperative and intraoperative data were similar between both groups. Higher incidence of PONV (48% vs. 10%; relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.5; P = 0.003) was observed in group A. Selective NGT behaved as a protective factor regarding earlier first oral intake in first postoperative 48 hours (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; P = 0.05). There were no differences in other adverse events although a trend toward fewer respiratory complications was observed in patients with nonsystematic NGT. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates higher incidence of PONV and longer time to first oral intake in patients with systematic NGT with no benefits derived from this practice. Based on these results, selective NGT decompression should be encouraged in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery.

Endovascular treatment of external iliac artery occlusive disease: midterm results.

PURPOSE: To report midterm outcomes for endovascular treatment of external iliac artery (EIA) occlusive disease and assess possible factors affecting patency. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 99 consecutive patients (91 men; mean age 67.3 years) with claudication (n=70) or critical limb ischemia (n=29) owing to occlusive EIA disease treated at our center from January 2005 to June 2012. The majority of lesions (79/108) were TASC A/B. Lesions were a mean 42.2 mm long (range 10-125); 43/108 affected the distal third of the EIA. Balloon angioplasty alone was performed in 7 limbs, while the remaining 101 lesions were stented (65 self-expanding, 24 balloon-expandable, and 12 covered). Clinical and hemodynamic follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after therapy and yearly thereafter. The factors examined were procedure characteristics and patency rates. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range 1-89), there were 2 (1.9%) early occlusions followed by a successful reintervention, 4 late occlusions, and 5 hemodynamic failures followed by 7 reinterventions. These events led to primary and secondary patency rates at 30 months of 89.7% and 94.1%, respectively. No differences in patency rates were detected according to age, clinical state, or comorbidity. Use of covered stents (p=0.006) was the only variable associated with lower primary patency rates. CONCLUSION: Endovascular therapy to treat TASC A/B lesions of the EIA yielded good short and midterm patency and low early morbidity and mortality. Lesions involving the distal third of the EIA treated by simple angioplasty ± stenting fared worse. No clinical factors could be correlated with patency.

Cystic adventitial degeneration of the popliteal artery: report on 3 cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Cystic adventitial disease (CAD) is a rare, nonatherosclerotic vascular condition predominantly seen in middle-aged men with no cardiovascular risk factors. Three cases have been diagnosed and treated in our institution during the past 8 years. The purpose of this report is to provide an updated literature review of this condition with the addition of 3 new cases. METHODS: Information about 3 new cases is presented along with data obtained from articles published between 1979 and 2012 from PubMed and Embase databases. Two hundred thirty-eight articles were found, and 98 were included in our review. RESULTS: All patients treated presented with rapidly progressive intermittent calf claudication. Diagnosis of CAD was confirmed by at least 2 imaging techniques, either duplex ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, with a preoperative angiography performed in all cases. Wall cyst resection was performed in the 3 cases reported here, after intraoperative confirmation that there was no arterial wall damage. All patients remained asymptomatic with no signs of recurrence after a median 36-month follow-up (24-60 month follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: CAD is a rare vascular condition usually affecting arteries that presents as a sudden onset of unilateral intermittent calf claudication. Diagnosis must be confirmed with imaging techniques, such as duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. On the basis of existing knowledge, surgery remains the treatment of choice, with cystic evacuation in cases with no arterial wall damage or resection and grafting. However, the follow-up algorithm for treated patients remains unclear.