Treatment of persistent focalized Q fever: time has come for an international randomized controlled trial.

Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis due to Coxiella burnetii, responsible for endocarditis and endovascular infections. Since the 1990s, the combination hydroxychloroquine + doxycycline has constituted the curative and prophylactic treatment in persistent focalized Q fever. This combination appears to have significantly reduced the treatment's duration (from 60 to 26 months), yet substantial evidence of effectiveness remains lacking. Data are mostly based on in vitro and observational studies. We conducted a literature review to assess the effectiveness of this therapy, along with potential alternatives. The proposed in vitro mechanism of action describes the inhibition of Coxiella replication by doxycycline through the restoration of its bactericidal activity (inhibited in acidic environment) by alkalinization of phagolysosome-like vacuoles with hydroxychloroquine. So far, the rarity and heterogeneous presentation of cases have made it challenging to design prospective studies with statistical power. The main studies supporting this treatment are retrospective cohorts, dating back to the 1990s-2000s. Retrospective studies from the large Dutch outbreak of Q fever (>4000 cases between 2007 and 2010) did not corroborate a clear benefit of this combination, notably in comparison with other regimens. Thus, there is still no consensus among the medical community on this issue. However insufficient the evidence, today the doxycycline + hydroxychloroquine combination remains the regimen with the largest clinical experience in the treatment of 'chronic' Q fever. Reinforcing the guidelines' level of evidence is critical. We herein propose the creation of an extensive international registry, followed by a prospective cohort or ideally a randomized controlled trial.

Invasive Pneumococcal Disease and Long-Term Mortality Rates in Adults, Alberta, Canada.

The relationship between increased short-term mortality rates after invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) has been frequently studied. However, the relationship between IPD and long-term mortality rates is unknown. IPD patients in Alberta, Canada, had clinical data collected that were linked to administrative databases. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling, and the primary outcome was time to all-cause deaths. First IPD events were identified in 4,522 patients, who had a median follow-up of 3.2 years (interquartile range 0.8‒9.1 years). Overall all-cause mortality rates were consistently higher among cases than controls at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.75, 95% CI 3.29-4.28), 30‒90 days (aHR 1.56, 95% CI 1.27‒1.93), and >90 days (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.33-1.54). IPD increases risk for short, intermediate, and long-term mortality rates regardless of age, sex, or concurrent conditions. These findings can help clinicians focus on postdischarge patient plans to limit long-term effects after acute IPD infection.

Concurrent Infection with Hepatitis C Virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Little is known about concurrent infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Streptococcus pneumoniae, which causes invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). We hypothesized that co-infection with HCV and S. pneumoniae would increase risk for death and complications. We captured sociodemographic and serologic data for adults with IPD in a population-based cohort study in northern Alberta, Canada, during 2000-2014. IPD patients infected with HCV were compared with IPD patients not infected with HCV for risk of in-hospital deaths and complications by using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 355 of 3,251 patients with IPD were co-infected with HCV. The in-hospital mortality rate was higher for IPD patients infected with HCV. Prevalence of most IPD-related complications (e.g., cellulitis, acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation) was also higher in HCV-infected patients. Infection with HCV is common in patients with IPD, and HCV is independently associated with an increased risk for serious illness and death.

Rates of, and risk factors for, septic arthritis in patients with invasive pneumococcal disease: prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are many case reports of septic arthritis complicating invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD); however, no study has compared patients with IPD with septic arthritis to those who didn't develop septic arthritis Thus, we aimed to determine the rates of, and risk factors for, septic arthritis in patients with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). METHODS: Socio-demographic, clinical, and serological data were captured on all patients with IPD in Northern Alberta, Canada from 2000 to 2014. Septic arthritis was identified by attending physicians. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were used to compare characteristics of those with septic arthritis and IPD to those who did not. RESULTS: Septic arthritis developed in 51 of 3251 (1.6%) of patients with IPD. Inability to walk independently, male sex, and underlying joint disease were risk factors for developing septic arthritis in patients with IPD. Capsular serotypes 22 and 12F were more common in patients with septic arthritis than those without. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IPD, septic arthritis is uncommon. Certain risk factors such as walking with or without assistance and underlying joint disease make biological sense as damaged joints are more likely to be infected in the presence of bacteremia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Ten-Year Mortality after Community-acquired Pneumonia. A Prospective Cohort.

RATIONALE: Information on the long-term prognosis after community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine if CAP increases adverse long-term outcomes relative to a control population. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2002, 6,078 adults with CAP from six hospitals and seven emergency departments in Edmonton (AB, Canada) were prospectively recruited and matched on age, sex, and site of treatment with five control subjects without pneumonia (n = 29,402). Mortality, hospitalizations, and emergency department admissions through 2012 were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for socioeconomic status and comorbidities. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Average age was 59 years (2,682 [44%] ≥ 65 yr), 3,214 (53%) were men, and 3,425 (56%) were managed as outpatients. Over a median of 9.8 years, 2,858 patients with CAP died compared with 9,399 control subjects (absolute risk difference, 30 per 1,000 patient years [py]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-1.73; P < 0.001). Patients with CAP who were younger than 25 years old had the lowest absolute rate difference for mortality (4 per 1,000 py; aHR, 2.40), and patients older than 80 years old had the highest absolute rate difference (92 per 1,000 py; aHR, 1.42). Absolute rates of all-cause hospitalization, emergency department visits, and CAP-related visits were all significantly higher in patients with CAP compared with control subjects (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that an episode of CAP confers a high risk of long-term adverse events compared with the general population who have not experienced CAP, and this is irrespective of age.

Macrolides and mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Some studies suggest better outcomes with macrolide therapy for critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia. To further explore this, we performed a systematic review of studies with mortality endpoints that compared macrolide therapy with other regimens in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified via electronic databases, grey literature, and conference proceedings through May 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Using prespecified criteria, two reviewers selected studies; studies of outpatients and hospitalized noncritically ill patients were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data and evaluated bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random effects models were used to generate pooled risk ratios and evaluate heterogeneity (I). DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight observational studies (no randomized control trials) were included. Average age ranged from 58 to 78 years and 14-49% were women. In our primary analysis of 9,850 patients, macrolide use was associated with statistically significant lower mortality compared with nonmacrolides (21% [846 of 4,036 patients] vs 24% [1,369 of 5,814]; risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; p = 0.02; I = 63%). When macrolide monotherapy was excluded, the macrolide mortality benefit was maintained (21% [737 of 3,447 patients] vs 23% [1,245 of 5,425]; risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-1.00; p = 0.05; I = 60%). When broadly guideline-concordant regimens were compared, there was a trend to improved mortality and heterogeneity was reduced (20% [511 of 2,561 patients] mortality with beta-lactam/macrolide therapy vs 23% [386 of 1,680] with beta-lactam/fluoroquinolone; risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03; p = 0.09; I = 25%). When adjusted risk estimates were pooled from eight studies, macrolide therapy was still associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96; p = 0.02; I = 57%). CONCLUSIONS: In observational studies of almost 10,000 critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia, macrolide use was associated with a significant 18% relative (3% absolute) reduction in mortality compared with nonmacrolide therapies. After pooling data from studies that provided adjusted risk estimates, an even larger mortality reduction was observed. These results suggest that macrolides be considered first-line combination treatment in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and support current guidelines.

Diagnosis and management of Q fever--United States, 2013: recommendations from CDC and the Q Fever Working Group.

Q fever, a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii, can cause acute or chronic illness in humans. Transmission occurs primarily through inhalation of aerosols from contaminated soil or animal waste. No licensed vaccine is available in the United States. Because many human infections result in nonspecific or benign constitutional symptoms, establishing a diagnosis of Q fever often is challenging for clinicians. This report provides the first national recommendations issued by CDC for Q fever recognition, clinical and laboratory diagnosis, treatment, management, and reporting for health-care personnel and public health professionals. The guidelines address treatment of acute and chronic phases of Q fever illness in children, adults, and pregnant women, as well as management of occupational exposures. These recommendations will be reviewed approximately every 5 years and updated to include new published evidence.

Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of recurrent pneumonia: a population-based, nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested an increased risk of pneumonia with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, although this association is inconsistent. We evaluated the risk of recurrent pneumonia associated with ICS use in a high-risk population of individuals who survived an episode of pneumonia. METHODS: Clinical and 5-year follow-up data were collected on all adults aged ≥ 65 years with pneumonia over a period of 2 years. Using a nested case-control design, first cases (patients with recurrent pneumonia ≥ 30 days after initial episode) and then controls (free of pneumonia and matched on age, sex, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) were identified. ICS use was classified as never, past (remote, only before initial pneumonia), or current. Our primary outcome measure was recurrent pneumonia assessed using conditional multivariate logistic regression after adjustment of demographics and clinical data. RESULTS: During 5 years of follow-up, 653 recurrent pneumonia cases were matched with 6244 controls; mean age was 79 (SD, 8) years, 3577 (52%) were male, 2652 (38%) had COPD, and 2294 (33%) ever used ICS. Overall, 123 of 870 (14%) current ICS users had recurrent pneumonia compared to 395 of 4603 (9%) never-users (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.50; P < .001; number need to harm = 20). Conversely, there was no association between past (remote) use of ICS and pneumonia: 9% of past users versus 9% never-users (P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: ICS use was associated with a 90% relative increase in the risk of recurrent pneumonia among high-risk pneumonia survivors. This should be considered when prescribing ICS and when deciding which patients might need more intensive follow-up.

Macrolide use in the treatment of critically ill patients with pneumonia: Incidence, correlates, timing and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Macrolide antibiotics are commonly used to treat pneumonia despite increasing antimicrobial resistance. Evidence suggests that macrolides may also decrease mortality in severe sepsis via immunomodulatory properties. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, correlates, timing and mortality associated with macrolide-based treatment. METHODS: A population-based cohort of critically ill adults with pneumonia at five intensive care units in Edmonton, Alberta, was prospectively followed over two years. Data collected included disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score), pneumonia severity (Pneumonia Severity Index score), comorbidities, antibiotic treatments at presentation and time to effective antibiotic. The independent association between macrolide-based treatment and 30-day all-cause mortality was examined using multivariable Cox regression. A secondary exploratory analysis examined time to effective antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: The cohort included 328 patients with a mean Pneumonia Severity Index score of 116 and a mean APACHE II score of 17; 84% required invasive mechanical ventilation. Ninety-one (28%) patients received macrolide-based treatments, with no significant correlates of treatment except nursing home residence (15% versus 30% for nonresidents [P=0.02]). Overall mortality was 54 of 328 (16%) at 30 days: 14 of 91 (15%) among patients treated with macrolides versus 40 of 237 (17%) for nonmacrolides (adjusted HR 0.93 [95% CI 0.50 to 1.74]; P=0.8). Patients who received effective antibiotics within 4 h of presentation were less likely to die than those whose treatment was delayed (14% versus 17%; adjusted HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.94]; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Macrolide-based treatment was not associated with lower 30-day mortality among critically ill patients with pneumonia, although receipt of effective antibiotic within 4 h was strongly predictive of survival. Based on these results, timely effective treatment may be more important than choice of antibiotics.

HISTORIQUE: Les macrolides sont souvent utilisés pour soigner la pneumonie, malgré une résistance croissante aux antimicrobiens. Selon les données probantes, les macrolides réduiraient également la mortalité en cas de septicémie sévère, en raison de ses propriétés immunomodulatoires. OBJECTIF: Évaluer l'incidence, les corrélats, les délais et la mortalité associés à un traitement fondé sur les macrolides. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Pendant deux ans, les chercheurs ont procédé au suivi rétrospectif d'une cohorte en population d'adultes atteints d'une grave pneumonie, hospitalisés dans cinq unités de soins intensifs d'Edmonton, en Alberta. Ils ont colligé la gravité de la maladie (indice APACHE II d'évaluation de la physiologie aiguë et de la santé chronique), la gravité de la pneumonie (indice de gravité de la pneumonie), les comorbidités, les traitements antibiotiques à la présentation et le délai avant la prise efficace d'antibiotiques. Ils ont examiné l'association indépendante entre le traitement aux macrolides et le décès au bout de 30 jours toutes causes confondues au moyen de la régression de Cox multivariable. Ils ont utilisé une analyse exploratoire secondaire pour examiner le délai avant un traitement antimicrobien efficace. RÉSULTATS: La cohorte se composait de 328 patients dont l'indice moyen de gravité de la pneumonie se situait à 116 et l'indice APACHE II moyen à 17; 84 % d'entre eux ont eu besoin d'une ventilation mécanique. Quatre-vingt-onze patients (28 %) ont reçu des traitements aux macrolides, sans corrélats significatifs du traitement à part le fait d'habiter dans un centre d'hébergement et de soins de longue durée (15 % par rapport à 30 % pour les non-résidents [P=0,02]). La mortalité globale correspondait à 54 cas sur 328 patients (16 %) au bout de 30 jours, soit 14 des 91 patients (15 %) traités aux macrolides par rapport à 40 des 237 (17 %) n'en ayant pas pris (RR rajusté de 0,93 [95 % IC 0,50 à 1,74]; P=0,8). Les patients qui prenaient des antibiotiques efficaces dans les quatre heures suivant leur présentation étaient moins susceptibles de mourir que ceux dont le traitement était retardé (14 % par rapport à 17 %; RR rajusté 0,50 [95 % IC 0,27 à 0,94]; P=0,03). CONCLUSIONS: Le traitement aux macrolides ne s'associait pas à une réduction du taux de mortalité au bout de 30 jours chez les patients atteints d'une grave pneumonie, mais la prise d'antibiotiques efficaces dans les quatre heures était fortement prédictive de la survie. D'après ces résultats, l'administration rapide d'un traitement efficace serait plus importante que le choix d'antibiotique.

Macrolide-based regimens and mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Macrolides are used to treat pneumonia despite increasing antimicrobial resistance. However, the immunomodulatory properties of macrolides may have a favorable effect on pneumonia outcomes. Therefore, we systematically reviewed all studies of macrolide use and mortality among patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: All randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing macrolides to other treatment regimens in adults hospitalized with CAP were identified through electronic databases and gray literature searches. Primary analysis examined any macrolide use and mortality; secondary analysis compared Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guideline-concordant macrolide/beta-lactam combinations vs respiratory fluoroquinolones. Random effects models were used to generate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and evaluate heterogeneity (I(2)). RESULTS: We included 23 studies and 137,574 patients. Overall, macrolide use was associated with a statistically significant mortality reduction compared with nonmacrolide use (3.7% [1738 of 47,071] vs 6.5% [5861 of 90,503]; RR, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], .64-.95; P = .01; I(2)= 85%). There was no survival advantage and heterogeneity was reduced when analyses were restricted to RCTs (4.6% [22 of 479] vs 4.1% [25 of 613]; RR, 1.13; 95% CI, .65-1.98; P = .66; I(2)= 0%) or to patients treated with guideline-concordant antibiotics (macrolide/beta-lactam, 5.3% [297 of 5574] vs respiratory fluoroquinolones, 5.8% [408 of 7050]; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, .91-1.50; P = .22; I(2)= 43%). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized patients with CAP, macrolide-based regimens were associated with a significant 22% reduction in mortality compared with nonmacrolides; however, this benefit did not extend to patients studied in RCTs or patients that received guideline-concordant antibiotics. Our findings suggest guideline concordance is more important than choice of antibiotic when treating CAP.