Results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2.

This trial was designed to determine the 1-year survival rate, efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity with gemcitabine in patients with stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles; patients who responded with complete response or partial response received < or = 2 additional cycles. Forty-two patients were enrolled at 31 community-based centers between March and November 2002. Most patients had stage IV disease (74%). The median age was 73 years (range, 58-84 years), and 19% had received prior palliative radiation therapy. Patients received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-8 cycles). The median survival was 4.8 months (range, < 1 to 19.2 months), and the estimated 1-year survival was 20%. Median PFS was 2.5 months (range, < 1 to 19.2 months), and PFS at 1 year was 11.1%. Thirty-one patients died of disease progression, and 1 each died of myocardial infarction, brain herniation, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. Seven patients were not evaluable for response; 4 refused or received no treatment, treatment in 2 failed (myocardial infarction and pneumonia), and 1 was lost to follow-up. Among 35 evaluable patients, there were 5 partial responses (14%), 10 with stable disease (29%), and 20 with disease progression (57%). Drug-related grade > or = 3 toxicities included neutropenia (18%), anemia (8%), and dyspnea (2.6%). These results suggest that patients with NSCLC with an ECOG PS of 2 may benefit from single-agent chemotherapy gemcitabine. General toxicity, including myelotoxicity, was relatively low. Further studies comparing single-agent chemotherapy with combination chemotherapy for patients with a PS of 2 are warranted.

Phase II study of trastuzumab plus gemcitabine in chemotherapy-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of trastuzumab plus gemcitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Sixty-four patients were enrolled, the majority of whom (95%) had been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane before study enrollment. Eligible women were treated with gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2) weekly for 2 weeks with the third week off on a 21-day cycle) plus weekly doses of trastuzumab (4-mg/kg loading dose; 2 mg/kg thereafter) until disease progression. The median patient age was 55 years, and the median number of previously administered (including adjuvant) chemotherapy regimens was 3. Twenty-two patients were scored as 2+ for HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry; 39 patients scored 3+. Three patients were assessed as HER2-negative on central pathology review and were ineligible for evaluation. Fifty-nine of the 61 patients remained evaluable for response. The objective response rates were 38% in the intent-to-treat population (23 of 61) and 44% among the 39 patients with HER2 3+ expression. The median response duration was 5.8 months, median overall survival was 14.7 months, and median time to disease progression was 5.8 months. Trastuzumab plus gemcitabine was well tolerated. No cases of clinical congestive heart failure occurred. Grade 3/4 toxicities included asthenia in 4 patients, fever in 4, neutropenia in 18, dyspnea in 6, abdominal or back pain in 3, and edema and nausea in 1 patient each. The combination of trastuzumab plus gemcitabine appears to be well tolerated and effective for patients with HER2-positive MBC previously treated with chemotherapy.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy: preliminary results.

Preliminary results of a phase II study of gemcitabine plus trastuzumab in previously treated (up to 3 previous regimens) metastatic breast cancer patients are presented. Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer, with 2+ or 3+ tumor HER2 expression. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg over 90 minutes, followed by 2 mg/kg infused over 30 minutes weekly. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Preliminary results are available on the first 38 patients enrolled. Median patient age was 53 years, 53% had estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive disease, and HER2 staining was 2+ in 39% and 3+ in 61% of patients. There was a median of 3 previously administered (including adjuvant) chemotherapy regimens, and a median of 4.5 treatment cycles per patient has been administered so far. Twelve patients (32%) have had an objective partial response, with a median response duration of 8.6 months. Median time to disease progression is 6.7 months to date, with a median overall survival of 10.2 months. No unexpected toxicities or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities have been observed; 2 patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and 1 patient had febrile neutropenia. Thus, gemcitabine/ trastuzumab resulted in an encouraging 32% response rate, given the heavily pretreated patient population. Tolerability was good overall, with no unexpected side effects observed.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as single-agent treatment of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II multicenter study.

The purpose of this study was to determine the objective response rate, median duration of response, time to disease progression, and survival time and to evaluate the safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in previously treated patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Thirty-two patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated and analyzed. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 was administered intravenously as a single dose on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and had stage II-IV disease. The median baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 60%, and the median age was 68 years. In 29 evaluable patients, there were 3 (10%) complete responses, 6 (21%) partial responses, 11 (38%) patients with stable disease, and 9 (31%) with progressive disease. The median number of cycles was 4 (range, 1-22 cycles). The median duration of response (complete response plus partial response) was 11.0 months (range, 2.3-37.0 months). The estimated median time to progression was 5.6 months (range, 1.1-40.5 months) and the estimated median survival was 29.6 months (range, 3.9-41.6 months). Treatment-related toxicities grade = 3 included neutropenia (25%) and palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (9%). Only 1 clinically significant cardiac toxicity was observed. There were 17 deaths; none were treatment related. Single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, is associated with antitumor activity in the treatment of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, as shown by an objective response of 31%, and produced no significant cardiac or hematologic toxicity. Based on these results, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin should be further evaluated in combination with other agents in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Circulating tumor cell data: integration with imaging and serum tumor markers for metastatic breast cancer patient management.

Management of metastatic breast cancer is critical to maximizing survival with good quality of life. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) levels in the peripheral blood hold promise for enabling improved patient care. We describe a case of a 47-year-old female with infiltrating ductal carcinoma who developed metastatic disease. Serum tumor markers were discordant with imaging studies at several time points. CTC levels were used to support decision making in light of the discordant data. The use of this tool enabled prompt changes in therapy with progressive disease and supported suspending therapy to enable recovery from treatment adverse effects when a significant response was detected by imaging and CTCs were absent from the peripheral circulation. The additional information provided by CTC enumeration helped clarify disease status and provided support for treatment decisions.

Biomarker analyses from a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIIb trial comparing bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ATLAS).

INTRODUCTION: ATLAS compared bevacizumab plus erlotinib (B+E) with bevacizumab plus placebo (B+P) as maintenance therapy after first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (B+C) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prespecified biomarkers were prospectively evaluated. METHODS: Tumor samples were analyzed for: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (immunohistochemistry [IHC]); EGFR gene copy number (fluorescence in-situ hybridization [FISH]); EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions/L858R mutations); and KRAS mutations (exons 2/3). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. RESULTS: Of 743 patients randomized to receive maintenance treatment (after four cycles of B+C without progression), 190 (B+E) and 177 (B+P) were evaluable for biomarker status. Median PFS (from randomization) was 4.4 months (B+E) versus 3.7 months (B+P; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.99), which was numerically similar to the intent-to-treat PFS. PFS benefit of B+E was observed across most biomarker subgroups. EGFR IHC, EGFR FISH, and EGFR/KRAS mutation status were not predictive of outcome. B+E-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC had longer PFS compared with B+P-treated patients (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.86; p = 0.0139). Patients with KRAS wild-type disease had significant PFS improvements with B+E, compared with B+P (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.485-0.914; p = 0.0105). No OS benefit of B+E was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with KRAS wild-type or EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC derived PFS benefits from B+E. However, EGFR IHC, EGFR FISH, and EGFR or KRAS mutation status were not strongly predictive of survival. A larger sample size would be needed to confirm the initial trends observed in this study.

The NCI Community Oncology Research Program: what every clinician needs to know.

Research in the community setting is essential for the translation of advances in cancer research into practice and improving cancer care for all populations. The National Cancer Institute is proposing a new community-based program, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), which is the alignment of two existing programs, the Community Clinical Oncology Program, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program, and their Research Bases, and the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program. NCROP will support cancer control, prevention, treatment, and screening clinical trials and expand its research scope to include cancer care delivery research. Cancer disparities research will be integrated into studies across the continuum of NCORP research. Input from current NCI-funded community investigators provides critical insight into the challenges faced by oncology practices within various organizational structures. Furthermore, these investigators identify the resources, both administrative and clinical, that will be required in the community setting to support cancer care delivery research and to meet the requirements for a new generation of clinical research. The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has initiated a forum to focus on the conduct of clinical research in the community setting. Resources are being developed to help practices in managing cancer care in community settings.

ATLAS: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIIB trial comparing bevacizumab therapy with or without erlotinib, after completion of chemotherapy, with bevacizumab for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III trial was performed to assess the potential benefit of adding maintenance erlotinib to bevacizumab after a first-line chemotherapy regimen with bevacizumab for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand one hundred forty-five patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC (stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion, stage IV, or recurrent) received four cycles of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Seven hundred forty-three patients without disease progression or significant toxicity were then randomly assigned (1:1) to bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1, 21-day cycle) plus either placebo or erlotinib (150 mg per day). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Median PFS from time of random assignment was 3.7 months with bevacizumab/placebo and 4.8 months with bevacizumab/erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86; P < .001). Median overall survival (OS) times from random assignment were 13.3 and 14.4 months with bevacizumab/placebo and bevacizumab/erlotinib, respectively (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.21; P = .5341). During the postchemotherapy phase, there were more adverse events (AEs) overall, more grade 3 and 4 AEs (mainly rash and diarrhea), more serious AEs, and more AEs leading to erlotinib/placebo discontinuation in the bevacizumab/erlotinib arm versus the bevacizumab/placebo arm. The incidence of AEs leading to bevacizumab discontinuation was similar in both treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The addition of erlotinib to bevacizumab significantly improved PFS but not OS. Although generally well tolerated, the modest impact on survival and increased toxicity associated with the addition of erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance mean that this two-drug maintenance regimen will not lead to a new postchemotherapy standard of care.

Defining Value in Cancer Care: AVBCC 2013 Steering Committee Report.

The AVBCC Annual Meeting experiences exponential growth in attendance and participation as oncologists, payers, employers, managed care executives, patient advocates, and drug manufacturers convened in Hollywood, FL, on May 2-5, 2013, for the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Value-Based Cancer Care (AVBCC). The conference presented an all-inclusive open forum for stakeholder dialogue and integration across the cancer care continuum, facilitating an open dialogue among the various healthcare stakeholders to align their perspectives around the urgent need to address value in cancer care, costs, patient education, safety, outcomes, and quality. The AVBCC 2013 Steering Committee was held on the first day of the conference to define value in cancer care. The committee was divided into 7 groups, each representing a key stakeholder in oncology. The goal of the Steering Committee was to define value from the particular point of view of each of the stakeholder groups and to suggest how that particular perspective can contribute to the value proposition in oncology, by balancing cost, quality, and access to care to improve overall patient outcomes. The following summary highlights the major points addressed by each group.

Reducing cancer costs and improving quality through collaboration with payers: a proposal from the Florida society of clinical oncology.

One of Florida's largest private payers has retained an outside consulting firm to develop a program to reduce cancer care spending, which could seriously limit the ability of oncology practices in Florida to provide quality care to their patients.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To review the evidence about the efficacy and utility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRHM). METHODS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and analyze a comprehensive systematic review of the RFA literature from Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. RESULTS: Because data were considered insufficient to form the basis of a practice guideline, ASCO has instead published a clinical evidence review. The evidence is from single-arm, retrospective, and prospective trials. No randomized controlled trials have been included. The following three clinical issues were considered by the panel: the efficacy of surgical hepatic resection versus RFA for resectable tumors; the utility of RFA for unresectable tumors; and RFA approaches (open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous). Evidence suggests that hepatic resection improves overall survival (OS), particularly for patients with resectable tumors without extrahepatic disease. Careful patient and tumor selection is discussed at length in the literature. RFA investigators report a wide variability in the 5-year survival rate (14% to 55%) and local tumor recurrence rate (3.6% to 60%). The reported mortality rate was low (0% to 2%), and the major complications rate was commonly reported to be between 6% and 9%. RFA is currently performed with all three approaches. CONCLUSION: There is a compelling need for more research to determine the efficacy and utility of RFA to increase local recurrence-free, progression-free, and disease-free survival as well as OS for patients with CRHM. Clinical trials have established that hepatic resection can improve OS for patients with resectable CRHM.

Pemetrexed with or without matuzumab as second-line treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This randomized phase II study investigated pemetrexed in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting monoclonal antibody matuzumab compared with pemetrexed alone as second-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m every 3 weeks either alone (n = 50) or in combination with matuzumab at either 800 mg weekly (n = 51) or 1600 mg every 3 weeks (n = 47). The primary end point was objective response, as assessed by an independent review committee. RESULTS: Tumor EGFR expression was detected in 87% of randomized patients. The objective response rate for the pooled matuzumab-treated arms was 11% compared with 5% for pemetrexed alone (p = 0.332). Apart from one patient in the pemetrexed alone group, all responses occurred in patients whose tumors expressed EGFR. The objective response rate for patients receiving weekly matuzumab was 16% compared with 2% for those receiving matuzumab every 3 weeks. There was also a trend for improved overall survival in patients receiving matuzumab weekly versus every 3 weeks (12.4 months versus 5.9 months, respectively, versus 7.9 months for pemetrexed alone). The combination of pemetrexed and matuzumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, with the most common grade 3/4 adverse event being neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Although the analysis on the pooled matuzumab-treated arms did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in objective response for the addition of matuzumab to pemetrexed compared with pemetrexed alone, the trends for improvement in objective response and overall survival for pemetrexed plus weekly matuzumab compared with pemetrexed alone warrant confirmation in additional clinical trials.

News and Notes From the 2009 Carrier Advisory Committee Meeting: Medical Necessity, Off-Label Chemotherapy, and More.

A discussion of two compelling topics at this summer's Hematology-Oncology Carrier Advisory Committee Network Meeting: coverage for off-label uses of anticancer drugs and medical necessity for oral versus intravenous antiemetics.

Cetuximab in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel for patients with metastatic or advanced-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab, an immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 chimeric monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, has demonstrated evidence of activity in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When administered in combination with carboplatin and docetaxel, a commonly used regimen for advanced NSCLC, cetuximab has exhibited synergistic interaction in preclinical studies. Therefore, a phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cetuximab, carboplatin, and docetaxel for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients aged >or=18 years with stage IIIB (with effusion) or stage IV NSCLC received cetuximab (at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and 250 mg/m(2) on Days 8 and 15) plus docetaxel (at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1) and carboplatin (area under the concentration vs time curve [AUC]=6 on Day 1) every 21 days for up to 6 cycles (graded according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System). Thereafter, patients without evidence of disease progression were continued on single-agent cetuximab for a maximum of 1 year or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was response rate. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range, 1-6 cycles). The objective response rate was 15.2%, with a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months and a median overall survival of 10.3 months. The salient grades 3 of 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30%), hypotension (3%), hypokalemia (4%), and hypomagnesemia (3%). Twenty-five patients received single-agent cetuximab (median duration, 12 weeks) and this was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large, multicenter, phase 3 study indicate that the novel combination of cetuximab with docetaxel and carboplatin demonstrate modest anticancer activity for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC and has an acceptable toxicity profile.