Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doença de Hodgkin/mortalidade , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Brentuximab Vedotin , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoconjugados/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) and secondary AML after an antecedent hematologic disorder (sAML-AHD) are often addressed together, blurring any clinical and prognostic differences. Among 516 AML patients, we compared characteristics and outcomes of 149 patients with "sAML" (sAML-AHD: 104, tAML: 45), uniformly and intensively treated during the last 2 decades at 1 center. Clinical outcomes of the whole "sAML" cohort were significantly inferior compared to de novo AML and in both intermediate and poor cytogenetic risk groups. Adverse karyotype had no effect on survival in tAML, while it was a negative predictor in sAML-AHD. Both groups showed similarly dismal outcome, with low complete remission rates (CR 44% vs. 41%) and median overall survival (OS 7 vs. 10.5 months). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) recipients in CR1 had superior median OS (24 vs. 8 months). By multivariate analysis, alloHCT was an independent predictor of outcome, while karyotype was for sAML-AHD only. In conclusion, both "sAML" groups have inferior outcomes after chemotherapy, with adverse karyotype affecting primarily sAML-AHD. Until new treatment approaches are available, only alloHCT offers a survival advantage.
Assuntos
Doenças Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Doenças Hematológicas/complicações , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/etiologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/terapia , Prognóstico , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
Bone marrow failure (BMF) syndromes are a group of various hematological diseases with cytopenia as a main common characteristic. Given their rarity and continuous progress in the field, we aim to provide data considering the efficiency and safety of the therapeutic methods, focusing on the treatment of aplastic anemia(AA) and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). We enrolled consecutive patients diagnosed with BMF in two referral centers of Northern Greece from 2008 to 2020. We studied 43 patients with AA (37 adults and 6 children/adolescents) and 6 with classical PNH. Regarding classical PNH, 4 patients have received eculizumab treatment with 1/4 presenting extravascular hemolysis. Among 43 patients with aplastic anemia, PNH clones were detected in 11. Regarding patients that did not receive alloHCT (n=15), 14/15 were treated with ATG and cyclosporine as first line, with the addition of eltrombopag in patients treated after its approval (n=9). With a median follow-up of 16.7 (1.8-56.2) months from diagnosis, 12/14 (85.7%) are alive (4-year OS: 85.1%). AlloHCT was performed in 28 patients. Five patients developed TA-TMA which did not resolve in 3/5 (all with a pre-transplant PNH clone). With the follow-up among survivors reaching 86.3 (6.3-262.4) months, 10-year OS was 56.9%, independently associated with PNH clones after adjusting for age (p=0.024). In conclusion, our real-world experience confirms that novel treatments are changing the field of BMF syndromes. Nevertheless, there is still an unmet need to personalize algorithms in this field.
RESUMO
Optimal conditioning remains a challenge in lymphomas. We designed a regimen consisting of Busulfex, etoposide and melphalan (BuEM). We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients conditioned with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) or BuEM in matched-pair analysis on a planned 2:1 ratio. Eighty-seven patients treated with BEAM who fulfilled the matching criteria were randomly selected. Two-year progression-free survival/overall survival (PFS/OS) were 63.2%/76.7% for BEAM vs. 65.6%/79.8% for BuEM after 64.7 and 42.7 months, respectively. Furthermore, marginally better PFS and OS were noted in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after BuEM. In multivariate analysis, PFS was superior in HL, chemosensitive disease and complete remission post-transplant. BEAM correlated with faster engraftment, reduced infections, less mucositis and liver toxicity, and BuEM with less need for blood cell and platelet transfusions and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration. In conclusion, BuEM was well tolerated and equally highly efficacious as BEAM for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and offered marginally significantly improved PFS and OS in HL with acceptable toxicity and zero mortality.