Is guided, targeted information about the risks of twin pregnancy able to increase the acceptance of single embryo transfer among IVF couples? A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether receiving information about twin pregnancy in the form of oral presentation given by a physician could affect the acceptance of single embryo transfer (SET) by couples undergoing IVF. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. SETTING: University hospital IVF unit. PATIENTS: One hundred and forty patients (70 couples) undergoing IVF. INTERVENTIONS: A questionnaire to measure patients' emotions about twin pregnancy was administered to IVF patients just before and immediately after attending a slide presentation in which the risks of twin pregnancy were explained. Patients scored (1 to 6) ten adjectives linked either to positive or negative emotions; scores before and after presentation were compared. The patients' preference between double embryo transfer (DET) and SET was also registered before and after the presentation. RESULTS: The presentation about twin pregnancy caused a significant (p < 0.001) shift of the score distribution toward lower values for positive adjectives referred to twin pregnancy and higher values for negative adjectives. Information impacted similarly on women and men. Despite the relevant change in the emotional attitude, after presentation, 45.7% of women and 48.6% of men were still favorable to DET, whereas 24.3% of women and 37.1% of men preferred SET. CONCLUSIONS: Oral information on the risks of twin pregnancy can affect the emotional attitude of patients toward twin pregnancy, but the wish of getting pregnant after fresh embryo transfer overcomes all rational consideration, and the majority of patients still prefer DET.

Does Ovarian Endometriosis Increase Oocyte Sensitivity to ICSI-Induced Mechanical Damage?

Some studies have shown that ICSI obtains poorer results than conventional IVF in women with ovarian endometriosis, suggesting that oocytes could be sensitive to ICSI-induced mechanical damage. The aims of this study were to clarify (a) whether ovarian endometriosis could induce peculiar fragility in the oocyte, so that ICSI would finally result harmful, and (b) whether endometrioma removal before IVF could be advisable in order to avoid any hypothetical detrimental effect. We retrospectively studied 368 women, 203 with in situ endometrioma (128 of which underwent ICSI, 75 conventional IVF) and 164 who received laparoscopic stripping of endometrioma before ICSI. For women with in situ endometrioma, cIVF and ICSI outcome was comparable for all parameters studied, including the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (PR/ET: 31.8% vs. 39.5% in the cIVF and ICSI groups) and cumulative live birth rate per ovum pick-up (CLBR/OPU: 24.4% vs. 27.7%). ICSI outcome was similar comparing women with in situ endometrioma and women previously submitted to laparoscopic stripping of cysts (CLPR/OPU 27.7% vs. 25.3%). Our findings suggest that (a) in women with in situ endometrioma ICSI may be performed, when needed, without harming oocytes and compromising the outcome and (b) that there is no advantage in removing endometrioma before ICSI.