Adaptive radiotherapy (up to 74 Gy) or standard radiotherapy (66 Gy) for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, according to [18F]FDG-PET tumour residual uptake at 42 Gy (RTEP7-IFCT-1402): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic radiation intensification is debated in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the activity and safety of a boost radiotherapy dose up to 74 Gy in a functional sub-volume given according to on-treatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)-PET results. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled non-comparative phase 2 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with inoperable stage III NSCLC without EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and who were affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social benefit system, with evaluable tumour or node lesions, preserved lung function, and who were amenable to curative-intent radiochemotherapy. Patients were randomly allocated using a central interactive web-response system in a non-masked method (1:1; minimisation method used [random factor of 0·8]; stratified by radiotherapy technique [intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy] and by centre at which patients were treated) either to the experimental adaptive radiotherapy group A, in which only patients with positive residual metabolism on [18F]FDG-PET at 42 Gy received a boost radiotherapy (up to 74 Gy in 33 fractions), with all other patients receiving standard radiotherapy dosing (66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6·5 weeks), or to the standard radiotherapy group B (66 Gy in 33 fractions) over 6·5 weeks. All patients received two cycles of induction platinum-based chemotherapy cycles (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks and carboplatin area under the curve [AUC]=6 once every 3 weeks, or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 60 mg/m2 orally [or 30 mg/m2 intravenously] on day 8 once every 3 weeks). Then they concomitantly received radiochemotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (three cycles for 8 weeks, with once per week paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 intravenously and carboplatin AUC=2 or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 40 mg/m2 orally (or 20 mg/m2 intravenously) on day 8 in 21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was the 15-month local control rate in the eligible patients who received at least one dose of concomitant radiochemotherapy. This RTEP7-IFCT-1402 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02473133), and is ongoing. FINDINGS: From Nov 12, 2015, to July 7, 2021, we randomly assigned 158 patients (47 [30%] women and 111 [70%] men) to either the boosted radiotherapy group A (81 [51%]) or to the standard radiotherapy group B (77 [49%)]. In group A, 80 (99%) patients received induction chemotherapy and 68 (84%) received radiochemotherapy, of whom 48 (71%) with residual uptake on [18F]FDG-PET after 42 Gy received a radiotherapy boost. In group B, all 77 patients received induction chemotherapy and 73 (95%) received radiochemotherapy. At the final analysis, the median follow-up for eligible patients who received radiochemotherapy (n=140) was 45·1 months (95% CI 39·3-48·3). The 15-month local control rate was 77·6% (95% CI 67·6-87·6%) in group A and 71·2% (95% CI 60·8-81·6%) in group B. Acute (within 90 days from radiochemotherapy initiation) grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 20 (29%) of 68 patients in group A and 33 (45%) of 73 patients in group B, including serious adverse events in five (7%) patients in group A and ten (14%) patients in group B. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [10%] of 68 in group A vs 16 [22%] of 73 in group B), and anaemia (five [7%] vs nine [12%]). In the acute phase, two deaths (3%) occurred in group B (one due to a septic shock related to chemotherapy, and the other due to haemotypsia not related to study treatment), and no deaths occurred in group A. After 90 days, one additional treatment-unrelated death occurred in group A and two deaths events occurred in group B (one radiation pneumonitis and one pneumonia unrelated to treatment). INTERPRETATION: A thoracic radiotherapy boost, based on interim [18F]FDG-PET, led to a meaningful local control rate with no difference in adverse events between the two groups in organs at risk, in contrast with previous attempts at thoracic radiation intensification, warranting a randomised phase 3 evaluation of such [18F]FDG-PET-guided radiotherapy dose adaptation in patients with stage III NSCLC. FUNDING: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National 2014.

Clinical and pathological characterization of 158 consecutive and unselected oligometastatic breast cancers in a single institution.

PURPOSE: Data about incidence, biological, and clinical characteristics of oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) are scarce. However, these data are essential in determining optimal treatment strategy. Gaining knowledge of these elements means observing and describing large, recent, and consecutive series of OMBC in their natural history. METHODS: We collected data retrospectively at our institution from 998 consecutive patients diagnosed and treated with synchronous or metachronous metastatic breast cancer (MBC) between January 2014 and December 2018. The only criterion used to define OMBC was the presence of one to five metastases at diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 998 MBC, 15.8% were classified OMBC. Among these, 88% had one to three metastases, and 86.7% had only one organ involved. Bone metastases were present in 52.5% of cases, 20.9% had progression to lymph nodes, 14.6% to the liver, 13.3% to the brain, 8.2% to the lungs, and 3.8% had other metastases. 55.7% had HR+/HER2- OMBC, 25.3% had HER2+OMBC, and 19% had HR-/HER2- OMBC. The HR+/HER2- subtype statistically correlated with bone metastases (p = 0.001), the HER2+subtype with brain lesions (p = 0.001), and the HR-/HER2- subtype with lymph node metastases (p = 0.008). Visceral metastases were not statistically associated with any OMBC subtypes (p = 0.186). OMBC-SBR grade III was proportionally higher than in the ESME series of 22,109 MBC (49.4% vs. 35.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: OMBC is a heterogeneous entity whose incidence is higher than has commonly been published. Not an indolent disease, each subgroup, with its biological and anatomical characteristics, merits specific management.

Oral mucosal changes induced by adjuvant endocrine therapies in breast cancer patients: clinical aspects and proposal for management.

Adjuvant systemic treatments in breast cancer are indicated to reduce the risk of relapse. Their systemic side effects have been well documented and include menopausal symptoms such as impaired libido and vaginal dryness, increased risk of endometrial cancer, stroke, musculoskeletal symptoms including arthralgia and myalgia, osteopenia and fractures, skin rashes, and hypercholesterolemia. However, few articles have focused on the oral mucosal reactions related to adjuvant endocrine therapies (AETs) which clearly differ from those reported with chemotherapies or other targeted therapies used for breast cancer. AETs primarily expose patient to a higher risk of worsened periodontal health, salivary flow modifications, taste disturbance, and global deterioration of oral health-related quality of life. Although the rate of permanent discontinuation of AETs because of oral mucosal changes remains low, an interdisciplinary approach to evaluate oral health and to optimize oral supportive care appears essential to ensure an appropriate management and limit dose adjustment in treated patients. In this respect and based on our clinical experience, we propose recommendations to allow oncologists, nurses, and attending practitioners to implement appropriate measures rapidly and/or refer patients to dentists.

Outcome of pN0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with or without Lymph Node Irradiation: A Single Institution Experience.

The optimal management of patients with pathologically node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (pN0 TNBC) remains unclear. We hypothesized that lymph node irradiation (LNI; internal mammary chain/periclavicular irradiation) had an impact on outcomes of pN0 TNBC. A cohort of 126 consecutive patients with pN0 TNBC treated between 2007 and 2010 at a single institute were included. All radiotherapy (breast/chest wall, ±LNI) was delivered adjuvantly, following completion of surgery ± chemotherapy. Tumors were reviewed and histologic features were described. Tissue microarrays were constructed and tumors were assessed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies against ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, cytokeratins 5/6, 14, epidermal growth factor receptor and androgen receptor. Patients were divided into two groups for statistical analysis: LNI (LNI+) or no LNI (LNI-). We focused on disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Fifty-seven and 69 patients received or not LNI, respectively. Median age was 52 (range [25-76]) and 55 (range [29-79]) in LNI+ and LNI- group (p = 0.23). LNI was associated with larger tumors (p = 0.033), central/internal tumors (33 versus 4, p < 0.01) and more chemotherapy (86% versus 59.4% p < 0.01). The median follow-up was 53.5 months. The rate of first regional relapse (associated or not with distant relapse) was low in both groups. There was no difference in 4-year DFS (82.2% versus 89.9%; p = 0.266), MFS (87.0% versus 91.1%; p = 0.286) and OS (85.8% versus 89.9%; p = 0.322) between LNI+ and LNI- group, respectively. In univariate analysis, only clinical size (T >10 mm versus ≤10 mm), histologic size (pT >10 mm versus ≤10 mm) and grade 3 (versus grade 2) were found to be significantly associated with shorter DFS. Omission of LNI in patients with pN0 TNBC does not seem to result in poorer outcome. Further studies are needed to specifically evaluate LNI in pN0 TNBC with histologic grade 3 and/or (p)T >10 mm.

Recommendations for Post-Operative RadioTherapy After Complete Resection of Thymoma-a French DELPHI Consensus Initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Thymomas are rare intrathoracic malignancies that can relapse after surgery. Whether or not Post-Operative RadioTherapy (PORT) should be delivered after surgery remains a major issue. RADIORYTHMIC is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial addressing this question in patients with completely R0 resected Masaoka-Koga stage IIb/III thymoma. Experts in the field met to develop recommendations for PORT. METHODS: A scientific committee from the RYTHMIC network identified key issues regarding the modalities of PORT in completely resected thymoma. A DELPHI method was used to question 24 national experts, with 115 questions regarding the following: (1) imaging techniques, (2) clinical target volume (CTV) and margins, (3) dose constraints to organs at risk, (4) dose and fractionation, and (5) follow-up and records. Consensus was defined when opinions reached more than or equal to 80% agreement. RESULTS: We established the following recommendations: preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan is recommended (94% agreement); optimization of radiation delivery includes either a four-dimensional CT-based planning (82% agreement), a breath-holding inspiration breath-hold-based planning, or daily control CT imaging (81% agreement); imaging fusion based on cardiovascular structures of preoperative and planning CT scan is recommended (82% agreement); right coronary and left anterior descending coronary arteries should be delineated as cardiac substructures (88% agreement); rotational RCMI/volumetric modulated arc therapy is recommended (88% agreement); total dose is 50 Gy (81% agreement) with 1.8 to 2 Gy per fraction (94% agreement); cardiac evaluation and follow-up for patients with history of cardiovascular disease are recommended (88% agreement) with electrocardiogram and evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction at 5 years and 10 years. CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus for PORT in thymoma. Implementation will help to harmonize practices.

Impact of radiation on host immune system in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab consolidation for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The optimal modalities of radiotherapy when combining concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) and immunotherapy (IO) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) remain to be determined. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of radiation on different immune structures and immune cells in patients treated with CCRT followed by durvalumab. Material and methods: Clinicopathologic data, pre- and post-treatment blood counts, and dosimetric data were collected in patients treated with CCRT and durvalumab consolidation for LA-NSCLC. Patients were divided into two groups according to the inclusion (NILN-R+) or not (NILN-R-) of at least one non-involved tumor-draining lymph node (NITDLN) in the clinical target volume (CTV). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty patients were included with a median follow-up of 23.2 months (95% CI 18.3-35.2). Two-year PFS and 2-year OS were 52.2% (95% CI 35.8-66.3) and 66.2% (95% CI 46.5-80.1), respectively. In univariable analysis, NILN-R+ (hazard ratio (HR) 2.60, p = 0.028), estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) >6.3 Gy (HR 3.19, p = 0.049), and lymphopenia ≤ 500/mm3 at IO initiation (HR 2.69, p = 0.021) were correlated with poorer PFS; lymphopenia ≤ 500/mm3 was also associated with poorer OS (HR 3.46, p = 0.024). In multivariable analysis, NILN-R+ was the strongest factor associated with PFS (HR 3.15, p = 0.017). Conclusion: The inclusion of at least one NITDLN station within the CTV was an independent factor for poorer PFS in the context of CCRT and durvalumab for LA-NSCLC. The optimal sparing of immune structures might help in achieving better synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy in this indication.

Systemic treatment with or without ablative therapies in oligometastatic breast cancer: A single institution analysis of patient outcomes.

PURPOSE: Local ablative treatment (LAT) is increasingly combined with systemic therapy in oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC), without a high-level evidence to support this strategy. We evaluated the addition of LAT to systemic treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and toxicity. We sought to identify prognostic factors associated with longer OS and PFS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2018 for synchronous or metachronous OMBC (defined as ≤ 5 metastases). LAT included stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), surgery, cryotherapy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRA). PFS and OS were calculated, and Cox regression models analyzed for potential predictors of survival. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were included (no-LAT, n = 62; LAT, n = 40). Sixty-four metastases received LAT. Median follow-up was 50.4 months (95% CI [44.4; 53.4]). One patient experienced grade 3 toxicity in the LAT group. Five-year PFS and OS were 34.75% (95% CI [24.42-45.26]) and 63.21% (95% CI [50.69-73.37]) respectively. Patients receiving both LAT and systemic therapy had longer PFS and OS than those with no-LAT ([HR 0.39, p = 0.002]) and ([HR 0.31, p = 0.01]). The use of LAT, HER2-positive status and hormone-receptor positivity were associated with longer PFS and OS whereas liver metastases led to worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS: LAT was associated with improved outcomes in OMBC when added to systemic treatment, without significantly increasing toxicity. The prognostic factors identified to extend PFS and OS may help guide clinicians in selecting patients for LAT.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for extra-cranial oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent small-cell lung cancer.

Introduction: The role of local ablative treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is an area of active research in oligometastatic patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis, with common diffuse metastatic evolution. We evaluated the outcomes after SBRT in uncommon oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC presentation. Methods: Data of SCLC patients who received SBRT for oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent metastatic disease at four centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease, SBRT for primary lung tumor and brain radiosurgery were not included. Relapse and survival rates were defined as the time between the date of SBRT and the first event. Results: Twenty patients (60% with initially limited-disease [LD]) presenting 24 lesions were identified. Oligoprogression and oligorecurrence were observed in 6/20 (30%) and 14/20 (70%) patients, respectively. SBRT was delivered to one (n = 16) to two (n = 4) lesions (median size, 26 mm), mainly to lung [n = 17/24] metastases. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, no local relapse was observed and 15/20 patients experienced a distant relapse (DR). The median DR and OS were 4.5 months (95 %CI: 2.9-13.7 months) and 17.2 months (95 %CI: 7.5-65.2 months), respectively. The 3-year distant control and OS rates were 25% (95 %CI: 6-44%) and 37% (95 %CI: 15-59%), respectively. Initial LD (vs extensive-disease) was the only prognosis factor associated with a lower risk of post-SBRT DR (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0-0.88; p = 0.03). There was no severe observed SBRT-related toxicities. Conclusion: Prognosis was poor, with DR occurring in most patients. However, local control was excellent and long term response after SBRT may rarely occur in patients with oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC. Local ablative treatments should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting on well-selected cases.

Immune changes in hilar tumor draining lymph nodes following node sparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of localized cN0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: While much progress has been accomplished in the understanding of radiation-induced immune effects in tumors, little is known regarding the mechanisms involved at the tumor draining lymph node (TDLN) level. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the immune and biological changes arising in non-involved TDLNs upon node sparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors. Methods: Patients with proven localized (cN0M0) NSCLC, treated by radical surgery plus lymph node dissection with (CRT+) or without (CRT-) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, whereby radiotherapy was targeted on the primary tumor with no significant incidental irradiation of the non-involved TDLN station (stations XI), were identified. Bulk RNA sequencing of TDLNs was performed and data were analyzed based on differential gene expression (DGE) and gene sets enrichment. Results: Sixteen patients were included and 25 TDLNs were analyzed: 6 patients in the CRT+ group (12 samples) and 10 patients in the CRT- group (13 samples). Overall, 1001 genes were differentially expressed between the two groups (CRT+ and CRT-). Analysis with g-profiler revealed that gene sets associated with antitumor immune response, inflammatory response, hypoxia, angiogenesis, epithelial mesenchymal transition and extra-cellular matrix remodeling were enriched in the CRT+ group, whereas only gene sets associated with B cells and B-cell receptor signaling were enriched in the CRT- group. Unsupervised dimensionality reduction identified two clusters of TDLNs from CRT+ patients, of which one cluster (cluster 1) exhibited higher expression of pathways identified as enriched in the overall CRT+ group in comparison to the CRT- group. In CRT+ cluster 1, 3 out of 3 patients had pathological complete response (pCR) or major pathological response (MPR) to neoadjuvant CRT, whereas only 1 out of 3 patients in the other CRT+ cluster (cluster 2) experienced MPR and none exhibited pCR. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant node sparing concurrent CRT of NSCLC patients is associated with distinct microenvironment and immunological patterns in non-involved TDLNs as compared to non-involved TDLNs from patients with non-irradiated tumors. Our data are in line with studies showing superiority of lymph node sparing irradiation of the primary tumor in the induction of antitumor immunity.

The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), a marker of response to chemoradiotherapy in breast cancer?

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of the tyrosine kinase receptor fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGFR1) and its ligand, the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) in determining the response to chemoradiotherapy of breast cancers. S14 was a phase II neoadjuvant study carried out at the Institut Curie that recruited 59 patients between November 2001 and September 2003. This prospective study aimed to assess the pathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy (5FU-Navelbine-radiotherapy) for large breast cancers. The expression of FGFR1 and FGF2 in tumor cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Tumors in which no staining was seen, were considered as negative for that protein. We used the Khi-2 test or the Fisher test to compare the qualitative variables and the Student t test or the non-parametric Wilcoxon test for the quantitative variables. We included in the present study all the 32 patients from the S14 cohort for whom the tissue blocks from the biopsy specimens were available with sufficient tumoral tissue. FGFR1 and FGF2 staining were observed respectively in 17 (56%) and 22 (68%) of the 32 tumoral biopsies. The expression of FGFR1 was associated with the hormone receptor positive status (p=0.0191). Only 11% (1/9) of the high grade tumors failed to respond to chemoradiotherapy compared to 68 % resistant tumors (15/22) among the low/intermediate grade tumors (p=0.0199). Among the low/intermediate grade tumors, FGFR1 negative tumors did not respond to chemoradiotherapy (0/9), compared with tumors expressing FGFR1 among which, almost one half had a good response (6/13) (p=0.0167). Among the low and intermediate grade breast cancers, the FGFR1 negative tumors were resistant to chemoradiotherapy. The expression of FGFR1 in patients' biopsies may serve as a marker of response to chemoradiotherapy.

Helical tomotherapy for post-mastectomy radiation therapy with or without breast implant: a single institution experience.

Introduction: We report on our experience of using Helical Tomotherapy (HT) in the context of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with or without immediate implant-based breast Reconstruction (IBR). Material and methods: The study included a total of 173 patients who underwent PMRT with HT between 2013 and 2015 in our institution (87 immediate breast reconstructions with retropectoral implants (IBR + ), 86 without reconstructions (IBR-)). The chest wall target volume included subcutaneous tissue and pectoralis muscle and excluded the posterior region of the implant as well as the ribs. Results: Median time to initiation of the first adjuvant treatment from mastectomy was similar between the two groups (p = 0.134). Dose coverage to the chest wall was significantly improved for the IBR + group (V95% = 95.1 % versus 92.0 %; p < 0.0001). The irradiated volume of the ipsilateral lung was significantly decreased in the IBR + group with a median V20Gy of 11.6 %, compared to 15.2 % for the control group (p < 0.0001). The median heart V15Gy was also significantly lower in the IBR + group than in the control group (1.7 vs 2.5 %; p = 0.0280). The reconstruction failure rate was 14.9% (n = 13). After a median follow-up of 65 months, loco regional recurrence rate was low in both groups: 3 patients (3.4%) in the IBR + group and 5 patients (5.8%) in the control group, without any local recurrence in the posterior part of the implant. Conclusions: The presence of a breast implant reduces cardiac and pulmonary doses during Tomotherapy irradiation, without compromising oncological outcomes.

Diagnosis, biology and epidemiology of oligometastatic breast cancer.

Does oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) deserve a dedicated treatment? Although some authors recommend multidisciplinary management of OMBC with a curative intent, there is no evidence proving this strategy beneficial in the absence of a randomized trial. The existing literature sheds little light on OMBC. Incidence is unknown; data available are either obsolete or biased; there is no consensus on the definition of OMBC and metastatic sites, nor on necessary imaging techniques. However, certain proposals merit consideration. Knowledge of eventual specific OMBC biological characteristics is limited to circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts. Given the data available for other cancers, studies on microRNAs (miRNAs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and genomic alterations should be developed Finally, safe and effective therapies do exist, but results of randomized trials will not be available for many years. Prospective observational cohort studies need to be implemented.

Quality assurance program and early toxicities in the phase III BONBIS randomized trial evaluating the role of a localized radiation boost in ductal carcinoma in situ.

PURPOSE: To describe the quality assurance (QA) program and early toxicities in the phase III randomized trial BONBIS (NCT00907868) on the role of a localized radiation boost in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2008 to July 2014, 2004 patients were randomized in arm A (only whole breast radiotherapy, WBRT) and arm B (WBRT + boost). The QA program involved 44 participant centers that performed the dummy run (DR). Compliance and uniformity of clinical target volume (CTV) delineations, and dose prescription and delivery according to the BONBIS trial radiotherapy guidelines were analyzed. Acute toxicities (during and up to 3 months after radiotherapy completion, NCI-CTCAE v3.0 classification) were evaluated in 1929 patients. RESULTS: The differences in whole breast CTV (CTV1) and planning target volume (PTV1) were ≤10%, and the differences in boost CTV (CTV2) and PTV (PTV2) were ≥20% compared with the reference DR values; 95% of the prescribed dose encompassed 98.7% and 100% of the median CTV1 and CTV2. Grade ≥2 breast erythema (38.3% vs. 22.4% of grade 2 and 5.4% vs. 2.1% of grade 3, p < 0.001), grade ≥2 dermatitis (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001), and grade 2 hyperpigmentation (6.9% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.005) were more frequent in arm B than arm A. No acute lung or cardiac toxicity was observed. Smoking history, large breast size, and large breast CTV were strong predictive factors of grade ≥2 acute skin toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The QA program showed deviations in breast and tumor bed delineation. The boost significantly increased acute skin toxicities.

Long-Term Follow-up of Immediate Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment sequence involving a mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) via the latissimus dorsi flap technique after chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not common. Our experience of this alternative to the standard treatment at our institute is reported herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. We enrolled patients who received this so-called "inverse" sequence for invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer between 2009 and 2016. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients, aged between 24 and 65 years, with a mean body mass index of 24.5 underwent this treatment. Most involved T2 (59.6%, n = 32), multifocal (55.8%, n = 29) tumors, and 57.7% (n = 30) of the patients presented with axillary lymph node involvement. All patients had received sequential chemotherapy and 50 Gy of radiation. Pathological complete response (pCR) was found in 51.3% (n = 20), of cases in the traditional inverse sequence group, using Chevalier and Sataloff classifications (T and N pCR). Postoperatively, 1 patient required surgical revision because of a hematoma, 42 (80.8%) presented with lymphocele, 3 had impaired would healing, and 2 had more than 5 cm of skin necrosis on the front flap. Median follow-up was 61.9 months and the median time between diagnosis and surgery was 9.7 months. Three patients presented with metastases, 2 with local recurrence, and 1 patient died of cancer. No contralateral or lymph node recurrence was discovered. CONCLUSION: This treatment sequence, the feasibility of which was shown in this study, is an alternative for patients who want an IBR to avoid the time spent without one breast. This practice requires upstream multidisciplinary cooperation for optimal patient screening.

Continuous Infusion of Cilengitide Plus Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Stage III Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Phase I Study.

INTRODUCTION: Because of our previous preclinical results, we conducted a phase I study associating the specific αvß3/αvß5 integrin inhibitor cilengitide, given as a continuous infusion, with exclusive chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used. Cilengitide was given as a continuous infusion (dose levels of 12, 18, 27, and 40 mg/h), starting 2 weeks before and continuing for the whole course of chemoradiotherapy (66 Gy combined with platinum/vinorelbine), and then at a dose of 2000 mg twice weekly in association with chemotherapy. 2-Deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography scans were performed before and after the first 2 weeks of cilengitide administration and then every 3 months. RESULTS: Of the 14 patients included, 11 were evaluable for evaluation of the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). One DLT, a tracheobronchial fistula, was reported with the 40 mg/h dose. No relevant adverse events related to cilengitide were observed overall. At the PET evaluation 2 months after chemoradiotherapy, 4 of 9 patients had a complete response and 4 had a partial response. The median progression-free and overall survival was 14.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4 to not reached) and 29.4 months (95% CI, 11.73 to not reached), respectively. CONCLUSION: Cilengitide, given continuously with chemoradiotherapy, showed acceptable toxicity and gave encouraging clinical results.

Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Decision Making for Postoperative Radiotherapy in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Insights from the RYTHMIC Prospective Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare intrathoracic malignancies for which surgery represents the mainstay of the treatment. Current practice for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is highly variable, and there is a lack of prospective, high level evidence. Réseau Tumeurs Thymiques et Cancer (RYTHMIC) is the nationwide network for TETs in France. Established in 2012, it prospectively collects data on all TET patients, for whom management is discussed at a national multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). We assessed whether PORT decisions at the MTB were in accordance with RYTHMIC guidelines and ultimately implemented in patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients for whom PORT was discussed at the MTB from 2012 to 2015 were identified from the RYTHMIC prospective database, and a complete review of their medical records was performed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients, including 243 with thymoma (89%) and 31 with thymic carcinoma (11%), were analyzed. The decision of the MTB was in accordance with guidelines in 221 patients (92%) of the 241 with stage I or III TET. An MTB decision to deliver PORT was made for 117 patients (43%). PORT was ultimately initiated in 101 patients. The most frequent reason for not delivering PORT was excessive (>3 months) delay after surgery. Dose-volume constraints defined by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group were followed in all but four patients. CONCLUSION: Our data provide a unique insight into the decision-making process for PORT in TETs, highlighting the need for systematic discussion at an expert MTB, while stressing the value of current available guidelines.

Phase II Study of a Radiotherapy Total Dose Increase in Hypoxic Lesions Identified by 18F-Misonidazole PET/CT in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (RTEP5 Study).

See an invited perspective on this article on page 1043.This multicenter phase II study investigated a selective radiotherapy dose increase to tumor areas with significant 18F-misonidazole (18F-FMISO) uptake in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Methods: Eligible patients had locally advanced NSCLC and no contraindication to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The 18F-FMISO uptake on PET/CT was assessed by trained experts. If there was no uptake, 66 Gy were delivered. In 18F-FMISO-positive patients, the contours of the hypoxic area were transferred to the radiation oncologist. It was necessary for the radiotherapy dose to be as high as possible while fulfilling dose-limiting constraints for the spinal cord and lungs. The primary endpoint was tumor response (complete response plus partial response) at 3 mo. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival at 1 y. The target sample size was set to demonstrate a response rate of 40% or more (bilateral α = 0.05, power 1-ß = 0.95). Results: Seventy-nine patients were preincluded, 54 were included, and 34 were 18F-FMISO-positive, 24 of whom received escalated doses of up to 86 Gy. The response rate at 3 mo was 31 of 54 (57%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-71%) using RECIST 1.1 (17/34 responders in the 18F-FMISO-positive group). DFS and overall survival at 1 y were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74), respectively. DFS was longer in the 18F-FMISO-negative patients (P = 0.004). The radiotherapy dose was not associated with DFS when adjusting for the 18F-FMISO status. One toxic death (66 Gy) and 1 case of grade 4 pneumonitis (>66 Gy) were reported. Conclusion: Our approach results in a response rate of 40% or more, with acceptable toxicity. 18F-FMISO uptake in NSCLC patients is strongly associated with poor prognosis features that could not be reversed by radiotherapy doses up to 86 Gy.

The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion on biopsy specimens in lung cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine prognostic factors for patients who have non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients has been treated with radiation therapy and concomitant or sequential chemotherapy between 2000 and 2005. Paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens were obtained before treatment from 73 patients and reviewed by two independent pathologists. Complete follow-up data were collected. The impact of clinical and pathological factors and treatment modality on survival was studied using the χ(2) and Fisher exact tests. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were evaluated, 58 men and 15 women. Median age was 62 years. Most had locally advanced disease (42 stage IIIB and 24 stage IIIA), whereas 7 were medically inoperable stage I-II patients. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was identified in 20 biopsy specimens (27.4 %). Radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 66 Gy (range, 60 to 70 Gy). The median overall survival was 20.5 months. Relapse-free and overall survival were significantly higher in the concomitant arm than in the sequential arm (P = .025 and P = .031, respectively). We found an independent association between the presence of LVI and both the risk of death with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-4.83) and the risk of metastatic progression (adjusted HR = 3.01; 95% CI 1.58-5.72). CONCLUSION: The presence of LVI on stage III NSCLC biopsy specimens was the only independent prognostic factor for poor outcome and may, therefore, be helpful in identifying patients at high risk of metastatic disease.

Implant breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy: can helical tomotherapy become a standard irradiation treatment?

To evaluate the benefits and limitations of helical tomotherapy (HT) for loco-regional irradiation of patients after a mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction. Ten breast cancer patients with retropectoral implants were randomly selected for this comparative study. Planning target volumes (PTVs) 1 (the volume between the skin and the implant, plus margin) and 2 (supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and internal mammary nodes, plus margin) were 50 Gy in 25 fractions using a standard technique and HT. The extracted dosimetric data were compared using a 2-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. Doses for PTV1 and PTV2 were significantly higher with HT (V95 of 98.91 and 97.91%, respectively) compared with the standard technique (77.46 and 72.91%, respectively). Similarly, the indexes of homogeneity were significantly greater with HT (p = 0.002). HT reduced ipsilateral lung volume that received ≥20 Gy (16.7 vs. 35%), and bilateral lungs (p = 0.01) and neighboring organs received doses that remained well below tolerance levels. The heart volume, which received 25 Gy, was negligible with both techniques. HT can achieve full target coverage while decreasing high doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung. However, the low doses to normal tissue volumes need to be reduced in future studies.