Long-acting injectable antiretrovirals for HIV treatment in the ICONA cohort: physicians' and nurses' points of view.

BACKGROUND: Implementation level of long-acting injectable agents cabotegravir/rilpivirine (LAI CAB/RPV) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment in Italy is still not known. The aim of this study is to identify the status of implementation of LAI CAB-RPV and its barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among infectious diseases (ID) physicians and nurses belonging to the ICONA network in Italy. Three validate 4-items measures were used: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). RESULTS: Out of 61 ICONA centres, 38 (62%) completed the survey: 57.9% were academic centres, 42.1% were hospital-based. In total, 104 respondents were ID physicians (57.4%), 77 were nurses (42.5%); 4.5% of all PWH followed at the 38 centres started LAI CAB/RPV at time of study. Centres taking care of >1000 PWH reported 95% application of procedures for LA implementation, higher than other centres (P = 0.009). Mean score of AIM was (16.0, standard deviation, SD, 3.3), of IAM (16.0, SD 3.0) and FIM (16.0, SD 2.9). A linear correlation was found between AIM and the number of people with HIV who started LAI CAB/RPV (25-50 versus <25, coefficient of correlation [b] 2.57, 95%CI 0.91-4.60, P = 0.004), academic versus hospital-based centres (b -1.59, 95%CI -2.76-0.110044, P = 0.007) and the absence of preliminary systematic assessment of staff (b -1.98, 95%CI -3.31-0.65, P = 0.004). Implementation barriers were not significantly different according to the number of PWH/centre. CONCLUSIONS: LAI CAB/RPV implementation was low, with a great variability according to centre size. Tailored and centre-specific interventions to address barriers and to optimize the LA treatment implementation should be designed.

Liver stiffness reduction and serum fibrosis score improvement in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals.

OBJECTIVES: Only a few studies have addressed liver stiffness dynamics after hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. The aim was to evaluate the variation in liver stiffness and in serum liver fibrosis scores in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients before and after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). METHODS: Liver stiffness measured using transient elastography as well as serum liver fibrosis scores [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI)] were evaluated before and at 6-12 months after DAA treatment. Variation in the outcome variables was evaluated using the Wilcoxon nonparametric test. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression models were used. RESULTS: A total of 78 HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects were included in the study. Median values of hepatic stiffness significantly decreased after DAA treatment compared with baseline [16.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 10.2-27.0) kPa at baseline vs. 9.4 (IQR 6.7-15.0) kPa after DAA treatment; P < 0.01). Further, a decrease in median FIB-4 score [2.8 (IQR 1.5-4.8) vs. 2.0 (IQR 1.3-3.2), respectively; P < 0.01] and APRI [0.9 (IQR 0.5-2.2) vs. 0.4 (IQR 0.2-0.7), respectively; P < 0.01] was found. In univariate analysis, liver stiffness decrease was associated with increasing age, 'other' HCV genotype (vs. G1), the presence of cirrhosis, higher pre-DAA liver stiffness, sofosbuvir-based regimens and longer DAA treatment (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression confirmed the significance of the association only with higher baseline liver stiffness (P < 0.01). Greater FIB-4 and APRI reductions were associated with higher respective baseline values, while the presence of hepatic steatosis correlated with lower score reduction after DAA. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in liver stiffness and an improvement in fibrosis scores were observed in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients soon after DAA treatment. The clinical implications of these observations need to be evaluated in larger populations with longer follow-up.

A 72-h intervention for improvement of the rate of optimal antibiotic therapy in patients with bloodstream infections.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are implemented to optimize the use of antibiotics and control the spread of antibiotic resistance. Many antimicrobial stewardship interventions have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics, the duration of antimicrobial therapy, and mortality. We evaluated the benefits of a combination of rapid diagnostic tests and an active re-evaluation of antibiotic therapy 72 h after the onset of bloodstream infection (BSI). All patients with BSI from November 2015 to November 2016 in a 1100-bed university hospital in Rome, where an Infectious Disease Consultancy Unit (Unità di Consulenza Infettivologica, UDCI) is available, were re-evaluated at the bedside 72 h after starting antimicrobial therapy and compared to two pre-intervention periods: the UDCI was called by the ward physician for patients with BSI and the UDCI was called directly by the microbiologist immediately after a pathogen was isolated from blood cultures. Recommendations for antibiotic de-escalation or discontinuation significantly increased (54%) from the two pre-intervention periods (32% and 27.2%, p < 0.0001). Appropriate escalation also significantly increased (22.5%) from the pre-intervention periods (8.1% and 8.2%, p < 0.0001). The total duration of antibiotic therapy decreased with intervention (from 21.9 days [standard deviation, SD 15.4] in period 1 to 19.3 days [SD 13.3] in period 2 to 17.7 days in period 3 [SD 11.5]; p = 0.002) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (from 29.7 days [SD 29.3] in period 1 to 26.8 days [SD 24.7] in period 2 to 24.2 days in period 3 [SD 20.7]; p = 0.04) than in the two pre-intervention periods. Mortality was similar among the study periods (31 patients died in period 1 (15.7%), 39 (16.7%) in period 2, and 48 (15.3%) in period 3; p = 0.90). Rapid diagnostic tests and 72 h re-evaluation of empirical therapy for BSI significantly correlated with an improved rate of optimal antibiotic therapy and decreased duration of antibiotic therapy and length of stay.

Procalcitonin is useful in driving the choice of early antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PCT levels could be used to distinguish among different bacterial and fungal etiologies in patients with documented bloodstream infection (BSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Monocentric retrospective cohort study on patients admitted to the Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli Hospital between December 2012 and November 2015 with BSI. Those who had undergone PCT determination within 48 hours of when the first positive blood culture was sampled were included in the study. RESULTS: Four hundred and one patients were included in the study. Both the 24h and 48h PCT values were significantly higher in patients with Gram-negative (GN) BSI than in those with Gram-positive (GP) or candida BSI (p at ANOVA = 0.003). A PCT value of > 1 ng/ml was found in 31.5% of patients with GN BSI. Less than 7% of people with candida BSI had PCT level of > 1 ng/ml. At multivariable regression analysis, GN BSI, septic shock, and plasma creatinine were significantly correlated with PCT values. CONCLUSIONS: PCT may be of value in distinguishing GN BSI from GP, and fungal BSI and PCT values of > 1 ng/ml could be used to prevent unnecessary antifungal treatment.